patrick.net

Maricopa County Spokesperson Admits 20,000 ‘Late’ Ballots Were Scanned Before Verification; Expert Says Likely a Crime

IV3 Newsletter | June 2022

Hi, I’m Cole Hughes, True the Vote’s Executive Director.

We are grateful to all of you for signing up for IV3 and joining us as we continue to build out the app, establish best practices, grow an unstoppable grassroots movement, and work towards clean voter rolls and election integrity across the country!

Going forward, we’ll use the IV3 newsletter to keep you in the loop on important IV3 updates and feature releases, new state additions, and other relevant news.

You may have noticed that Facebook and Instagram are banning or limiting TTV and IV3 content, so in addition to the newsletter we’ve started a True the Vote Locals community where we’ll share additional IV3 information. Be sure to check Locals for special live events, to participate in Q&As, and to connect with like minded citizens from around the country. We are really excited about the future of IV3 and the community that is growing with us!

For today, I want to quickly cover where we are with the IV3 program and what you can look forward to over the weeks and months ahead – including submitting challenges to your counties.

First, we’ve learned some tough lessons. We realized when we set out to build a web-based app that enables citizens to review and report on their local voter rolls, we were doing something that had never been done before and we would likely encounter, well, challenges along the way. We’ve found that building a scalable app and national program designed to be compliant with both state and federal laws and local processes is extremely difficult. Not impossible, but definitely difficult.

For example, Ohio issued an opinion that NCOA alone is insufficient to grant a challenge, so we had to alter our process to accommodate the inclusion of additional data points. Texas may require a signed statement from each challenger, so we had to build out a workflow to support that requirement. County officials in many states have declined to give us direct answers on how we can best facilitate challenges in their counties, so we've had to ask repeatedly. It has been an uphill battle, but we are figuring it out!

Second, we're adding functionality slowly but surely. Many of you signed up some months ago, but we've yet to add your state's voter roll data. Or maybe we have your state data, but only have a residency query for your review. Please keep the faith! Our plans are to continue to expand and enhance the platform. At scale, we expect to support all state rolls, include a variety of queries, and be open to citizens and government workers alike.

A few basics. In order to challenge an ineligible voter record, the challenger must also be a registered voter in the same county as the voter record they are challenging. When you complete a challenge in IV3, that challenge is not automatically sent to your county. Our team is working county by county to determine the best method of submitting challenges in our active states, according to each state’s laws and county processes.

When we submit challenges, the county receives the challenger’s name and identifying information, the record(s) being challenged, and the reason for challenge. Your local elections administrators and boards will follow their established processes for reviewing challenges and determining how they will proceed. This may include a public meeting and vote on whether to take up the challenges.

As we kick off challenge deliveries we’ll email you, push notifications to IV3, and post content on truethevote.org and True the Vote Locals. It’ll be important to watch for any communication from us or your local elections board and to monitor the board’s announcements and public meeting agendas for mentions of challenges or other references to voter rolls.

Looking ahead, the federal National Voter Registration Act (NVRA) prohibits voter roll maintenance within 90 days of a federal election, so our goal is to complete submissions and wrap up the majority of our Midterm work by Friday, August 5th. After the 5th, we’re going to take IV3 offline for a few months, while we expand coverage and functionality. Planned additions and features include:

adding more state data
adding more queries for identifying records to be reviewed
gamification features
automations to improve efficiency and performance.

The last (for now!) big addition coming to IV3 after the Midterms are TTV Sentinels, our IV3 Field Team!

Sentinels will be in a position to help you with questions, they’ll oversee organizing at the state and local level, and track laws and rules impacting elections and processes in your state.

I am excited for the future of IV3, and I am honored to be on this journey with each of you.

On behalf of our entire team of developers and staff, thank you!

Onward!

Cole Hughes
Executive Director
True the Vote

Charles Barron said there’s been a decades-long history of improper politicalization of poll workers.

He said some district leaders require poll workers to join the local Democratic club — and pay membership dues — or volunteer to collect petition signatures for county-backed candidates in order to be considered for election site work.

Biden and the uniparty must have plans to steal the 2022 mid-terms. There is no way they can win legitimately. Why wouldn’t they steal the election? They got away with the 2020 Election steal with the only arrests related to those who protested the steal. To think they won’t steal the next election would be ignorant.

Republicans in Texas have passed a resolution to officially declare that Democrat President Joe Biden was “not legitimately elected.”

The resolution also states that “substantial” election fraud, in favor of Biden, influenced the results of the 2020 presidential election in key metropolitan areas.

“We believe that the 2020 election violated Article 1 and 2 of the US Constitution, that various secretaries of state illegally circumvented their state legislatures in conducting their elections in multiple ways, including by allowing ballots to be received after November 3, 2020,” states the resolution.

Democrat President Joe Biden has warned that “there’s going to be another pandemic” while telling reporters that his administration needs more money to prepare.

Biden issued the warning during a press conference where he assured reporters that “the second pandemic” is coming.

However, as many have pointed out, “another pandemic” would bring major disruption to the November midterm elections.

In 2020, Democrats used the COVID-19 pandemic to push changes to voting processes that included the widespread use of controversial mail-in ballots.

https://slaynews.com/news/biden-theres-going-to-be-another-pandemic-midterms-loom/

Democrat President Joe Biden has warned that “there’s going to be another pandemic” while telling reporters that his administration needs more money to prepare.

Biden issued the warning during a press conference where he assured reporters that “the second pandemic” is coming.

However, as many have pointed out, “another pandemic” would bring major disruption to the November midterm elections.

In 2020, Democrats used the COVID-19 pandemic to push changes to voting processes that included the widespread use of controversial mail-in ballots.

