« First « Previous Comments 41 - 63 of 63 Search these comments
EC meets TOMORROW, not Tuesday.
That means it is DEFINITELY over.
I look forward to the embarrassment and the Constitutional Crises when John Ratcliffe releases his report.
At the end of the day, this is what it boils down to. And shit is going to get deadly and bloody if they try Install a Communist regime without a full inspection of the ballots.
The Courts think they are giving Trump the Business. They are championing their purge is what in the fuck they are doing, by denying due process, with such disregard for our Constitution.. NO Tickey No fucking Laundry! PERIOD! And we don't give a fuck how Chris Wallace feels about it.
https://gab.com/system/media_attachments/files/060/662/731/original/f6e489394ce1c349.jpeg
Wasn't bogus. Supremes just pussed out. The supremes were setup to be the trail court in disputes between states and this was a valid dispute.
At least according to these lawyers:
www.youtube.com/embed/Y5IPEvYchMo
just_passing_through saysWasn't bogus. Supremes just pussed out. .
No it wasn't a valid dispute. However one state chooses its Electors does not effect how another does. Period.
Only if PA's process somehow messed with Texas' process in choosing its Electors would there be a case. Texas didn't even try to argue that.
Who cares what a bunch of so-called lawyers posting bullshit have to say about it? If they are lawyers they should be disbarred if you ask me.
just_passing_through saysThe supremes were setup to be the trail court in disputes between states and this was a valid dispute.
No dispute.
EXACTLY. You win the kewpie doll!
just_passing_through saysSome states didn't do this. Therefore standing.
No. That isn't how standing works.
"Yes, we'll do what this constitution thingy says Yes, we agree. This is required for the union. Some states didn't do this. Therefore standing"
No. First, show me in the fucking Constitution where it says that POTUS is to be elected in a fraud-free election by voters. Show me. Hell, show me where it shows that elections are required determine who the Electors are at all...then get to the 'fraud free part'.
Good luck with that!
Show me where Texas was impaired to exercise how its Electors are chosen. Show me where PA interfered in the process that Texas set up to that and its implementation.
And no...no state has the right to have things go 'their way' in another state's selection process (no matter what it is). Things 'not going your way' does co...
TrumpingTits saysEXACTLY. You win the kewpie doll!
Reminds me I need to order some more kewpie... Just bought a bunch of bubba burgers.
What we're seeing now, instead of a slow cut off, isolation, and unpersoning bit-by-bit, is panic. And that panic must have a cause - exactly what who can say.
« First « Previous Comments 41 - 63 of 63 Search these comments
Stop your whining like a bunch of Libtards. Stop all your posts with the most ridiculous logic I have ever heard (like all the lamest of lame excuses peddled as to justifying Texas had ANY standing to bitch about how the Electors in another state are chosen).
IT IS FUCKING OVER.
Why: Because the Electoral College meets and votes on Monday, kiddies.
That means that thereafter the issue becomes one involving Congress, not the courts. After the EC meets and votes, only Congress in a special joint session chaired by Pence in early January can vote up or down on a state's ballots from the EC. SCOTUS has no say in that. Nor can or will it void any State's EC ballots, either.
The level of denial I've seen here on Patrick.net about all this reminds me of Shrillary supporters back in December of 2016. It is sad .It's embarrassing. It's what Libtards do.
No, seriously. This is EXACTLY what those pussies do.
And for those of you who think I am being an asshole: Too damn bad. You deserve the spanking I am giving you. Take some fucking time to learn a bit about the law and the Constitution as it actually is, not how you dream of it being and insisting that others buy your bullshit about it. <--- THAT is what I meant by what Libtards do.
That means learning what the hell 'STANDING' means in law. It is very, very simple concept, really. That means learning about WHO ACTUALLY ELECTS POTUS and VPOTUS. That is in the Constitution and very clearly spelled out. That means learning when election laws concerning voters apply and do not. That one is a bit more convoluted but can be understood with some study.
Either way, stop being a Libtard.
-- End of Rant --