patrick.net

https://twitter.com/amuse/status/1749086718345486752

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2024/01/gig-is-up-exclusive-local-reporter-describes-election/

In June 2023, the Federal District Court for the Northern District of Georgia unsealed the 96-page Halderman Report – the Security Analysis of Georgia’s ImageCast X Ballot Marking Devices.

Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger had been hiding this report from the public for two years.

University of Michigan Professor of Computer Science and Engineering J. Alex Halderman and Security Researcher and Assistant Professor at Auburn University Drew Sringall collaborated on the report where they discovered many exploitable vulnerabilities in the Dominion Voting Systems’ ImageCast X system.

Far-left Judge Amy Totenberg sealed and covered up the results of the investigation of Dominion voting machines in Georgia and sat on the report until this week.

The report confirmed that votes can be altered in the Dominion voting machines. In fact, the report revealed that the Dominion software is vulnerable and can be hacked.

https://twitter.com/America1stLegal/status/1749509703577530503

https://vidmaxviral.com/video/222174-tell-us-you-stole-the-election-without-telling-us-you-stole-the-election

Benny Johnson asks: WHEN in American election history have all 5 swing states simultaneously STOPPED counting ballots on election night?

Is there any explanation for this other than centrally organized fraud?

https://www.wnd.com/2024/01/knew-exactly-texas-ag-explains-dems-stole-2020-election/

Tucker Carlson: They stopped counting votes on election night.

Ken Paxton: Because what they needed to figure out was how many real votes there were so they could figure out how many mail in ballots to apply to the election. That’s what they would have done in Texas, I’m convinced.

Tucker Carlson: So you think that was fraud, right?

Ken Paxton: I have no doubt, having been through that whole process.

Tucker Carlson: It wasn’t just a water leak.

Ken Paxton: It was definitely planned. I mean, it would have happened in Texas, I promise.

Tucker Carlson: But can you just stop counting ballots on election night whenever you’re watching tv? Oh, I know.

Ken Paxton: Have you ever seen that before? Ever? For three?

Tucker Carlson: Well, you tell me. You’re the one…

Ken Paxton: I’ve never seen it before in my life. I was like, I knew it when they stopped and Trump is leading in all these states. I knew exactly what they were doing. Because there’s no way to know where those mail in ballots came. Anybody could have filled them out. Anybody. There’s no way to know where those ballots came from.

Tucker Carlson: That’s not a dangerous conspiracy theory.

Ken Paxton: I watched it happen.

https://twitter.com/bennyjohnson/status/1749439952843161744

Patrick says

Ken Paxton: I’ve never seen it before in my life. I was like, I knew it when they stopped and Trump is leading in all these states. I knew exactly what they were doing. Because there’s no way to know where those mail in ballots came. Anybody could have filled them out. Anybody. There’s no way to know where those ballots came from.

Two things I remember Trump distinctly saying. I stayed up on election night because I was basically alarmed. Somebody asked Trump on live TV when everybody was getting ready to turn in about how he felt being ahead, and would he go to sleep feeling that he had the election. Trump stated outright that the voting would be stopped at 3AM (the devil's hour) and that the trucks stuffed with ballots would be pulling up at the polling stations. He KNEW the election was going to be defrauded and just plain stated it.

The other thing I remember Trump saying when the 'Chinese scare' started over the Covid fraud disease (the Chinese were happy to kill a lot of their own citizens with 5G to start the Covid scare), I heard Trump say very succinctly that Covid was a psyop. He knew absolutely that Covid was a massive fraud from the get go. He knew all their plans and what they were doing, and whatever strategy he had, he let them do it.

Thanks so much for the education, President Trump, you flogged it into us.

