5
0

Riots? What Riots?


 invite response                
2020 Sep 9, 10:55pm   1,458 views  32 comments

by Patrick   ➕follow (55)   💰tip   ignore  

https://www.takimag.com/article/riots-what-riots/

In my three decades as a media critic, this summer’s huge effort by the press to cover up the endless rioting by George Floyd’s mourners has been its most shameless and shameful episode yet.

Until very recently, a remarkable number of naive Americans had fallen for the mainstream media’s repetitions that the Peaceful Protesters were not—repeat, not—looting and burning. The MSM has been in such flat-out denial mode that it hasn’t even bothered to concoct exculpatory euphemisms for the riots, such as Retail Mourning, Do-It-Yourself Reparations, or Arson for Equity.

Even last week a new report from a leftist think tank, the Armed Conflict Location & Event Data Project, admitting to the immense number of violent demonstrations during this Summer of George was spun by the media as proving that all those boarded-up shops near you don’t exist. CNN, for example, declaimed:

About 93% of racial justice protests in the US have been peaceful, a new report finds

About 93% of racial justice protests in the US since the death of George Floyd have been peaceful and nondestructive, according to a new report. The findings, released Thursday, contradict assumptions and claims by some that protests associated with the Black Lives Matter movement are spawning violence and destruction of property.

About 7,750 of those protests were linked to the Black Lives Matter movement, the report states. Peaceful racial justice protests took place in more than 2,440 locations across all 50 states and Washington, DC—violent demonstrations occurred in fewer than 220 locations, according to the report.

In other words, there have been riots in almost 220 different cities. Now, to you and me, riots in approximately 218 places might sound like a lot, especially since there were multiple riots in many of these locations. For example, ACLED records 69 separate riots in Portland.

If you look at the data behind this report, you will see this leftist group has characterized 617 incidents in the U.S. since the death of George Floyd as “riots,” with 598 falling in the subcategory of “violent demonstrations” and 19 of “mob violence.”

A few were unassociated with Black Lives Matter or Antifa, such as a July 21 brawl in Los Angeles between Armenians and Azerbaijanis. But the vast majority of the 617 riots were related to the media-proclaimed Racial Reckoning.

Indeed, ACLED may be undercounting the number of lawbreaking events. For example, commenter Steppe-Optimized pointed out:

This is one of the real howlers. They count the Seattle CHOP as a peaceful protest…because the police stood down and let the rioters have their way.

Even with all the leftist biases, this is an eye-opening database for the sheer quantity of bad behavior it documents.

Because the media has spent the past half decade warning about the purported vast menace posed by the violent right while imposing a virtual embargo on all reporting about the much larger forces of the violent left, many credulous readers have assumed that the disorder must be due to right-wing “outside agitators.”

In reality, there was almost negligible rightist opposition for the first three months of rioting. The basic pattern has been the same all summer:

—A black criminal, such as George Floyd in Minneapolis, Rayshard Brooks in Atlanta, or Jacob Blake in Kenosha, resists arrests and thereby comes to grief at the hands of the police.

—Local black youths begin to joyously loot neighborhood stores.

—The next night, white Antifa arrive and break glass, set fires, and attack the police.

—Gangs launch expeditions against expensive stores in white neighborhoods.

One novel development this year has been these semiorganized raids by caravans of looters on expensive shopping streets. While Rodney King-era rioters mostly just walked to the corner in their own dingy neighborhoods to break into liquor stores and birthday-party supply shops, this summer’s Restorative Ransackers have used social media to converge en masse on elite shoe stores that LeBron or Kanye might patronize.
“Rioting over race should be treated as a hate crime and punished accordingly.”

For example, after a police shooting in Southern California last week, the police department in wealthy Santa Monica noticed that yet another pillaging was being organized on Instagram: “Looting Santa Monica at 7 p.m.”

