by Heraclitusstudent ➕follow (8) 💰tip ignore
« First « Previous Comments 558 - 597 of 3,372 Next » Last » Search these comments
Can you guys comment objectively on a real world problem without making it a political question colored by your tribalism?
Why is this a bigger deal?
We're up to 19000 flu deaths by now, just saying ;)
https://www.wlav.com/2020/03/09/family-accidentally-orders-12-years-worth-of-toilet-paper/
I doubt anybody on patnet will catch it as we're currently at less than 2 in 1 million. if it becomes endemic and seasonal then your chances of catching it eventually rise over the years.
Dengue can easily spread person to person by mosquito bites.
The whole thing is hype, heavily colored by politics since day one.
We're up to 19000 flu deaths by now, just saying ;)
overwhelmingly concentrated among lifetime elderly smokers eating bats in heavily polluted China.
A simple projection implies a lot more people than that will die from COVID19 in the coming year in the US.
You can't look at absolute numbers now and ignore the trajectory.
No way. For the 2019/2020 season COVID-19 deaths will NOT outnumber flu deaths. Not even close. While anything is possible, that simple projection is very likely very wrong
mell saysNo way. For the 2019/2020 season COVID-19 deaths will NOT outnumber flu deaths. Not even close. While anything is possible, that simple projection is very likely very wrong
Why? At 0.5%, 20,000 dead is just 4 millions infected.
What will stop the spread of this before we have 4 millions infected? Especially if we take your recommendation to ignore it.
mell saysNo way. For the 2019/2020 season COVID-19 deaths will NOT outnumber flu deaths. Not even close. While anything is possible, that simple projection is very likely very wrong
Why? At 0.5%, 20,000 dead is just 4 millions infected.
What will stop the spread of this before we have 4 millions infected? Especially if we take your recommendation to ignore it.
As far as I can tell, we could easily see 100k, or even 500k deaths in the US in 1 year.
Unless we take a page from the Chinese playbook - in which case the market is probably right to head south.
Heraclitusstudent saysmell saysNo way. For the 2019/2020 season COVID-19 deaths will NOT outnumber flu deaths. Not even close. While anything is possible, that simple projection is very likely very wrong
Why? At 0.5%, 20,000 dead is just 4 millions infected.
What will stop the spread of this before we have 4 millions infected? Especially if we take your recommendation to ignore it.
As far as I can tell, we could easily see 100k, or even 500k deaths in the US in 1 year.
Unless we take a page from the Chinese playbook - in which case the market is probably right to head south.
Some say that the virus is an artificial, weaponized strain and as such is too deadly to survive long-term. Meaning that it either will wind down and disappear or become less deadly with every mutation. Which makes project...
people are totally willing to entertain 20K flu deaths per season in the US without taking any special precautions
It already mutated once into a less aggressive strain which has been seen emerging more and more lately.
Some say that the virus is an artificial, weaponized strain and as such is too deadly to survive long-term. Meaning that it either will wind down and disappear or become less deadly with every mutation.
Yes some miracle could happen that will save the day. Until then row projections say 20K deaths is a low estimate in the US. Mutations can also turn out more contagious or more deadly.
The_Weeping_Ayatollah saysSome say that the virus is an artificial, weaponized strain and as such is too deadly to survive long-term. Meaning that it either will wind down and disappear or become less deadly with every mutation.
Miracle thinking. God will save us. Mutations will happen to help us. It will miraculously go away because of something we have yet to see.
Motivated reasoning.
Nothing miraculous about it - simple fucking evolution: it's actualy beneficial for a virus to be less deadly, not more, so it will mutate towards being less deadly.
Again, the new infection rate in the US has started to trend down since testing has been established.
The_Weeping_Ayatollah saysNothing miraculous about it - simple fucking evolution: it's actualy beneficial for a virus to be less deadly, not more, so it will mutate towards being less deadly.
Yes and you know how it works: these deadly viruses die after they killed too many of their hosts, and can't continue to propagate.
Are you saying this is what will happen here?
mell saysAgain, the new infection rate in the US has started to trend down since testing has been established.
Got a graph?
The Wikipedia graph of new infections ("Total" or "Rest of World") seems to show a flattening in the last 3 days, but that could be noise:
It's not spreading exponentially in the US. Is it?
You say that only because have your politics colored glasses and see everything presumably bad for Trump as a conspiracy.
« First « Previous Comments 558 - 597 of 3,372 Next » Last » Search these comments
patrick.net
An Antidote to Corporate Media
1,261,935 comments by 15,070 users - Booger, mell, Onvacation, Patrick, The_Deplorable online now