Comments 1 - 6 of 26       Last »     Search these comments

1   Tenpoundbass   @   2020 Oct 2, 12:11pm  

I might but a round of hot molten lead in his head might be so cool with it.
2   Hircus   @   2020 Oct 2, 12:19pm  

with someone 14 to 17 years old and was no more than 10 years older than the person.




The measure won’t apply when a minor is under 14, when the age gap is larger than 10 years, or when either party says the sex wasn’t consensual.
3   Ceffer   @   2020 Oct 2, 12:28pm  

Thanks for making me barf my insides out.
4   FortWayneAsNancyPelosiHaircut   @   2020 Oct 2, 12:33pm  

Fucked up shit. I don't understand why the left is pushing this pedo shit. Where the fuck is the money in it? Is there some super ultra wealthy pedo pushing this shit? Some rich homo somewhere or what?
5   EBGuy   @   2020 Oct 2, 12:46pm  

Everyone needs to calm down and take a deep breath.
First, I don't agree with the bill, but be aware this is ONLY about whether an offender appears on the sex offender registry. They are still guilty of statutory rape. Nothing has changed.
6   Patrick   @   2020 Oct 2, 12:49pm  

Hircus says
with someone 14 to 17 years old and was no more than 10 years older than the person.




The measure won’t apply when a minor is under 14, when the age gap is larger than 10 years, or when either party says the sex wasn’t consensual.


More from the article:

SACRAMENTO, Calif. (AP) — California Gov. Gavin Newsom on Friday signed a law that would give judges a say on whether to list someone as a sex offender for having oral or anal sex with a minor.

The bill would expand the discretion currently granted judges in statutory rape cases and was promoted as bringing fairness under the law to LGBTQ defendants.

The current law, in place for decades, permits judges to decide whether a man should be placed on California’s sex offender registry if he had voluntary intercourse with someone 14 to 17 years old and was no more than 10 years older than the person.

But that discretion only applied to a man who had vaginal intercourse. The new change permits judges to use that same discretion when the case involves voluntary oral or anal sex.

The measure won’t apply when a minor is under 14, when the age gap is larger than 10 years, or when either party says the sex wasn’t consensual.

The bill was introduced by state Sen. Scott Wiener, a San Francisco Democrat.


Still, California is a piece of pedophile shit now.

Comments 1 - 6 of 26       Last »     Search these comments

Please register to comment:

api   best comments   contact   latest images   memes   one year ago   users   suggestions   gaiste