Santa Monica had been stormed by buccaneers on May 31, and the cops were not in the mood to let it happen again. The Santa Monica Outlook reported:

An hour later—as called for in the Instagram post—caravans of rental cars began exiting the freeway and traveling in rows of three to five towards the Downtown. Officers began pulling over drivers who violated the traffic code, [officer Candice] Cobarrubias said. “As soon as we started doing traffic stops the others would leave,” she said. “As soon as they saw the officers, they veered off.”

This alert response succeeded in scaring off the bandits.

The pattern of the looting was similar to that in other cities like Chicago, she said. “It’s the same M.O. (modus operandi). Organized groups are renting cars and driving in caravan style. They meet outside the targeted area and drive in,” she said.

Who are these pirates?

While many of the rental cars used in Santa Monica had out-of-state plates, those inside were mostly young residents of the Los Angeles area, with a few from Northern California, Cobarrubias said.

I’m guessing they tend to be South Central criminal gangs and their associates. From Los Angeles magazine, an account of the May 31 Sack of Santa Monica:

I was in Santa Monica that afternoon, on my way to the protests when a caravan of luxury vehicles brimming with passengers arrived on the scene, leaving a strong scent of cannabis in their wake…. [What] I witnessed was a well-planned organized heist that used the protestors as a shield and a diversion for their own nefarious purposes…. [About] 25 people spilled out of their autos and onto the street. They appeared to be highly organized. As they fanned across the neighborhood, a few people yelled out orders from inside their idling vehicles, waving this small army from one target to another with military precision. I watched as one group would break into the stores, smashing the windows with their hammers and screwdrivers. When the doors were finally breached, a second group would file in with empty duffel bags and emerge a few minutes later with their bags full. Then they would jump back into waiting vehicles and speed away to the next target.

But this reporter refuses to mention the race of the criminals he observed.

An eyewitness to the May 31 looting of the fashionable Jewish district of West Hollywood told me that most of the thieves were Latinos. In general, law-abiding Hispanics have seemed unenthusiastic about Black Lives Matter this summer, but in Los Angeles, Mexican and Salvadoran gangs outnumber and out-organize black gangs. In Chicago, though, the repeated raids upon the Magnificent Mile appear to have been largely black.

Who are the various flavors of rioters?

Unfortunately, the well-funded press has done little reporting on even the basic demographics of rioters. I suspect there are four main types:

—The initial looters hitting Targets and Walmarts tend to be local black kids.

—In some cities, such as Oakland, there are black radical organizations that riot fairly frequently.

—The whiter, more political vandals who smash the windows of unlootable venues like Starbucks (what are they going to steal: coffee stirrers?) and burn police stations are Antifa.

—The more organized raiders of upscale shopping streets tend to be criminal gangs and their hangers-on.

Who make up Antifa?

One thing that is clear is that Democrats’ conspiracy theories about white supremacist outside agitators have failed to pan out despite three months’ opportunity to prove their case. On May 30, Minneapolis’s feckless progressive mayor Jacob Frey tweeted:

"We are now confronting white supremacists, members of organized crime, out of state instigators, and possibly even foreign actors to destroy and destabilize our city and our region."

But the Minneapolis Star-Tribune reported this month:

Of the dozens of people charged so far with crimes related to the riots, none have been publicly linked to white nationalist groups.

Moreover, no evidence of Putin’s spetsnaz commandos air-dropping from their base in Murmansk into Minneapolis, Portland, and Kenosha has turned up.

After all these years of Antifa violence in the streets, we still know very little about their makeup because the press hasn’t been interested in reporting on them.

Judging from mug shots, they tend to be ugly people with bad teeth and even worse taste in grooming.

A remarkable fraction in Portland are some version of transgender. Oregon has offered free transsexual health services for several years, so perhaps the state attracts this type of mentally ill person from across the country?

Also common are drug addicts, sex offenders, punk rock fans, educators, and general lowlifes who have personal reasons for hating cops. On the other hand, they don’t seem particularly interested in stealing nice things the way the black looters are.

The riots tend to go on the longest in places like Portland where there are few blacks, so it’s easier to theorize about what they must be like.

