1
0

If Trump has definitive proof...


 invite response                
2020 Nov 14, 9:20am   1,789 views  28 comments

by GlocknLoad   ➕follow (0)   💰tip   ignore  

If Trump and his team have definitive proof (and you believe it) of voter fraud, would you support Trump enacting Marshall Law and not leaving the White House?

« First        Comments 8 - 28 of 28        Search these comments

8   Tenpoundbass   2020 Nov 14, 11:02am  

He's a fucking pussy if he leaves office without burning it all down. They are coming after his whole family, not just him.
9   Kepi   2020 Nov 14, 11:34am  

GlocknLoad says
If Trump and his team have definitive proof (and you believe it) of voter fraud, would you support Trump enacting Marshall Law and not leaving the White House?


Yes.
11   Shaman   2020 Nov 14, 12:36pm  

If he can demonstrate that the Democrats used foreign powers to subvert the will of the people, he should order the arrest of all involved and make an address to the nation with intelligence and law enforcement officials standing by to make additional supporting statements and answer questions. Then he can appeal to the SCOTUS to decertify the election in the states where Dominion changed votes. Then he lets the state legislatures do their duties. If they choose him well bully. If they choose Biden instead, well at least the Constitution has been followed. Upholding the Constitution is his sworn duty.
12   WookieMan   2020 Nov 14, 12:48pm  

I don't back down from a fight if I know I'm right. He has to know he's right is all I'll say. Assuming he won in a landslide, there's still at minimum 50M that voted against him. Needs to tread lightly if he's going to use any executive authority.
13   MisdemeanorRebel   2020 Nov 14, 12:55pm  

There's no doubt in my mind that Venezuelans and Chinese Money worked together here, with the knowledge of Democrat and Deep State bigwigs.

Rule #1-Democrats always project.
14   rocketjoe79   2020 Nov 14, 1:55pm  

Nope. No need for Martial Law. If he wins in court and the electors vote properly, he'll win via the electoral college - like every other president. No need for crazy shenanigans.
15   Bd6r   2020 Nov 14, 2:51pm  

NoCoupForYou says
There's no doubt in my mind that Venezuelans and Chinese Money worked together here, with the knowledge of Democrat and Deep State bigwigs.

Rule #1-Democrats always project.

+ Russians, don't forget them. Putin said in one interview that he likes D's- his country is still paying money to Angela Davis, who is one of ideological parents of BLM - this is infinitely more proof than what they had in 2016 screaming about Trump and Russians.
16   RWSGFY   2020 Nov 14, 3:24pm  

Dbr6 says
+ Russians, don't forget them. Putin said in one interview that he likes D's- his country is still paying money to Angela Davis, who is one of ideological parents of BLM - this is infinitely more proof than what they had in 2016 screaming about Trump and Russians.


Yep, and Biden is literally the father of '09 "reset" with Putin. He even coined the phrase "let's push the reset button".
18   GNL   2020 Nov 14, 4:39pm  

rocketjoe79 says
Nope. No need for Martial Law. If he wins in court and the electors vote properly, he'll win via the electoral college - like every other president. No need for crazy shenanigans.

But what if the courts deny him the chance to fight in court?
19   MisdemeanorRebel   2020 Nov 14, 5:13pm  

WineHorror1 says
But what if the courts deny him the chance to fight in court?





Then the state legislators declare the elections too fraudulent to depend on, and nominate the electors.

In fact, it would be great if it happened before SCOTUS, since Article II and Bush v. Gore makes State Legislators totally in charge, and SCOTUS can just affirm their decision without comment.
20   mell   2020 Nov 14, 5:50pm  

NoCoupForYou says
WineHorror1 says
But what if the courts deny him the chance to fight in court?





Then the state legislators declare the elections too fraudulent to depend on, and nominate the electors.

In fact, it would be great if it happened before SCOTUS, since Article II and Bush v. Gore makes State Legislators totally in charge, and SCOTUS can just affirm their decision without comment.


But he needs to win another state even with PA electors, MI a good candidate.
21   MisdemeanorRebel   2020 Nov 14, 5:57pm  

mell says
But he needs to win another state even with PA electors, MI a good candidate.





PA, WI, MI, AZ, and GA all have Rep Legislatures.
22   mell   2020 Nov 14, 6:00pm  

NoCoupForYou says
mell says
But he needs to win another state even with PA electors, MI a good candidate.





PA, WI, MI, AZ, and GA all have Rep Legislatures.


Yeah. which ones are the least cucked?
23   GNL   2020 Nov 14, 6:02pm  

I've never been so psychologically invested in the outcome of an election. It sure would be nice if the outcome had no effect on us. That was how it was supposed to be...the office of president was supposed to have very little to do with citizens.
24   Dholliday126   2020 Nov 14, 8:07pm  

Well if he has anything he better get to it, the narrative aka media will turn people against him. Shit or get off the pot...
25   MisdemeanorRebel   2020 Nov 14, 8:14pm  

mell says
Yeah. which ones are the least cucked?



All of them, if they don't want to lose their seats in 2022. Mostly, the power of majority comes from Trump fanatic 70-80% rural and suburban areas, so they can kiss their careers goodbye as most of them are in their 40s and only a few terms in office, too few to build up the influence necessary to get private/lobbyist jobs. They should also realize how much power they'd lose in a Kamala admin that will focus on reducing their power and continuing to centralize the power in DC.

--- or so we hope.

We've got PA's GOP majority leader onboard, or so it appears.
https://www.politico.com/news/2020/11/10/pennsylvania-gop-rallies-trumps-defense-435864

If Trump can cough up some serious evidence, which I hope is NSA intercepts of China/Soros Shit with the Dems... they have a national security excuse to blow past any reasonable objections.

I believe the Benford Law stuff won't cut it as "The Thing" if it comes down to State Legislatures. It'll have to be a whopper that apolitical people can grasp.
26   MisdemeanorRebel   2020 Nov 14, 8:56pm  

Poison Pill in PA State Act 77 allowing PA Mail In Ballots?

If any of the parts are not honored, even to any one person, then the whole thing is tossed.
27   GNL   2020 Nov 14, 9:58pm  

NoCoupForYou says
Poison Pill in PA State Act 77 allowing PA Mail In Ballots?

If any of the parts are not honored, even to any one person, then the whole thing is tossed.

The whole what thing?
28   MisdemeanorRebel   2020 Nov 14, 10:05pm  

Poison Pill. It prevents an activist court from saying "Well, this part of mail voting was violated, or fraught with issues, but everything else was okay so they must be accepted".

In other words, if any court or even in the opinion of the State Legislature, strikes down a provision or seeks to make an except to the act or decides the least bit of it wasn't properly executed, ALL Mail Ins are null and void because the entire ACT legitimizing mail in ballots is then nullified.

Please register to comment:

api   best comments   contact   latest images   memes   one year ago   random   suggestions