patrick.net

Let's say charged with a crime by that date.

OK, it's a bet.

If Fauci dies, everyone wins!

I think a strong case can be made for recovering all that loot and giving it to the relatives of Fauci's victims.

Woody Harrelson eviscerates Fauci over ‘extraordinarily evil s–‘ during Joe Rogan podcast interview: ‘He knows what he did’

He had no cheers for Fauci.

Woody Harrelson demolished Dr. Anthony Fauci on Joe Rogan’s podcast Saturday, accusing the former head of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases of some “extraordinarily evil s–t.” ...

Fauci, who took over as head of the NIAID in the mid-1980s, was given a preemptive pardon by former President Joe Biden on his last day at the White House amid fears once President Trump returned to office he would be subject to charges that he lied to Congress.

Once inaugurated, Trump pulled Fauci’s taxpayer-funded security detail.

In his own shot at the immunologist, Rogan said Fauci could still find himself in hot water.

“These states can still sue him,” he said. “There’s a lot of issues with being pardoned that I don’t think Biden took into consideration, or Fauci took into consideration either. I think he just wanted anything to protect him because he knew it was coming.

“It’s just a bummer that someone had that kind of power for so long and was such a f—-ing monster.”

Meanwhile, Harrelson fawned over Robert Kennedy Jr., Tump’s new health secretary, calling the notorious anti-vaccine advocate “heroic” and “a man who cares deeply.”

Robert Redfield, the former director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) when the pandemic erupted, has accused American and British intelligence agencies of orchestrating a clandestine campaign to shut down concerns over a possible laboratory leak in China.

In an exclusive interview with the Daily Mail, the world-renowned virologist says he is now '100 per cent' convinced that Covid-19 was the result of scientists becoming infected while carrying out high-risk experiments to boost the infectivity of bat viruses amid low biosecurity in laboratories in the city of Wuhan.

He believes that Anthony Fauci, former chief medical advisor to President Biden, worked with the heads of US and UK research funding bodies to push a now-debunked theory of natural transmission from animals on sale in the Wuhan wet market to humans.

The purpose, he claims, was to cover up their support for controversial 'gain-of-function' research, which was banned in the US between 2014-2017. Any dissenting scientists were labelled as conspiracy theorists.

Redfield also fears security services secretly 'pulled a lot of the strings' to protect their agents inside China's military-linked laboratories, pointing to Fauci's ties with intelligence since 2004 while running the $38billion US biosecurity programme.

'The role of the intelligence community is much deeper than meets the eye. It was so effective. I think it was not just the Americans – the British had to be involved too.

'Intelligence agencies spent a lot of time and energy infiltrating Chinese research programmes, including military programmes, and they were trying to protect their assets as far as possible so did not want any investigations into that [Wuhan] laboratory.

'The more scrutiny of the laboratory, especially by the Chinese leadership, the higher the risk. I don't know all the answers, but the bottom line is that this does not smell right.'

In a remarkable four-hour interview, Redfield, the infectious disease expert who spent two decades serving as a scientist in the military...

Called Dr Fauci 'a father of the virus' for his long-standing promotion of gain-of-function research (in which an organism's genes are altered to boost infectivity or other characteristics supposedly to help better understand future outbreaks) despite deep concern from other experts over the dangers.
Said he believes the lab leak occurred between mid-August and September 2019, when scientists at the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV) became infected and then spread the virus around the city.

Argues China's leaders covered up the outbreak from mid-September, when their military took full control of WIV – and on the same day the lab took virus databases offline and ordered a new ventilation system.

Suspects the October 2019 Military World Games, when thousands of athletes converged on Wuhan, played a significant role in spreading the disease worldwide.

Reveals he received fake anthrax and death threats after saying he suspected a possible lab leak – including from a leading US scientist who told him to kill himself.

Now calls for misconduct investigations into what he says was Fauci's cabal of international scientists who branded backers of the lab leak idea as conspiracy theorists, despite evidence emerging that several privately held similar concerns.

