« First « Previous Comments 67 - 106 of 1,144 Next » Last » Search these comments
Let's not make a bankster scam into an "evil joo" thing again. It wouldn't surprise me if the banksters are behind the "evil joo" propaganda because statistically Jews have higher savings (Israel has average savings rate around 24% of their income, compared to 8% for most of Europe and 6.8% for the US) therefore promoting hate towards Jews and then killing average middle class and upper-middle class Jews en masse (i.e. another Holocaust) would benefit the banksters, who then don't have to pay back the deposits or life insurance policies. Bernie Madoff was Jewish himself, but his scam was a bankster scam and a large cross-section (if not a slight majority) his victims were Jewish; calling Madoff's scam or todays Covid-Vaxx scam an "evil joo" thing would only side-track the topic and benefit the real scammers (including the Swiss bankers behind the WEF) who are out to kill average (and above-average) Jews along the average middle-class and upper-middle class in every nation/ethnicity.
Robert W Malone, MD
@RWMaloneMD
4h
Coordinated censorship and propaganda are getting worse. "Balanced" data-based evaluation and discussion concerning COVID-19 Rx and vax are now banned. There is no objectivity allowed. Only "the word" according to Oligarchs, Investment funds, Big Pharma and servile politicians.
3:01 PM · Dec 8, 2021
During the pandemic, the pharmaceutical giant Pfizer quadrupled its revenues from vaccines, and is now looking at $33.5 billion in 2021 from Covid vaccine sales alone (for comparison, a normal pre-pandemic year Pfizer averaged around $50bn in revenue, across all its products). The Covid vaccines indeed look like a juicy boost.
Rebecca Robbins and Peter Goodman report for the New York Times that the U.S. paid Pfizer around $20 per dose delivered, with Israel even worse with $30 per dose. Pfizer expects to deliver about 2 billion doses this year, at somewhere between $10-$15 in revenue per dose (as it shares revenue with BioNTech) for a neat $20 or $30 billion of revenue – a 40-60% boost to pre-pandemic revenue. ...
What’s most disturbing, of course, is that the very media outlets least likely to approve of pharmaceutical companies making billions – The New York Times, The Guardian, MSNBC etc – are the ones loudest shouting for vaccine mandates. On the other hand, they run articles denouncing the many billions that pharma companies are making from Covid vaccines (here, here, or here). ...
All they had to do for the chips to fall where they did was to convince enough people and politicians that this was a terrible disease, that no other protection works, and that recurring booster shots are the only “scientific” way out.
Of the many odd events in the last 20 months is that the CDC still refuses to offer practical advice that seems to work well – go outside, get exercise, ensure you’re not Vitamin-D deficient. To quote Bret Weinstein, a pariah of the corporate press, why are we not picking the low-hanging fruit before we go after excessively complicated and poorly working medical interventions like rushed and experimental vaccines?
Why should we unquestioningly believe a government that has routinely, incessantly, and carelessly hid information, issued faulty claims, and at every step of the way prevented truthful and accurate information from reaching the public?
Plenty of other medications seem to have a protective effect against Covid-19 and many of its consequences. The laughable “horse dewormer” debacle over Ivermectin is a good example. A recent study in The Lancet shows that Fluvoxamine, another cheap and readily available drug, seems to work well against Covid. What do these treatments have in common? They’re cheap, off-label, widely accessible – and don’t massively boost the revenue of Big Pharma.
None of this is proof of foul play, but it sure feels like the circumstantial evidence is piling up. I’m not saying we have a smoking gun. I’m not saying there were dark rooms with despicable people smoking cigars and dreaming about billions of new pharma dollars. But given the corruption in American politics, in its bureaucracy, and most importantly in its media and academic establishments, is it inconceivable to suggest that maybe Big Pharma wanted its share of the as-a-Service-revolution?
Lots of them are Jewish, but more of them are not.
Bill Gates and Anthony Fauci have created a formidable public-private partnership that wields incredible power over the American public, along with global health and food policies.
Inspired by Rockefeller’s business model, Bill and Melinda Gates donated $36 billion worth of Microsoft stock to the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation (BMGF) between 1994 and 2018.
Gates also created Bill Gates Investments (BGI), which predominantly invests in multinational food, agriculture, pharmaceutical, energy, telecom and tech companies with global operations.
Gates strategically targets BMGF’s charitable gifts to give him control of the international health and agricultural agencies and the media, allowing him to dictate global health and food.
Fauci and Gates met in person, shaking hands in 2000 in an agreement to control and expand the global vaccine enterprise.
You can read all of the details in Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s best-selling book, “The Real Anthony Fauci,” which contains more than 2,200 footnotes of referenced data.
Wow, so much just wrong in that.
Think about it. No one named "Xavier" is Jewish.
