patrick.net

Later that morning, at 11:47 a.m., Dr. Auchincloss replied to Dr. Fauci:

The paper you sent me says the experiments were performed before the gain-of-function pause but have since been reviewed and approved by NIH. Not sure what this means since [we are] sure that no coronavirus work has gone through the P3 framework. [We] will try to determine if we have any distant ties to this work abroad.

Wow! Dr. Auchincloss’ email confirms Dr. Fauci’s worst fear. American tax dollars funded gain of function research at the WIV and that research didn’t go through proper oversight (the P3 framework).

Dr. Fauci already knew there was a lethal virus on the loose in Wuhan, China. In just 13 hours, between 10:32 p.m. January 31, 2020, and 11:47 a.m. February 1, 2020, Dr. Fauci learned three additional facts.

First, Dr. Fauci knew that American taxpayers had helped to fund dangerous gain-of-function research in Wuhan, China.

Second, Dr. Fauci knew this research funding did not go through the government’s required safety review process — a process known as the P3 framework.

Third, Dr. Fauci knew that the virus “looked…engineered” and seemed to be “inconsistent with evolutionary theory.”

Fauci and Daszak created the virus specifically to sell the "vaccine".

M-CAM International Innovation Risk Management Chairman Dr. David Martin gives a deposition to attorney Reiner Fuellmich after scrutinizing thousands of patents since the early 2000’s for the SarsCov spike protein injections, naming companies, universities, and major players, including DARPA and government entities.

One cannot patent something found in nature, so they created computer-generated genome sequences claimed to be coronaviruses, patented those man-made sequences, allowing patenting the PCR test sequence to detect their contrived sequence, then allowing patenting the jab, comprised of synthetic lab-made proteins to “treat” the contrived, patented coronavirus, detected by the patented test, to detect the make-believe virus, “and then they poison you.”

According to him, “outbreaks” are merely PCR test fraud looking for made-up patented sequences using the name coronavirus, SARS, etc. They only exist on paper for patent reasons; the real bioweapon is in the jab, not an actual virus circulating the public.

https://americasfrontlinedoctors.org/frontlinenews/watch-dr-david-martin-exposes-sarscov-spike-protein-injection-patents-since-early-2000s/

M-CAM International Innovation Risk Management Chairman Dr. David Martin gives a deposition to attorney Reiner Fuellmich after scrutinizing thousands of patents since the early 2000’s for the SarsCov spike protein injections, naming companies, universities, and major players, including DARPA and government entities.

One cannot patent something found in nature, so they created computer-generated genome sequences claimed to be coronaviruses, patented those man-made sequences, allowing patenting the PCR test sequence to detect their contrived sequence, then allowing patenting the jab, comprised of synthetic lab-made proteins to “treat” the con...

Sen. Paul began by reminding the ubiquitous doctor of Section 1001 of the US Criminal Code, which makes it a felony, carrying a prison term of up to five years, for lying to Congress. He then reminded Dr Fauci that on his last testimony before Congress, on May 11, he stated that the National Institutes of Health, where Dr Fauci is employed, ‘has not ever and does not now fund gain-of-function research in the Wuhan Institute of Virology’.

Oh dear.

Let me introduce you to Dr Shi Zhengli, the infamous ‘Bat Lady’, whom Sen. Paul referred to in his presentation.

Dr Shi is a researcher at the Wuhan Institute of Virology. She and her colleagues have been engaged in gain-of-function research there for years.

What is ‘gain-of-function’ research? It is experimenting with virus to make them more communicable, more virulent, or transmissible from animals to humans.

Why would one do this? To create biological weapons is one reason. Another, claimed by Dr Shi and her colleagues in 2015, is to investigate ‘the potential to prepare for and mitigate future outbreaks’.

The trouble is, as the science reporter Nicholas Wade points out in Where COVID Came From, ‘The benefits of the research in preventing future epidemics have so far been nil, the risks vast.

