patrick.net

https://sagehana.substack.com/p/effects-of-ivermectin-therapy-on

"Effects of Ivermectin therapy on the sperm functions of Nigerian onchocerciasis patients" ...

We therefore suggest that caution be seriously exercised in the treatment of male onchocerciasis patients with ivermectin to avoid the adverse effects it has on the patients’ sperm functions.

Might be true.

https://phillipaltman.substack.com/p/covid-19-vaccination-in-children

After much speculation, it has now been reported that ivermectin, which has been shown to be effective in prophylaxis and treatment of COVID-19 in many published controlled and randomised clinical trials, binds tightly to both the spike protein on the SARS-CoV-2 virus itself and to the spike protein produced by the mRNA gene-based COVID-19 “vaccines”. It is the spike protein which is the mediator of toxicity of both the virus and the “vaccines”. The binding renders the spike protein incapable of facilitating its toxic effects.

Patrick says

https://tobyrogers.substack.com/p/thinking-points-october-24-2023

A massive poker tell

One cannot just say “no vaccines.” One has to explain how any acute infections will be treated. Which makes me wonder anew about Pharma’s ferocious assault on ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine. Yes, they were creating a market for the Covid vaccines. But in retrospect it feels like a massive poker tell. It seems that Pharma knows these existing medicines (and many others) are incredibly effective at treating a broad ranges of infectious diseases (Covid and beyond) — possibly eliminating any justification whatsoever for vaccines. That’s why Pharma and their friends at the FDA went berserker to try to suppress these meds (at the cost of millions of lives).

Yep. And they're still pushing the BS

https://thehill.com/homenews/4235916-1-in-20-used-ivermectin-hydroxychloroquine-to-treat-covid-19-research/

One good thing COVID did was show the incredible power HCQ and ivermectin had over COVID and probably other respiratory viruses

https://vigilantfox.substack.com/p/dr-pierre-kory-the-smear-campaign

Dr. Pierre Kory: The Smear Campaign Against Ivermectin Caused Millions to Die Around the World

Ivermectin is often recognized – 2nd to penicillin – for having the greatest impact on human health. Its discovery even won the Nobel Prize.

But the propagandists told you it was a “dangerous horse dewormer.” Now, why would they do such a thing?

Because ivermectin’s existence threatened a multi-hundred billion dollar vaccine enterprise. The COVID shots forced upon the world would not be able to exist if ivermectin was shown to be effective.

The Emergency Use Authorization states:

“For the FDA to issue an EUA, there must be no adequate, approved, and available alternative candidate product for diagnosing, preventing, or treating the disease or condition.”

So, they had to smear and discredit ivermectin.

And in doing so, Dr. Pierre Kory says, “that has caused millions of people to die around the world.”

I know the links to Ivermectin and HCQ are buried in this thread, but perhaps a sticky of best providers would be helpful. On the other hand, this might bring unwanted attention by the feds to them, so I put it for group discussion.

How many other cheap, generic, well-tolerated, and long used drugs have unknown or concealed benefits?

2016 - before COVID:

Rage Disorder Linked with Parasite Found in Cat Feces

Toxoplasmosis may alter brain chemistry in people exhibiting bouts of explosive anger

https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/rage-disorder-linked-with-parasite-found-in-cat-feces/

Guess what works against the toxoplasmosis bearing parasite?

https://www.coffeeandcovid.com/p/three-advisors-friday-march-22-2024/comment/52207385

FDA loses its war on ivermectin and agrees to remove all social media posts and consumer directives regarding ivermectin and COVID, including its most popular tweet in FDA history.

This landmark case sets an important precedent in limiting FDA overreach into the doctor-patient relationship.

Thank you @BoydenGrayPLLC for your excellent counsel. @drpaulmarik1 @RobertApter1 @Covid19Critical

--- https://twitter.com/MdBreathe/status/1771023714584273015

Someone noted: There's absolutely no news on this...

She responds: "It literally just became final. We just got the signed order tonight. Press release going out in the morning. "

AmericanKulak says

Guess what works against the toxoplasmosis bearing parasite?

I don't think Ivermectin does, but it wouldn't hurt likely.

https://jessicar.substack.com/p/i-am-a-horse

https://phillipaltman.substack.com/p/fda-loses-war-on-ivermectin

FDA LOSES WAR ON IVERMECTIN

At long last, the FDA has been ordered to remove misleading information regarding ivermectin by Federal court order in the US. ...

