
Comments 1 - 29 of 1,092 Next » Last » Search these comments
Her 6 DUI's were the cops fault, not hers
Before MADD, drunk driving was just a moderate fine, and even cops drank and drove.
Thanks @krc I didn't know that.
Not trying to support them here, I just thought it was a good article. I've seen for myself how bad San Francisco was, and how much further down it went.
Ceffer saysBefore MADD, drunk driving was just a moderate fine, and even cops drank and drove.
When I was 16 back in the 70s, I borrowed my friends car and went to a kegger. The party was dead so 3 friends and I filled up our cups and took off.
A couple of minutes later we got pulled over. I was underage, unlicensed, had no ID, was drinking, had open containers of beer, and was driving someone else's car.
The cop made us empty our beers, checked if I was sober enough to drive, and sent us on our way.
I am still amazed I survived high school.
Some drunk drivers drive for years without being caught. Some never get caught.
Once they reach a certain point and get caught once, however, they get caught over and over.
I got two drinking tickets under 21. Not DUI's, just underage drinking at a party and one camping.
Don't cop cars have some kind of automatic license plate readers now? I guess once you're in "the computer" as a drunk driver it gives the cop an alert whenever your plates get recognized by the fucking contraption.
Ess Eff lost $8billion last year in tourist dollars (and over 60,000 jobs). The idea that tourists will return in droves with the current state of affairs is tenuous. Will be interesting to see how this plays out.
I'm generally calm and not a physical fighter, though I can, but you'll get a right or left hook to the face if you bitch at me for not wearing a mask outdoors.
I said "Sure is" or something like that. But it was a trick question! The right answer would have bene to pour it out and say "No sir."
They won't.
Really have no interest in being bitched at for not wearing a mask outside and I fear that's what would happen if I visit CA.
I will keep pointing out that National Review was wholly and completely opposed to Trump from the very start and actively campaigned against him even in 2016. Trump and "the masses" are not in anyway supported by NR. This is a pretend organization. They want an aristocratic right-wing party with free trade and a large mass of poor people they can control. They were instrumental in support of outsourcing, moving manufacturing overseas, etc...Victor Davis Hanson was pretty pro-Trump. Alas, he might be the only one worth reading at National Review. Here you go: https://www.nationalreview.com/?s=victor+davis+hanson&sp%5Bforce%5D=1&search-date=anytime&search-date-from=&search-date-to=&orderby=relevance&order=DESC
Victor Davis Hanson was pretty pro-Trump. Alas, he might be the only one worth reading at National Review.
Victor Davis Hanson was pretty pro-Trump. Alas, he might be the only one worth reading at National Review. Here you go: https://www.nationalreview.com/?s=victor+davis+hanson&sp%5Bforce%5D=1&search-date=anytime&search-date-from=&search-date-to=&orderby=relevance&order=DESC
To visit or not visit SF, drop money there, is not a political statement for them.
Problem is it's still almost exclusively domestic visitors that go to CA
Comments 1 - 29 of 1,092 Next » Last » Search these comments
patrick.net
An Antidote to Corporate Media
1,364,100 comments by 15,737 users - Misc, WookieMan online now