« First « Previous Comments 299 - 338 of 720 Next » Last » Search these comments
So one opinion for, and zero against.
Can you calculate who's ahead?
MrEd saysYou’re is a contraction of the phrase you are. Easy enough to remember. Here’s how it looks in a few sentences:
MrEd saysYou do realize how bad this makes you look.
What degrees did you say you had? ROTFLOL
It was the several posts above that which you have now apparently edited you lying horse face doggy soldier.
So one opinion for, and zero against.
Can you calculate who's ahead?
MrEd saysSo one opinion for, and zero against.
Can you calculate who's ahead?
Wear your buttplug proudly then.
How about offering a rebuttal link instead of throwing insults?
I'd like to read an opposing link to balance the argument.
prodigy saysHow about offering a rebuttal link instead of throwing insults?
I'd like to read an opposing link to balance the argument.
Rebuttal? He offered a butt plug? What else do you want?
How about offering a rebuttal link
prodigy saysHow about offering a rebuttal link
If there is no peer-reviewed study establishing eye route for infection how can there be a link to it? Unless you accept /dev/null as such.
The death rate has fallen flat. The unemployment curve is what needs flattening
If there is no peer reviewed study showing the eye as an entry point for covid 19 infection, then how about another opposing opinion?
prodigy saysIf there is no peer reviewed study showing the eye as an entry point for covid 19 infection, then how about another opposing opinion?
Your demands make no sense. If certain hypotesis has no scientific proof it is false until such proof is obtained.
What is the harm of asking ( not demanding ) an opposing opinion so the merits of each opinion can be discussed?
Eric Holder saysprodigy saysIf there is no peer reviewed study showing the eye as an entry point for covid 19 infection, then how about another opposing opinion?
Your demands make no sense. If certain hypotesis has no scientific proof it is false until such proof is obtained.
WTF? The opinion stated above is not enough? Here it is again: "eye route is bullshit because it has not been proven via proper scientific methods".
That's your opinion.
I'm talking about another opinion from a verified doctor, to oppose the original opinion from a verified doctor.
prodigy saysThat's your opinion.
I'm talking about another opinion from a verified doctor, to oppose the original opinion from a verified doctor.
So scientific method is out of fashion now? Nice to know.
Scientific method is initiated based on opinions.
You're grasping for straws and we both know it.
prodigy saysScientific method is initiated based on opinions.
Are you saying that there are not enough opinions that eyes are the gateway for the virus to even warrant a scientific study? Doesn't it undermine it even fucking further?
You're grasping for straws and we both know it.
I'm saying I would like to read an opposing opinion from someone that has the same or better credentials than the doctor who posted the original opinion.\
Not trying to prove or disprove anything. Trying to gather evidence.
So you know more than "webMD.com"?
"How the Infection Spreads
The new coronavirus, named SARS-CoV-2, gets passed on primarily through droplets from a cough or a sneeze. These particles most often enter through your nose or mouth as well as your eyes. "
https://www.webmd.com/eye-health/covid-19-and-your-eyes#1
NBC News contributor never had COVID
This illustration provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in January 2020 shows the 2019 Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV). This virus was identified as the cause of an outbreak of respiratory illness first detected in Wuhan, China. (CDC via AP)
By MICHAEL GRAHAM |
PUBLISHED: July 14, 2020 at 1:10 a.m. | UPDATED: July 14, 2020 at 1:11 a.m.
A frightening NBC News report that a medical contributor caught COVID-19 through his eyes while simply sitting on an airplane has been debunked by multiple tests results. Unfortunately, the network has yet to correct the story.
In May, NBC medical contributor Joseph Fair, a self-styled “virus hunter,” told the Today Show about his experience with the virus. “If it can take me down, it can take down anybody,” he said.
According to Fair, he caught the virus on a commercial flight out of New Orleans. “I had a mask on, I had gloves on, I did my normal wipes routine… but obviously, you can still get it through your eyes,” Fair told the Today Show from his hospital bed. “And, of course, I wasn’t wearing goggles on the flight.”
"I don’t have any of those underlying conditions, I’m 42 years old. So you wouldn’t think, clinically, that I would be one of those people that would get so very ill,” Fair said, adding: “Those people that are young and think they’re invincible or people that just don’t think it’s going to affect them that greatly even if they do get it. I can say that my own experience was the complete opposite.”
What Fair, Todd and NBC News didn’t tell the audience is that before he made this claim, Fair had already tested negative for COVID-19 at least five times. Fair followed that up with an antibody test to detect if he’d ever had the virus. The results were negative.
But it wasn’t until July 7, nearly two months after his initial appearance, that both Fair and NBC revealed the results of his antibody test. Fair now claims his illness “remains an undiagnosed mystery.”
Not only was Fair’s suggestion that he caught the virus through his eyes pure speculation (and in the view of some medical professionals, irresponsible to boot), but his COVID infection has been repeatedly debunked. And still NBC News has yet to take the incorrect report of his “coronavirus infection” off their website.
No studies but a lot of conjecture.
prodigy saysSo you know more than "webMD.com"?
"How the Infection Spreads
The new coronavirus, named SARS-CoV-2, gets passed on primarily through droplets from a cough or a sneeze. These particles most often enter through your nose or mouth as well as your eyes. "
https://www.webmd.com/eye-health/covid-19-and-your-eyes#1
remind me what we are debating about...
And how did we morph from we must shut down the economy for two weeks or the hospitals were going to be overwhelmed by THE MILLIONS THAT WERE GOING TO DIE REGARDLESS?,
Onvacation saysAnd how did we morph from we must shut down the economy for two weeks or the hospitals were going to be overwhelmed by THE MILLIONS THAT WERE GOING TO DIE REGARDLESS?,
Anyone?
« First « Previous Comments 299 - 338 of 720 Next » Last » Search these comments
https://humanevents.com/2020/07/14/flattening-the-curve-is-still-the-right-answer/