Is the show trying to cast blame on Patrick.net or online forums?
Sounded like Patrick.net! The woman was dumb enough to post something more personal (picture(s)!) and left a printout next to the printer!! Not sure that it was intentional or not. Husband might have seen it on the same day! In either case murdering wife is 100% wrong if that was the case.
Turtle dove lost a bet and posted photos of her tits and then left evidence of it somewhere her husband ended up seeing it and then he killed for showing pictures of her tits online? Did I get that right?
Turtle dove lost a bet and posted photos of her tits and then left evidence of it somewhere her husband ended up seeing it and then he killed for showing pictures of her tits online? Did I get that right?
That is what it looks like for the most part on that day! Also, (2 years before!) she was contemplating making (lot of) money out of things like 'survivor' where she admits have to do some "crazy" things! No one knows exactly what else was going on...
I imagine there will be a flock of people coming to Patnet out of curiosity.
There have been a lot of registrations today and yesterday, 82 so far.
They might al be spammers though, just waiting to post spam later.
Was expecting this. They gave it a lot of mentions, many more than expected. Also surprisingly they treated it pretty fairly @Patrick, calling it "conservatively leaning". Gotta give props. And the Patrick and the 10 lbs basser are famous now! Though in a sad context, but what do they say about publicity...
The typical dazed and confused, LibbyFucks will log in, get memed, throw up, and leave. They'll need five days of round the clock propaganda just to get their pretty little heads equilibrated again.
@Tenpoundbass You were mentioned during the trial as well.
Twice I've asked for a transcript of my testimony, but the DA people who got me there to testify don't seem interested in helping me get that. I think they have moved on.
From this thread, I guess it was Strategist that called me up trying to treat me like a potential suspect. He asked me why I typed "God Damn It!" upon hearing of her "accident" as it was first reported. Strategist lied to me, and said someone at Patnet tipped him off, to call me. But now it's evident that he was here and most likely tried to ensnare Patnet members, because of our political leanings. What a scumbag.
I welcome those viewers to come read my profile and digest every thread I ever wrote here. Those Dateline pickle heads will rue the day they mentioned my moniker.
Twice I've asked for a transcript of my testimony,
My recollection is that in typical lawyer excessive taxation way, double spaced large print copies of transcripts from the transcription services are dollars a page. You can demand a copy to take away and read, and then take it to a copy store to copy the parts you want.
Either way the husband couldn't bear being cucked like that.
Noooo. Nobody is that psycho especially today.
To flash your breasts on the internet is just being cheeky, and if I was her, Id just pick up a random image anyhow.
You don't know the motive of the murder. Speculation on it mind if makes you an asshole. You don't know so stop misleading people.
You have no idea so stop.pretending you do.
@Patrick, this asshole just intimated that this site is responsible for her death. You want to put up with that, when he DEFINITELY doesn't know? Your site.
Calling him an asshole, is quite mild. What is said is tantamount to libel.
Either way the husband couldn't bear being cucked like that.
They were killer tits!
She was silly to make that promise and post. She must have been looking for attention in some way. Probably lonely. But I’m certain she would not have done it had she known how he would react. What a tragic end. Again, may God bless the children for they are the only thing left of TD, and none of this was their fault.
Watched it. Did the defense really say dogs choked her??? I legit don't have words for that human scum that would come up with that defense. No longer have dogs, but they'd chew up all sorts of clothing. At no point was I worried about them choking my wife. Twilight Zone. It's not remotely funny, but this would be a comedy bit about attorneys. Someone spent 6 years of their life to come up with dogs choking a woman???
Obviously I'm sure the kids lurk on the site. As someone that sees a therapist, I'd suggest doing it after watching that episode. Maybe they have. Actually blaming dogs for killing TD? Never saw that coming. That's my take away. RIP TD. The defense attorney should lose his law license. So sad on many levels.
Patnet wasn't mentioned as much as I was expecting. Clearly seems like a fit of rage. Everyone has it in themselves. You can blame a migraine on sleeping in another room, but that's not normal. Kids sleeping in the parents bed at that age? A lot was off there. A lot to unpack from watching that. I wish the kids the best, but I think there's more to this story that they need to share is all I'll say. My gut instinct thinks more was/is going on is all. No proof. There's still something off about this story.
Obviously I'm sure the kids lurk on the site. As someone that sees a therapist, I'd suggest doing it after watching that episode. Maybe they have. Actually blaming dogs for killing TD? Never saw that coming. That's my take away. RIP TD. The defense attorney should lose his law license. So sad on many levels.