The Epoch Times reported on 22 March: “The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has agreed to remove social media posts and webpages that urged people to stop taking ivermectin to treat COVID-19, according to a settlement dated March 21.”

The FDA has already removed a page that said: “Should I take ivermectin to prevent or treat COVID-19? No.”

However, the FDA has not admitted to any violation of law or any wrongdoing.

We will never know how many lives were lost due to the misinformation coming from the FDA and our own health authorities due to the failure to recommend and institute early effective treatment of COVID-19. We need a Royal Commission.

At my next check up, I'll ask if they will prescribe me ivermectin to cure TDS.

stereotomy says

At my next check up, I'll ask if they will prescribe me ivermectin to cure TDS.

I'm going to copy you!

My GP hates me. I hate her too. It's a match made in hell.

https://flccc.substack.com/p/breaking-the-fda-has-lost-its-war

Patrick says

https://flccc.substack.com/p/breaking-the-fda-has-lost-its-war

That is a ridiculous remedy. They only need to stop telling the lie? How about printing a correction on the website and social media posts.

HeadSet says

That is a ridiculous remedy. They only need to stop telling the lie? How about printing a correction on the website and social media posts.

Damage is already done. Just ignore the FDA, they are full of shit.

The FDA has been full of shit for DECADES, I'm glad they did something to wake the public up to it, at least part of it.

Patrick says

https://flccc.substack.com/p/breaking-the-fda-has-lost-its-war

Uh, Oh! The Rockefellers aren't going to like this. They'll have to sell more street fentanyl to make up for the loss of profits from the increase in population health. So, what does it mean exactly when you have to sue the agency that is supposed to oversee the health and safety of our country in order to keep them from doing the opposite?
Patrick says

https://flccc.substack.com/p/breaking-the-fda-has-lost-its-war

Ceffer says

the increase in population health.

What?

GNL says

Ceffer says

the increase in population health.

What?

The increase on the general health of the overall population.

After these last 3 years, it seems hard for me to deny that the purpose of modern medicine isn't to help people, it's to hurt them and make them dependents. They are basically drug pushers making you addicted not to getting high, but making you addicted to not feeling ill or sick.

The vaccines did NOTHING other than harm people. I know a few people now that think they were negatively, and perhaps permanently, effected by the injection. One is a rock climber that believes he's become considerably weaker since he took the injection. I know several women who were just beyond menopause that started experiencing menstruation again. One guy got blood clots and he's like early 40's.

Kid got pinworms at school. Considering.

Ivermectin may cure cancer!

AmericanKulak says

Kid got pinworms at school. Considering.

I think Ivermectin cures pinworms.

Pre Wuhan Article
https://www.nature.com/articles/ja201711
Abstract
Over the past decade, the global scientific community have begun to recognize the unmatched value of an extraordinary drug, ivermectin, that originates from a single microbe unearthed from soil in Japan. Work on ivermectin has seen its discoverer, Satoshi Ōmura, of Tokyo’s prestigious Kitasato Institute, receive the 2014 Gairdner Global Health Award and the 2015 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine, which he shared with a collaborating partner in the discovery and development of the drug, William Campbell of Merck & Co. Incorporated. Today, ivermectin is continuing to surprise and excite scientists, offering more and more promise to help improve global public health by treating a diverse range of diseases, with its unexpected potential as an antibacterial, antiviral and anti-cancer agent being particularly extraordinary.

https://voiceforscienceandsolidarity.substack.com/p/do-we-need-to-move-from-c-19-vaccine-fd8

Given the lack of herd immunity and the ongoing evolution of the virus towards enhanced transmissibility, combined with the fact that there is absolutely no scientific rationale to believe that updated C-19 vaccines will protect highly vaccinated populations that, by now, have experienced multiple rounds of vaccine breakthrough infections, citizens should pressure their governments to immediately ensure the availability of safe and effective antiviral drugs in sufficient supply and at affordable prices.

Ironically, this means that governments in highly C-19 vaccinated countries should ideally mandate the use of ivermectin and/or hydroxychloroquine to mitigate the detrimental consequences of their insane C-19 vaccine mandates.

https://transcriberb.dreamwidth.org/166700.html

"Dr. McCullough speaks in Fresno at the Remdesivir Lawsuit conference!"
[National Press Conference, September 7, 2022 TruthforHealth.org]
https://rumble.com/v1jl35e-dr.-mccullough-speaks-in-fresno-at-the-remdesivir-lawsuit-conference-min-53.html

DR. JANCI LINDSAY: Hi everyone. Thank you so much for coming today. And I just want to say right from the start that I am so very deeply sorry for your loss. I hope that we can in some part help you to, to regain some of the trust in the medical profession that was undoubtedly lost during all this.