Not many whites in Detroit (if any are left) feel like rioting in the name of black impunity. In fact, Detroit blacks seem chastened by what they did to the city from 1967 onward, with Detroit’s white mayor and black police chief speaking out forcefully against riots this summer with good effect.

Ethnically, Antifa arrestees tend to be of Anglo or German stock, with not that many Catholics or Jews. (There has been little Antifa rioting in heavily Jewish cities like New York and Los Angeles.) Some are from affluent backgrounds, but more appear from their lack of orthodontic care to have always been fairly downscale.

Are Antifa led by behind-the-scenes masterminds? Perhaps, but their actions don’t seem anywhere near as clever as, say, those of Hong Kong demonstrators. They seem to mostly succeed by having Democratic politicians on their side.

Are Antifa being funded with George Soros’ money? I don’t know. To me, what they are doing doesn’t look all that expensive, especially during a time when government cash is flowing to the unemployed.

My impression is that the Soros family has recently been pouring its money into a more respectable way to cause chaos in the streets: by funding anti-law-and-order district attorneys in elections across the country. For example, one of the most consequential races this November will be in giant Los Angeles County, where the Soroses are funding a white male leftist challenger against the incumbent black woman district attorney Jackie Lacey because they object to her effective anti-crime stance.

What can be done about the rioting?

As with the huge increase this year in black crime, the first step is to tell the truth about how bad it has been. In particular, please mock the influential for the stupidity of their spin.

One obvious response to looting is shooting, which gets the deterrent message through quickly and vividly.

For example, the teenage marksman Kyle Rittenhouse appears to have single-handedly ended the Kenosha riots by shooting the three Antifa who attacked him. The Texas Rangers cherish the phrase “One Riot, One Ranger,” but in Kenosha, it was “One Teen, No Riot.”

On the other hand, the press is positively salivating over the prospect of getting some Horst Wessel-type Antifa lowlife, or, ideally, some angelic black youth killed so they can blame it on Trump. If Biden can’t get the job done, the deep state very much wants a Color Revolution in Washington this November and it will gladly sacrifice a few BLM or Antifa thugs to accomplish its ends.

So, it’s imprudent to shoot many rioters.

Alternatively, the Constitutional authorities could impose rule of law by prosecuting the guilty, as the Tory government did after the 2011 London Riots. Just like in the U.S. in 2020, these free-for-alls began with the police shooting a black criminal, followed by yet another peaceful protest, then the usual giant orgy of criminality.

Many at the time assumed that the looters would of course get away scot-free. But England was thoroughly wired with video cameras, so Her Majesty’s Government put hundreds of detectives to work scanning the tapes and then arrested 3,000 surprised and indignant rioters.

In 2020, U.S. cities have many high-definition cameras. Plus, there now exists facial recognition software that is extraordinarily accurate, at least with the unmasked.

Of course, the fundamental problem is political rather than technical: Democratic governors and mayors haven’t wanted to arrest the criminals.

But it would be reasonable after Nov. 3 to treat race rioting as a federal civil rights offense. Rioting over race should be treated as a hate crime and punished accordingly.

After all, one lesson of 2020 is that the country will have to be reorganized on the unifying principle that the equal protection of the laws applies to all races, not just to the privileged ones. To survive, the United States of America can no longer afford to treat some races as above the law.

Comments 1 - 32 of 32        Search these comments

1   steverbeaver   2020 Sep 9, 11:05pm  

Taki's is a good read. They *gasp* tend to defend *gasp* WHITE PEOPLE! lately.
2   richwicks   2020 Sep 9, 11:10pm  

Patrick says
In my three decades as a media critic, this summer’s huge effort by the press to cover up the endless rioting by George Floyd’s mourners has been its most shameless and shameful episode yet.


Have you seen the complete video?

www.youtube.com/embed/0gQYMBALDXc

I remember when the media said Floyd did not resist arrest - but he resists arrest for 5 minutes. Chauvin is actually fairly polite with him. Floyd claims he cannot breath when they are trying to get him into the back of the police car. Floyd ASKS to lie down.

