« First « Previous Comments 494 - 533 of 657 Next » Last » Search
gatito bueno1 hr agoi am just a kitten and not terribly savvy on politics, but i kinda think that maybe if “those who defrauded the american people should face prosecution” is a radical right wing idea that probably i can see why so few people seem to trust the left anymore…i mean, "if people find out about the things we did, they are gonna to be super angry at us so no one should be allowed to tell the truth" is not much of a mantra for "the side of science" is it?
Wall Street Silver@WallStreetSilvDid Fauci fund gain of function research at the Wuhan lab? Let's review the statements and evidence. 🔥🔥🔥@elonmusk
"The worst possible thing you could do is to vaccinate somebody to prevent infection and actually make them worse." - Tony Fauci.
Locking him up would be a pretty mild punishment for killing more than six million people by approving and funding illegal virus research.
“We have previously presented materials confirming the involvement of Hunter Biden and his Rosemont Seneca Foundation, as well as other US Democratic Party-controlled entities, in funding the Pentagon's main contractors operating in Ukraine.It has been shown how deeply the son of the current US president, Hunter Biden, is involved in funding the US DOD-controlled company Metabiota.However, some participants in closed projects remain in the shadows, although they are key players in Ukraine's military-biological programme.They include former DITRA director Kenneth Myers, executive vice president of the CIA-controlled In-Q-Tel venture capital fund Tara O'Toole, former head of the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Thomas Frieden, former the National Institutes of Health director Francis Collins, former Battelle Memorial Institute executive director Jeffrey Wadsworth, chief scientist and president of international research, development and medicine at Pfizer and many others.All of them, in one way or another, are beneficiaries of the Pentagon's biological projects and are linked to the US Democratic Party, whose leaders act as the masterminds of military- biological research and the creators of covert money-laundering schemes to benefit a narrow circle of US elites.It is these people who should be asked why taxpayers' money is being spent on illegal military-biological research in Ukraine and other countries around the world.” ...“Despite formal bans, the US budget is being spent on dual-use research. In this connection, the Republican Party has initiated an investigation into the director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases and President Biden's chief medical adviser Anthony Fauci. Public funding through an intermediary organisation was confirmed for experiments to enhance the pathogenicity of viruses, including coronaviruses, the incidence of which was not widespread until 2019.The investigation found that Fauci openly lied and deliberately concealed US government involvement in the research programmes.At the same time, his collusion with social media management to manipulate public opinion on the causes of COVID-19 was revealed.Such revelations raise legitimate questions for the US about the causes of new human-caused pathogens and the patterns of pandemic spread.”
@DailyCallerFLASHBACK:Tony Fauci expresses concerns about the long-term effects of an AIDS vaccine.FAUCI: "You take it, and a year goes by...Then you find out that it takes twelve years for all hell to break loose."
Question: the last time the DoD worked with the EcoHealth Alliance, 6 million people died. So if the DoD considers that project a success, then what exactly would a failed project look like? Are there any circumstances under which DoD would consider NOT contracting with EcoHealth Alliance?
NYC Protesters Crash Fauci Event, Call For Arrest Of ‘Murderer’ Over Lockdowns & Jabs
'Knew Covid had been engineered to make it infectious to humans but were told to shut-up'... Whilst looking closely for these features it became immediately obvious that this virus was extremely unlikely to have come from a bat, even via another animal, as it had inserts around the receptor binding region and - a feature not present on any similar virus - that would make it more infectious.Moreover, these features had been previously published by researchers in Wuhan, which was the largest coronavirus research laboratory in the world.We, therefore, concluded that the chances that this virus was not natural but had escaped from the laboratory were extremely high and pointed out that SARS-1 had escaped from high-security laboratories on over six occasions since its isolation.We wrote a manuscript and shared it with the Government, Cabinet and scientific advisors saying that it was extremely likely that this was a laboratory escape and had clear and present security implications. Imagine our surprise when we were told quite categorically that there was no way it could have been a laboratory escape and was a natural zoonosis. We tried to publish this on many occasions and each and every one of the top journals, including Nature, Science, The Lancet and many others refused to publish this as it was not in the public interest.What was to follow was a complete suppression of any debate about the origin, which would appear to have been driven by Tony Fauci from the NIAID in America. ...What was incredible was that this narrative was picked by governments throughout the world, all the mainstream media and the majority of scientists, who should have known better than to accept the narrative rather than look at the evidence. ...Now, more than two years later, two of the people involved with this, Professor Colin Butler from Australia and Delia Randolph from the University of Greenwich, London, have spoken out that it is clear now that all the evidence DOES support a lab leak and that there has been a suppression of the truth.There has been secrecy and cover-up of this issue on a truly Orwellian scale. ...This failure to engage with a different mindset of eminent scientists and clinicians at this time has probably cost the UK Government at least a trillion pounds, given the long-lasting disastrous legacy of lockdown on everything from education, mental health and misdiagnosis leading to early deaths from cardiac and other diseases, such as cancer. ...The British Government in the early days of the pandemic repeatedly said they were following the science. This, for me, has to be one of the greatest lies ever told to the British people as there was no science involved in this at all. ...Covid is a respiratory virus and lockdown should never have been entertained. The only time for lockdown is for a highly infectious disease, such as Ebola, and it was clear from the beginning we were NOT dealing with an agent that kills 70 percent of the people it infects.What lessons have we learnt from this? Essentially none, but in future any new threat, infectious disease or pandemic must be addressed with open scientific debate and not the complete suppression of the truth, secrecy and coverup which unfortunately George Orwell foresaw as far back at 1948 as a possible dystopian terrifying future.
