patrick.net

I might but a round of hot molten lead in his head might be so cool with it.

with someone 14 to 17 years old and was no more than 10 years older than the person.

The measure won’t apply when a minor is under 14, when the age gap is larger than 10 years, or when either party says the sex wasn’t consensual.

Thanks for making me barf my insides out.

Fucked up shit. I don't understand why the left is pushing this pedo shit. Where the fuck is the money in it? Is there some super ultra wealthy pedo pushing this shit? Some rich homo somewhere or what?

Everyone needs to calm down and take a deep breath.
First, I don't agree with the bill, but be aware this is ONLY about whether an offender appears on the sex offender registry. They are still guilty of statutory rape. Nothing has changed.

Hircus says

with someone 14 to 17 years old and was no more than 10 years older than the person.

The measure won’t apply when a minor is under 14, when the age gap is larger than 10 years, or when either party says the sex wasn’t consensual.

More from the article:

SACRAMENTO, Calif. (AP) — California Gov. Gavin Newsom on Friday signed a law that would give judges a say on whether to list someone as a sex offender for having oral or anal sex with a minor.

The bill would expand the discretion currently granted judges in statutory rape cases and was promoted as bringing fairness under the law to LGBTQ defendants.

The current law, in place for decades, permits judges to decide whether a man should be placed on California’s sex offender registry if he had voluntary intercourse with someone 14 to 17 years old and was no more than 10 years older than the person.

But that discretion only applied to a man who had vaginal intercourse. The new change permits judges to use that same discretion when the case involves voluntary oral or anal sex.

The measure won’t apply when a minor is under 14, when the age gap is larger than 10 years, or when either party says the sex wasn’t consensual.

The bill was introduced by state Sen. Scott Wiener, a San Francisco Democrat.

Still, California is a piece of pedophile shit now.

If homosexuality can be spread through a virus like HPV spreads cervical cancer, that would go a long way towards explaining why:
1)Gay people haven’t been weeded out of the population with natural selection.
2)why pockets of permissible and encouraged gayness always grow and grow their gay populations in those cities.
3) why young boys who are coerced into gay sex or raped by gay pedophiles so very often wind up gay themselves.

I’m thinking that curing AIDS was a bad move.

NancyPelosiHaircut says

Fucked up shit. I don't understand why the left is pushing this pedo shit. Where the fuck is the money in it? Is there some super ultra wealthy pedo pushing this shit? Some rich homo somewhere or what?

I believe leftists vote for anything that creates chaos.

Thread title does not correspond to the legislation it addresses. Dismiss.

Automan Empire says

Thread title does not correspond to the legislation it addresses. Dismiss.

it does. it protects pedos in name of equality. left is so obsessed with equality that they don't fucking understand consequences of anything they do anymore.

It does correspond, with this correction:

A 24 year old man can now fuck a 14 year old boy in the ass and get away with it in CA, if the (probably also gay) judge says it was "consensual".

I predicted this.

If you still live in CA and you have children you are officially bad parents.

No amount of money or good weather is going to make me stay in a place where my minor child can be raped by 20+ year olds.

Patrick says

A 24 year old man can now fuck a 14 year old boy in the ass and get away with it in CA, if the (probably also gay) judge says it was "consensual".

Did you read anything I wrote. Here, from a "pride" legal site:
In California, statutory rape involves sexual intercourse with a minor under the age of consent. Regardless of the victim’s consent, sex with a minor is always considered to be statutory rape because minors are statutorily unable to consent to sex. Unlike some states, California does not have a Romeo-and-Juliet Law, which allows sexual intercourse between two couples if they had been together and had intercourse prior to turning 18 or having a close age relation.
The rapist will go to jail.
Now, with the recent law change, the rapist will appear before a judge to determine if he will be placed on the sex offender registry once he serves his sentence. Previously, there would be NO judicial discretion and the offender would automatically be put on the list.

EBGuy says

Previously, there would be NO judicial discretion and the offender would automatically be put on the list.

We don’t need judicial discretion for a 24 and 14 year old. Thanks!

ignoreme says

We don’t need judicial discretion for a 24 and 14 year old. Thanks!

Previously, there was only sex offender registry discretion for vaginal intercourse (because, biology!) So the LGBT lobby took them court (and lost, because biology!). Then the LGBT lobby then screamed Equity! and we got this ridiculous piece of legislation.