These are explosive claims by Redfield, 73, a prominent AIDS researcher before he became the first virologist to lead the CDC, with its network of domestic and international offices, including one in China.

The German version of the CIA —der BND— gave a secret report to U.S. intelligence agencies in December. The report, concluding with 85% certainty that covid was made in the Wuhan lab, provided previously-unseen evidence in the form of unpublished research reports written by scientists working in the lab. But even that admission buried the lede.

A critical distinction the fake-news media has deliberately blurred for years is the key difference between a dangerous virus that leaks from a lab, or a dangerous virus that was made in the lab. The two concepts are related—but their implications are vastly different.

Over the past two years, as the media has crept ever closer to just admitting Covid leaked from Wuhan, they’ve carefully sidestepped the bigger question: was it a naturally occurring virus that spilled out due to sloppy lab safety? Or was it deliberately engineered—a much more sinister possibility, one that raises disturbing but important questions about motive.

Independent researchers have long pointed to viral features suggesting artificial origins—its furin cleavage site, embedded HIV segments, human-optimized receptor binding domain, and the conspicuous absence of gradual adaptation in humans. But this BND report marks the first official acknowledgment—at a very high level of confidence—that SARS-CoV-2 was an artificial virus.

The Daily Mail’s story also revealed the Germans had this intelligence since 2020, raising more pressing questions: Why weren’t public officials more forthcoming when this information mattered? Why did they hold back better intelligence when it could have changed the course of events?

The story quoted Dr. Richard Ebright, a Rutgers University professor, who said, “The main points are clear: All informed persons - without exception - knew by early 2020 that SARS-CoV-2 likely entered humans through a research-related incident in Wuhan.” It is no longer just a lab leak. It has evolved into a “research-related incident.”

Ebright was blunt: “the scientific establishment and the intelligence agencies of the US and Germany withheld information from the public and policy makers.” Not unsurprisingly, the BND report also alleged that the Chinese are continuing the research. Were covid’s lab origins withheld so that the research could continue uninterrupted? Did some agency worry that, if the public and officials found out, the plug would be pulled?

But the plug must be pulled. And fast. But were there even darker motivations behind what has undeniably become the greatest cover-up in human history?

Each new revelation, exposed unwillingly in drops and squirts, adds to the mounting stack of damning evidence. As the government censorship complex encounters its rapid unscheduled dissassembly, more and better information continues to emerge. At what late date will it finally be enough?

In mid-2018, Washington insiders rehearsed the reverse-engineered ‘Global Health Crisis’… in plain sight

Clade X - the least covered and most revealing tabletop exercise - provides key evidence of planning-in-plain-sight for the coordinated US-led ‘response’ to the manufactured COVID crisis… starting with a ‘vaccine solution’ and working backwards to an ‘outbreak’.

On the fifth anniversary of the launch of lockdowns across the ‘free world’, Clade X - held in Washington DC on 15 May 2018 and promoted internationally as a template for policy decisions in the event of a ‘global pandemic’ - deserves more scrutiny.

Like the Dark Winter simulation in June 2001, Clade X involved a series of urgently-convened National Security Council meetings with a cast of high level US Government characters to discuss measures to mitigate an evolving ‘pandemic’.

[Plot spoiler alert: In a repeat of Dark Winter - and a portent of Operation COVID-19 - the powers that be determine that the only way to prevent deaths on an apocalyptic scale is the deployment of mass Quarantines-and-Vaccines… to the fortuitous benefit of those with vested public-private interests!]

March 2020 Intel Brief to PM Johnson: "COVID-19 WAS ENGINEERED IN WUHAN INSTITUTE OF VIROLOGY.

Briefing from former head of SIS and other top security analysts stated unequivocally that pandemic originated at WIV, refuted fraudulent "Proximal Origins" paper by Andersen et al.

