patrick.net
An Antidote to Corporate Media
1,351,541 comments by 15,724 users - ForcedTQ, Maga_Chaos_Monkey, Misc, The_Deplorable online now
NEWS CLIP - SIDNEY POWELL 450,000 BALLOTS WITH ONLY JOE BIDEN ON THEM
2020 Dec 9, 3:02pm 1,041 views 18 comments
Comments 1 - 18 of 18 Search these comments
1
Patrick
2020 Dec 9, 7:30pm
Patrick
2020 Dec 9, 7:30pm
Why don't we have a brutally simple system?
1. requiring proof of citizenship to vote
2. keeping all ballot envelopes with their signatures, plus a signed card for those who vote in person
3. publishing the names, ages, and residency zip code of all those people who signed an envelope or card so that the general public can look at the names
4. requiring a revote in any county where the number of ballots counted is greater than the sum of (signed envelopes + signed cards)
1. requiring proof of citizenship to vote
2. keeping all ballot envelopes with their signatures, plus a signed card for those who vote in person
3. publishing the names, ages, and residency zip code of all those people who signed an envelope or card so that the general public can look at the names
4. requiring a revote in any county where the number of ballots counted is greater than the sum of (signed envelopes + signed cards)
3
Tenpoundbass
2020 Dec 10, 12:46pm
Tenpoundbass
2020 Dec 10, 12:46pm
election2020 says
She's proved just as much that it was not an honest election, than those who created an election that on the surface appears to have been conducted by cheats.
They proved that by all of their actions.
The law suit is going to prove, that the election was flawed and can't be trusted. The fraud will be addressed in future convictions. The election it's self was not ran with integrity that instills trust in the vote counts The only proof the Opposition has presented is denial? IF that worked in a criminal court of law, then no criminal would go to jail
This lady hasn't proved anything.
Tall claims and flop in courts is what i don't like.
She's proved just as much that it was not an honest election, than those who created an election that on the surface appears to have been conducted by cheats.
They proved that by all of their actions.
The law suit is going to prove, that the election was flawed and can't be trusted. The fraud will be addressed in future convictions. The election it's self was not ran with integrity that instills trust in the vote counts The only proof the Opposition has presented is denial? IF that worked in a criminal court of law, then no criminal would go to jail
4
richwicks
2020 Dec 10, 1:00pm
richwicks
2020 Dec 10, 1:00pm
Patrick says
Because it's been ballot fraud that has placed a good portion of our government in power.
Do you really believe Nancy Pelosi is elected?
Why don't we have a brutally simple system?
Because it's been ballot fraud that has placed a good portion of our government in power.
Do you really believe Nancy Pelosi is elected?
5
komputodo
2020 Dec 10, 1:05pm
komputodo
2020 Dec 10, 1:05pm
Patrick says
The same reason we don't have a brutally simple tax code.
Why don't we have a brutally simple system?
The same reason we don't have a brutally simple tax code.
8
Zak
2020 Dec 10, 2:27pm
I hear lots of words. I don't see any pictures of ballots. If you say it is so, it should be easy enough to put an example ballot up with only the Biden bubble filled in.
If you really really wanted to get evidence of a coordinated problem on those ballots, you could probably take a DNA sample from some arbitrary sample seet, and compare the DNA.. If a large portion of them have the same DNA from handling, without a wide secondary set from actual voters, then you have ballots that voters didn't touch.. Boom, fraud proof. I don't see that here. Why not?
If you really really wanted to get evidence of a coordinated problem on those ballots, you could probably take a DNA sample from some arbitrary sample seet, and compare the DNA.. If a large portion of them have the same DNA from handling, without a wide secondary set from actual voters, then you have ballots that voters didn't touch.. Boom, fraud proof. I don't see that here. Why not?
9
WookieMan
2020 Dec 10, 2:41pm
WookieMan
2020 Dec 10, 2:41pm
Zak says
Cool. Then just let people examine them, right? That wasn't allowed in multiple locations via sworn affidavit. Just make the data available to any person or party that wants to see it. Problem solved. That's not happening. What is there to hide?
I hear lots of words. I don't see any pictures of ballots. If you say it is so, it should be easy enough to put an example ballot up with only the Biden bubble filled in
Cool. Then just let people examine them, right? That wasn't allowed in multiple locations via sworn affidavit. Just make the data available to any person or party that wants to see it. Problem solved. That's not happening. What is there to hide?
