patrick.net
An Antidote to Corporate Media
1,364,564 comments by 15,736 users - brazil66, clambo, TheAntiPanicanLearingCenter online now
« First « Previous Comments 12 - 16 of 16 Search these comments
12
ignoreme
@
2021 Jan 4, 1:12pm
TrumpingTits says
The December 14 date is just statutory, it’s not in the constitution. If massive fraud were to be proven, a state could invalidate their electors. If enough states were to invalidate then you’d be in a contested election.
This would be easier if the states would invalidate before Jan 6, but even after then, the only date in the constitution is Jan 20.
Of course everything would go to the Supreme Court, but you need states to decertify so there’s something for them to actually decide.
I think Trumps play is to prosecute the secretary of states for certifying an election they know to be fraudulent. This got way easier since the GA dude leaked the confidential call.
Not sure there’s a high chance of this, but I don’t think it’s over.
And it wouldn't change anything for Trump anyway.
The December 14 date is just statutory, it’s not in the constitution. If massive fraud were to be proven, a state could invalidate their electors. If enough states were to invalidate then you’d be in a contested election.
This would be easier if the states would invalidate before Jan 6, but even after then, the only date in the constitution is Jan 20.
Of course everything would go to the Supreme Court, but you need states to decertify so there’s something for them to actually decide.
I think Trumps play is to prosecute the secretary of states for certifying an election they know to be fraudulent. This got way easier since the GA dude leaked the confidential call.
Not sure there’s a high chance of this, but I don’t think it’s over.
13
richwicks
@
2021 Jan 4, 1:36pm
richwicks
@
2021 Jan 4, 1:36pm
ignoreme says
No, but you'd expect people to stop trusting blatantly obvious propaganda. I can basically tell who is a moron when they start sending me propaganda and I spend more time explaining that the propaganda is wrong, than it would take for them to find out that propaganda is wrong.
It's very simple - if you cannot comment on an article or you get censored when you do, you're reading propaganda. This is true WITHOUT EXCEPTION.
It’s so tiring having to read the sources instead of being able to trust the media to properly summarize. This is why the country is so divided. You can’t expect everyone to listen to a one hour phone call to figure out what happened.
No, but you'd expect people to stop trusting blatantly obvious propaganda. I can basically tell who is a moron when they start sending me propaganda and I spend more time explaining that the propaganda is wrong, than it would take for them to find out that propaganda is wrong.
It's very simple - if you cannot comment on an article or you get censored when you do, you're reading propaganda. This is true WITHOUT EXCEPTION.
14
BoomAndBustCycle
@
2021 Jan 4, 1:38pm
ignoreme says
I listened to the full hour last night and it was the rantings of someone who spends all day reading Donald.win, gateway pundit and golfing instead of doing his job as president. If he really wanted answers he should have flown Air Force one down to Fulton county months ago and inspected the polling stations in person.
Have you listened to the full call? I know you haven’t because Trump lays out the fraud in the first minute.
I listened to the full hour last night and it was the rantings of someone who spends all day reading Donald.win, gateway pundit and golfing instead of doing his job as president. If he really wanted answers he should have flown Air Force one down to Fulton county months ago and inspected the polling stations in person.
15
BoomAndBustCycle
@
2021 Jan 4, 1:46pm
ignoreme says
I listened to the hour long call last night ... it was an hour of nothing. 90% of the time Trump was talking about how it’s impossible he lost the election cause of every conspiracy theory you read daily on gateway pundit... without any new info.
The first 12 minutes is Trump saying THEY SAID 100 times about everything that’s come up on this site about election fraud. He might even read Pat.net to get this information.
You can’t expect everyone to listen to a one hour phone call to figure out what happened.
I listened to the hour long call last night ... it was an hour of nothing. 90% of the time Trump was talking about how it’s impossible he lost the election cause of every conspiracy theory you read daily on gateway pundit... without any new info.
The first 12 minutes is Trump saying THEY SAID 100 times about everything that’s come up on this site about election fraud. He might even read Pat.net to get this information.
16
Automan Empire
@
2021 Jan 4, 2:01pm
Automan Empire
@
2021 Jan 4, 2:01pm
Patrick says
Was trying to get ahead of people who sidetrack or bunt the debate by attacking the specific source that was linked while ignoring the facts and merits of the matter at hand. You went full meta and attacked Google while ignoring the facts and merits of the matter at hand.
You mean "choose a source from the ones that Google carefully selected
Was trying to get ahead of people who sidetrack or bunt the debate by attacking the specific source that was linked while ignoring the facts and merits of the matter at hand. You went full meta and attacked Google while ignoring the facts and merits of the matter at hand.
« First « Previous Comments 12 - 16 of 16 Search these comments
https://www.google.com/search?q=trump+phone (Choose a source you like for the story)
At what point does a diehard Trump supporter realize they've been operating within a Narcissist's frame and not making rational observations and decisions?