I think Wade is right. Given what we know now, ‘it seems clear that the NIH did not intend its funds to be used for gain-of-function’. ‘Intend.’ But it is undeniable — no, that’s not quite right, because Fauci did deny it — let me say then that it is simply the case that ‘researchers at the Wuhan Institute of Virology were doing gain-of-function experiments designed to make coronaviruses infect human cells and humanized mice.’ At least some of that research was funded by US taxpayers via grants made through agencies of the NIH.

Will Dr Fauci ever take responsibility for COVID’s emergence?
St Anthony was raked over hot coals by Sen. Rand Paul again this week

That's very scary if it was true, its better to stay away from the doctors unless in emergency.

Sometimes the treatment is the cause of a new disease if that makes sense.

Watch CNN Personalities Squirm As They're Being Roasted Live On Air For Their Sycophantic "Fangirling" Over Dr. Fauci

There was a study comparing Minnesota to Florida because Florida has twice the doctors per person that Minnesota does. Life expectancy was higher in Minnesota, where there were far fewer doctors around.

Tylenol is worse on your liver than a handle of vodka.

More propaganda ticker tape from the Deep (Shallow) State:

Database Proving How Fauci Funded Wuhan Lab Has Been Taken Offline.
AUGUST 1, 2021NATALIE WINTERS

When searched, the database, which itemizes the billions of taxpayer-funded grants distributed by various National Institutes of Health (NIH) agencies, yields no results and prompts users with an error message. Among the agencies included in the registry is the Fauci-led National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), which has come under scrutiny for funding gain-of-function research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology.

The website also previously revealed NIAID-directed funds for joint research between disgrace COVID-19 investigator Peter Daszak’s EcoHealth Alliance and the Chinese government-run lab under the auspices of a nearly $3.7 million grant entitled “Understanding the Risk of Bat Coronavirus Emergence.”

Splitting hairs on the definition of “gain of function” research is not productive (“Anthony Fauci, Rand Paul and Wuhan,” Review & Outlook, July 26). Despite the federal government’s 2014 definition, genetically modifying a pathogen to increase its transmissivity to human cells—as the Wuhan Institute of Virology was doing—must count. Sen. Paul is correct and Dr. Fauci demonstrated that he is a political, not medical, animal.

What was the purpose of funding research at the Wuhan lab given its collaboration with the People’s Liberation Army? I beg to differ with your statement that “the reality is complicated.”

Dr. Anthony Fauci is back in sales mode, again representing his pharmaceutical patrons. After spending many billions already on what in many cases have become throw-away monoclonal antibodies and several questionable therapies in the pipeline, the head of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) and chief medical advisor to POTUS spent lots of time minimizing the mounting evidence associated with many generic early COVID-19 treatment options, from fluvoxamine and ivermectin to even hydroxychloroquine used in select scenarios. Now Fauci will deliver to the market the perfect pill and help the industry monetize the massive market for early-onset COVID-19 mild-to-moderate cases—the 90%+ of total cases that fit in that category.

lol wtf

Former CDC director Robert Redfield: I was “sidelined” & “threatened” for taking the lab leak theory seriously

https://notthebee.com/article/former-cdc-director-robert-redfield-says-he-was-sidelined-and-threatened-for-taking-the-lab-leak-theory-seriously

Former CDC director Robert Redfield: I was “sidelined” & “threatened” for taking the lab leak theory seriously

Of course he was.

Fraudulent Fauci does not want to hang for his crime against humanity.

idarthor said, on August 16, 2021 at 10:46 pm
Re: 2.4 – Lab Leak: This suddenly got a lot more acceptable to talk about after Biden’s election and it wasn’t just a Trump Issue. Several Dem-leaning commentators/media suddenly started talking about how we needed to take the possibility seriously some months ago, US intelligence was instructed to look into it etc, but it seems to have died down a bit for whatever reason.

Personally, I was convinced to not really care about this by a @dsquareddigest twitter take:

“an investigation into a totalitarian state which lies all the time, carried out by an intelligence service which lies all the time is simply not going to give an answer. you can’t develop a better algorithm to find the true value of one divided by zero.”