Floyd wasn't killed by having a neck injury. It appears he did die of a heart attack. All these riots were INTENTIONALLY created by the media. It's no accident. I keep trying to tell people that the US news media literally exists, alone, to misinform.
3   steverbeaver   2020 Sep 10, 12:01am  

Agreed @richwicks. Sometimes I damn near have to shake my mom by her shoulders. Fox news addict- can't comprehend that they lie to, that she's been lied to her whole life. But on to Floydget... nah man, once you realize he was just the excuse, the "event" (look it up), all is made clear as the color on their uniforms.
4   MisdemeanorRebel   2020 Sep 10, 2:36am  

richwicks says
Floyd wasn't killed by having a neck injury. It appears he did die of a heart attack. All these riots were INTENTIONALLY created by the media. It's no accident. I keep trying to tell people that the US news media literally exists, alone, to misinform.



It was supposed to start with Arbery, but the raw footage came out before the media was in full national ramp up mode that busted their narrative cold - Arbery charged the Neighborhood Watch from 20 yards away and tried to grab their weapons.
5   richwicks   2020 Sep 10, 5:08am  

NoCoupForYou says
It was supposed to start with Arbery, but the raw footage came out before the media was in full national ramp up mode that busted their narrative cold - Arbery charged the Neighborhood Watch from 20 yards away and tried to grab their weapons.


I don't know about Arbery - those two guys are still in jail, and there's a question as to why one guy was recording it. Unless that was entirely fake, but if it was, was botch it? You have a day or two at least to do several takes.

I think those boys DID murder him, unless nobody actually died.

And it took months for the video to surface. No, I think they did murder him.
6   richwicks   2020 Sep 10, 5:17am  

steverbeaver says
Agreed @richwicks. Sometimes I damn near have to shake my mom by her shoulders. Fox news addict- can't comprehend that they lie to, that she's been lied to her whole life. But on to Floydget... nah man, once you realize he was just the excuse, the "event" (look it up), all is made clear as the color on their uniforms.


I go through that with my parents.

I know a few Russians and used to know an expat in Ukraine. I try to explain to my parents, Ukraine didn't have a revolution - here's what is going on and they just go silent, and I bet they're thinking:

"Do we have insanity running in the family?"

I have a coworker that I had a nice discussion with today - he's Russian. He's GENUINELY surprised I know all this crap but I better check and make certain he's not just humoring me and doesn't think I'm nuts.

It's just so damned frustrating when you know a bunch of things are just complete propaganda, but it's IMPOSSIBLE to get people to realize it is. Very few Americans realize the news media just up and up lies to them, and that it's not just this network, or that paper, it's all of them. He's an expat.

When I was a kid, I used to wonder "how could Germans believe Nazi propaganda?" - now I know. Heck, I used to believe quite a bit of it, if not all of it when i was young and stupid.
7   Shaman   2020 Sep 10, 7:54am  

The propaganda is carefully crafted to fall into one of two specific categories:
1)news that people are AFRAID is true
(Fox News does this a lot)
2)news that people HOPE is true
(MSNPC,CNN, etc does this a lot to whip up TDS hate for conservatives and the President)
8   Robert Sproul   2020 Sep 10, 8:57am  

richwicks says
it's IMPOSSIBLE to get people to realize it

I have a close friend who is a devout Christian. I could never make an impact (nor would I think of trying) in his belief system with some divergent “facts” or “statistics”. I have come to see that it is exactly like that when you try to introduce some contradictory points of view to political TRUE BELIEVERS re: current events or politics. I have stopped all attempts because it has proved to be extremely corrosive to several relationships. Also, the more I cared about the person the harder I might try to Red Pill them and the worse the outcomes. This confirms the studies that I have heard about that say that contradictory information only reaffirms people's convictions.
I am rereading Marcus Aurelius.
9   CBOEtrader   2020 Sep 10, 9:39am  

Robert Sproul says
I have a close friend who is a devout Christian. I could never make an impact (nor would I think of trying) in his belief system with some divergent “facts” or “statistics”.


Oh gawd are you one of those righteous atheists? Yeah I wouldn't listen to you either, and I'm also basically an atheist.

