patrick.net
An Antidote to Corporate Media
1,352,956 comments by 15,729 users - Ceffer, Dholliday126, Kepi, KgK one, SunnyvaleCA online now
« First « Previous Comments 141 - 146 of 146 Search these comments
143
Patrick
2025 Oct 31, 11:40am
Patrick
2025 Oct 31, 11:40am
https://newrightpoast.substack.com/p/240-they-having-a-fed-off
> While you were partying (crying about antisemitism), Rachel Bovard was studying the blade (focusing on real problems like full spectrum lawfare pointed at Trump). Funny name for a lawfare op, btw.
I literally don’t care who Tucker had on his podcast. Joe Biden’s government tried to judicially assault us all out of existence, and was very close to doing it.
> Biglaw firms are no longer going after Trump.
Biglaw let leftist impact litigators rely on their cohorts of young liberal associates looking for a break from securities litigation to help with the big cases. In the end this was a force-multiplier for the legal left, and one of its main structural advantages. It seems to be diminishing.
« First « Previous Comments 141 - 146 of 146 Search these comments
We've stayed away from that sort of stuff here in the States (charging presidents and former presidents with crimes). Seems like the political establishment might do away with that as to curtail other businessmen from encroaching on their turf.
I say the Deplorables fight back.
Texas already threw down a gauntlet by arresting illegals for child endangerment. The Texas AG could say that he's looking into criminal charges for conspiracy to commit child endangerment. It's pretty apparent that Biden's policies are driving unaccompanied minors to cross the border so bring charges versus Biden and those making those policies. It would certainly send a chill down DC's spine.
I am interested to hear what other charges members of Patrick.net can think of to bring against Biden & co.