« First « Previous Comments 1,431 - 1,470 of 2,279 Next » Last » Search these comments
Yesterday, based on screenshots provided by a whistleblower, Libs of TikTok reported that the University of Arizona’s nursing school is teaching nursing students to begin questioning kids about their gender identity as early as three years’ old. Basically, from the time kids can speak English.
The slides are plainly titled, “Asking pediatric patients about gender identity.” The first slide suggests “What to ask - Ages 3 to 13:”
“Some kids feel like a girl on the inside, some kids feel like a boy on the inside, and some kids feel like neither, both, or someone else. What about you? How do you feel on the inside? There’s no right or wrong answer.”
Oh yes. Yes there is a wrong answer.
The second training slide, subtitled “When to ask,” suggests “Start at around age 3, during the well visit.”
Whoever is running the University of Arizona’s nursing program is crazier than a sprayed roach.
You might well ask, what does confusing small children — who still believe in mermaids and Santa Claus — about their sexual identities have to do with medical care? Libs asked the University of Arizona for an explanation, and you know what happened. Crickets.
This seems a whole lot more like a recipe for creating gender dysphoria than for treating it. What do you think?
Nothing worse than being in a trench with tranny soldiers, and getting all their makeup, falsies and guts blown all over your face.
Patrick says
Just have some more kids, you look young enough.
I am intensely curious as to the fallout of this societal insanity in a few years.
richwicks says
I am intensely curious as to the fallout of this societal insanity in a few years.
Hopefully it won't take that long for people to wake up.
We can thank Trump for helping normalize this mental illness.
What caused Gavin Newsom to veto that bill that would allow California to take kids away from “non-affirming” parents?
Could it be maybe he's hedging his bets that this particular bill is (a) enough of a lightning rod that it could be easily used against him in a possible presidential campaign, while being (b) obscure enough that vetoing it won't cause too many political headaches among Democrats both in California and nationwide?
... it is worth reminding folks of the high stakes to the children, and I apologize for doing this to you, but behold this January 2022 New York Magazine cover, which re-defined the ancient concept of “penis envy”:
Although “Gabriel’s” leg was heavily airbrushed, you can still see the absurd cost she paid to obtain her prominent Pirola package and, in her inflamed imagination, to join the boy’s club. In case you missed previous explainers, Gabriel’s Nazi-inspired doctors harvested a huge chunk of her leg to make a non-functional appendage and she still needs to put the seat down to urinate.
I don’t know who needs to hear this, but that is not healthcare. That is surgical mutilation, adventures in plastic surgery, and magical thinking at its worst. Never before have we treated mental illness with extreme surgical modification to make someone’s body more consistent with their self-perceived psychological identity delusions.
What we really need is a bill to strip any doctor of their medical license for performing that Frankensteinian surgery.
« First « Previous Comments 1,431 - 1,470 of 2,279 Next » Last » Search these comments
So Arkansas overrode the veto from beta cuck governor. But no one is asking why the leftist tran activists trying to fuck kids up before they grow normal since puberty tends to fix this shit. Such murderous jealous fucks, trying to drag kids down with them since they fucked up their own lives.