patrick.net

ThreeBays says

Karloff says

So if vaxxed people can still transmit, why would they be excluded from mask/distancing requirements?

Because fully vaxxed are 90% less likely to transmit.

Is that the bullshit relative risk reduction statistic, or absolute risk reduction?

ThreeBays says

Karloff says

So if vaxxed people can still transmit, why would they be excluded from mask/distancing requirements?

Because fully vaxxed are 90% less likely to transmit.

People w/o symptoms do not transmit, period.

porkchopexpress says

ThreeBays says

Karloff says

So if vaxxed people can still transmit, why would they be excluded from mask/distancing requirements?

Because fully vaxxed are 90% less likely to transmit.

Is that the bullshit relative risk reduction statistic, or absolute risk reduction?

86% of stats on the Internet are made up.

URGENT WARNING - TEENS EXPERIENCING HEART PROBLEMS AFTER JAB - DR JANE RUBY

It is suspected that the 162 cases of enlarged hearts are only 1% of the actual count.

ThreeBays says

Because fully vaxxed are 90% less likely to transmit.

I'll bite.

How often do the "unvaccinated" transmit if they are not "90% less likely to transmit" ?

Not expecting a cogent answer.

FuckCCP89 says

86% of stats on the Internet are made up.

The stat was 97%! But it was made up.

Over 4200 REPORTED deaths from the jab, and counting.

https://notthebee.com/article/is-lebron-james-an-anti-vaxxer-it-seems-like-lebron-james-is-an-anti-vaxxer

Onvacation says

ThreeBays says

Because fully vaxxed are 90% less likely to transmit.

I'll bite.

How often do the "unvaccinated" transmit if they are not "90% less likely to transmit" ?

Not expecting a cogent answer.

If you're unvaxxed you already have a miniscule chance of contracting covid and then the current R0 is below 1 due to herd immunity, so what are they trying to solve here..

VP of Oracle got vaxxed then died.

https://coronanews123.wordpress.com/2021/05/30/one-third-of-deaths-reported-to-cdc-after-covid-vaccines-occurred-within-48-hours-of-vaccination/

'HOW CAN YOU GIVE THIS TO YOUNG WOMEN IF YOU DON'T KNOW?'

They do know.

Maybe we all misheard and what they said was "follow the seance".

V-safe: phone app to tell CDC if you have any reactions after the vaccine, so they can get ahead of it with lies and gaslighting. Unfortunately, app inventor died of vaccine, so he won't be reporting much any more.

CDC thanks him for his noble service posthumously.

https://www.infowars.com/posts/first-case-of-astrazeneca-vaccine-blood-clotting-recorded-in-south-korea/
First Case of AstraZeneca Vaccine Blood Clotting Recorded in South Korea

ThreeBays says

porkchopexpress says

Is that the bullshit relative risk reduction statistic, or absolute risk reduction?

Relative risk

Figures

This is scary:
https://needtoknow.news/2021/04/document-shows-pfizer-anticipated-that-those-injected-with-mrna-might-transmit-infection-to-those-who-are-non-injected/

A document published by Pfizer during trials of their COVID-19 mRNA shots appears to warn participants against contact with those who are not part of the trial, including pregnant women. It defines SAE (Serious Adverse Event) as an adverse event in someone who received the shot, had skin contact with the contents of the shot, inhaled it, or someone who was exposed to someone who received the mRNA shot. The document lists ‘abnormal pregnancy outcomes’ such as ectopic pregnancy, spontaneous abortion, intrauterine fetal demise, neonatal death, and congenital anomaly as SAEs. It then says that exposure during breastfeeding can occur through inhalation or skin contact. The paper instructs investigators to “report exposure during breastfeeding to Pfizer Safety within 24 hours of the investigator’s awareness, irrespective of whether an SAE has occurred.” -GEG
CORRECTION: We previously referred to SAE as a ‘Secondary Adverse Event’, but Pfizer’s Vaccine Protocol paper defines is as a ‘Serious Adverse Event’. The document still shows that Pfizer knew that direct exposure through the vaccine, called ‘intervention’, exposure of the skin to the contents of the injection, inhalation of the contents, and even contact with a person who received the injection could lead to adverse events, which is significant.

From my understanding the potential of shedding is near zero but if you wanted it to be practically zero you'd want to avoid close contact with a freshly vaccinated person for 24-72 hours. Just don't get vaccinated and don't have your wife/husband/gf/bf or real doll get vaccinated.

ThreeBays says

Is it a bird? Is it a plane? No, it's an inflammatory dis-information

That makes sense.

Onvacation says

ThreeBays says

Is it a bird? Is it a plane? No, it's an inflammatory dis-information

That makes sense.

ThreeBays says

Is it a bird? Is it a plane? No, it's an inflammatory dis-information piece!

Is it? Do you have a source?

porkchopexpress says

Is it? Do you have a source?

Probably not.

The reality is I don't trust my government in the first place. The fact it's not even FDA approved allows me to deny getting vaccinated. And even then I'd wait another year or two after or if it even gets approved. I'll take my risk with getting Covid over a super new vaccine at my age and health.

The funny part is when the FDA doesn't approve the original formulas for the major vaccines for Covid. I could totally see that happening. I don't care if anyone got it, just don't think it was a good decision. There's a reason these things take years and not months. Factor in the time of when it "escaped" and the host country barely had anyone die, with a super high smoking rate seems like complete BS.

