3
0

LOL California Republicans defend Drop Boxes as legitimate "Ballot Harvesting" which is legal in California


               
2020 Oct 13, 6:35am   828 views  32 comments

by Tenpoundbass   follow (10)  

More brutal ass beatings, from the Republicans taking the Democrat's shit and beating them senseless with it.
For they know not what they do!

https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2020/10/13/california-republicans-defend-drop-boxes-if-democrats-can-do-ballot-harvesting-so-can-we-election/

Republicans appear to have settled on a new method: using drop-off boxes at Republican offices or otherwise friendly locations.

California officials say the drop-boxes violate a state law requiring ballot harvesters to identify themselves by signing the mail-in envelopes.

The GOP disagrees.

State Republican Party spokesman Hector Barajas pointed Breitbart News to a new law passed by the Democrat-dominated state legislature in 2018 that specifies that “a ballot shall not be disqualified solely because the person authorized to return it did not provide on the identification envelope his or her name, relationship to the voter, or signature.”

Barajas also argued that any kind of receptacle can be used by law to store the ballots that a “ballot harvester” collects.

In a statement to Breitbart News, Barajas said:

“There is nothing in any of the laws or regulations cited in that advisory that indicate private organization drop boxes are NOT permitted. The regulations cited apply to Registrar of Voters only.

« First        Comments 25 - 32 of 32        Search these comments

25   Tenpoundbass   2020 Oct 15, 8:00am  

So you're consuming the news and going with your gut. That's what they hoped you would do.

The difference in Trump supporters and those who despise him no matter what.

They have been following the News for the last 5 years.
While we have been studying the Facts.

Just go to WashingtonPost.com and see how buried the Hunter Biden story is. Then when you find it, it is riddled with.

"Allegedly", "Presumably", "But there's no proof Biden replied to the email",

then there's another article on their site hidden away.
"Biden's laptop explainer"

CNN doesn't have one single article, about any truth bombs that has come out the last several weeks.

We've been feeding on the actual intel as it has leaked over the last five years. At a great cost and disservice to the facts.
I can't help but feel if the good guys, the whistle blowers, the crowd sourced investigators, the Congressmen paying attention, the folks in the DOJ that are paying attention, all kept their mouth shut, and didn't put it out for TGP, Breitbart, The Conservative Treehouse, 4Chan, and all else to digest and inform those interested in the facts.
If they had just sat on it, and not allowed Sean Hannity and Tucker Carlson to slowly release the pressure to the point, the Left feels like it's a nothing burger by now, and the Right feels more vindicated than Angry.
Then there would be 2 million man march on Washington today demanding the incarceration of all of Obama's administration, and demanding about 40% of Congress and the Senate to step down, because they've all known about it for as long as we have. And most were instrumental in the execution of these crimes, and seditious acts.

Which has all been part of their plan. Don't let them get away with it, with complacency, and saying. Well if it didn't come up on my Yahoo news feed, then it isn't true.

At least take a curious eye to it, and seek out the truth. Then I will accept if you want to say.

"Well I'm a a partisan thinker, and I don't see a problem with what the Establishment did, before Trump, during his campaign and since he came in office. I just want to see Democrats win. It's a means to an end."

I can at least reason with that logic. I don't get people who just assume that if Wapo and CNN isn't outraged then it didn't happen. But if they are, then Trump had Russian hookers piss on him.

I don't get it.
26   Onvacation   2020 Oct 15, 8:16am  

Automan Empire says
. I don't take any news outlet at their word, but some have maintained good credibility

Which news outlet are you talking about? Fox? They seem a bit biased to me. Will you name the source of your propaganda?
27   Tenpoundbass   2020 Oct 15, 8:20am  

Onvacation says
Which news outlet are you talking about? Fox?


My brother told me about his TDS mother in law. He said all she does is watch FOX and bitches about Trump.

FOX has become the cable news channel of choice for the TDS. I miss the good ole days, when the Democrats were trying to shut them down for being the Only conservative voice in the Cable news market.
28   richwicks   2020 Oct 15, 10:02am  

Tenpoundbass says
I miss the good ole days, when the Democrats were trying to shut them down for being the Only conservative voice in the Cable news market.


15 years ago, all Fox "news" did was perpetuate propaganda to support the stupid Iraq War that George W. Bush lied this nation into.

At the time, I was bothered by the fact that US "news" channels were nakedly pushing propaganda, and were perfectly willing to misinform and lie to the population. The result of Fox "news" being on the air though demonstrated that all "news" channels in the United States, all of them, promote propaganda and are perfectly willing to misinform and lie to the population.

There's no reason to hold Fox accountable for being the propaganda arm of the 4th Reich instead of the 4th estate because they are all propaganda arms now and perhaps have always been.
29   Tenpoundbass   2020 Oct 15, 10:07am  

richwicks says
15 years ago, all Fox "news" did was perpetuate propaganda to support the stupid Iraq War that George W. Bush lied this nation into.


Me. The Dixie Chicks and Richard Gere were the only people in America that didn't want Bush to go into the Afghanistan or Iraq.
30   richwicks   2020 Oct 15, 10:11am  

Tenpoundbass says
richwicks says
15 years ago, all Fox "news" did was perpetuate propaganda to support the stupid Iraq War that George W. Bush lied this nation into.


Me. The Dixie Chicks and Richard Gere were the only people in America that didn't want Bush to go into the Afghanistan or Iraq.


And all those anti-war protestors. Don't you remember them?

Barely - because Obama did have quite a success, he absolutely destroyed the anti-war movement, as he went on to bomb Libya, Syria, Pakistan, Somalia, and Yemen.
31   Tenpoundbass   2020 Oct 15, 10:24am  

There was no antiwar movement on the eve of Bush taking us into the middle east. Most Americans bought it all hook line and sinker. They welcomed the formation of the Homeland Security Administration.

There was no Patnet then, so I'm not saying those here were pro Bush war. But from my POV in my neck of the woods, everyone thought it was unpatriotic of me, to say it was a bad thing.
32   richwicks   2020 Oct 17, 4:06pm  

Tenpoundbass says
There was no antiwar movement on the eve of Bush taking us into the middle east.


Yes, there absolutely was. People went to Iraq to be human shields, there was Cindy Sheehan.

The only thing the Obama administration did was to destroy that movement. That is why the Neocon traitor Obama is "remembered" so fondly by our so-called "news" media.

I used to post on yahoo when all "news" articles had comments. Most of us were anti-war, people explained who Scott Ritter was, what Hussein did to religious leaders seeking political power, and why it was impossible that binLaden would have worked with Hussein. You can't see this now, because yahoo simply deleted all of that information.

Our government pretends there was no anti-war movement, and you're falling for it. Our government is just a group of criminal scum, and they lie to you constantly. They need you obedience for them to get away with their unspeakable crimes.

« First        Comments 25 - 32 of 32        Search these comments

Please register to comment:

api   best comments   contact   latest images   memes   one year ago   users   suggestions   gaiste