patrick.net

I don't know personally know anyone who died of Wuhan Virus, but now you and I know people who were murdered by Fauci via his "vaccine".

The 'silver or the bullet' fiat money pouring into this fraud is amazing, as is the rank cowardice of the people we are supposed to be able to trust. Decades of credibility flushed and burned up in a short time for the psychopaths to reach their goals, turning scientists and doctors into useful idiots along with MSM.

Google funded research conducted by Peter Daszak, a controversial British scientist credited for the online silencing of the theory that COVID-19 virus leaked from a lab. Google claims the research it funded was not related to COVID-19.

It was a letter organized by Daszak that was used by Facebook as the basis of its censorship of the lab hypothesis.

As revealed by The National Pulse, Google’s charity arm, Google.org, funded several scientific studies co-authored by Daszak between 2010 and 2018.

Google’s charity arm, Google.org, funded several scientific studies co-authored by Daszak between 2010 and 2018.

The sudden shift in narrative over the possibility that COVID-19 could have emerged from a lab in Wuhan, China, is mysterious and is evidence of “just how corrupt our system has become,” according to evolutionary biologist Bret Weinstein. ...

“My channel was very early on this topic, and it was quite clear to many of us, starting with the tremendous coincidence of this virus having emerged first in Wuhan, where there is a biosafety level four lab studying these very viruses and enhancing them,” said Weinstein. “It was quite clear that there was at least a viable hypothesis that needed to be discussed.

Weinstein, a visiting fellow at the James Madison Program at Princeton University, said that before the narrative surrounding the COVID-19 lab leak theory gained traction, those who did discuss it were stigmatized, demonized and “portrayed as everything from racist to reactionary.”

“All we were doing was following the evidence,” Weinstein continued. “The change in that story was, I have to say, completely mysterious.”

While the theory that the virus was the result of a leak from the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV) was labeled a “conspiracy theory” last year, it has recently gained traction as a growing number of scientists and officials have lent credence to the hypothesis.

COVID-19, the disease caused by the CCP (Chinese Communist Party) virus, was first reported in the Chinese city of Wuhan.

A January State Department fact sheet raised questions about whether the outbreak could have been the result of a lab accident at WIV. It said the United States has “reason to believe” that several WIV researchers became sick with symptoms consistent with both COVID-19 and common seasonal illnesses in autumn 2019. The department also said the lab had been conducting secret military experiments on animals since at least 2017, and that it has a history of conducting gain-of-function research on viruses. Such research involves modifying viruses to have new or enhanced capabilities. ...

Weinstein criticized the explanations provided in recent weeks by “all of those who had gotten the story wrong” after the lab leak theory gained wider recognition.

PolitiFact, for example, on May 24 quietly retracted a September 2020 fact check that labeled a Hong Kong virologist’s claim that COVID-19 originated in a lab as inaccurate and a “debunked conspiracy theory.”

“The claim is inaccurate and ridiculous,” the now-archived fact check previously said. “We rate it Pants on Fire!” ...

Separately, the Washington Post quietly walked back its claims regarding the COVID-19 lab leak theory.

The paper in February 2020 published an article claiming the idea was a “conspiracy theory” that had been “debunked.” The article attacked Sen. Tom Cotton (R-Ark.), who called for an investigation into the origins of the CCP virus.

*Some reporters have said that they disregarded the lab leak theory because Republicans were largely the ones promoting the idea.*

Weinstein described the phenomenon as “a headlong rush, by all of those who had gotten the story wrong to explain themselves—and their explanations made less than no sense.”

He said that certain journalists or media outlets “seemed to center on the fact that because [former President] Donald Trump had been favorable to the idea that this might have emerged from a lab, that that made it not true.”

“Which, of course, is such an illogical conclusion that it’s hard to imagine how anybody who considers himself a journalist could for a moment have been misled,” he continued. “I mean, at worst, if you thought everything that Donald Trump said was a lie—at worst, you would have to take it as no evidence either way.

“But that’s not how people treated it. They treated it almost as if the truth was always the opposite of what he said.”

Other outlets have also corrected or quietly updated stories, including Vox, while Facebook stopped banning posts suggesting the virus was man-made.

Weinstein said that he believes it eventually became “impossible to maintain the public lie that a laboratory version was somehow in conflict with the evidence.”

“And we now know from Dr. Fauci, his emails, that behind the scenes, the top people didn’t believe it either. They were just simply feeding the public a line that they had their own reasons for wanting the public to believe,” he said.

“I do have hope. But it is contingent on the several different stories that surround COVID revealing to us just how corrupt our system has become.”

Another theory:

"Was Coronavirus a Biowarfare Attack Against China?"

https://www.unz.com/article/was-coronavirus-a-biowarfare-attack-against-china/

Karloff says

Another theory:

"Was Coronavirus a Biowarfare Attack Against China?"

https://www.unz.com/article/was-coronavirus-a-biowarfare-attack-against-china/

Looks like a propaganda attempt to make China the "victim" and not the perp. Now that the "wet market" lie is getting exposed, here is an attempt to say the West developed the bug and hit Wuhan with it.

Therefore, it usually takes several years to design a vaccine prototype and then develop new vaccines. However, China seemed to be very familiar with the development of this vaccine.

It is common knowledge that vaccine prototypes used in clinical trials must first be developed over a lengthy time. The Pfizer vaccine began research and development on March 20, 2020 and it took them at least four months to produce a feasible prototype; Chinese state media reported the Sinopharm vaccine began its R&D on Jan. 19, 2020, and started clinical trials on April 12 in the same year.

Sinopharm was faster at creating a vaccine than Pfizer, which implies that the CCP was prepared for a pandemic before it all began, including getting a head start on the vaccine.