My name is Dr. Janci Lindsay. I'm a toxicologist and a molecular biologist. I own a company, Toxicology Support Services. I've been doing scientific research for over 30 years and I consult as an expert witness in litigation cases across the country as a toxicologist.

I'm here to tell you that hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin were always safe and effective for the treatment of coronavirus and that there was an agenda that was set out to demonize them, to, to show that they weren't safe and effective in order to allow for emergency use authorization for both remdesivir and the covid genetic vaccines.

WOMAN'S VOICE: Yes.

JANCI LINDSAY: This was wrong. We know from countless studies that hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin have worked. I want to tell you a little bit about ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine and how safe and effective they are.

Ivermectin was approved in 1984 as an anti-parasitic in humans. It was shown to be safe for all ages. By 2016 2 billion doses had been given. It's on the WHO [World Health Organization] list of essential medicines to be given. In 2015 Satoshi Omura and William Campbell got the Nobel Prize in Medicine and Physiology for its use to treat African river blindness. Ivermectin has potent anti-viral properties against several families of viruses, West Nile virus, Zika, dengue, influenza, HIV, and of course, coronavirus.

2021 review by Zaidi and Dehgani noted 20 separate mechanisms of action of ivermectin against the SARS-CoV-2 virus, all unique.[1]

A recent paper from Brazil, a giant study of rem—, of, excuse me, of ivermectin use in 88,000 patients resulted in a 92% reduction in fatality as compared to the control group of infected persons with SARS-CoV-2. But not only that, we have countless other studies of the safety of ivermectin. In India in Uttar Pradesh they used a treatment program in— which resulted, with IVM [ivermectin], which resulted in only 11 cases as of September 10th 2021. By August 31st of that same year out of 187,638 tests for covid, there were only 21 positive cases with the use of ivermectin.[2]

Now why am I saying that? Because ivermectin is useful not only for the treatment of SARS-CoV-2, but for the prevention of SARS-CoV-2. And you may have a seen a meme that I wrote that went around where I advocated for the use of hydroxychloroquine, ivermectin, both cheap and out of patent, for the treatment of SARS-CoV-2. And I said, if they really wanted to stop this they would use both of these medicines because they stop the contraction and they stop the transmission of this virus.

But they don't want to stop it. They don't want to let up their emergency powers. They don't want to stop not treating covid.

We know, in Peru, when they put forth their program of ivermectin treatment, that within a month they had a 75% reduction in death from covid cases. In a month. We know it works. We know it has worked in India, in Africa. In all of the states in Africa that use both ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine for malarial prophylaxis they had barely any covid cases. Yet these countries were ignored, except for those of us that, that were trying to get the word out.

50:01
Not only that, but most people don't know that ivermectin used for malaria actually has an extra benefit. It kills the mosquitos so that they can't go on further to transmit any other mosquito-borne pathogens. It's an amazing medicine.

Hydroxychloroquine is the same. Approved for use in humans in 1955. It's on the WHO list of essential medicines for humans, and can be used while you're pregnant, in nursing women, and in infants. In 2019 it was the 122nd most prescribed drug in the US with over 5 million prescriptions. Sounds pretty unsafe, doesn't it?

[audience murmur]

It's a potent antimalarial drug and a potent anti-inflammatory that acts against the second phase of the SARS-CoV-2 infection where you really get that cytokine storm. It prevents the binding and replication of SARS as well. It changes the pH inside the cell that interferes with replication of the virus and entry. 356 studies, 487,600 patients, you get a 62% improved early treatment regimen if you use the drug. 72% less death we're seeing in 15 studies using this drug.

It's cheap and out of patent. It's used to treat RA [rheumatoid arthritis] and lupus on a daily basis at doses that are just as effective for treating SARS-CoV-2.

So what happened?

