5
0

Wikipedia refuses to allow Bloomberg's height to be published


 invite response                
2020 Feb 2, 9:51am   3,002 views  76 comments

by Patrick   ➕follow (60)   💰tip   ignore  

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_Bloomberg

Note that the article is locked due to "vandalism", by which they mean the reporting of Bloomberg's height, which is 5' 7"" from https://heightline.com/michael-bloomberg-worth-wife-age-height/ It is not reasonable to suppose that no one has tried to include Bloomberg's diminutive stature in the article, especially as Trump keeps calling it out in his Tweets.

Wikipedia has become terribly biased politically exactly as its wealth has dramatically increased, and it is a reasonable supposition that these two events are connected: wealthy Democratic donors have co-opted the Wikipedia to push the globalist agenda.

Please, do not donate to Wikipedia. They really don't need the money, and are using their massive fortune against the public interest already.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Guy_Macon/Wikipedia_has_Cancer

« First        Comments 66 - 76 of 76        Search these comments

66   mell   2020 Feb 18, 6:40pm  

rdm says
Looks like the cult is worried about Bloomy. Giving him such loving attention. If Donald did or said the same thing it would be simply wonderful, cept he is disqualified cause he is short. The debate might be interesting...for a change


You're wrong on this. When has Trump every said anything racist? Your only - very vague - option is his quote about Mexican's where he was factually right as the Mexican government loves to send over their worst they don't want to deal with. But maybe it hurt some feelings depending on how much it's quoted out of context. Other than that Trump has never said anything bad about black people, ever. The hypocrisy here is stunning. I don't care if Bloomberg said this or that, esp. since we know stop and frisk was actually a huge success and part of cleaning up the city, but to say Trump is worse is simply a lie. I hear this racist shit thing daily and immediately confront them asking for a concrete example and nothing ever comes out of it. If you applied the mentally ill left's own definition of racism to Bloomberg they should have canceled him the minute he announced that he was running. Not a minute later.
67   WookieMan   2020 Feb 18, 8:21pm  

rdm says
Looks like the cult is worried about Bloomy. Giving him such loving attention. If Donald did or said the same thing it would be simply wonderful, cept he is disqualified cause he is short. The debate might be interesting...for a change

Yes, it might be interesting because the existing candidates that have debated blow. Not sure that Bloomberg changes the field though, just makes for an interesting debate. Congrats to the Dems on a maybe interesting debate. #winning #lol
68   Patrick   2020 Feb 20, 5:44pm  

Nor will the Wikipedia allow anyone to edit https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adam_Schiff

One reason: people might point out that his great great grandfather was Jacob Schiff, part of a banking cartel connected to the Rothschilds. Those cartels repeatedly influenced international relations for their own benefit, funding various wars to serve their own interests.
70   Heraclitusstudent   2020 Feb 25, 10:46am  

Does someone think height is an important characteristic of a president?
71   Bd6r   2020 Feb 25, 11:09am  

rdm says
Looks like the cult is worried about Bloomy. Giving him such loving attention. If Donald did or said the same thing it would be simply wonderful, cept he is disqualified cause he is short. The debate might be interesting...for a change

Cult should be worried about Sanders combination with recession-causing coronavirus. Bloomie debates very poorly, Trump will shred him to minuscule pieces. Sanders, on the other hand, is a populist and may take disaffected blue-collar worker votes - they have voted this, and that, and Trump, and life still gets worse - so they may switch to Sanders who is different from all of the above. He also debates reasonably well.
72   CBOEtrader   2020 Feb 25, 1:52pm  

RC2006 says


facts are facts


he wasnt wrong about his reasoning. his policy violated civil liberties, but it worked. the left should be thrilled.
73   Onvacation   2020 Feb 25, 2:07pm  

Heraclitusstudent says
Does someone think height is an important characteristic of a president?

Yes, because short people have beady little eyes.
74   SoTex   2020 Feb 25, 4:54pm  

And no reason to live.
75   WookieMan   2020 Feb 25, 7:00pm  

Heraclitusstudent says
Does someone think height is an important characteristic of a president?

Do you think it's not? Haven't had a POTUS under 6' in a while. Could be the personalities that got them elected, but I'd argue height does matter. I think Dick Nixon was the last sub six footer at 5'11". That's a long time.

Bloomberg looks like a wimp out there to men and women. Money can buy sex, but I don't think it buys the presidency.
76   WookieMan   2020 Feb 25, 7:03pm  

lol, Bloomberg just acknowledged his height as I was typing that comment. You can't tell me it doesn't matter if he's addressing it at a fucking debate.

« First        Comments 66 - 76 of 76        Search these comments

Please register to comment:

api   best comments   contact   latest images   memes   one year ago   random   suggestions   gaiste