Hint: if you start every conversation assuming the other side is ignorant compared to your vastly informed self, you are probably the one who is more wrong.
10   CBOEtrader   2020 Sep 10, 9:42am  

Robert Sproul says
I have a close friend who is a devout Christian.


FYI, In my life experience it is the devout Christians who make the best life choices. Fewer sexual partners, married at an early age, devotion to family and values... yeah I don't believe in a cloud coach called God either, but I sort of wish I did...AND, frankly I have not seen an atheist life formula that works. Christianity works better than atheism.
11   Patrick   2020 Sep 10, 9:44am  

Robert Sproul says
I could never make an impact (nor would I think of trying) in his belief system with some divergent “facts” or “statistics”.


I read the free pages in Scott Adam's book about why facts don't matter:

https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/34427205-win-bigly

It's good, I may actually buy this book.
12   Robert Sproul   2020 Sep 10, 11:26am  

CBOEtrader says
Oh gawd are you one of those righteous atheists?

You seem to have missed the point of my analogizing political "belief" with religious faith.
Or please point out to me how I am disparaging religion, or my friend's religiosity, in my comment.
I thought the "nor would I think of trying" statement would be clear enough. I am a lifelong atheist but have never beaten anybody up about it. It frankly isn't of great interest to me. I AM grateful to live in a Judeo-Christian culture.
13   Ceffer   2020 Sep 10, 11:33am  

CBOEtrader says
Hint: if you start every conversation assuming the other side is ignorant compared to your vastly informed self, you are probably the one who is more wrong.


Yes. Don't close your mind just because you are dealing with closed minds.
14   georgeliberte   2020 Sep 10, 11:47am  

In my life experience it is the devout Christians who make the best life choices.
If is them actually making those choices and not capitulation t o parents or comunity demands, that tends to backfire.
16   MisdemeanorRebel   2020 Sep 11, 9:11pm  

Imagine that.

Poor Crump
17   MisdemeanorRebel   2020 Sep 11, 9:15pm  

richwicks says
And it took months for the video to surface. No, I think they did murder him.



It came out in a few days, not months. He charged at them from at least 40-50 feet where they parked the truck in front of them. Georgia is even charging the third man, who was pulling up in his car and filmed when Arbery started charging the McMichaels, with accessory to murder.

https://www.bitchute.com/video/mtm9AKqF8kOl/

The boys are like Zimmerman; they weren't charged until the Racists made a thing of it. Now they have to go through the motions to look "Fair". Same thing with Officer Wilson, they had to bother with a Grand Jury even though they had multiple witnesses to Wilson's account.

There's also video of Arbery arguing with cops about driving his mom's car after his license was suspended months before about how he wasn't driving, and another of him walking out with a 65" TV from Walmart and arguing with cops in the parking lot claiming he didn't steal it (which he did)
18   rocketjoe79   2020 Sep 12, 10:45pm  

George Floyd's life and death were tragic. But BLM and other Organizations refuse to honor his family's request to not Riot, Loot, Burn, and assault citizens and Police in response. I have no respect for these organizations. I believe the rule of law should be re-established by force. But, I admire Trump for not forcing federal troops on any city that did not request aid. No one can call Trump any sort of dictator. He has let these cities fail - at their own request. Every incident of burning, assault, looting and riot only strengthens his case, and makes the opposition look more dangerous and just plain crazy.

I believe this will become apparent on election day. People don't want dangerous and crazy. They want safety, stability and a regular (pay)check. I could be wrong, but I can't imagine folks getting outta bed on election day, fully energized to rush to the polls to be first in line to vote for..... Joe Biden?!?? I think they'll sleep in, have a late breakfast, go to work late if they have a job, and watch the returns in the evening. After it's over, they'll say: "Ach, dangit, forgot to vote today! Meh. Next time I won't forget!"
19   MisdemeanorRebel   2020 Sep 12, 10:51pm  

rocketjoe79 says
George Floyd's life and death were tragic.


No it wasn't. You do lots of drugs with 70% arterial blockage, and die.