They're going to need even more massive fraud to overcome the red wave this time. Sounds like they're already working on it.

They're going to need even more massive fraud to overcome the red wave this time. Sounds like they're already working on it.

Wisconsin's conservative-led Supreme Court ruled Friday that absentee voter drop boxes are illegal under the state's constitution.

I know why Seth Rich had to die. There were two sets of polling places this primary season–one set for most of the voters, who went on state websites to find their polling locations, and a second set for Hillary Clinton supporters who looked on Hillary Clinton’s website to find their polling location.
The Secretary of State for each state had one set of locations on the record; the other set of locations, the ones listed on Hillary’s website, we’re not on the state record. I know this because I looked on her website to find where a friend should vote…then double-checked the state website, which shows a different address. I thought there must be a mistake, but I kept checking, right up to election day.
But until they killed Seth Rich, I couldn’t figure out why there would be two different polling places. This is how I think the scam worked: while most voters looked up their location on their state website, voters who were signed up as Hillary Clinton supporters would be directed to her site to find their polling place.
It was set up the same as any other DNC polling place with DNC volunteers, regular voting machines, etc.
And there was a duplicate voter roster, the same as the roster at the other polling place. Voters would be checked off on the roster, same as at the other polling place. Period.
And after the polls close, the DNC supervisor would pick up the roster and the ballots. The supervisor would then pick up the roster at the legitimate polling place and the ballots there.
He (or she) would then replace a number of Bernie Sanders ballots with an equal number of the ballots from the Hillary Clinton voting location. Then, the duplicate roster from the HRC location would be shredded and thrown away, along with all the Bernie Sanders ballots that had been replaced.
In this way the number of people who voted (on the remaining roster) still matches the number of ballots. This is why so many states reported a “lower than expected voter turnout”.
Seth Rich, who was responsible for the app that helped voters find their polling places, did not realize that there were two sets of polling places until he himself went to vote. He lived in Washington, D.C. which voted at the end of the primary season. A week after Clinton had already been declared the winner.
I believed that he had discovered it then and had started asking questions about why the polling places on Hillary’s website didn’t match the ones on the D.C. website.

On November 4th, 2020, Georgia Showed 100% Reporting and TRUMP WON – Then 250,000 Ballots Were Manufactured and Biden Was Given Win by Raffensperger Days Later – Per VoterGA

Less than two weeks before the Aug. 9 primary election, Racine County Sheriff Christopher Schmaling called on Wisconsin election officials to immediately suspend a major portion of the state-run absentee ballot program. He also requested an immediate statewide investigation based on an alleged serious threat to voter integrity.

In a posting on social media, the Sheriff’s Office said it was acting in response to citizen complaints that reported “apparent vulnerabilities to fraudulent voting within the state’s website MyVote Wisconsin.”

MyVote Wisconsin is an official online elections administration and information website.

The Sheriff’s Office stated citizens have reported that “With only a person’s name and date of birth, anyone can request another person’s ballot and have the ballot sent to any address entered. No identification is needed, and the requester can make a declaration of being indefinitely confined, thus, for the current and future elections, the requester will be sent someone else’s ballot at the different address.”

Arizona Patriots Hold Drop Box Tailgate Parties to Protect Free and Fair Elections

In an effort to prevent fraudulent activity in the upcoming primaries across the nation, individuals are holding drop box tailgate parties. The patriots are watching over the drop boxes . They are preventing mules from stealing the election this time around.

“If elections are conducted outside of the law, the people have not conferred their consent on the government. Such elections are unlawful, and their results are illegitimate.” — Justice Rebecca Grassl Bradley, writing for the Wisconsin Supreme Court majority in Teigen v. Wisconsin Elections Commission

Acourt of law has finally confirmed it: The 2020 election was “illegitimate.” And all the demands for sufficient evidence of voter fraud to reverse the outcome were a red herring.

The truly dispositive factor, as stated by a Republican Wisconsin state legislator in a March hearing and affirmed in the opinion: “If a vote is cast in an illegal process, it’s an illegal vote!”

The reasons for legislatively enacted absentee ballot protections are clear. Justice Bradley quotes the Wisconsin Legislature’s rationale: “(P)revent the potential for fraud or abuse … overzealous solicitation of absent electors who may prefer not to participate in an election … undue influence on an absent elector … or other similar abuses.”

And that’s exactly what unlawfully relaxed provisions occasioned in Wisconsin:

Nearly 3,600 trips by 138 “mules” to drop boxes to traffic 137,551 votes. (Trump lost the state by about 20,000.)
Illegal assistance with absentee ballots by nursing home staff to residents, some with dementia.
“Zuckerbucks” exploiting these changes to “purchase Joe Biden an additional 65,222 votes, without which Donald Trump would have won the state by 44,540 votes.”
But again, per Wisconsin’s Supremes, Donald Trump didn’t have to prove the existence or extent of fraud, only deviation from legislative schemes. Because – nota bene! – the votes’ unlawful nature is the proof.

The same “pollution” of the “integrity of the results,” as the Court expressed it, occurred in:

Michigan: Unlawfully imposed rules for validating absentee signatures and a refusal to comply with an enactment allowing access to drop-box video surveillance.

Georgia: The Stacey Abrams settlement that, as a U.S. Supreme Court amicus curiae brief demonstrated, ran afoul of schemes regulating – what else? – drop boxes and signature identification.

Pennsylvania: A state Supreme Court decree involving absentee deadlines that, per U.S. Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito, “squarely alter(ed) an important statutory provision enacted by the Pennsylvania Legislature.”

As Texas and 17 other states argued in a petition to the U.S. Supreme Court, these jurisdictions’ “significant and unconstitutional irregularities … cumulatively preclude(d) knowing who legitimately won the 2020 election.”