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2024/01/bridgeport-democrat-mayor-wins-race-after-his-associate/

Bridgeport Democrat Mayor Wins Race After His Associate Is Caught Stuffing the Local Ballot Drop Boxes with Bags of Ballots

Mayor Joe Ganim won another victory on Tuesday in the Bridgeport, Connecticut special election for the Democratic primary for mayor. Ganim quickly claimed victory after winning the in-person tally by 274 votes.

In November a local judge overturned the initial primary election after Wanda Geter-Pataky, the Vice Chairwoman of the Democratic Town Clerk and a vocal supporter of incumbent Mayor Joe Ganim, was caught on video stuffing the ballot drop boxes with dozens if not hundreds of absentee ballots.

So Mayor Ganim won again on Tuesday against John Gomes in the Democrat primary.




The Gomes campaign was able to identify the woman in the footage as Wanda Geter-Pataky, the Vice Chairwoman of the Democratic Town Clerk and a vocal supporter of incumbent Mayor Joe Ganim, who is seeking reelection. Gomes’ campaign claims that the video shows Geter-Pataky dropping off stacks of absentee ballots ahead of the September 12th primary.

“Video surveillance proving that the mayoral election was unequivocally stolen through corruption within City Hall by tampering with absentee ballots,” John Gomes said on his Facebook page.

“This is an undeniable act of voter suppression and a huge civil rights violation. It’s time to restore lasting credibility to our city’s democracy. Once and for ALL. Enough is enough!” he added.

https://twitter.com/CollinRugg/status/1749893378165391480

Get this and more charts here from:
https://peternavarro.com/the-navarro-report/

Who got 4 months in jail from the Commies.

https://www.racket.news/p/is-the-electoral-fix-already-in

https://twitter.com/TexasLindsay/status/1750427983448256552

https://slaynews.com/news/federal-bureaucrats-censored-public-concerns-mail-in-ballots-2020-election-docs-show/

Federal Bureaucrats Censored Public Concerns over Mail-In Ballots during 2020 Election, Docs Show

Unelected federal bureaucrats censored the concerns of the American people regarding the use of mail-in ballots during the 2020 election, newly obtained documents have revealed.

Public concerns about the election were censored by the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA).

According to the newly released docs, CISA officials knew it was wrong to censor Americans voicing legitimate concerns but they did it anyway.

A tranche of documents was published by America First Legal (AFL) on Monday.

The docs alleged the Department of Homeland Security’s (DHS) CISA was aware ahead of the 2020 election that mail-in ballots were less secure than in-person voting.

They knew that mail-in votes carried a risk of voter fraud but sought to cover up this information and smear and suppress those who, accurately, suggested in-person voting was safer, AFL’s vice president and general counsel Gene Hamilton revealed.

As part of the campaign, the CISA undertook an “unprecedented censorship campaign to mislead the American people about the truth,” according to Hamilton.

“Common sense dictates that ballots submitted via mail are inherently less secure than verified, in-person voting by a citizen who shows identification before casting his or her ballot,” Hamilton said in a press release.

“The American people were lied to, and there must be accountability.”

https://twitter.com/Real_RobN/status/1750910941208907886

Harpy: A lying liar who lies, is lying again!



https://twitter.com/liz_churchill10/status/1751506524860551321

Patrick says

Not if they steal.it.

"...there are two ways to run [as a candidate] either without an opponent or scared." Kamala


original link

UkraineIsFucked says

Patrick says

Not if they steal.it.

Yeah, they're going to steal it, again.

WisOpinion.com.

On Friday, Green Bay Election Observer Janet Angus won an important battle in the fight for transparent elections. A Brown County Circuit Court Judge ruled in Angus’ favor over the City of Green Bay, who had retaliated against her. This case stems from Green Bay City Clerk Celestine Jeffreys accepting multiple absentee ballots on election day in Spring 2022. Janet Angus bravely challenged this illegal acceptance, was rebuffed by the City Clerk, and then had the City of Green Bay try to intimidate her. Janet Angus’ court victory on Friday is a significant win for election integrity.

