patrick.net

The PCR tests were absurdly over-sensitive, enabling the authorities to detect exactly as much COVID-19 as they wanted to detect. There’s no question that the insane social interventions and counter-productive treatments contributed significantly to the death toll. And of course, people are extremely suggestible – the nocebo effect is a real thing.

However, I’m pretty sure the COVID-19 virus is real, and I’m pretty sure it came from a lab.

My own personal experience is quite enough to convince me of the former. I’ve had the virus twice, and each time it was like no cold or flu that I’ve ever had. The second time, last September, was the worst. I tested positive on the day I fell ill, and negative a few days later when the symptoms had cleared up. ...

As to its origin in a lab, enough virologists have remarked on the bizarre features of the furin cleavage site, the cytotoxic spike protein, and various aspects of the viral genome to make a reasonable case in my mind at least that they’re not talking nonsense. Combine that with the presence of a biosafety lab in Wuhan, a long organizational paper trail of grant applications and funding allocations and peer-reviewed publications relating to gain of function research, a biowarfare facility in Fort Detrick, the emails revealing the attempt by that little goblin Fauci and his merry band of lickspittle lab trolls to squelch all talk of gain of function research or lab leaks, and years of censorship and mockery of the lab leak scenario by every official regime organ. That’s a lot of smoke if there’s no fire.

Baric & the malfeasants working on the bat & mouse coronaviruses, notice the date on this NIH Fauci-Collins grant (2014) so research was going on before; I believe the leak & clone work happened here

go to page 161 and read what I have highlighted! Right there they tell us they just created this chimeric deadly coronavirus! Menachery & Baric publish in 2015 & 2016 about this deadly research

When Trump's NIH pulled Peter Daszak's grant to Wuhan in April 2020, the pushback was unimaginable. 77 Nobel laureates begged NIH to give it back.
So did 31 different "scientific societies" -- see an article in SCIENCE magazine, the journal of the American Academy for the Advancement of Science

The New York Times appeared to turn on Dr. Anthony Fauci in a recently published opinion essay that criticized the former NIH director's approach to information sharing during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Times contributing opinion writer Megan Stack wrote a column titled 'Dr. Fauci Could Have Said a Lot More,' that primarily explored the government scientist's stifling of the COVID lab leak theory that most Americans have now come to believe.

Stack, a former China correspondent, wrote that Fauci and British zoologist, Peter Daszak, were early to refute in near absolute terms the theory that the novel coronavirus sprung out of the Wuhan Institute of Virology.

Not only was that information not necessarily true, but, wrote Stack, the pair could have qualified their statements in ways that exposed Americans to more of the full picture, but they did not.

Stack further condemned Fauci for initially lying that masks weren't effective, then becoming their biggest champion, and repeatedly moving the needle on when it would be safe to lift lockdown measures.

Fauci has appeared in a new PBS documentary series: “American Masters.” The clip is titled: “Dr. Fauci visits D.C. to battle vaccine hesitancy,” and is from June 2021.

In the below segment, Fauci and DC Mayor are shown going door to door in southeast D.C. Their goal is to talk to residents on their doorstep and urge them to get the COVID-19 vaccine. ...

Fauci and Bowser then push the vaccine to a man from the bottom of the steps. They instantly get rejected. The man tells Fauci, America is not satisfied with the information being given out about the vaccine and questions the timeline of the vaccine development.

Mayor Bowser then responds to guilt trip this man for prolonging the pandemic. She (falsely) believes the vaccine stops transmission. She says:

The only reason I’m talking to you right now, as close as we are, is that I’ve been vaccinated. If thousands of people like you don’t get vaccinated, you’re going to let this virus continue to percolate in this country and in this world.

The man then added:

When you start talking about paying people to get vaccinated, when you start talking about incentivizing things to get people vaccinated, it’s something else going on with that. Y’all’s campaign is about fear. It’s about inciting fear in people. Y’all attack people with fear.

After that exchange, Fauci, Bowser and their team quickly left. The clip ends with Fauci applying hand sanitizer in the back seat of his chauffeured car.

