
« First « Previous Comments 1,467 - 1,468 of 1,468 Search these comments
Lesbo who FAFO'd in Minneapolis:
Assuming you are masochistic enough to consume corporate media’s articles, when reading this type of piece, always first ask: “do all the quoted sources agree with each other, and varying expert opinions are conspicuously absent?” If so, you can safely ignore all the quotes and focus just on the factual reporting of what actually happened.
Believe it or not, this kind of reporting is what is most responsible for killing legacy media and driving people to social media for news. On social media, folks actually find the diversity of voices and opinions that is lacking in contemporary corporate media. Even allowing for all the noise of misinformation, outright lies, silliness, and unintelligent commentary, Twitter’s “town square” beats whatever the Times is serving up.
At least the bias is obvious on Twitter/X, which is all anybody asked for anyway.
It would be trivially easy for big news publishers like the Times to give readers right-click access to quoted experts’ biographies, previous comments, publication history, and political donation records. But they don’t. Think about that. And think about the claim that publications like the Times allegedly exist to “inform” us.
« First « Previous Comments 1,467 - 1,468 of 1,468 Search these comments
patrick.net
An Antidote to Corporate Media
1,360,661 comments by 15,738 users - FortWayneHatesRealtors, goofus, HeadSet, KgK one, Misc, Onvacation, REpro online now