10
CBOEtrader
2020 Dec 10, 2:55pm
CBOEtrader
2020 Dec 10, 2:55pm
Tenpoundbass says
She's getting there. Its still frustrating to hear this level of bluster w zero supporting evidence shared. "450k ballots w Joe biden only"... ok, tell us why you think that?! Or frankly it's not helpful.
None of us should accept claims without evidence from anyone.
I'm putting this claim in the unproven pile in my mind. We shall see
election2020 saysThis lady hasn't proved anything.
Tall claims and flop in courts is what i don't like.
She's proved just as much that it was not an honest election
She's getting there. Its still frustrating to hear this level of bluster w zero supporting evidence shared. "450k ballots w Joe biden only"... ok, tell us why you think that?! Or frankly it's not helpful.
None of us should accept claims without evidence from anyone.
I'm putting this claim in the unproven pile in my mind. We shall see
11
ignoreme
2020 Dec 10, 3:02pm
Zak says
I love this idea. It shows how easy it would be to prove vinny was in the back room filling in so many ballots that he didn’t have time to fill bubbles other then Biden. Each ballot should have at least one unique DNA signature right?
The fact that the FBI has no interest in doing this just proves the corruption more.
you could probably take a DNA sample from some arbitrary sample seet, and compare the DNA.. If a large portion of them have the same DNA from handling, without a wide secondary set from actual voters, then you have ballots that voters didn't touch.. Boom, fraud proof. I don't see that here. Why not?
I love this idea. It shows how easy it would be to prove vinny was in the back room filling in so many ballots that he didn’t have time to fill bubbles other then Biden. Each ballot should have at least one unique DNA signature right?
The fact that the FBI has no interest in doing this just proves the corruption more.
12
richwicks
2020 Dec 10, 3:16pm
richwicks
2020 Dec 10, 3:16pm
Zak says
Because ballot fraud is why our government is in power. There is ZERO interest in our government to have fair elections.
If you got into power through electoral fraud, of course you don't want to fix it. That is the situation we are in now. There is absolutely no incentive by our "elected" officials to fix the voting system. Surely, you can see this.
I don't see that here. Why not?
Because ballot fraud is why our government is in power. There is ZERO interest in our government to have fair elections.
If you got into power through electoral fraud, of course you don't want to fix it. That is the situation we are in now. There is absolutely no incentive by our "elected" officials to fix the voting system. Surely, you can see this.
13
Karloff
2020 Dec 10, 3:44pm
Karloff
2020 Dec 10, 3:44pm
Wouldn't even need to search for DNA, just analyze the ink used to fill out the ballot. Probably find that they all came from the same source that way.
16
Patrick
2020 Dec 10, 8:42pm
Patrick
2020 Dec 10, 8:42pm
Zak says
I like this idea!
you could probably take a DNA sample from some arbitrary sample seet, and compare the DNA.. If a large portion of them have the same DNA from handling, without a wide secondary set from actual voters, then you have ballots that voters didn't touch.. Boom, fraud proof.
I like this idea!
17
Patrick
2020 Dec 10, 8:43pm
Patrick
2020 Dec 10, 8:43pm
Karloff says
Even better! Well, maybe they share pens at the polling place.
But if you found identical ink from many different mail in ballots, that would be something.
Can mail in ballots even be distinguished from walk in anymore? I read that Georgia was burning the envelopes with the signatures on them.
Wouldn't even need to search for DNA, just analyze the ink used to fill out the ballot. Probably find that they all came from the same source that way.
Even better! Well, maybe they share pens at the polling place.
But if you found identical ink from many different mail in ballots, that would be something.
Can mail in ballots even be distinguished from walk in anymore? I read that Georgia was burning the envelopes with the signatures on them.
18
Patrick
2020 Dec 10, 8:44pm
Patrick
2020 Dec 10, 8:44pm
richwicks says
This is the same reason we won't get publicly funded elections. That would give people a chance to get elected without taking bribes in the form of "campaign donations".
If you got into power through electoral fraud, of course you don't want to fix it.
This is the same reason we won't get publicly funded elections. That would give people a chance to get elected without taking bribes in the form of "campaign donations".
/