patrick.net

Democrat President Joe Biden has warned that “there’s going to be another pandemic” while telling reporters that his administration needs more money to prepare.

Biden issued the warning during a press conference where he assured reporters that “the second pandemic” is coming.

However, as many have pointed out, “another pandemic” would bring major disruption to the November midterm elections.

In 2020, Democrats used the COVID-19 pandemic to push changes to voting processes that included the widespread use of controversial mail-in ballots.

https://slaynews.com/news/biden-theres-going-to-be-another-pandemic-midterms-loom/

Democrat President Joe Biden has warned that “there’s going to be another pandemic” while telling reporters that his administration needs more money to prepare.

Biden issued the warning during a press conference where he assured reporters that “the second pandemic” is coming.

However, as many have pointed out, “another pandemic” would bring major disruption to the November midterm elections.

In 2020, Democrats used the COVID-19 pandemic to push changes to voting processes that included the widespread use of controversial mail-in ballots.

They're going to need even more massive fraud to overcome the red wave this time. Sounds like they're already working on it.

They're going to need even more massive fraud to overcome the red wave this time. Sounds like they're already working on it.

Wisconsin's conservative-led Supreme Court ruled Friday that absentee voter drop boxes are illegal under the state's constitution.

I know why Seth Rich had to die. There were two sets of polling places this primary season–one set for most of the voters, who went on state websites to find their polling locations, and a second set for Hillary Clinton supporters who looked on Hillary Clinton’s website to find their polling location.
The Secretary of State for each state had one set of locations on the record; the other set of locations, the ones listed on Hillary’s website, we’re not on the state record. I know this because I looked on her website to find where a friend should vote…then double-checked the state website, which shows a different address. I thought there must be a mistake, but I kept checking, right up to election day.
But until they killed Seth Rich, I couldn’t figure out why there would be two different polling places. This is how I think the scam worked: while most voters looked up their location on their state website, voters who were signed up as Hillary Clinton supporters would be directed to her site to find their polling place.
It was set up the same as any other DNC polling place with DNC volunteers, regular voting machines, etc.
And there was a duplicate voter roster, the same as the roster at the other polling place. Voters would be checked off on the roster, same as at the other polling place. Period.
And after the polls close, the DNC supervisor would pick up the roster and the ballots. The supervisor would then pick up the roster at the legitimate polling place and the ballots there.
He (or she) would then replace a number of Bernie Sanders ballots with an equal number of the ballots from the Hillary Clinton voting location. Then, the duplicate roster from the HRC location would be shredded and thrown away, along with all the Bernie Sanders ballots that had been replaced.
In this way the number of people who voted (on the remaining roster) still matches the number of ballots. This is why so many states reported a “lower than expected voter turnout”.
Seth Rich, who was responsible for the app that helped voters find their polling places, did not realize that there were two sets of polling places until he himself went to vote. He lived in Washington, D.C. which voted at the end of the primary season. A week after Clinton had already been declared the winner.
I believed that he had discovered it then and had started asking questions about why the polling places on Hillary’s website didn’t match the ones on the D.C. website.

On November 4th, 2020, Georgia Showed 100% Reporting and TRUMP WON – Then 250,000 Ballots Were Manufactured and Biden Was Given Win by Raffensperger Days Later – Per VoterGA

Less than two weeks before the Aug. 9 primary election, Racine County Sheriff Christopher Schmaling called on Wisconsin election officials to immediately suspend a major portion of the state-run absentee ballot program. He also requested an immediate statewide investigation based on an alleged serious threat to voter integrity.

In a posting on social media, the Sheriff’s Office said it was acting in response to citizen complaints that reported “apparent vulnerabilities to fraudulent voting within the state’s website MyVote Wisconsin.”

MyVote Wisconsin is an official online elections administration and information website.

The Sheriff’s Office stated citizens have reported that “With only a person’s name and date of birth, anyone can request another person’s ballot and have the ballot sent to any address entered. No identification is needed, and the requester can make a declaration of being indefinitely confined, thus, for the current and future elections, the requester will be sent someone else’s ballot at the different address.”

Arizona Patriots Hold Drop Box Tailgate Parties to Protect Free and Fair Elections

In an effort to prevent fraudulent activity in the upcoming primaries across the nation, individuals are holding drop box tailgate parties. The patriots are watching over the drop boxes . They are preventing mules from stealing the election this time around.

