13
0

Corona virus (more correctly, Wuhan virus)


 invite response                
2020 Jan 24, 12:33pm   184,835 views  3,363 comments

by Heraclitusstudent   ➕follow (8)   💰tip   ignore  

Anyone wants to risk a bet on the eventual number of sick people? Dead people?

« First        Comments 2,984 - 3,023 of 3,363       Last »     Search these comments

2984   WookieMan   2021 Dec 28, 7:41am  

Booger says

Do you make these Booger? Or just grab them from other sites? Either way this is probably one of the best I've seen about our current situation. "Follow the science"

The "science" has done some extremely fucked up shit over human history. I'm not sure why people believe this time is different.
2985   richwicks   2021 Dec 28, 8:57am  

WookieMan says
The "science" has done some extremely fucked up shit over human history. I'm not sure why people believe this time is different.


People always think that we've overcome the errors of the past. It's the conceit of the present.

I remember when I was a kid, thinking that science couldn't get much more advanced. We could talk to anybody on the planet, we could play movies at home, we had computers, we could listen to music from 40 years ago - on a telephone, with a VCR tape machine, on an 8 bit machine, using a cassette tape..

I think the big change that is coming is people are beginning to realize that the "experts" aren't. A significant number of people are calling BS on this pandemic and the "vaccines" - I don't think that would have happened in 1980.
2987   Patrick   2021 Dec 28, 7:37pm  

richwicks says
I remember when I was a kid, thinking that science couldn't get much more advanced. We could talk to anybody on the planet, we could play movies at home, we had computers, we could listen to music from 40 years ago - on a telephone, with a VCR tape machine, on an 8 bit machine, using a cassette tape..

I think the big change that is coming is people are beginning to realize that the "experts" aren't. A significant number of people are calling BS on this pandemic and the "vaccines" - I don't think that would have happened in 1980.



Those things are connected.

The internet arose, a technology we didn't have then.

And so now people can share truth about the vaxx directly with each other, giving us all a small way around the corporate media.

Which is why there are many bills about censoring the internet now.
2988   HeadSet   2021 Dec 29, 6:30am  

Patrick says
Which is why there are many bills about censoring the internet now.

Really? All I see is threats of such bills, threats which the Dems keep bringing up to remind Google/Facebook/Twitter that Google/Facebook/Twitter better keep censoring the Right and keep carrying water for the Dem/RINOs.
2989   Patrick   2021 Dec 29, 8:15am  

True, I don't know that any were actually created or voted on.
2994   richwicks   2021 Dec 31, 8:53am  

Patrick says
I think the naive and panicked elderly support the vaxx for exactly this reason.

They watch TV, sadly, and they believe Blackrock's propaganda.


They believe ALL the propaganda, and they've been holding society back for at least 20 years with this mentality.

George W. Bush should have been drawn and quartered once it was clear his administration lied us into a war, but NOOOOOOOooo, it was just a "mistake", the "news" wouldn't lie to the country, said everybody 50+ 20 years ago.

Because of that, we spent 20 years in war and it cost us something like 20 trillion dollars to do so, our military was subsequently exhausted, infrastructure was ignored for the entire time, our news became complete propaganda, and our public education system turned to complete shit because of NEGLECT.
2995   Patrick   2021 Dec 31, 10:48am  

Patrick says
True, I don't know that any were actually created or voted on.


Here's such a bill which was actually created:

https://reclaimthenet.org/israel-votes-to-push-social-media-censorship-law/?source=patrick.net
2998   Booger   2021 Dec 31, 1:45pm  

Patrick says
And another:

https://reclaimthenet.org/israel-votes-to-push-social-media-censorship-law/?source=patrick.net


The purpose of the bill is to create a new way to censor online speech.
3009   Booger   2022 Jan 2, 9:08am  

In NY now:

3010   HeadSet   2022 Jan 2, 11:41am  

Booger says

That mannequin has an uncanny resemblance to Mark Zuckerberg.
3014   Patrick   2022 Jan 3, 11:05am  

https://spectatorworld.com/newsletter/this-is-how-covid-ends/?source=patrick.net


A strange thing happened during the DC Diary’s festive break. The Covid arguments once written off as fringe and dangerous not only went mainstream but were made by some of the high priests and priestesses of the public health establishment.

Dr. Anthony Fauci Zoomed onto the cable news shows to point out that case numbers aren’t necessarily the right metric to track and clarified that many of the children registered as Covid hospitalizations are hospitalized with Covid, not because of it. He said that the Omicron variant may end up being “more of a bothersome upper-respiratory infection” for the vaccinated or previously infected. Dr. Leana Wen, a former Baltimore public health official and CNN regular, has said that cloth masks don’t work. Former FDA commissioner and Pfizer board member Scott Gottlieb agreed on the Sunday shows. These are the sort of statements that, not too long ago, would get you booted off of social media or, at least, have your posts flagged as misinformation.

When it comes to the national policy response, the CDC dropped its recommended isolation to five days. Joe Biden, whose core 2020 campaign claim was that a more competent president would bring the pandemic to an end, declared that “there is no federal solution” to the pandemic. The administration that promised to defeat Covid decisively now says that America must learn to live with the virus. Everywhere there are one-time Covid hawks reminding Americans of the need to keep calm and carry on.

What is going on? Is the medical establishment taking a leaf out of George Constanza’s book, deploying an “opposite” strategy in hope of better results?
3015   Patrick   2022 Jan 3, 11:39am  

https://vinayprasadmdmph.substack.com/p/should-you-wear-an-n95kn95kn94?r=wmzwk&utm_campaign=patrick.net&utm_medium=patrick.net&utm_source=patrick.net


COVID19 does damage the brain. But not primarily by binding to neurons. Instead it creates irrational anxiety among a certain class of social media user who continually escalates what is necessary to “keep us safe.” It has now reached an apogee with rising cases.
3021   richwicks   2022 Jan 4, 8:10am  

Patrick says
Fortunately, karma has a way of taking care of vaxxers:

https://www.lewrockwell.com/political-theatre/nyt-editor-makes-video-boasting-about-taking-his-3rd-shot-dies-the-same-day-of-a-heart-attack/?source=patrick.net


That is Stewart Reynolds not Carlos Tejada in the video. Lew Rockwell should be more careful in his research.
3022   Patrick   2022 Jan 4, 1:05pm  

Thank you @richwicks

How do you know? Do you just recognize him?

He's not a NY Times editor then, right?

« First        Comments 2,984 - 3,023 of 3,363       Last »     Search these comments

Please register to comment:

api   best comments   contact   latest images   memes   one year ago   random   suggestions   gaiste