He pulled the same drama LAST YEAR with cops when Mr. Turn Life Around was arrested for yet more drug possession:

20   richwicks   2020 Sep 14, 5:58pm  

CBOEtrader says
Oh gawd are you one of those righteous atheists? Yeah I wouldn't listen to you either, and I'm also basically an atheist.


I am one of those!

You know what being an atheist has taught me? It's taught me that the existing Judeo-Christian culture is superior to some new bullshit that has been recently invented and not tested for the last 2000 years.

You want me to convince some atheist he's wrong about almost everything they believe in animal rights, vegetarianism, culture, marriage, sex, "alternative lifestyles", etc - I'm one of the best people to do it. I understand precisely where they are coming from, what their reasoning is, how they adopted that reasoning.

One thing I cannot do though, is convince them there is a god, because I don't believe there is one either. I just don't get how people can still believe in a god after you've accumulated enough hard science into your brain. I can explain theories on where morality might come, I can fully explain evolutionary processes, and why different peoples from different environments are fundamentally different because of that.

Most atheists I think are atheists because it's fashionable though, I don't think they've actually gone through the agonizing process of trying to actually understand life and feeling you've got a close idea of just what it is. I'm a meat robot, I have programming, my purpose is keep my genes immortal and pass them on to the next generation. Evolutionary psychology works to ensure that, conformance does as well - if you're properly functioning.

You might think I fear my death being an atheist too. Well, here's a shock, I've died multiple times before. That 3 year old kid I was, he's dead. So is that 5 year old. The 10 year old is dead. The 15 year old is. So is the 20 year old, the 25 year old - and so on. They only shared memories, had entirely different viewpoints in life, and interests, had entirely different knowledge sets, and vastly different personalities.

If you don't realize you were an idiot at 25 when you're 40, wow, you didn't develop at all. Remember being 5? What 3 year old kid wasn't an idiot back then? I imagine if I get to 70, I'll be thinking this of my current self.
21   just_passing_through   2020 Sep 14, 6:26pm  

richwicks says
I'm a meat robot, I have programming, my purpose is keep my genes immortal and pass them on to the next generation.


Ding ding ding! We have a winner!

Funny, I've heard from Christians (family) that 'You must have some ego if you don't believe in god!', and one from a scientist peer of mine, 'You should be atheist. If you're agnostic it means you're the type of person that can't make up their mind!'.

I think the scientist guy was more ironic. I'm agnostic BECAUSE nobody knows wtf and there is zero evidence. Guy's got a right to say: I don't know! You don't either! My guess though is that none of the religious fuckers are right.
22   richwicks   2020 Sep 14, 6:35pm  

Well, just_adhom_preaching says
Funny, I've heard from Christians (family) that 'You must have some ego if you don't believe in god!', and one from a scientist peer of mine, 'You should be atheist. If you're agnostic it means you're the type of person that can't make up their mind!'.


I hate that one about your being arrogant for NOT believing in a god.

Christian: "Oh, I'm a Christian, the creator of 30 billion light years of space has a special plan for ME! I'm important to that unimaginable intellect that has been around for all of time! It loves me!"

Me: "I'm the result of billions of years of competition and in less than 100 years, nobody will know I even existed, even my descendants and I will have returned to dust."

just_adhom_preaching says
I think the scientist guy was more ironic. I'm agnostic BECAUSE nobody knows wtf and there is zero evidence. Guy's got a right to say: I don't know! You don't either! My guess though is that none of the religious fuckers are right.


Hey, you have 0 evidence that Santa Claus exists, and 0 evidence he doesn't. For all you know, he hangs out on Neptune all the time because all the children are bad.

You know this, if you make a positive assertion its your burden of proof. The default position is atheism but I think the religion is very useful in making society cohesive and stable. Gives them necessary ego and narcissism. Gives them purpose in a purposeless life and an imaginary friend they can always turn to and rely on. There's a reason religion exists and I think it keeps the human species healthy overall.