Fellow Substack author Michael Schellenberger just shared an intelligence briefing dated 27 March 2020 from Sir Richard Dearlove, former head of British intelligence, and other ranking security analysts to Prime Minister Johnson. The following is a reproduction of the first page.




In other words, Sir Richard and his team expressly told Prime Minister Boris Johnson on March 27, 2020 that SARS-CoV-2 came out of the WIV.

https://s3.documentcloud.org/documents/23993097/covid-second-briefing-redacted.pdf

Zeynep told it straight. She described the criminal behavior of noted scientists and NIH officials who scrubbed emails, bought burner phones, held secret conferences, taught each other tricks about how to avoid public records exposure, and altogether conspired to manufacture a fake narrative of natural viral origin, even while warning each other that the damned thing must have leaked from the lab. Evolutionary biologist Kristian Andersen, for example, wrote in the conspirators’ secret Slack channel, “The lab escape version of this is so friggin’ likely to have happened because they were already doing this type of work and the molecular data is fully consistent with that scenario.”

Then David Morens, senior advisor to Fauci himself, wrote to EcoHealth president Peter Daszak saying, “We’re all smart enough to know to never have smoking guns, and if we did, we wouldn’t put them in emails, and if we found them, we’d delete them.”

The Professor also described, without equivocation, how NGO darling Daszak drafted and circulated a natural origins letter while strategizing about how to hide his tracks and assuring his recruited team of signing scientists that it “will not be identifiable as coming from any one organization or person.” Meaning, himself. The Lancet published Daszak’s fake letter and has never retracted it.

“What else,” Zeynep rightly wondered, “is still being kept from us about the pandemic that half a decade ago changed all of our lives?” ...

Well, Zeynep? Preventing future lab-leaked pandemics is an admirable goal, but what part does decency play in the orchestrated public health cover-up you so eloquently described? Or does accountability only apply to those of us in the tier below your élite club?

Fauci is one of the worst medical criminals this country has seen. He has had multiple weapons of choice, including AZT, remdesivir (run death is near), and of course, the mRNA vaccines.

An Unsuspected Fauci Basher: The Bill Maher Show

The conspiracy theorists have won again. The lab leak theory has slowly but surely transformed from a conspiracy theory to a widely accepted cause of the covid pandemic.

Bill Maher, one of the last standing sane democrats, recently had a guest on his show who slammed Fauci’s gain of function research.

Most people thought that Obama put a pause on gain of function research in 2014. The sad reality is that we merely closed US research sites at the time and relocated everything to China. The rest is history.

It’s nice to see the right and left slowly unite on this. After all, medical ethics should be a commonly shared goal among political parties.

The Trump White House has drastically repurposed the COVID.gov website into a public-facing indictment of the pandemic establishment, accusing Anthony Fauci, federal agencies, and international bodies of suppressing the truth about COVID-19’s origins. The news comes as Trump tightens the screws on the Chinese Communist Party. The National Pulse understands the COVID.gov website does massive amounts of organic web traffic.The revamped site now leads with the claim that the virus likely leaked from the Wuhan Institute of Virology and that Fauci helped orchestrate the now-infamous “Proximal Origin” paper to shut down the lab leak theory, both stories that were first broken here on The National Pulse.

“The Proximal Origin of SARS-CoV-2” publication — which was used repeatedly by public health officials and the media to discredit the lab leak theory — was prompted by Dr. Fauci to push the preferred narrative that COVID-19 originated naturally.

1.
The virus possesses a biological characteristic that is not found in nature.

2.
Data shows that all COVID-19 cases stem from a single introduction into humans. This runs contrary to previous pandemics where there were multiple spillover events.

3.
Wuhan is home to China’s foremost SARS research lab, which has a history of conducting gain-of-function research (gene altering and organism supercharging) at inadequate biosafety levels.

4.
Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV) researchers were sick with COVID-like symptoms in the fall of 2019, months before COVID-19 was discovered at the wet market.

5.
By nearly all measures of science, if there was evidence of a natural origin it would have already surfaced. But it hasn’t.

