patrick.net

I am intensely curious as to the fallout of this societal insanity in a few years.

richwicks says

I am intensely curious as to the fallout of this societal insanity in a few years.

Hopefully it won't take that long for people to wake up.

We can thank Trump for helping normalize this mental illness.

What caused Gavin Newsom to veto that bill that would allow California to take kids away from “non-affirming” parents?

Could it be maybe he's hedging his bets that this particular bill is (a) enough of a lightning rod that it could be easily used against him in a possible presidential campaign, while being (b) obscure enough that vetoing it won't cause too many political headaches among Democrats both in California and nationwide?

... it is worth reminding folks of the high stakes to the children, and I apologize for doing this to you, but behold this January 2022 New York Magazine cover, which re-defined the ancient concept of “penis envy”:




Although “Gabriel’s” leg was heavily airbrushed, you can still see the absurd cost she paid to obtain her prominent Pirola package and, in her inflamed imagination, to join the boy’s club. In case you missed previous explainers, Gabriel’s Nazi-inspired doctors harvested a huge chunk of her leg to make a non-functional appendage and she still needs to put the seat down to urinate.

I don’t know who needs to hear this, but that is not healthcare. That is surgical mutilation, adventures in plastic surgery, and magical thinking at its worst. Never before have we treated mental illness with extreme surgical modification to make someone’s body more consistent with their self-perceived psychological identity delusions.

What we really need is a bill to strip any doctor of their medical license for performing that Frankensteinian surgery.

What we really need is a bill to strip any doctor of their medical license for performing that Frankensteinian surgery.

A San Francisco transgender daycare worker has been sentenced to 25 years in prison after she was caught abusing “tod­dler and preschool-aged chil­dren.”

Jace Wong, a woman formerly known as Robyn Danielle Wong who claims to be a transgender “man,” was reportedly taking “libido-boosting” male hormones due to the misguided belief she could change gender.

The San Francisco Public Safety News reported Monday that Wong was sentenced for multiple counts of child sexual abuse.

Wong pled guilty to possession and distribution of child pornography after she was caught distributing images and videos of children being abused online.

Wong was abusing children at the daycare center and uploading pictures of young boys and girls being abused to online pedophile chat rooms.

Prosecutors told the court that Wong is “a sys­tem­atic preda­tor of tod­dler and preschool-aged chil­dren.”

Wong would touch the children inappropriately, and encourage them to touch her inappropriately.

According to videos on Wong’s phone, she would also describe in detail further sexual abuses that she planned to carry out against the innocent children who were supposedly in her care. ...

During the trial, one parent said that they “miss the smiles of my girls that I re­mem­ber see­ing and know­ing prior to Wong’s ma­li­cious abuse.”

Jace Wong, a woman formerly known as Robyn Danielle Wong who claims to be a transgender “man,” was reportedly taking “libido-boosting” male hormones due to the misguided belief she could change gender.

This trans student beat the snot out of multiple girls at an Oregon middle school

https://notthebee.com/article/this-trans-student-beat-the-snot-out-of-a-girl-but-noticing-anything-different-about-the-two-is-a-thoughtcrime

This trans student beat the snot out of multiple girls at an Oregon middle school

Thursday, in a 2-1 vote, the federal Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals rejected a legal challenge from transgender families and allies who argued that the new Tennessee and Kentucky bans “discriminated on the basis of sex.” But the 6th Circuit panel agreed with supporters of sterilization prohibitions and genital mutilation bans, who successfully argued the treatments are unproven and risk permanently harming kids.

According to the Sixth Circuit’s written decision, the plaintiffs failed to prove that transgenderism is an “immutable characteristic” or even describes any “discrete group” of people:

To establish a new classification, plaintiffs must show that transgender individuals "exhibit obvious, immutable, or distinguishing characteristics that define them as a discrete group." Bowen v. Gilliard, 483 U.S. 587, 602 (1987). It is difficult to see, at least at this stage of the case, how transgender identity fits that description. Unlike existing suspect classes, transgender identity is not "definitively ascertainable at the moment of birth." Ondo at 609. It is not necessarily immutable, as the stories of "detransitioners" indicate and as plaintiffs do not dispute. See Detransitioners' Amicus Brief. Instead of defining a "discrete group," Bowen at 602, "transgender" can describe "a huge variety of gender identities and expressions," 2022 WPATH Guidelines.

This fantastic ruling was the second in a row by a federal appeals court, after another 11th Circuit ruling recently revived a similar Alabama law, overruling the lower court. The two appeals court decisions make it very likely that the Supreme Court will agree, if the issue ever gets that far due to a split in circuits.

Even though the so-called “gender affirming” treatments did not even exist a few years ago, lawyers for gender-bending families and the so-called ACLU decried the ruling as a "devastating result for transgender youth and their families" and said "we are assessing our next steps" in defense of transgender rights.