COVID Likely Emerged From Wuhan Lab — and Earlier Than Previously Believed, Senate Report Concludes

COVID-19 likely resulted from an accidental leak at a laboratory in Wuhan, China, and triggered the start of the pandemic earlier in 2019 than Chinese government officials claimed, according to a Senate report released today.

KanekoaTheGreat
@KanekoaTheGreat
Former DNI John Ratcliffe says the CDC Director, the Secretary of State, and the Director of National Intelligence agreed that COVID-19 was most likely created in the Wuhan lab, but Dr. Anthony Fauci labeled the lab origin as a "conspiracy theory" because he funded the lab:

"You had the top diplomat, the top of the intelligence community, the top public health official all telling you with some confidence level that the most likely origin of this was a lab leak...

Some of those individuals, including Dr. Fauci, were promoting the idea that this was natural origins, and notwithstanding the language which was read, they were referring to this publicly as a conspiracy theory in certain conversations and interviews...

The best evidence of that is their own conversations, which say that they didn't want unwanted attention to the relationships that were taking place between Western virologists and those working within the Wuhan Institute of Virology and funding sources for some of that research."

KanekoaTheGreat
@KanekoaTheGreat
The former Director of National Intelligence agrees with the former CDC Director that Dr. Anthony Fauci lied to Congress under oath about funding gain-of-function research at the Wuhan lab:

"Some of Dr. Fauci's testimony is inconsistent with some of the intelligence that we have that remains classified as well as inconsistent with some information that is publicly available."

Records Show Funding for EcoHealth/Wuhan Institute Research to Create Coronavirus ‘Mutants’; Eco Health planned to sequence the spike protein from coronaviruses obtained from bats for the purpose of “creating mutants to identify how significantly each would need to evolve to use ACE2,” which is explained as “the receptor to gain entry to human cells.”; stunning FOIA findings

The only question now is was this an accidental or intentional release of the man made virus? Was it manslaughter or murder?

According the 552 pages released, the Wuhan Institute of Virology was so safe, there were assurances made to this effect and the facilities were never inspected by the US government. The risk of mutant viruses escaping the laboratory was never even discussed in the risks associated with conducting this research.

If it was so safe, doesn’t the intentional release of this mutant virus have to be considered?

This only gets worse. The year 2 report (2016) clearly states that AIM 3 for year 3 had been expanded to also include conducting gain-of-function research using the MERS virus! ...

This research has to stop now. Congress must stop the funding immediately. There must be accountability. There must be justice for the injured and the dead.

There are ten million people dead from this research “project”. Do we need another man-made outbreak to fully grasp how dangerous this type of research is?

04/20/23

Revealed: NIH Funded Research at Wuhan Lab to Create Mutant Bat Coronaviruses and Study Their Capacity to Infect Humans
Records obtained by Judicial Watch show the National Institutes of Health funded an EcoHealth Alliance grant for sequencing the spike protein from coronaviruses obtained from bats to “creat[e] mutants to identify how significantly each would need to evolve to use ACE2,” which is explained as “the receptor to gain entry to human cells.”

The latest Twitter Files release has provided new evidence that proves Dr. Anthony Fauci lied under oath during his congressional testimony.

During his 7-hour deposition in November, Fauci, Democrat President Joe Biden’s former chief health advisor, stated under oath that he had never used Twitter.

He even went as far as to claim that he “wouldn’t know how to access Twitter if you paid me.”

However, according to the latest release of the social media platform’s internal communication files, Fauci was tasked with running the official White House COVID-19 Response account on Twitter. ...

Igor Chudov 🐭
@ichudov
Sars-CoV-2 in a 2006 scientific study?

WTF is that?

A chimera of HIV, Sars-CoV-1, and Sars-CoV-2????

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7542541/

Fauci FINALLY admits Covid vaccine mandates he helped orchestrate fueled anti-vaxx movement across the US
Dr Fauci was an early vocal supporter of federal and state government mandates
Mandates were meant to bolster lagging vaccination rates during the delta wave

WASHINGTON, D.C. — In a testy exchange with an interviewer for Meet the Press last week, Dr. Anthony Fauci claimed he never locked down schools and hasn't even heard of COVID.