“If elections are conducted outside of the law, the people have not conferred their consent on the government. Such elections are unlawful, and their results are illegitimate.” — Justice Rebecca Grassl Bradley, writing for the Wisconsin Supreme Court majority in Teigen v. Wisconsin Elections Commission

Acourt of law has finally confirmed it: The 2020 election was “illegitimate.” And all the demands for sufficient evidence of voter fraud to reverse the outcome were a red herring.

The truly dispositive factor, as stated by a Republican Wisconsin state legislator in a March hearing and affirmed in the opinion: “If a vote is cast in an illegal process, it’s an illegal vote!”

The reasons for legislatively enacted absentee ballot protections are clear. Justice Bradley quotes the Wisconsin Legislature’s rationale: “(P)revent the potential for fraud or abuse … overzealous solicitation of absent electors who may prefer not to participate in an election … undue influence on an absent elector … or other similar abuses.”

And that’s exactly what unlawfully relaxed provisions occasioned in Wisconsin:

Nearly 3,600 trips by 138 “mules” to drop boxes to traffic 137,551 votes. (Trump lost the state by about 20,000.)
Illegal assistance with absentee ballots by nursing home staff to residents, some with dementia.
“Zuckerbucks” exploiting these changes to “purchase Joe Biden an additional 65,222 votes, without which Donald Trump would have won the state by 44,540 votes.”
But again, per Wisconsin’s Supremes, Donald Trump didn’t have to prove the existence or extent of fraud, only deviation from legislative schemes. Because – nota bene! – the votes’ unlawful nature is the proof.

The same “pollution” of the “integrity of the results,” as the Court expressed it, occurred in:

Michigan: Unlawfully imposed rules for validating absentee signatures and a refusal to comply with an enactment allowing access to drop-box video surveillance.

Georgia: The Stacey Abrams settlement that, as a U.S. Supreme Court amicus curiae brief demonstrated, ran afoul of schemes regulating – what else? – drop boxes and signature identification.

Pennsylvania: A state Supreme Court decree involving absentee deadlines that, per U.S. Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito, “squarely alter(ed) an important statutory provision enacted by the Pennsylvania Legislature.”

As Texas and 17 other states argued in a petition to the U.S. Supreme Court, these jurisdictions’ “significant and unconstitutional irregularities … cumulatively preclude(d) knowing who legitimately won the 2020 election.”

For those who did not stay up late last night, gubernatorial candidate Kari Lake was down by 10 points when the polls were closing. All the sudden she stormed back to take the lead as the votes started coming in. Meaning the the mail-in votes were heavily in favor of her opponent, establishment Republican Karrin Taylor Robson. While the day-of votes were heavily in favor of Kari Lake.

This gives serious validity to the reality that mail-in ballots are being manipulated. More proof that mail-in ballots consistently favor Trump’s opponents, when mathematically the mail-in ballots should be representative of the day-of votes. Giving more validity to the reality that the Dems don’t like lockdowns for scientific reasons, but rather for political ones. Thus giving more validity to the reality that the Dems are creating biological weapons to justify these lockdowns. It all ties together.

This is why the Left and their subservient media are so hostile towards the Trump backed candidates, specifically in AZ. All of them are openly criticizing the results of the 2020 election due to the incontrovertible evidence of fraud.

Cari Kelemen 2.0
@CariKelemen
Aug 3
Kari Lake won 70% of Election Day votes.

Early Voting allows cheaters the time to manufacture the votes they need to win, but when voters show up en masse in person on Election Day, like they did for Trump in 2016, the cheaters run out of time.

Remember this in November!
Aug 3, 2022 · 2:12 PM UTC

Maricopa County Announced They Have Updated Results Then Send You to Results Page That Has Not Been Updated for 20 Hours

Maricopa County and the State of Arizona have not updated their primary election results since 2:30 AM in the morning.

They quit counting when Kari Lake pulled ahead.

The Maricopa County elections department tweeted this out at 2:42 AM on Wednesday morning.
They all went home with 20% of the vote left to count.

Voters in Maricopa County Now Reporting Their Votes Were Thrown Out and Didn’t Count ...

