patrick.net

You have probably not failed to notice the incessant recital of the phrase “our democracy” by Democratic Party field marshals starting with “Joe Biden” in the final months of his, uh, late performance. “Our democracy” has nothing to do, really, with citizen participation in governance. The phrase is a cover for their desperate power-seeking — for instance, the “nomination” of Kamala Harris with zero democratic voting procedure — in the service of preserving a vast empire of rackets that siphon taxpayer dollars into multitudinous NGOs and countless government programs that provide jobs and free stuff to an ever-growing class of parasitic dependents in the party’s thrall. ...

Meanwhile, the emerging scandal around the “Arctic Frost” scheme executed under “Joe Biden’s” DOJ to harass and persecute his admin’s political adversaries, takes shape as “worse than Watergate,” in the words of Senate Judiciary Committee chair Charles Grassley. Fresh evidence about this nefarious activity only reinforces the developing seditious conspiracy case that will be prosecuted out of the Southern District of Florida encompassing the entirety of treasonous acts from RussiaGate forward amounting to a long-running coup that never did manage to succeed, no matter how they keep at it.

You know the names of most of the major players involved, and ever more members of the supporting cast, lodged in the Deep State, are being revealed daily.

ELON TO JOE ROGAN: “THE LEFT CAN’T EVEN SEE THE CENTER WITH A TELESCOPE"

"I think I’m a centrist. But from the perspective of someone on the far left, we look right-wing.

Have you seen those videos people post online where they take a speech from Obama or Hillary and interview people on a college campus, asking, 'What do you think of this speech by Trump?'

And they’re like, 'Oh, I hate it. He’s a racist bigot.'

And then it’s like 'just kidding, that was Obama.'

No, actually, that was Obama or Hillary.

To your point, the left has gone so far left that they can’t even see the center with a telescope."

Yesterday, the New York Times ran a widely covered story under the dramatic headline, “Lawmakers Suggest Follow-Up Boat Strike Could Be a War Crime.” War crimes! Already! The sub-headline sneered, “Top Republicans have joined Democrats in demanding answers about the escalating military campaign the Trump administration says is aimed at targeting drug traffickers.”

The ‘controversy’ —if there is any— arose after an anonymous whistleblower (sound familiar?) told the Washington Post that Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth had ordered a “double strike” on a narco-terrorist boat. A first strike had disabled the decidedly non-fishing boat, and the second strike made sure that the boat and the terrorists on board were completely destroyed. ...

Democrats (and a few wobbly Republicans) are howling like wolves whose zookeeper has missed two consecutive feedings in a row. But how quickly they forget. Behold this headline from twelve years ago in 2013, under Obama, from the BBC:

Drones kill rescuers in 'double tap', say activists
22 October 2013

Here’s what sneaky Obama was getting up to: The military (or CIA) would launch a missile at a wedding or funeral where a terrorist was suspected of showing up. Then they would wait ten or fifteen minutes, and send a second missile, to kill all the rescuers and first responders who rushed in, hoping to capture a few more bad guys.

Needless to say, all this double-tapping caused an unpleasant degree of collateral damage. And I will give you one guess what Democrats said about Obama’s double-tapping at the time.

Nothing, that’s what. They were fine with it. They never demanded evidence, called for hearings, or threatened any war crimes investigations.

“President Obama,” the UK Times reported at the time, “claimed that the drone campaign in Pakistan was a ‘targeted, focused effort’ that ‘has not caused a huge number of civilian casualties.’” You can’t make an omelet without breaking a few Pakistani firemen.

Plus, it all depends on what you mean by huge numbers of casualties. “Research by the Bureau,” the UK Times continued, “has found that since Obama took office three years ago, between 282 and 535 civilians have been credibly reported as killed— including more than 60 children.” Remember, those figures were only as of April, 2012. Obama kept it up for years longer.

That’s not even counting double-tapped terrorists. Those figures just reflect the bloody tally of peaceable civilians. Now —I’m just saying— but under Trump, we’ve killed zero civilians and even fewer children. So.

We wonder whether, in 2012, Democrats demanded investigations into Obama for war crimes? Nope. No, they didn’t. Democrats defended Obama’s strikes and double taps. No less a rotten apple than John Brennan, then Obama’s ‘counterterrorism advisor’, claimed that killing terrorists was legal anywhere, anytime...

In other words, to the extent any legal ambiguity actually exists, that ambiguity was created by Congress. And Congress lets it continue, on purpose. Nor did they get particularly wound up when Obama was killing hundreds of kids and first responders as unfortunate collateral damage in double-taps.

So I really don’t care what they think about whatever Pete Hegseth said or didn’t say.

Somewhere in hell, Saddam Hussein must be laughing ruefully. Yesterday, NPR ran an angry story headlined, “Trump designates street fentanyl as WMD, escalating militarization of drug war.”

Okay, I must pause right here to get something off my chest. And it’s not an alien face-hugger. Instead, I am getting very cranky about corporate media hypocritically calling it a drug war for 55 long years, but now suddenly complaining about “militarization” of the “war.”

What do these nincompoops think a war is? Who “militarized” it by calling it a “war” in the first place?

Seriously. It was reporters. The term was coined by the Chicago Tribune, after President Nixon in 1971 called drug abuse “public enemy number one” and promised an “all-out offensive.” (Nixon should have been looking for different enemies number one, but that’s another story.) Media manufactured the “war on drugs” label, repeated it approximately six trillion times over five decades, and now they want to whine about Trump militarizing drug policy? ...

But— is it WMD? Undoubtedly, fentanyl can cause mass destruction. It has been aerosolized and used in mass-casualty attacks before (outside the US). The hangup seems to be over whether an illegal drug can be considered a weapon or not. It seems odd to me that the same people quibbling over this definition happily expanded the word “vaccine” to include experimental mRNA gene treatments that don’t prevent infections, but whatever. ...

Trump’s EO clearly, specifically, and very precisely requires the Secretaries of the Treasury and War to “pursue appropriate actions.” In other words, Trump’s team has some kind of a plan. But they’re not warning the cartels what it is yet. The media will never forgive how unfair President Trump is being by not advertising his next moves to cartel chiefs.