51:39
In 2020 I was astonished to see that two of our most respected medical journals, The New England Journal of Medicine and The Lancet, published false, fraudulent studies on hydroxychloroquine. There was a made-up data base called the Surgisphere data base[3] which boasted of 500,000 patients that had been treated around the world. It was completely fake. This was used along with 2 other studies where they used known toxic doses of hydroxychloroquine on patients to demonize this drug to allow for the emergency use authorization of remdesivir and the genetic vaccines.

This was wrong. It was always fraudulent. And I'm here to tell you that ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine are safe and effective for the treatment of SARS-CoV-2 and you've been lied to.

Gin up the ivermectin fear-mongering. Yeadon is claiming ivermectin is a "violent fertility toxin."

Looks like someone "got" to Yeadon.

https://x.com/5dsoul/status/1825808269039849903?s=42

There's a rash of hit pieces that have come out in the past couple of months.

@Rin - some of the hit piece articles claim that ivermectin + quercetin is even more harmful. Looks like they're trying to cover all the bases. I half expect them to claim zinc is poisonous.

Some other articles found by searching "ivermectin fertility" on Yandex point out that fertility issues can be reduced by taking R-lipoic acid.

https://x.com/newstart_2024/status/1829993168588230782

https://x.com/Ultrafrog17/status/1830008709474300225

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32474842/

Purpose: Ivermectin is an antiparasitic drug that exhibits antitumor effects in preclinical studies, and as such is currently being repositioned for cancer treatment. However, divergences exist regarding its employed doses in preclinical works. Therefore, the aim of this study was to determine whether the antitumor effects of ivermectin are observable at clinically feasible drug concentrations.

Methods: Twenty-eight malignant cell lines were treated with 5 μM ivermectin. Cell viability, clonogenicity, cell cycle, cell death and pharmacological interaction with common cytotoxic drugs were assessed, as well as the consequences of its use on stem cell-enriched populations. The antitumor in vivo effects of ivermectin were also evaluated.

Results: The breast MDA-MB-231, MDA-MB-468, and MCF-7, and the ovarian SKOV-3, were the most sensitive cancer cell lines to ivermectin. Conversely, the prostate cancer cell line DU145 was the most resistant to its use. In the most sensitive cells, ivermectin induced cell cycle arrest at G0-G1 phase, with modulation of proteins associated with cell cycle control. Furthermore, ivermectin was synergistic with docetaxel, cyclophosphamide and tamoxifen. Ivermectin reduced both cell viability and colony formation capacity in the stem cell-enriched population as compared with the parental one. Finally, in tumor-bearing mice ivermectin successfully reduced both tumor size and weight.

Conclusion: Our results on the antitumor effects of ivermectin support its clinical testing.

Patrick says

" https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32474842/
Purpose: Ivermectin is an antiparasitic drug"

Yes...
1. Ivermectin is an antiparasitic drug.
2. Ivermectin is also a proven antiviral medication and
3. Ivermectin is also a proven anti-cancer medication.

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29257278/

Ivermectin as an inhibitor of cancer stem‑like cells

The aim of the present study was to demonstrate that ivermectin preferentially inhibited cancer stem‑like cells (CSC) in breast cancer cells and downregulated the expression of 'stemness' genes. Computational searching of DrugBank, a database of approved drugs, was performed using the principles of two‑dimensional similarity searching; the chemical structure of salinomycin was used as a query. Growth inhibition of the breast cancer cell lin e MDA‑MB‑231 by ivermectin was investigated in the total cell population, in cell spheroids and in sorted cells that expressed cluster of differentiation (CD)44+/CD24‑. The effects of ivermectin treatment on the expression of pluripotency and self‑renewal transcription factors, such as homeobox protein nanog (nanog), octamer‑binding protein 4 (oct‑4) and SRY‑box 2 (sox‑2), were evaluated by reverse transcription‑quantitative polymerase chain reaction and western blotting. Ivermectin exhibited a similarity value of 0.78 in reference to salinomycin. Ivermectin demonstrated an inhibitory effect upon the growth of MDA‑MB‑231 cells in the range of 0.2‑8 µM. Ivermectin preferentially inhibits the viability of CSC‑enriched populations (CD44+/CD24‑ and cells growing in spheroids) compared with the total cell population. The opposite pattern was observed with paclitaxel treatment. Ivermectin exposure reduced the expression of nanog, oct‑4 and sox‑2 at the mRNA and protein levels. Ivermectin preferentially inhibited the CSC subpopulation in the MDA‑MB‑231 cells and downregulated the expression of genes involved in the maintenance of pluripotency and self‑renewal.