1
0

If Trump has definitive proof...


               
2020 Nov 14, 9:20am   2,823 views  28 comments

by GlocknLoad   follow (0)  

If Trump and his team have definitive proof (and you believe it) of voter fraud, would you support Trump enacting Marshall Law and not leaving the White House?

« First        Comments 24 - 28 of 28        Search these comments

24   Dholliday126   @   2020 Nov 14, 8:07pm  

Well if he has anything he better get to it, the narrative aka media will turn people against him. Shit or get off the pot...
25   MisdemeanorRebel   @   2020 Nov 14, 8:14pm  

mell says
Yeah. which ones are the least cucked?



All of them, if they don't want to lose their seats in 2022. Mostly, the power of majority comes from Trump fanatic 70-80% rural and suburban areas, so they can kiss their careers goodbye as most of them are in their 40s and only a few terms in office, too few to build up the influence necessary to get private/lobbyist jobs. They should also realize how much power they'd lose in a Kamala admin that will focus on reducing their power and continuing to centralize the power in DC.

--- or so we hope.

We've got PA's GOP majority leader onboard, or so it appears.
https://www.politico.com/news/2020/11/10/pennsylvania-gop-rallies-trumps-defense-435864

If Trump can cough up some serious evidence, which I hope is NSA intercepts of China/Soros Shit with the Dems... they have a national security excuse to blow past any reasonable objections.

I believe the Benford Law stuff won't cut it as "The Thing" if it comes down to State Legislatures. It'll have to be a whopper that apolitical people can grasp.
26   MisdemeanorRebel   @   2020 Nov 14, 8:56pm  

Poison Pill in PA State Act 77 allowing PA Mail In Ballots?

If any of the parts are not honored, even to any one person, then the whole thing is tossed.
27   GNL   @   2020 Nov 14, 9:58pm  

NoCoupForYou says
Poison Pill in PA State Act 77 allowing PA Mail In Ballots?

If any of the parts are not honored, even to any one person, then the whole thing is tossed.

The whole what thing?
28   MisdemeanorRebel   @   2020 Nov 14, 10:05pm  

Poison Pill. It prevents an activist court from saying "Well, this part of mail voting was violated, or fraught with issues, but everything else was okay so they must be accepted".

In other words, if any court or even in the opinion of the State Legislature, strikes down a provision or seeks to make an except to the act or decides the least bit of it wasn't properly executed, ALL Mail Ins are null and void because the entire ACT legitimizing mail in ballots is then nullified.

« First        Comments 24 - 28 of 28        Search these comments

Please register to comment:

api   best comments   contact   latest images   memes   one year ago   users   suggestions   gaiste