China has the 2nd number of domestic flights (traveling within China). No chance it didn't spread to other major Chinese cities. Yet somehow NY has more death than a country of 1.4B people. If that's not odd to you, you're not thinking. Wuhan is the size of NYC let alone the state. The math most certainly doesn't add up with all this.

WookieMan says

The math most certainly doesn't add up with all this.

Right, it never did add up.

"Soon, there will be only 99.7% of us left." as the cartoon says.

And yet there are 50 new "vaccine" billionaires, per Forbes.

And Ivermectin works even better than HCQ, but you're not allowed to have it because then you might cut into vaccine profits.

Patrick says

And yet there are 50 new "vaccine" billionaires, per Forbes.

Their vaccines don't even work. You can still spread it and can still get covid and potentially die from it. You can die from the vaccine itself. What is the net benefit? They keep saying it's 99% effective, but you are 99% unlikely to die if you get Covid. There's no point in getting these vaccines that aren't FDA approved and nobody on the planet understands any possible long term effects 2-5+ years down the road.

The data is provided, the media reports the complete opposite and people just eat the shit up. Why? What's wrong with saying Covid is a joke and we massively overreacted as a society. Shit the entire world. This is indisputable. IL is for the most part is back to full open besides Chicago, though I just saw clips of a recent Cubs game looking pretty packed.

This was all a joke and con to get Trump out. Pretty much 100% convinced at this point. People will argue why the whole world shut down. They were in on it. Maybe a dozen foreign leaders liked Trump. The world wanted him gone because they knew an America first position would fuck their GDP long term. So they took a short term hit to get an American globalist back in office.

WookieMan says

nobody on the planet understands any possible long term effects 2-5+ years down the road

I do.

Let me start w/ the following ...

Autoimmune disorder
Pulmonary dysfunction
Heart disease
Renal problems
etc

And yes, as a net result, the death toll will be a thousand percent of the death tolls due to Covid from 2020 to 2021.

WookieMan says

This was all a joke and con to get Trump out. Pretty much 100% convinced at this point.

I think we're going to find out that Covid is simply a small part of a long plan/game.

Rin says

And yes, as a net result, the death toll will be a thousand percent of the death tolls due to Covid from 2020 to 2021.

It depends on how you count them.

After all, they were going to die anyway.

Rin says

the death toll will be a thousand percent of the death tolls due to Covid from 2020 to 2021.

That would only be 5 million. I fear you underestimate the damage this experimental biologic agent will do.

Rin says

And yes, as a net result, the death toll will be a thousand percent of the death tolls due to Covid from 2020 to 2021.

Could be. I just don't understand if you're healthy and under 50 the purpose of taking it. For me it's more about the mindset of the people that take it. That bothers me the most. They just don't question anything because they're told to trust it. It's fucking weird. Cases and deaths are publicly available to view. 2/3rds of the population won't die from covid without a serious comorbidity or more at all, 0%. Yet there is a chance they could die from the vax or have complications. It's not logical.

Rin says

WookieMan says

nobody on the planet understands any possible long term effects 2-5+ years down the road

I do.

Let me start w/ the following ...

Autoimmune disorder
Pulmonary dysfunction
Heart disease
Renal problems
etc

And yes, as a net result, the death toll will be a thousand percent of the death tolls due to Covid from 2020 to 2021.

3.5 million have died of Covid...supposedly. You're saying 35 million will die of the Vax? IF so, that 35 million will be easily hidden from view/knowledge.

Onvacation says

I fear you underestimate the damage this experimental biologic agent will do.

I suspect that you're right.

WookieMan says

They just don't question anything because they're told to trust it. It's fucking weird. Cases and deaths are publicly available to view. 2/3rds of the population won't die from covid without a serious comorbidity or more at all, 0%. Yet there is a chance they could die from the vax or have complications. It's not logical.

In a word ... Society's Bitch!

When "Society" says jump, their response is "How High?"

When the WineHorror1 says

You're saying 35 million will die of the Vax? IF so, that 35 million will be easily hidden from view/knowledge.

It will be blamed on a new variant.

They were going to die anyway.

WookieMan says

This was all a joke and con to get Trump out.

It was certainly a con to get Trump out, but also a very profitable con for certain people (though devastating for the middle class, especially small shop and restaurant owners).

Win-win, from the point of view of Gates and Bezos. Got Trump out so the half-trillion in annual Chinese imports is unimpeded, and they got much much richer too!

Someday the people are going to hang them for this. But Fauci should go first, as the actual funder and inventor of the virus.

Great interview with Dr. McCullough on how he went from pro-covid-vaxx to anti.

https://thehighwire.com/videos/pro-vax-doc-i-can-no-longer-recommend-the-vaccine-to-any-individual/

One of my doofus brother in laws got vaxxed. Whole family told him not to, but his doctor pressured him into it. He couldn't get out of bed for three days after the first jab. He said all muscles and joints hurt, hurt, hurt. We'll see if he becomes road kill, or is even as foolish as to the second jab.

Ceffer says

One of my doofus brother in laws got vaxxed. Whole family told him not to, but his doctor pressured him into it. He couldn't get out of bed for three days after the first jab. He said all muscles and joints hurt, hurt, hurt. We'll see if he becomes road kill, or is even as foolish as to the second jab.

It's sad but sometimes it takes making life-altering mistakes to learn a life-altering lesson, which is doing our own objective analysis and thinking for ourselves.

https://welovetrump.com/2021/06/01/17-year-old-left-gasping-for-air-and-sent-to-the-hospital-with-myocarditis-after-2nd-dose-of-pfizer-experimental-jab/