"COVID? I've never even heard of such a thing! What is COVID? That sounds made up!" said the former NIAID Director and COVID advisor to the President. "And I certainly had nothing to do with locking down schools and destroying kids' learning and development for over a year. What kind of monster would do something like that? You must have me confused with someone else."

The interviewer then nervously checked his notes to make sure he was, indeed talking to Anthony Fauci, the chief architect of U.S. COVID policies. "But it says here that--"

"Shut up!" cried Fauci as he smacked the notes out of the interviewer's hands. "I'll ask the questions here! I AM SCIENCE!"

Sources say the doctor further denied any involvement in business closures, Wuhan lab coverups, or the field of medicine altogether. At publishing time, former President Trump had claimed to have no idea who Fauci was.

One Health is also a funding stream for collecting viruses for GOF research. And USAID is a big funder; isn't USAID another name for CIA? Isn't Gain of Function another name for Germ Warfare?

Enter Jonna Mazet, a very close colleague of Peter Daszak and prof at UC Davis. She ran the Predict project to trap wild viruses and send them back to DOD's DTRA for further investigation, etc. ...

And guess what? The Global Virome Project [to produce viruses for the next pandemic] is supported by Tedros and friends at WHO through the Trinity Challenge—in which Daszak, Mazet and friends wants donors and partners to fund them to keep catching viruses for fun and profit.

Florida Governor Ron DeSantis was in New Hampshire this week, and has obviously coined a whole new term for overreaching and incompetent government: “Fauci-ism.”

https://twitter.com/michaelpsenger/status/1659656218682757120?ref_src=patrick.net

Specifically, DeSantis said:

They want to institutionalize lockdowns. They act like ‘this worked,’ when it did incredible damage throughout our country…it destroyed parts of the economy, and it didn’t stop the spread…so the idea we would even be entertaining that going forward is absolutely crazy. I think we need to make sure we say: Fauci-ism was wrong. Fauci-ism was destructive. We will never let Fauci-ism take root in this country ever again.

I can’t think of any better way to honor the late head of the NIAID, except perhaps a firing squad (after a fair trial, of course). Making the doctor’s name a hissing and a byword might be the next best thing.

Ron DeSantis was in New Hampshire this week, and has obviously coined a whole new term for overreaching and incompetent government: “Fauci-ism.”

@KimDotcom
This is the most important video you will watch this year. Millions were killed with Covid-19 for profit.

“Covid-19 was an act of biological warfare perpetrated on the human race. It was a financial heist. Nature was hijacked. Science was hijacked.”

https://twitter.com/KimDotcom/status/1661698114917646336?ref_src=patrick.net
KimDotcom
This is the most important video you will watch this year. Millions were killed with Covid-19 for profit.
“Covid-19 was an act of biological warfare perpetrated on the human race. It was a financial heist. Nature was hijacked. Science was hijacked.”

A new study published in the the Journal of Biological Chemistry this month with the complex title, “SARS-CoV-2 Spike Ectodomain Targets α7 Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors.” It was more bad news about the spike, showing how nature somehow rapidly evolved the spike protein in parallel to lots of other existing deadly diseases and poisons.

Here’s the knockout part of the study, right from the article’s abstract:

The SARS-CoV-2 glycoprotein contains a neurotoxin-like region that has sequence similarities to the rabies virus and the HIV glycoproteins, as well as to snake neurotoxins, which interact with nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (nAChR) subtypes via this region.
Snake venom! The researchers discovered neurotoxic, snake venom-like genetic characteristics within the spike protein. It confirms Dr. Brian Ardis’ concerns, who faced ridicule and exclusion from medical freedom conferences after he discussed the similarities between the spike protein and snake venom on the Stew Peters show.

Somebody owes Brian Ardis an apology.

I’m only a lawyer, not a virologist, but I could not find a single other virus that has ever been described as having neurotoxic features similar to snake venom. Feel free to correct me, but it looks like a truly novel feature of this virus that supposedly somehow evolved naturally in a Chinese bat cave, at least according to human cockroach Tony Fauci. Maybe the snakes were getting cuddly with the bats or something.