Xavier Malina
richwicks saysXavier Malina
Just because he's married to Christine Maxwell does not make him Jewish.
Xavier is Spanish for "savior", very Christian name.
Ghislaine herself is technically not Jewish, because her mother was not.
Before Floyd’s death, Candid found that philanthropies provided “$3.3 billion in racial equity funding” for the nine years from 2011 to 2019. Since then, Candid calculations revealed much higher totals for both 2020 and 2021: “50,887 grants valued at $12.7 billion” and “177 pledges valued at $11.6 billion.”
That sounds like a 30-fold increase in funding for racial wokeness activists. That’s going to pay for a whole bunch of Mini Ibram X. Kendis, all handed a platform and a megaphone, but all desperately worried that their current cushy gig won’t get funded again in a few years when billionaires move on to the next social justice fad. So, they will be desperately trying to Keep Up the Crisis forever.
Among the top funders, according to Candid’s calculations, are the Ford Foundation, at $3 billion; Mackenzie Scott, at $2.9 billion; JPMorgan Chase & Co. Contributions Program, at $2.1 billion; W.K. Kellogg Foundation, $1.2 billion; Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, $1.1 billion; Silicon Valley Community Foundation, $1 billion; Walton Family Foundation, $689 million; The William and Flora Hewlett Foundation, $438 million; and the Foundation to Promote Open Society, $350.5 million.
There are Democratic strategists who worry about unintended political consequences that could flow from this surge in philanthropic giving. Rob Stein, one of the founders of the Democracy Alliance, an organization of major donors on the left, argued in a phone interview that while most foundation spending is on programs that have widespread support, “when progressive philanthropists fund groups that promote extreme views like ‘defunding the police’ or that sanction ‘cancel culture,’ they are exacerbating intraparty conflict and stoking interparty backlash.” The danger, according to Stein, is that “some progressive politicians and funders are contributing to divisiveness within their ranks and giving fodder to the right.” …
Elites don’t really have a carefully worked-out Plan for what will happen next. Indeed, besides not having much of a Plan, they barely have a clue. Elites mostly just have bigoted emotional reactions that can be exploited on the fly by the self-interested.
Mackenzie Scott,
Much has been written about the extraordinary grant making of businesswomen, MacKenzie Scott. With a net worth of $65.3B, there are a lot of MacKenzie Scott funds available. Scott is a member of the Giving Pledge. When she signed the pledge she said: "I have a disproportionate amount of money to share.
Patrick saysMackenzie Scott,
Much has been written about the extraordinary grant making of businesswomen, MacKenzie Scott. With a net worth of $65.3B, there are a lot of MacKenzie Scott funds available. Scott is a member of the Giving Pledge. When she signed the pledge she said: "I have a disproportionate amount of money to share.
https://bloomerang.co/blog/5-tips-to-help-your-nonprofit-receive-mackenzie-scott-funds/?source=patrick.net
"businesswoman", a blowjob for Bezo's turns into billions for black lives matter.
In the midst of this upheaval, a young man named Gideon van Meijeren was recently elected to the Dutch Parliament. It’s very likely that his candidacy reflects Dutch citizens’ increasing disgust with the government’s endless extensions of its newly acquired COVID power over the people.
A video is circulating showing van Meijeren, during his first official appearance in Parliament, asking Prime Minister Rutte a question. It’s a brilliant video because van Meijeren sticks to his guns as the Prime Minister sneers at him and at all those who are no longer on board with the world establishments’ COVID narrative. You will witness one of the great moments of someone truly speaking truth to power. Also, for an added smile, be sure to keep your eyes on the young woman sitting behind van Meijeren.
I’m not sure when van Meijeren took his stand but perhaps it’s no coincidence that, on January 14, the government abruptly announced that it was walking back its restrictions on shops, gyms, and hairdressers—although it is forcing bars, restaurants, cafes, and “cultural establishments to remain closed until January 25 at the earliest. Why restaurants are more dangerous than shops and hairdressers will forever be a mystery.
Incidentally, young van Meijeren’s willingness to be a maverick is something that (thankfully) more young people are embracing. The New York Post profiled five college students who have had it with the woke culture on their campuses and are speaking up. Likewise, on Friday, Tucker Carlson spoke with a young Republican activist who thumbed his nose at the January 6 committee in wonderful fashion.
If we are to emerge from this attempt by the world’s totalitarians (an amalgam of billionaires, millionaires, and leftists) to weaponize COVID and wokeness to end the democratic republics that have held sway for more than 200 years, and to reinstate the totalitarianism that has been the world’s norm for most of humankind, the only way to do it is to push back: Refuse to be silenced, ridicule these self-styled “elite,” speak the truth whenever and wherever you can, and just say “no,” as Martin Luther King and Gandhi both did (and that’s true regardless of how one feels about their politics). We’re in a war of ideas and our ideas win only if we speak them loudly and proudly.