The point is. CA has now (mostly) decriminalized both hetero and homo pedophilia. I stand by my original position.

EBGuy says

The rapist will go to jail.

No, not if the judge decides to rule it "consensual" now.

At 14, I was ready and eager for sex, and able to discern relationships I wanted with no desire for the partner's life to be ruined, and those that were malevolent and would need legal intervention if they came up. Some teens have this level of agency, others don't; therefore allowing a judge's discretion is legally sensible.

The new law appears to give the legal system the tools to lay off the type of cases where the couple would end up married with kids anyway, while having power to intervene with predatory types. A good balance between my hate of pedophiles and hate of zero tolerance rule systems.

Thread title is still annoyingly irrelevant.

Automan Empire says

At 14, I was ready and eager for sex, and able to discern relationships I wanted with no desire for the partner's life to be ruined, and those that were malevolent and would need legal intervention if they came up.

How many kids do you have?

ignoreme says

How many kids do you have?

I've helped raise a couple sets of older stepkids over the decades, plus a niece and nephew. I've actually put in the work of parenting the kids in my care, teaching them healthy relationship concepts and boundaries, guiding and guarding where necessary. I made a lot of open and grotesque pedophiles disappear off Yahoo360 back in the day, linked to young teen stepdaughter's account.

I see the government and legal system as a backstop, not a substitute parent or nanny, for the sexual misadventures of 14+ minors as legislated.

Automan Empire says

I see the government and legal system as a backstop, not a substitute parent or nanny, for the sexual misadventures of minors.

100% agree, but I’d still appreciate the backstop.

I disagree with you about 14 year olds being ready for sex. Sex isn’t about understanding your partners feelings, it’s about being ready to raise a child.

Definitely I am not okay with having my daughters having sex under my roof, don’t care how eager your were at 14.

Automan Empire says

I've helped raise a couple sets of older stepkids over the decades, plus a niece and nephew. I've actually put in the work of parenting the kids in my care, teaching them healthy relationship concepts and boundaries, guiding and guarding where necessary. I made a lot of open and grotesque pedophiles disappear off Yahoo360 back in the day, linked to young teen stepdaughter's account.

If you know anything about parenting you’d know that 14 yo know nothing about anything and can be easily manipulated. Which is why there is no consent before 18.

CA literally now decriminalized pedophilia.

Automan Empire says

and able to discern relationships I wanted with no desire for the partner's life to be ruined

Gonna call absolute BS on this line. Yes, even 10-12 year olds get horny and start "exploring" themselves. Maybe even have sex. A 14 year old simply has no concept of the ramifications that sex can bring. A good friend of mine had a kid at 17. She admits she fucked up and would turn back the clock if she could. I get the 16 year old getting with a 18-19 year old being borderline.

But a 14 year old with a 24 year old is out of bounds. The 14 year old has ZERO clue what is happening and you did too at the time, but for some reason you support it. It's pure manipulation and slightly scary that you think it's okay and makes me question your childhood in all honesty. 14 and 24 ain't normal even if you "think" you could ruin their life. At 24 you have plenty of opportunity to fuck 18-24 year olds. There's no shortage of them.

Fortwaynemobile says

If you know anything about parenting you’d know that 14 yo know nothing about anything and can be easily manipulated.

Even Milo was able to eventually figure this out (see 7:50).
www.youtube.com/embed/1NovrKDrdO8

Patrick says

No, not if the judge decides to rule it "consensual" now.

No, the legislation is ONLY about the sex offender registry. See California bill eliminating sex offender list inequity toward LGBTQ people passes.
SB145 by state Sen. Scott Wiener, D-San Francisco, would remove automatic sex-offender registration for young adults who are convicted of having anal or oral sex with a minor, leaving the decision up to a judge.
You can also read the actual text of SB-145 Sex offenders: registration.
Like I said I'm not happy with the law, but it is only about the sex offender registry. It does not remove criminal punishment for statutory rapists.

WookieMan says

But a 14 year old with a 24 year old is out of bounds.

I consider that an edge case, and I'd expect it to get exponentially harder to meet the criteria for every year of age gap over about 5 in a well functioning system.

I don't see this as a gold rush to pedophilia, but discretion to avoid punishments that don't fit the crime.