patrick.net

Woody Harrelson eviscerates Fauci over ‘extraordinarily evil s–‘ during Joe Rogan podcast interview: ‘He knows what he did’

He had no cheers for Fauci.

Woody Harrelson demolished Dr. Anthony Fauci on Joe Rogan’s podcast Saturday, accusing the former head of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases of some “extraordinarily evil s–t.” ...

Fauci, who took over as head of the NIAID in the mid-1980s, was given a preemptive pardon by former President Joe Biden on his last day at the White House amid fears once President Trump returned to office he would be subject to charges that he lied to Congress.

Once inaugurated, Trump pulled Fauci’s taxpayer-funded security detail.

In his own shot at the immunologist, Rogan said Fauci could still find himself in hot water.

“These states can still sue him,” he said. “There’s a lot of issues with being pardoned that I don’t think Biden took into consideration, or Fauci took into consideration either. I think he just wanted anything to protect him because he knew it was coming.

“It’s just a bummer that someone had that kind of power for so long and was such a f—-ing monster.”

Meanwhile, Harrelson fawned over Robert Kennedy Jr., Tump’s new health secretary, calling the notorious anti-vaccine advocate “heroic” and “a man who cares deeply.”

Robert Redfield, the former director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) when the pandemic erupted, has accused American and British intelligence agencies of orchestrating a clandestine campaign to shut down concerns over a possible laboratory leak in China.

In an exclusive interview with the Daily Mail, the world-renowned virologist says he is now '100 per cent' convinced that Covid-19 was the result of scientists becoming infected while carrying out high-risk experiments to boost the infectivity of bat viruses amid low biosecurity in laboratories in the city of Wuhan.

He believes that Anthony Fauci, former chief medical advisor to President Biden, worked with the heads of US and UK research funding bodies to push a now-debunked theory of natural transmission from animals on sale in the Wuhan wet market to humans.

The purpose, he claims, was to cover up their support for controversial 'gain-of-function' research, which was banned in the US between 2014-2017. Any dissenting scientists were labelled as conspiracy theorists.

Redfield also fears security services secretly 'pulled a lot of the strings' to protect their agents inside China's military-linked laboratories, pointing to Fauci's ties with intelligence since 2004 while running the $38billion US biosecurity programme.

'The role of the intelligence community is much deeper than meets the eye. It was so effective. I think it was not just the Americans – the British had to be involved too.

'Intelligence agencies spent a lot of time and energy infiltrating Chinese research programmes, including military programmes, and they were trying to protect their assets as far as possible so did not want any investigations into that [Wuhan] laboratory.

'The more scrutiny of the laboratory, especially by the Chinese leadership, the higher the risk. I don't know all the answers, but the bottom line is that this does not smell right.'

In a remarkable four-hour interview, Redfield, the infectious disease expert who spent two decades serving as a scientist in the military...

Called Dr Fauci 'a father of the virus' for his long-standing promotion of gain-of-function research (in which an organism's genes are altered to boost infectivity or other characteristics supposedly to help better understand future outbreaks) despite deep concern from other experts over the dangers.
Said he believes the lab leak occurred between mid-August and September 2019, when scientists at the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV) became infected and then spread the virus around the city.

Argues China's leaders covered up the outbreak from mid-September, when their military took full control of WIV – and on the same day the lab took virus databases offline and ordered a new ventilation system.

Suspects the October 2019 Military World Games, when thousands of athletes converged on Wuhan, played a significant role in spreading the disease worldwide.

Reveals he received fake anthrax and death threats after saying he suspected a possible lab leak – including from a leading US scientist who told him to kill himself.

Now calls for misconduct investigations into what he says was Fauci's cabal of international scientists who branded backers of the lab leak idea as conspiracy theorists, despite evidence emerging that several privately held similar concerns.

These are explosive claims by Redfield, 73, a prominent AIDS researcher before he became the first virologist to lead the CDC, with its network of domestic and international offices, including one in China.

The German version of the CIA —der BND— gave a secret report to U.S. intelligence agencies in December. The report, concluding with 85% certainty that covid was made in the Wuhan lab, provided previously-unseen evidence in the form of unpublished research reports written by scientists working in the lab. But even that admission buried the lede.

A critical distinction the fake-news media has deliberately blurred for years is the key difference between a dangerous virus that leaks from a lab, or a dangerous virus that was made in the lab. The two concepts are related—but their implications are vastly different.

Over the past two years, as the media has crept ever closer to just admitting Covid leaked from Wuhan, they’ve carefully sidestepped the bigger question: was it a naturally occurring virus that spilled out due to sloppy lab safety? Or was it deliberately engineered—a much more sinister possibility, one that raises disturbing but important questions about motive.

Independent researchers have long pointed to viral features suggesting artificial origins—its furin cleavage site, embedded HIV segments, human-optimized receptor binding domain, and the conspicuous absence of gradual adaptation in humans. But this BND report marks the first official acknowledgment—at a very high level of confidence—that SARS-CoV-2 was an artificial virus.

The Daily Mail’s story also revealed the Germans had this intelligence since 2020, raising more pressing questions: Why weren’t public officials more forthcoming when this information mattered? Why did they hold back better intelligence when it could have changed the course of events?

The story quoted Dr. Richard Ebright, a Rutgers University professor, who said, “The main points are clear: All informed persons - without exception - knew by early 2020 that SARS-CoV-2 likely entered humans through a research-related incident in Wuhan.” It is no longer just a lab leak. It has evolved into a “research-related incident.”

Ebright was blunt: “the scientific establishment and the intelligence agencies of the US and Germany withheld information from the public and policy makers.” Not unsurprisingly, the BND report also alleged that the Chinese are continuing the research. Were covid’s lab origins withheld so that the research could continue uninterrupted? Did some agency worry that, if the public and officials found out, the plug would be pulled?

But the plug must be pulled. And fast. But were there even darker motivations behind what has undeniably become the greatest cover-up in human history?

Each new revelation, exposed unwillingly in drops and squirts, adds to the mounting stack of damning evidence. As the government censorship complex encounters its rapid unscheduled dissassembly, more and better information continues to emerge. At what late date will it finally be enough?