That's his job. He has to come up with the best defense/alternative explanation, even if remotely possible only. He would lose his license if he threw his client under the bus. He could refuse to take the case of course or excuse himself at any point for a different defender to take over, but both sides need representation. Otherwise we'd be no different than dictatorships without due process.
invite response
« First « Previous Comments 107 - 144 of 144 Search these comments
Sounded like Patrick.net! The woman was dumb enough to post something more personal (picture(s)!) and left a printout next to the printer!! Not sure that it was intentional or not. Husband might have seen it on the same day! In either case murdering wife is 100% wrong if that was the case.
Turtle dove lost a bet and posted photos of her tits and then left evidence of it somewhere her husband ended up seeing it and then he killed for showing pictures of her tits online? Did I get that right?
That is what it looks like for the most part on that day! Also, (2 years before!) she was contemplating making (lot of) money out of things like 'survivor' where she admits have to do some "crazy" things! No one knows exactly what else was going on...
Was expecting this. They gave it a lot of mentions, many more than expected. Also surprisingly they treated it pretty fairly @Patrick, calling it "conservatively leaning". Gotta give props. And the Patrick and the 10 lbs basser are famous now! Though in a sad context, but what do they say about publicity...
@GNL
No, it's just the opposite! The TV drones just could bear to admit it though.
She promised to show her tits if Trump go the Republican nomination. That's not "losing" a bet, it's celebrating a win of something she hoped for.
Ah, gotcha. Sad story all the way around.
Site got really slow three times, apparently during the show. Here's every nginx hit's latency plotted over a few days:
I expect that when patrick.net was mentioned, a flood of people hit it all at once, overwhelming the database temporarily.
Twice I've asked for a transcript of my testimony, but the DA people who got me there to testify don't seem interested in helping me get that. I think they have moved on.
Maybe I need to write the court directly.
He asked me why I typed "God Damn It!" upon hearing of her "accident" as it was first reported.
Strategist lied to me, and said someone at Patnet tipped him off, to call me. But now it's evident that he was here and most likely tried to ensnare Patnet members, because of our political leanings. What a scumbag.
I welcome those viewers to come read my profile and digest every thread I ever wrote here. Those Dateline pickle heads will rue the day they mentioned my moniker.
My recollection is that in typical lawyer excessive taxation way, double spaced large print copies of transcripts from the transcription services are dollars a page. You can demand a copy to take away and read, and then take it to a copy store to copy the parts you want.
Patrick was already famous but now famouser...
Booger says
People who watch television are retarded. Good luck getting them to do any thinking
Either way the husband couldn't bear being cucked like that.
Noooo. Nobody is that psycho especially today.
To flash your breasts on the internet is just being cheeky, and if I was her, Id just pick up a random image anyhow.
You don't know the motive of the murder. Speculation on it mind if makes you an asshole. You don't know so stop misleading people.
You have no idea so stop.pretending you do.
@Patrick, this asshole just intimated that this site is responsible for her death. You want to put up with that, when he DEFINITELY doesn't know? Your site.
Calling him an asshole, is quite mild. What is said is tantamount to libel.
They were killer tits!
She was silly to make that promise and post. She must have been looking for attention in some way. Probably lonely. But I’m certain she would not have done it had she known how he would react. What a tragic end. Again, may God bless the children for they are the only thing left of TD, and none of this was their fault.
Obviously I'm sure the kids lurk on the site. As someone that sees a therapist, I'd suggest doing it after watching that episode. Maybe they have. Actually blaming dogs for killing TD? Never saw that coming. That's my take away. RIP TD. The defense attorney should lose his law license. So sad on many levels.
Patnet wasn't mentioned as much as I was expecting. Clearly seems like a fit of rage. Everyone has it in themselves. You can blame a migraine on sleeping in another room, but that's not normal. Kids sleeping in the parents bed at that age? A lot was off there. A lot to unpack from watching that. I wish the kids the best, but I think there's more to this story that they need to share is all I'll say. My gut instinct thinks more was/is going on is all. No proof. There's still something off about this story.
https://www.nbc.com/dateline
That's his job. He has to come up with the best defense/alternative explanation, even if remotely possible only. He would lose his license if he threw his client under the bus. He could refuse to take the case of course or excuse himself at any point for a different defender to take over, but both sides need representation. Otherwise we'd be no different than dictatorships without due process.
Like January 6th protestors or Derek Chavin?
I believe the defense's claim was that she was wearing a scarf and after she fell down the stairs, the dog pulled on it enough to strangle her.
Yes. We have already falling apart wrt due process so let's not aid and abet it
Hmm ... this is sounding like the Accordian playing dog.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xn75kCaHx8U
Perhaps someone who heard posting nude pics here gets her famous?
« First « Previous Comments 107 - 144 of 144 Search these comments