You’d think scientists would be marveling at this evolutionary miracle that completely defies our understanding of how viruses evolve in the wild. You’d think. Instead, the scientists are strangely silent.

The study also demonstrated astonishing genetic similarities between SARS-CoV-2 and rabies — which coincidentally is a central nervous system antagonist much like snake venom — as well as recurring genetic characteristics resembling HIV. It is truly remarkable how nature really outdid itself, exhibiting wild creativity by evolving genetic features of rabies, snake venom, and the human immunodeficiency virus into the common cold within the evolutionary period of about a half nanosecond.

What are the odds? The unlikely chances for such natural convergent evolution in the coronavirus’s genetic makeup are negligible to the point of ludicrous impossibility. When will scientists stop dancing around the obvious so we can start seriously looking for WHO made the virus?

Anyway. When people took the safe and effective shots to prevent a mild cold, did they realize they were forcing their bodies to make safe and effective fragments of unsafe and not-at-all-effective neurotoxic snake venom, rabies, and HIV, for months and months and months?

I spent this evening carefully reviewing declassified e-mails authored by the eminent Scripps Institute virologist, Kristian Andersen. The first one was dated January 31, 2020 and addressed to Anthony Fauci:



The most noteworthy sentences in the email are:

The unusual features of the virus make up a really small part of the genome [0.1%] so one has to look really closely at all the sequences to see that some of the features (potentially look engineered. … I should mention that after discussions earlier today, Eddie, Bob, Mike [Edward Holmes, Robert Garry, Michael Farzan] and myself all find the genome [of SARS-CoV-2] inconsistent with expectations from evolutionary theory.

3.5 days later—shortly after a phone conference with Dr. Fauci and others—Dr. Andersen completely changed his tune. By then, the decision had been to submit a letter to the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering and Medicine regarding the origin of SARS-CoV-2.



Please note the final sentence:

If one of the main purposes of this document is to counter those fringe theories [about the virus being engineered] I think it’s very important that we do so strongly and in plain language (“consistent with” [natural evolution] is a favorite of mine when talking to scientists, but not when talking to the public—especially conspiracy theorists).

After these e-mails were released to the public in response to a FOIA request, Dr. Andersen claimed that he learned revelatory things about the novel virus in the 3.5 days following his initial e-mail to Fauci, and that these revelations caused his perfect volte-face. However, it seems to me that his explanation doesn’t really account for his strident, unequivocal assertions in his second e-mail.

Many of the recipients’ names in his February 4, 2020 have been redacted, but there many apart from the two men who received his January 31 e-mail (Dr. Fauci and Jeremy Farrar). His first e-mail was a matter of strictly confidential counsel. His second pertains to an open letter—about to be sent to a large institution with many members—declaring that anyone who even suspects the novel virus to have emerged from a lab is a crackpot conspiracy theorist.

What on earth could inspire a virologist to adopt a posture of such Machiavellian duplicity about an infectious agent that—as he well knew—was about to inflict a catastrophe on all of mankind? He had to have known that such pronouncements—coming from a virologist of his eminence—would likely retard a thorough and impartial investigation of the virus’s origin.

Researchers in Wuhan, China working with the Chinese military were genetically manipulating the world's deadliest coronaviruses to create a new mutant virus right around the time that the Covid-19 pandemic began, according to the Sunday Times, which has reviewed hundreds of documents, "Including previously confidential reports, internal memos, scientific papers and email correspondence that has been obtained through sources or by freedom of information campaigners in the three years since the pandemic started."



... "It has become increasingly clear that the Wuhan Institute of Virology was involved in the creation, promulgation and cover-up of the Covid-19 pandemic," said one of the investigators, who found evidence that researchers working on said experiments were hospitalized in November 2019 with Covid-like symptoms, just one month before the West became aware of the pandemic. One of the victims' relatives died as well.

"We were rock-solid confident that this was likely Covid-19 because they were working on advanced coronavirus research in the laboratory. They’re trained biologists in their thirties and forties. Thirty-five-year-old scientists don’t get very sick with influenza," said an investigator.