Doesn't matter if it's true or not. It's useful, I have to admit.
23   richwicks   2020 Sep 14, 6:35pm  

Well, just_adhom_preaching says
Funny, I've heard from Christians (family) that 'You must have some ego if you don't believe in god!', and one from a scientist peer of mine, 'You should be atheist. If you're agnostic it means you're the type of person that can't make up their mind!'.


I hate that one about your being arrogant for NOT believing in a god.

Christian: "Oh, I'm a Christian, the creator of 30 billion light years of space has a special plan for ME! I'm important to that unimaginable intellect that has been around for all of time! It loves me!"

Me: "I'm the result of billions of years of competition and in less than 100 years, nobody will know I even existed, even my descendants and I will have returned to dust."

just_adhom_preaching says
I think the scientist guy was more ironic. I'm agnostic BECAUSE nobody knows wtf and there is zero evidence. Guy's got a right to say: I don't know! You don't either! My guess though is that none of the religious fuckers are right.


Hey, you have 0 evidence that Santa Claus exists, and 0 evidence he doesn't. For all you know, he hangs out on Neptune all the time because all the children are bad.

You know this, if you make a positive assertion its your burden of proof. The default position is atheism but I think the religion is very useful in making society cohesive and stable. Gives them necessary ego and narcissism. Gives them purpose in a purposeless life and an imaginary friend they can always turn to and rely on. There's a reason religion exists and I think it keeps the human species healthy overall.

Doesn't matter if it's true or not. It's useful, I have to admit.
24   Patrick   2020 Dec 22, 12:13pm  


Rehab that works!

After 6 burglaries,
3 car thefts,
Multiple illegal trespasses,
An ongoing cocaine and alcohol addiction,
Committing 2 violent home invasions,
3 armed robberies,
Dealing Fentanyl and Meth,
Passing counterfeit money,
Beating 4 victims senseless and
Being arrested 23 times since 1998,

George Floyd hasn’t committed a crime in over five months now.
25   WookieMan   2020 Dec 22, 12:21pm  

Patrick says
George Floyd hasn’t committed a crime in over five months now.

Lol. I need to check in on the court case. I have a $100 bet with my buddies dad that the cops get out of their charges. No one cares though anymore because of the list presented above. "Oh wait, the guy was a piece of shit? We rioted over that."
26   Onvacation   2020 Dec 22, 12:28pm  

just_passing_through says
My guess though is that none of the religious fuckers are right.

Are you saying that my imaginary friend who comforts me, gives me peace, and helps me make decisions is not real?

Who do you atheists and agnostics talk to when you're alone?
27   Onvacation   2020 Dec 22, 12:29pm  

richwicks says
the creator of 30 billion light years of space has a special plan for ME! I'm important to that unimaginable intellect that has been around for all of time! It loves me!"

EXACTLY!

that's why he is my friend
28   Onvacation   2020 Dec 22, 12:31pm  

When you get down to it, "I think therefore I am". All else is conjecture.

Even stranger is the thought without word.
29   Onvacation   2020 Dec 22, 12:33pm  

richwicks says
Gives them purpose in a purposeless life and an imaginary friend they can always turn to and rely on. There's a reason religion exists and I think it keeps the human species healthy overall.


Beats the hell out of nihilism, for both the individual and society.
30   Onvacation   2020 Dec 22, 12:35pm  

Onvacation says
Beats the hell out of nihilism

hehe
31   Patrick   2020 Dec 22, 8:54pm  

Onvacation says
When you get down to it, "I think therefore I am". All else is conjecture.


I'm not even sure of that.

richwicks says
I think the religion is very useful in making society cohesive and stable.


I think the real utility of religion is much closer to home. It's in belonging to a group that cares about you as a fellow member, something we do not get from America in these days because the Woke Disease has infected everything.
32   just_passing_through   2020 Dec 22, 9:50pm  

Onvacation says
Who do you atheists and agnostics talk to when you're alone?


It's okay if you talk to yourself @Onvacation. You only have to start worrying if you answer.

Please register to comment:

api   best comments   contact   latest images   memes   one year ago   random   suggestions