Wisconsin law (Wis. Stat. 7.41(1)) states that election observers have a right to “be present at any polling place, in the office of any municipal clerk whose office is located in a public building on any day that absentee ballots may be cast in that office.” Yet when Janet Angus followed this law in the April 2022 Spring Election, she was charged with disorderly conduct for pointing out that Clerk Jeffreys was not following Wisconsin law in accepting multiple absentee ballots from voters. Angus was not engaging in any disruptive behavior, interfering with voting, or intimidating anyone. When she saw wrongdoing, she went to the City Clerk, which is what you are supposed to do. Angus did this in a conversational tone of voice, keeping her voice down so as not to cause a disturbance. She asked if the Clerk had accepted 2 ballots and the Clerk admitted she had. Janet Angus then objected and challenged the Clerk for taking the two ballots in violation of Wisconsin law (Wis. Stat. 6.87 (4)(b)(1) says the absentee envelope is to be delivered in person to the municipal clerk). Janet Angus also filed a complaint with the Wisconsin Elections Commission for Clerk Jeffries breaking the law.

About 3 months later, the City of Green Bay charged Janet Angus with municipal disorderly conduct. Rather than address the issue the day the supposed incident occurred, the court transcript reveals that this investigation began weeks later after a city official reached out to the police department.

https://www.wispolitics.com/2024/matt-batzel-big-win-for-election-integrity-in-green-bay/

Patrick says

There are no fake ballots when they rig the elections.

They are real, printed ballots. Adding a watermark on them won't do shit.

You are forgetting the #1 force behind the fraud, which for some reason most do not want to discuss, is niggers. When was the last time you found a nigger that could comprehend a watermark or how it works. I am not ignorant of their coaches, but... despite the best efforts this will be a smoking gun because... well, you know.

UkraineIsFucked says

They are real, printed ballots. Adding a watermark on them won't do shit.

Correct, especially when the tallies are changed by Dominion anyway. If they wanted to take the fraud out, they would do what virtually every other Western country does and have voter ID with paper ballots counted at each polling station under supervision of competing parties.

https://slaynews.com/news/oregon-supreme-court-bans-10-gop-state-senators-seeking-re-election/

Oregon Supreme Court Bans 10 GOP State Senators from Seeking Re-Election

The Supreme Court of Oregon has banned ten Republican state senators from seeking re-election.

Fox News reports that the court’s members blocked the GOP lawmakers by accusing them of violating state rules.

It is, perhaps, not irrelevant that the court is dominated by leftist judges.

Banning the opposition party is also a form of election fraud.

original link

https://babylonbee.com/cleanArticle/study-finds-people-who-screamed-about-russia-for-last-4-years-have-100-chance-of-now-believing-elections-are-foolproof

https://babylonbee.com/cleanArticle/study-finds-people-who-screamed-about-russia-for-last-4-years-have-100-chance-of-now-believing-elections-are-foolproof

https://www.theblaze.com/columns/opinion/trump-likely-won-the-2020-election-after-all

In 2020, Biden won each of the six swing states by fewer than 20,000 votes, a tiny margin in the context of the overall vote.

But here’s the rub: When we extrapolated for mail-in voter fraud in the six crucial swing states, using state-specific mail-in voter data and accounting for a variety of fraud rates (from the 28% level all the way down to the 1% level), the Electoral College vote changed considerably.

In almost all the hypothetical scenarios we lay out, Trump would have won enough Electoral College votes to defeat Biden soundly. In other words, Biden’s Electoral College victory, although seemingly large, was predicated on razor-thin margins in all six of the swing states.

We know for a fact that each of the six swing states changed its election rules in the months leading up to the 2020 election to allow for mass mail-in voting based on inaccurate state voter registration rolls. We also know that several of these states made it easy for mail-in voting fraud to be committed by eliminating common-sense guardrails like signature verification and permitting shady election practices to take place like ballot harvesting.