In a strong reversal of its previous denial, the Trump Administration just published its summary of the House Report on the Coronavirus Review of the Coronavirus Pandemic on the White House website.

Now it is time for a Special Prosecutor to be named to commence the Covid Crimes Commission that will be affectionately named, Operation COVID 19 Justice.

The Trump White House just published this damning report on its public-facing website. This report, which is entitled, Lab Leak - The True Origins of COVID 19, represents the first half of the COVID 19 crime story. The second half of the story is the expansion of the countermeasure strategy that turned out to be equally disastrous. We can hope that the second half of the story will be acknowledged by the Trump Administration soon, so that the deadly COVID 19 Gene Therapy injections can be stopped and justice received for the victims of that countermeasure (every citizen of the world who either took the injections of were exposed to them via shedding).

This is an important development. ...

We are waiting.

I propose that the Trump Department of Justice name Dr. David Martin and Aaron Siri as Special Prosecutors to lead the COVID Crimes Commission, which will essentially be a crimes against humanity tribunal in the United States. It is essential that the leadership of such a commission come from outside of government. At the same time, President Trump and Secretary of State Marco Rubio should pressure German authorities to release investigator Reiner Fuellmich from prison so that he can convene a formal tribunal to prosecute the COVID 19 crimes against humanity. Fuellmich was convening an unofficial COVID 19 crimes against humanity commission when he was framed by the international Deep State on fake charges. The international Deep State has already been implicated in the COVID crimes by orchestrating and advancing the cover-up, the censorship, and the countermeasures.

There is no need for me to review all the crimes that were committed. That evidence is well-established. It is time for action.

I sound like Ceffer. But he's been right on his non-hyperbolic predictions, so I'm OK with that.

stereotomy says

I sound like Ceffer. But he's been right on his non-hyperbolic predictions, so I'm OK with that.

I have a non-hyperbolic prediction? I'll have to watch that. I thought they were all hyperbolic.

But he's been right on his non-hyperbolic predictions

Please provide a highly detailed and technical hand waiving dismissal of deaths following the Hiroshima bombing with the same kind of 'lying with statistics' Fauci would deny sudden death proximal to Covid vaccination.

ChatGPT said:

Sure. Here's a highly technical, statistically polished Fauci-style hand-waving dismissal of the deaths following the Hiroshima bombing, crafted to mimic the rhetorical and statistical style often criticized as obfuscatory or evasive:

Preliminary Epidemiological Clarification on Post-Event Mortality in Hiroshima

In light of renewed public discourse concerning mortality events in Hiroshima following the August 6, 1945 deployment of an ordnance device, it is essential to underscore that correlation does not imply causation. While there exists a temporal proximity between the detonation and a statistically observable increase in all-cause mortality, rigorous multivariate regression analyses suggest the need for caution before assigning direct causality to the incident in question.

1. Temporal Association ≠ Causality
Initial reports of "sudden" or "unexplained" mortality in the aftermath of the Hiroshima event have been disproportionately weighted by retrospective bias. Survivorship data inherently suffer from ascertainment skew: only those proximal to clinical care, and thus documentation, were recorded. The resultant data set suffers from selection bias, whereby only individuals within observational reach were counted. Hence, attributing mortality to any one cause, including acute ionizing radiation exposure, is premature and lacks the statistical power required for a definitive conclusion.

2. Absence of a Control Group
Without a randomized control cohort—e.g., a demographically and environmentally matched city exposed to a placebo detonation—it is epidemiologically irresponsible to claim with certainty that the bomb alone was a singular mortality vector. Natural confounders such as malnutrition, concurrent bacterial infections, poor infrastructure, and pre-existing socioeconomic stressors must be statistically accounted for before drawing monocausal inferences.