Dr. Anthony Fauci now admits the mRNA Covid vaccines hardly work and might not be approvableIn fact, a bombshell paper he co-authored last month suggests ALL vaccines for common respiratory viruses may face intractable hurdles. And that's not even the worst news. I'm not exaggerating.Alex Berenson11 hr agoLast month, three scientists pointed out flu shots barely work and couldn’t be approved based on the standards used for vaccines like measles:“After more than 60 years of experience with influenza vaccines, very little improvement in vaccine prevention of infection has been noted… our best approved influenza vaccines would be inadequate for licensure for most other vaccine-preventable diseases.” [emphasis added]True. Several rigorous papers have proven that flu shots are placebos masquerading as public policy.But the same scientists then compared our beloved and groundbreaking Covid vaccines to those pointless flu jabs:As variant SARS-CoV-2 strains have emerged, deficiencies in these [Covid] vaccines reminiscent of influenza vaccines have become apparent.Just who are these vicious anti-vax rebels?Three researchers at the National Institutes for Health. Including one whose name may ring a bell: the now-retired Dr. Anthony S. Fauci.Yet the Covid/flu shot comparison is only one of the article’s bombshells.At its core, the piece raises the question of whether any vaccines can ever work well enough to matter against bugs like common coronaviruses, influenza, and RSV.And that question hides an even more troubling one, one the authors do not ask: have our efforts to beat Sars-Cov-2 by driving our immune response in ways it was not designed to go caused dangers we are only beginning to understand?
Lab Leak Most Likely Origin of Covid-19 Pandemic, Energy Department Now SaysU.S. agency’s revised assessment is based on new intelligenceWSJ, February 26, 2023OK - so the Department of Energy has joined the FBI in determining that the virus was a lab escape. ...
So now, according to the FBI and the Department of Energy, it looks like Jon Stewart and all of us conspiracy theorists may have been right after all. In fact, it turns out there were and are people in the three letter agencies who also agree with the lab leak origin, even back in 2021.Waiting for the apologies to start in 10, 9, 8. 7…. Crickets.
Once upon a time, Dr. Anthony Fauci wanted Americans to know vaccines had risks and scientists couldn’t always give people the answers they wanted.Yes.This actually happened. And I have the proof.It was 2002, after the anthrax and Sept. 11 attacks. Fauci was pushing for a big rise in federal bioterrorism spending for his institute.By 2007, after Saddam Hussein’s laboratories turned out to be empty shells, researchers had repurposed the threat to “emerging infectious diseases” - bird flu and coronaviruses, found in Chinese caves rather than Middle Eastern labs. ...But at the time, the money was in the War on Terror. Fauci - then as now - knew how to follow the money.So, in April 2002, as the United States was beginning to gear up to invade Iraq, Fauci gave an interview called “Expanded Biodefense Role for the National Institutes of Health.” ...Fauci’s main pitch was a program that rapidly would match novel genetically engineered pathogens to the best possible treatments, a program he called “bug to drug in 24 hours.” ...Diane M Kane8 hr agoSo, let's get this straight. The government totally over-funded Fauci under the guise of preventing bioterrorism and what they accomplished is Fauci's facilitation of full-blown global bioterrorism. Am I missing something or is it that fricking simple?
« First « Previous Comments 494 - 533 of 657 Next » Last » Search