Later that morning, at 11:47 a.m., Dr. Auchincloss replied to Dr. Fauci:

The paper you sent me says the experiments were performed before the gain-of-function pause but have since been reviewed and approved by NIH. Not sure what this means since [we are] sure that no coronavirus work has gone through the P3 framework. [We] will try to determine if we have any distant ties to this work abroad.

Wow! Dr. Auchincloss’ email confirms Dr. Fauci’s worst fear. American tax dollars funded gain of function research at the WIV and that research didn’t go through proper oversight (the P3 framework).

Dr. Fauci already knew there was a lethal virus on the loose in Wuhan, China. In just 13 hours, between 10:32 p.m. January 31, 2020, and 11:47 a.m. February 1, 2020, Dr. Fauci learned three additional facts.

First, Dr. Fauci knew that American taxpayers had helped to fund dangerous gain-of-function research in Wuhan, China.

Second, Dr. Fauci knew this research funding did not go through the government’s required safety review process — a process known as the P3 framework.

Third, Dr. Fauci knew that the virus “looked…engineered” and seemed to be “inconsistent with evolutionary theory.”

Fauci and Daszak created the virus specifically to sell the "vaccine".

M-CAM International Innovation Risk Management Chairman Dr. David Martin gives a deposition to attorney Reiner Fuellmich after scrutinizing thousands of patents since the early 2000’s for the SarsCov spike protein injections, naming companies, universities, and major players, including DARPA and government entities.

One cannot patent something found in nature, so they created computer-generated genome sequences claimed to be coronaviruses, patented those man-made sequences, allowing patenting the PCR test sequence to detect their contrived sequence, then allowing patenting the jab, comprised of synthetic lab-made proteins to “treat” the contrived, patented coronavirus, detected by the patented test, to detect the make-believe virus, “and then they poison you.”

According to him, “outbreaks” are merely PCR test fraud looking for made-up patented sequences using the name coronavirus, SARS, etc. They only exist on paper for patent reasons; the real bioweapon is in the jab, not an actual virus circulating the public.

https://americasfrontlinedoctors.org/frontlinenews/watch-dr-david-martin-exposes-sarscov-spike-protein-injection-patents-since-early-2000s/

M-CAM International Innovation Risk Management Chairman Dr. David Martin gives a deposition to attorney Reiner Fuellmich after scrutinizing thousands of patents since the early 2000’s for the SarsCov spike protein injections, naming companies, universities, and major players, including DARPA and government entities.

One cannot patent something found in nature, so they created computer-generated genome sequences claimed to be coronaviruses, patented those man-made sequences, allowing patenting the PCR test sequence to detect their contrived sequence, then allowing patenting the jab, comprised of synthetic lab-made proteins to “treat” the con...

Sen. Paul began by reminding the ubiquitous doctor of Section 1001 of the US Criminal Code, which makes it a felony, carrying a prison term of up to five years, for lying to Congress. He then reminded Dr Fauci that on his last testimony before Congress, on May 11, he stated that the National Institutes of Health, where Dr Fauci is employed, ‘has not ever and does not now fund gain-of-function research in the Wuhan Institute of Virology’.

Oh dear.

Let me introduce you to Dr Shi Zhengli, the infamous ‘Bat Lady’, whom Sen. Paul referred to in his presentation.

Dr Shi is a researcher at the Wuhan Institute of Virology. She and her colleagues have been engaged in gain-of-function research there for years.

What is ‘gain-of-function’ research? It is experimenting with virus to make them more communicable, more virulent, or transmissible from animals to humans.

Why would one do this? To create biological weapons is one reason. Another, claimed by Dr Shi and her colleagues in 2015, is to investigate ‘the potential to prepare for and mitigate future outbreaks’.

The trouble is, as the science reporter Nicholas Wade points out in Where COVID Came From, ‘The benefits of the research in preventing future epidemics have so far been nil, the risks vast.

I think Wade is right. Given what we know now, ‘it seems clear that the NIH did not intend its funds to be used for gain-of-function’. ‘Intend.’ But it is undeniable — no, that’s not quite right, because Fauci did deny it — let me say then that it is simply the case that ‘researchers at the Wuhan Institute of Virology were doing gain-of-function experiments designed to make coronaviruses infect human cells and humanized mice.’ At least some of that research was funded by US taxpayers via grants made through agencies of the NIH.

Will Dr Fauci ever take responsibility for COVID’s emergence?
St Anthony was raked over hot coals by Sen. Rand Paul again this week

That's very scary if it was true, its better to stay away from the doctors unless in emergency.

Sometimes the treatment is the cause of a new disease if that makes sense.

Watch CNN Personalities Squirm As They're Being Roasted Live On Air For Their Sycophantic "Fangirling" Over Dr. Fauci

There was a study comparing Minnesota to Florida because Florida has twice the doctors per person that Minnesota does. Life expectancy was higher in Minnesota, where there were far fewer doctors around.

Tylenol is worse on your liver than a handle of vodka.

More propaganda ticker tape from the Deep (Shallow) State:

Database Proving How Fauci Funded Wuhan Lab Has Been Taken Offline.
AUGUST 1, 2021NATALIE WINTERS

When searched, the database, which itemizes the billions of taxpayer-funded grants distributed by various National Institutes of Health (NIH) agencies, yields no results and prompts users with an error message. Among the agencies included in the registry is the Fauci-led National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), which has come under scrutiny for funding gain-of-function research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology.

The website also previously revealed NIAID-directed funds for joint research between disgrace COVID-19 investigator Peter Daszak’s EcoHealth Alliance and the Chinese government-run lab under the auspices of a nearly $3.7 million grant entitled “Understanding the Risk of Bat Coronavirus Emergence.”