3. Post Hoc Attribution and ‘Background Mortality’
Deaths categorized as “radiation-induced” or “blast-related” are often derived from post hoc diagnostic criteria, many of which rely on subjective clinical judgments. Indeed, the increase in leukemia and other cancers could simply reflect a natural rise in incidence that coincidentally aligned with post-war environmental degradation. It is also crucial to note that during this same period, significant urban populations globally were experiencing increased disease burdens due to wartime conditions—suggesting that the observed effects may be attributable to global rather than local phenomena.

4. The Danger of Anecdotalism
While individual cases of hair loss, hemorrhage, or epilation may appear to confirm narratives of acute radiation syndrome (ARS), these are anecdotal and uncorroborated by double-blind, placebo-controlled studies. In fact, many such symptoms are psychosomatic or can be explained by stress-induced somatic reactivity (SISR), particularly in a highly traumatized civilian population. Therefore, these observations do not meet the evidentiary threshold of clinical significance.

5. Statistical Outliers Misrepresented as Normative
The focus on extreme mortality clusters within the first 48–72 hours post-detonation obfuscates the broader trend: the majority of Hiroshima residents did not die immediately and in fact exhibited resilience and immune system adaptation over time. The outliers should not dictate policy or historical interpretation, particularly when the broader data curve suggests a return to normalized mortality baselines within 36 months.

6. Modeling Challenges and Confounding Variables
Current modeling techniques, including Monte Carlo simulations and Bayesian posterior probability matrices, indicate that a significant portion of observed mortality variance can be attributed to environmental collapse, not the bomb per se. Additionally, potential radiological confounders—including preexisting radon exposure or chemical contaminants from industrial installations—cannot be ruled out. The detonation’s net impact, in statistical terms, is within the bounds of wartime mortality fluctuations.

Conclusion

While the Hiroshima event is frequently framed as a mass-casualty radiation disaster, the available evidence—when appropriately adjusted for confounders, selection bias, and observational noise—does not robustly support that conclusion. Scientists and historians must resist the temptation of narrative-driven analysis and instead prioritize rigorous, longitudinal, peer-reviewed inquiry before assigning causal blame to a singular event. Public health policy should not be shaped by optics or anecdote but by dispassionate statistical modeling.

2. Absence of a Control Group
Without a randomized control cohort—e.g., a demographically and environmentally matched city exposed to a placebo detonation—it is epidemiologically irresponsible to claim with certainty that the bomb alone was a singular mortality vector.

Fauci Household Got $3.5M Wealthier in First Year After Retirement

As he hit speaker circuit, wife Dr. Christine Grady remained NIH’s chief bioethicist.

Biden Administration Concealed Congressionally Mandated Report on Earliest Suspected American COVID Cases

Seven Americans may have contracted COVID-19 in Wuhan in October 2019, several months before the reported start of the pandemic, according to a bombshell military report obtained by the Washington Free Beacon that the Biden administration concealed from the public.

The December 2022 report, which the Biden administration was required by law to release to the public over two years ago but didn’t, reveals for the first time that seven U.S. military service members contracted COVID-19-like symptoms during or after their participation in the World Military Games in Wuhan in October 2019—contradicting the Biden administration’s public claims in 2021 that there was no evidence that any American participants contracted the virus at those games. The revelation adds to a mounting body of evidence that the virus was circulating in Wuhan for months before China disclosed it to the world in December 2019 and further bolsters the growing consensus that it could have leaked into the human population from a Chinese lab.

The 2022 National Defense Authorization Act required the Biden administration to make its report on the 2019 Wuhan World Military Games "publicly available on an internet website in a searchable format" by the summer of 2022. Though the Biden administration transmitted copies of the two-page report to the House and Senate Armed Services Committees in December 2022, it didn’t see the light of day until sometime in late March when the Trump administration quietly uploaded it to a Defense Department website.

Fauci’s Replacement at NIAID a Cheerleader for Gain-of-Function Research...

Jeffery Taubenberger, M.D., Ph.D., a 19-year veteran of NIAID and chief of the institute’s Viral Pathogenesis and Evolution Section, replaced Dr. Jeanne Marrazzo, who was placed on leave last month by the Trump administration.