Meanwhile, a separate analysis reveals that the epicenter of the original Covid-19 outbreak was close to the WIV, not Wuhan's "wet" wildlife market as previously thought. ...

In 2013, WIV researcher Shi Zhengli called Ralph Baric to ask for his help in growing sufficient quantities of a Sars-like virus found in a cave, SHC014, in order to conduct testing. Baric agreed, and the WIV provided him with the genetic sequence for the strain so that he could recreate genes from its spike proteins. Baric's team inserted SHC014s's "spike gene" into a copy of the original Sars virus they created in North Carolina and tested out the new chimeric virus on humanized mice.

Meanwhile in May 2014, EcoHealth Alliance was awarded $3.7 million from the US National Institutes of Health - of which over $500,000 went to fund lab equipment purchases at the WIV, and $130,000 went directly towards Shi and her assistant.

Then, the Obama administration banned gain-of-function research, but a 'loophole' allowed the practice to proceed if deemed 'urgent and safe.' Baric argued just this to the NIH, which granted approval.

After setting the table, Ioannidis and his co-authors made their central point, and it was hotter than English mustard:

Now add the uncertain but plausible possibility that COVID-19 was itself the product of biomedical science, and an apparently outrageous consequence becomes inescapable: science itself may have become a threat to overall population health… [I]t is hardly irrational that an increasing proportion of the dissatisfied public is wondering whether truth and the path to a healthier world must lie somewhere else than within prestigious journals and celebrities at the science–policy–communication interface.

Allow me to repeat that: “science itself may have become a threat to overall population health.”

He’s exactly correct, and bless him for saying so. Ioannidis’s comment was also particularly timely in light of the Sunday Times’ lengthy weekend exposé of “fresh evidence” of covid’s origins as a Chinese military bioweapon, which, until about ten minutes ago, it was domestic terrorism to point that out.

Dr. Ioannidis, a highly-credentialed and accomplished scientist, who among other praiseworthy things was the only reliable source during the pandemic of the REAL covid infection fatality rate, has survived the cancellation wars. Now it’s his turn. Ioannidis and other thoughtful scientists like him have quitely initiated the next phase of the war: reclaiming science from politics.

Here’s the link: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jep.13876

Quoting U.S. Government sources, the bombshell report says the first people to catch the coronavirus were scientists working on dangerous gain-of-function research.

That research was being funded using American taxpayer money by Fauci’s National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID). ...

“Now, answers increasingly look within reach. Sources within the US government say that three of the earliest people to become infected with SARS-CoV-2 were Ben Hu, Yu Ping, and Yan Zhu.

“All were members of the Wuhan lab suspected to have leaked the pandemic virus.

“As such, not only do we know there were WIV scientists who had developed COVID-19-like illnesses in November 2019, but also that they were working with the closest relatives of SARS-CoV-2, and inserting gain-of-function features unique to it. ...

“While scientists justify such research as necessary for developing vaccines, President Barack Obama banned federal funding for gain-of-function research of concern in 2014, because experts had come to the consensus that it was too dangerous.

“However, the National Institute of Health and NIAID headed by Francis Collins and Fauci, and a major U.S. government grantee, EcoHealth Alliance, deemed their work on SARS-like viruses as not falling under the gain-of-function research of concern definitions and funded this project in China and Southeast Asia,” the report says.

We should have seen it coming. The Biden Administration has completely ignored the bipartisan law passed in February requiring the government to declassify the covid origins evidence as of last Sunday. After giving it a couple days, yesterday the Washington Examiner ran a story headlined, “Biden Missed Deadline for Declassifying Intelligence on Wuhan Lab and Origins Of COVID-19.”

The deadline is not the only thing Biden is missing, but that’s a different story.

The Examiner didn’t have much to work with. The Biden Administration ignored the law and turned over nothing. Nor are they answering any questions about it. Biden is using his go-to strategy of waiting for someone to file suit, which will buy him another couple years.

The funny thing was all the media speculation last week about what everyone thought might be in the disclosures, but nobody predicted that Biden would just ignore the law. In hindsight, it was the most obvious thing that could have happened.