
« First « Previous Comments 1,465 - 1,472 of 1,472 Search these comments
I won’t spend much time on this developing ICE shooting story, except to say that the real story is the coverage of the story. Here’s this morning’s New York Times home page, with wall-to-wall coverage of the Minneapolis ICE-related tragedy. ...
Notice what’s missing:
no discussion of why the stop occurred,
no analysis of agent threat perception, and
no comparisons with hundreds of similar police shootings, including at least two other recent fatalities involving ICE firing into SUVs. ...
Yesterday, the New York Post ran a story headlined, “Renee Nicole Good was Minneapolis ‘ICE Watch’ ‘warrior’ who trained to resist feds before shooting.” She and her lesbian wife recently moved back to Minneapolis from Canada, where they’d briefly relocated in protest of Trump’s 2024 re-election. According to the Post, Good —a mother of three— was a card-carrying, trained ICE-resistance activist.
Good’s wife, Rebecca, was busy confronting ICE agents (outside the SUV) at the time of the shooting. The Post reported she was filmed sobbing, “it’s my fault,” after the shots rang out and she realized Renee had been struck. “I made her come down here, it’s my fault,” she can be heard saying in a video filmed by a local resident.
According to the Post’s story, both women were members of “ICE Watch,” a group that tracks the movements of ICE agents and coordinates ways to interfere with them. For instance, ICE Watch recently shared an Instagram post that encouraged members to bring items to help barricade the streets around where the shooting took place, including suggesting bringing dried-up Christmas trees to burn.
So, they’re not super smart. But still.
The story also noted that, according to DHS statistics, ICE agents have faced an unprecedented spike in car attacks, surging by +3,200% over the last year. The agent who shot Ms. Good was himself recently injured in a different car attack last June, in Minneapolis, under similar circumstances. According to a New York Times report, the agent was dragged 100 yards after trying to disable the driver with a stun gun, and required medical treatment.
Notwithstanding the growing evidence that Ms. Good and her wife deliberately intended to get in harm’s way, this media psy-op will probably work to shift the national focus from fraud to ICE enforcement, at least in the short term. Attention, after all, is limited. It’s a zero-sum market. It’s neither good nor bad; it is just how the psy-wars go.
Lesbo who FAFO'd in Minneapolis:
Assuming you are masochistic enough to consume corporate media’s articles, when reading this type of piece, always first ask: “do all the quoted sources agree with each other, and varying expert opinions are conspicuously absent?” If so, you can safely ignore all the quotes and focus just on the factual reporting of what actually happened.
Believe it or not, this kind of reporting is what is most responsible for killing legacy media and driving people to social media for news. On social media, folks actually find the diversity of voices and opinions that is lacking in contemporary corporate media. Even allowing for all the noise of misinformation, outright lies, silliness, and unintelligent commentary, Twitter’s “town square” beats whatever the Times is serving up.
At least the bias is obvious on Twitter/X, which is all anybody asked for anyway.
It would be trivially easy for big news publishers like the Times to give readers right-click access to quoted experts’ biographies, previous comments, publication history, and political donation records. But they don’t. Think about that. And think about the claim that publications like the Times allegedly exist to “inform” us.
How awful is corporate media? Pretty awful. There’s been a lot happening related to the Greenland story, quietly, but not at all hidden— just not spoonfed by government officials to infantile corporate media reporters like mashed peaches. Trump isn’t spoonfeeding them, and as a result, reporters look dumber and dumber.
For example, easily located defense contracts, published right on official US government websites, reveal the United States approved at least six major arms deals with Denmark over a six-week period starting in mid November, 2025. They include $318 million for AIM-9X missiles (Nov. 14), $730 million for AIM-120C-8 missiles (Dec. 11), $951 million for AMRAAM-ER missiles (Dec. 23), $1.8 billion for P-8A aircraft (Dec. 29), $45 million for Hellfire missiles (Jan. 8, 2026), and Denmark was allowed to redeem its expired savings stamps in return for several deluxe family appliances.
For comparison, the six weeks saw about ten times the volume of defense sales to Denmark during the entire previous twelve-month period, when the Nordic nation purchased only a handful of 9mm bullets and a large customized fighting stick that can be affixed to a dogsled.
In other words, while Trump was threatening to invade Greenland “the hard way,” the Danes were paying him billions of dollars. You think those remarkable, multi-billion dollar sales numbers might have been significant to the public’s understanding of the developing “Greenland crisis?”
None of it was a secret. Again, all the deals were published right on the Defense Security Cooperation Agency’s website. The stories even appeared in the military press. For one example, here’s a headline from the Defense Post, December 23rd:
https://thedefensepost.com/2025/12/23/us-amraam-er-denmark/
US OKs $951M AMRAAM Extended Range Missile Sale to Denmark
December 23, 2025
At this point, it is an open question whether better new reporting is produced by corporate media reporters or blind squirrels.
Yesterday, CNN broke a story headlined, “Alex Pretti broke rib in confrontation with federal agents a week before death, sources say.” In other words, the pugilistic anti-ICE activist was a pro who kept at it and fought through the pain to its predictable, tragic conclusion. But the good news is, media is learning to use AI:
In case you somehow missed it (or live in Portland), last week, a Minneapolis nurse named Alex Pretti blocked an ICE operation, blew his bullhorn in agent’s faces, physically tried to stop them from arresting another rioter, thereby committing a crime (assault on a federal officer), violently resisted arrest in a scrum with a half dozen officers, and after Pretti’s gun went off in the fracas, was shot and killed.
The media spent a week rediscovering Second Amendment rights, polishing Pretti’s resumé, manufacturing a nasty narrative of an unjustified police shooting, and credulously quoting Democrats calling Pretti’s death a “murder” and an “assassination.”
But things became more complicated yesterday. CNN reported that ‘sources’ said that, about a week before Pretti’s death, he was involved in another physical fight with ICE agents. Apparently, federal officers tackled him while he was interfering with their attempt to detain other protesters. Pretti told the source that five agents pigpiled him and one leaned on his back, which, he claimed, broke his rib. (He was released at the scene.)
The source said Pretti told a friend, “I thought I was going to die.” Ironic. But apparently it only whetted his appetite for more.
CNN then said it had “reviewed records consistent with treating a broken rib.” Its source also said Pretti was “known to federal agents,” but admitted that nobody knows whether the officers had ID’d him before last week’s shooting. ...
Had Pretti been arrested the first time around, he might still be here.
The repeated violent encounters suggest that Pretti had conceived a self-image as some kind of heroic, vigilante-style civil rights warrior. ...
Maybe we should dig more into who or what filled Pretti’s head with these fantastical ideas and urged the recently divorced, 37-year-old nurse to reinvent himself as an urban guerrilla. (People reported that Pretti’s ex-wife “hadn’t spoken to him since they divorced more than two years ago.” Oof.)
Sad. But now, having raced out of the gate with its “Pretti the hero” narrative, media’s whitewashing is falling apart like cheap gas station toilet paper. Pretti now sounds more like a despairing, unstable, broken man who might have been inclined to suicide-by-cop, in a vain attempt to infuse his life with final, tragic, victimized meaning.
« First « Previous Comments 1,465 - 1,472 of 1,472 Search these comments
patrick.net
An Antidote to Corporate Media
1,364,442 comments by 15,735 users - HANrongli, MolotovCocktail, RC2006, RWSGFY online now