It looks like they are trying to steal this election from the Trump-Endorsed candidate for Governor.

And now Republican voters are tweeting out that there vote has been nullified and erased.

John Rhodes tweeted out: Anyone else in Maricopa County having this issue? Says signature for early ballot verified but you can see my vote didn’t count. Dropped of on Election Day at voting location.

Check your ballot: https://elections.maricopa.gov/voting/track-your-ballot.html
CC: @KariLake @charliekirk11 @JackPosobiec

Anyone else in Maricopa County having this issue? Says signature for early ballot verified but you can see my vote didn’t count. Dropped of on Election Day at voting location.
Check your ballot: https://t.co/b9qqAP8ur8 @KariLake @charliekirk11 @JackPosobiec pic.twitter.com/f6TiqVevNE

— John D Rhode (@John_Rhode) August 4, 2022

He was not alone.

Another Twitter user claims his vote did not count and was erased.

yup. and voted in person. pic.twitter.com/zmnh3I6etz

— Wehrme (@wehrme_awake) August 4, 2022

And Maricopa County is only working a few hours a day and only posting results at 7 PM.

This is complete lawlessness once again by the radicals wanting to destroy this country.

The value we place on our citizenship, our nation and the will of its people is reflected in the sentences given to those who practice voter fraud.

Until voter fraud is a capital crime with huge penalties, no one is going to value our citizenship.

Who would risk lethal injection or life in prison to fiddle with voting machines or stuff ballots?
Jane C Conway
6 hours ago

It is a sad fact that virtually NO ONE has been charged and convicted for vote fraud. You cannot convince me that vote fraud has never happened in the entire USA -- but apparently the laws have never been enforced. If such fraud isn't already a felony, it certainly should be.
Alan Stevens
6 hours ago

Lethal injection is wimpy. They need to set up a gallows in the respective state capitol square.

Last night, Arizona estimated there were 16% uncounted ballots remaining - today at 10 am that jumped up to 18% - WTF?
posted 2 hours ago by MrCaveman +207 / -0

Did someone "find" additional ballots? 2% is around 9,000 new ballots

Did You Know the Supreme Court Will Finally Hear a Case This Fall on Election Law — Something They Punted on Back in December 2020?

Texas argued these four states violated the US Constitution because they made changes to voting rules and procedures through the courts or executive actions. But these states did not make the changes through the state legislatures as spelled out in the US Constitution.

At the time Justice Clarence Thomas argued in dissent that the Court failed to provide clear rules for future elections.

Thomas was right. His closing money quote is:

“One wonders what the Court waits for. We failed to settle this dispute before the election, and thus provide clear rules. Now we again fail to provide clear rules for future elections. The decision to leave election law hidden beneath a shroud of doubt is baffling. By doing nothing, we invite further confusion and erosion of voter confidence. Our fellow citizens deserve better and expect more of us. I respectfully dissent,” Thomas wrote on Monday…
…For more than a century, this Court has recognized that the Constitution operates as a limitation upon the State in respect of any attempt to circumscribe the legislative power to regulate federal elections,” he continued, quoting Supreme Court precedent. “Because the Federal Constitution, not state constitutions, gives state legislatures authority to regulate federal elections, petitioners presented a strong argument that the Pennsylvania Supreme Court’s decision violated the Constitution by overriding the clearly expressed intent of the legislature.”
“But elections enable self-governance only when they include processes that give citizens (including the losing candidates and their supporters) confidence in the fairness of the election,” Thomas added, quoting a recent Supreme Court case that held, “Confidence in the integrity of our electoral processes is essential to the functioning of our participatory democracy.”
“Unclear rules threaten to undermine this system. They sow confusion and ultimately dampen confidence in the integrity and fairness of elections,” he explained. “To prevent confusion, we have thus repeatedly — although not as consistently as we should — blocked rule changes made by courts close to an election.”

Most Americans assumed that was the end of the 2020 election legal challenges. But that is not the case. One case will be argued before the US Supreme Court this fall that could change this formula.

The US Constitution’s “Elections Clause,” Article I, Sec. 4 states:

“The Times, Places, and Manner of holding Elections for Senators and Representatives, shall be prescribed in each State by the Legislature thereof; but the Congress may at any time by Law make or alter such Regulations, except as to the Places of choosing Senators.”