What happened in the seventy-plus years since the end of the Second World War, is that an elite international class of technocrats, EU bureaucrats, global nonprofit leaders and international investors has developed, in which allegiance to the relationships, programs, profits and outcomes of that global class is more immediate and important to its members, than are any of the relationships, allegiances, rights, property and outrage of their fellow countrymen and women.
To these people, the nation-state — even one’s own nation-state of origin — is an artifact; a secondary, sentimental add-on. What really matters are other global elites in one’s social circle and business network, and the valuable relationships one can create with them. One’s “ordinary” countrymen and women recede and become theoretical. And the constant message one receives from one’s peers and from the elite meta-national culture, is that those “ordinary” men and women simply are not as smart or well educated as one’s meta-national peers, and so it would be a disaster to let them make their own decisions. One is saving them from their own fecklessness, ignorance and shortsightedness, by deciding for them.
What does this have to do with cruelty?
As the Milgram experiments showed, if you are far from seeing the victim whom you are harming, and you have an authoritative directive to harm that victim, then easily enough, “normal” people conveniently become monsters and abusers. And thus, many global elites who are lovely people one on one, nice to their kids, and so on, can execute vast cruelty without even noticing.
That is the situation of the new elite class and the cultural and economic environment I am describing below. It set the groundwork for the extraordinary global cruelty from these meta-national elites to men and women in the street. It set the stage for the cruelty of the lockstep “COVID policy” in which we presently find ourselves. ...
This is just one example of how great evil — evil at a national level — can easily be done: by distance, and by condescension, and by the creation of a meta-national community who see and hear and are answerable only to each other; but who do not see, or in any way respect, the rights of nations; or the rights of self-determination of elders, of voters, of property; of you or of me.
So — evil is not what you think. It need not be a goose-stepping soldier, or an official knocking at your door, wearing jackboots. To understand how COVID policy can be so coordinated and so cruel and so Neo-fascistic, we need to understand these realities.
Evil can come in the form of a well-dressed man or woman, far from any traditional loyalties or decencies, passing you the sherry.
Collective Fortune of 10 Richest Americans More Than Doubled Since Start of the Pandemic in March 2020, to $1.35 Trillion; With Every Passing Second, $12,600 Wealthier
As the World Economic Forum, criticized “as an elitist gathering of the super-rich,” met virtually this week, the wealth of America’s 10 richest billionaires reached $1.35 trillion, more than doubling since the beginning of the pandemic. Their $731 billion increase in wealth means they have added a billion dollars to their collective fortune every day between the beginning of the pandemic on March 18, 2020, and January 18, 2022, according to a new report from Americans for Tax Fairness analyzing Forbes data. That leap in riches equals roughly $12,600 a second, or an average of $1,260 per second per billionaire. [See tables below and here.] ...
Under current law, much of the huge pandemic rise in billionaire wealth may never be taxed. That would change if Congress included the Billionaires Income Tax proposed by Senate Finance Committee chairman Ron Wyden in the Build Back Better legislation now before the U.S. Senate. The Billionaires Income Tax would close the loophole that allows billionaire wealth gains to go tax-free by taxing the annual increase in value of billionaire assets, such as corporate stock. Now such gains are only taxed if the underlying assets are sold. If billionaires instead hold onto their assets until death—something they can do by living off cheap loans—those lifetime gains are never taxed.
“Stepped-up basis” is a huge tax loophole for rich people that allows them to avoid
taxes on investment gains for their entire lives and pass those assets onto heirs who
will never be taxed on that increase in value of the assets.
“Stepped-up basis” is a huge tax loophole for rich people that allows them to avoid
taxes on investment gains for their entire lives and pass those assets onto heirs who
will never be taxed on that increase in value of the assets.
James Lindsay, watching narratives crumble
@ConceptualJames
Jan 21
The World Economic Forum's Great Narrative Conference: "The good news is the elite across the world trust each other more and more... the bad news is that the majority of people trusted that elite less..."
« First « Previous Comments 67 - 106 of 1,144 Next » Last » Search these comments
WTF?
How can global policy and media across the world be so coordinated?
Kind of makes one tempted to believe in "conspiracy theories".
I really do think there is a cabal of billionaires who own the media and the government and which shifts course when things start to get hot, like right now. They are not "the Jews" but a collection of billionaires from many countries. Many of them are Jewish, but many are not.
Can we identify them by name? Bezos and Gates for sure, but what are the other names? I would especially like to know the names of the ones that desperately want to remain hidden. Klaus Schwab? Top leaders in China like Xi Jinping?
https://scholar.princeton.edu/sites/default/files/mgilens/files/gilens_and_page_2014_-testing_theories_of_american_politics.doc.pdf?source=patrick.net