patrick.net
An Antidote to Corporate Media
1,267,364 comments by 15,159 users - Robert Sproul, RWSGFY, SharkyP online now
invite response« First « Previous Comments 270 - 276 of 276 Search these comments
270
Patrick
2021 Nov 23, 10:41pm
Patrick
2021 Nov 23, 10:41pm
https://alexberenson.substack.com/p/if-you-like-heart-problems-youll
If you like heart problems, you'll love the Pfizer and Moderna Covid vaccines
So says a report on almost 600 patients presented last week at the American Heart Association's annual conference
271
Onvacation
2021 Nov 24, 8:25am
Onvacation
2021 Nov 24, 8:25am
sjmoca says
Why are you pushing the jab?
Do you think the jab works? If it does work why do we need a booster? Why would we need a booster for the delta variant if the original jabs don't work against the delta variant. If the boosters do work for the delta variant why didn't the original jabs work against the delta variant since they are the same experimental biologic agent?
I am not expecting cogent answers to these simple questions but can @sjmoca attempt to answer?
Or maybe it just means you are having an immune response to the vax...
Why are you pushing the jab?
Do you think the jab works? If it does work why do we need a booster? Why would we need a booster for the delta variant if the original jabs don't work against the delta variant. If the boosters do work for the delta variant why didn't the original jabs work against the delta variant since they are the same experimental biologic agent?
I am not expecting cogent answers to these simple questions but can @sjmoca attempt to answer?
272
Onvacation
2021 Nov 24, 8:29am
Onvacation
2021 Nov 24, 8:29am
sjmoca says
The Wuhan is not the flu. It is a laboratory created gain of function cold virus. The jab is not a vaccine it is an experimental biologic agent that tens of millions of people have taken.
This flu season should tell us a lot. If the jab works the jabbed will stop dying and the unjabbed will start dying in larger numbers. Time will tell.
"Apoptosis and other immune biomarkers predict influenza vaccine responsiveness"
https://www.embopress.org/doi/full/10.1038/msb.2013.15
The Wuhan is not the flu. It is a laboratory created gain of function cold virus. The jab is not a vaccine it is an experimental biologic agent that tens of millions of people have taken.
This flu season should tell us a lot. If the jab works the jabbed will stop dying and the unjabbed will start dying in larger numbers. Time will tell.
273
Onvacation
2021 Nov 24, 9:18am
Onvacation
2021 Nov 24, 9:18am
sjmoca says
So no answers. Wasn't expecting any.
All I did was dismantle your theory on "Vax Death Spike" with data. Make an informed choice.
So no answers. Wasn't expecting any.
274
Al_Sharpton_for_President
2021 Nov 24, 9:37am
Al_Sharpton_for_President
2021 Nov 24, 9:37am
sjmoca says
The PLUS Cardiac Test (GD Biosciences, Inc, Irvine, CA) a clinically validated measurement of multiple protein biomarkers which generates a score predicting the 5 yr risk (percentage chance) of a new Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS). Multiple biomarkers, not just one or two biomarkers. It has been validated as a tool for classifying Heart Disease.
Publications
https://pulstest.com/articles
Clinical Utility of the PULS Cardiac Test in Classifying Intermediate Risk Patients
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4231217/
Analytical Performance Validation of the PULS Cardiac Test
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23530883/
Clinical Validation of the PULS Cardiac Test for Improved Coronary Risk Assessment
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4231217/
etc.....
Obviously the Covid mRNA vaccine must be causing gastric cancer, joint infections, emphysema, rheumatoid arthritis, myocardial infarctions, taiwanese lung cancer, glioma, osteosarcoma.Non-Sequitur.
The PLUS Cardiac Test (GD Biosciences, Inc, Irvine, CA) a clinically validated measurement of multiple protein biomarkers which generates a score predicting the 5 yr risk (percentage chance) of a new Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS). Multiple biomarkers, not just one or two biomarkers. It has been validated as a tool for classifying Heart Disease.
Publications
https://pulstest.com/articles
Clinical Utility of the PULS Cardiac Test in Classifying Intermediate Risk Patients
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4231217/
Analytical Performance Validation of the PULS Cardiac Test
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23530883/
Clinical Validation of the PULS Cardiac Test for Improved Coronary Risk Assessment
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4231217/
etc.....
275
GNL
2021 Nov 24, 10:36am
GNL
2021 Nov 24, 10:36am
sjmoca says
Which is most weak...The PCR test or the PULS test?
I disagree. The PULS test thing is extremely weak on research. Those few papers just say "yes this test measures the markers we want to measure" and "physicians adapted their treatment plan in response to our test", but critically, no studies are available that validate the predictive efficacy.
Which is most weak...The PCR test or the PULS test?
276
Al_Sharpton_for_President
2021 Nov 24, 1:28pm
Al_Sharpton_for_President
2021 Nov 24, 1:28pm
sjmoca says
If you could cite publications where Il-16, soluble Fas, and HGF, the biomarkers described as elevated in the ahajournals.org abstract, were elevated in diseases other than heart disease, that could be a reasonable argument. But you have not, and it is not.
I disagree.You are engaging in hit-and run non-sequiturs by asserting that il-16 alone is a non-specific biomarker, and by providing an irrelevant reference (https://www.embopress.org/doi/full/10.1038/msb.2013.15) that does not measure the three biomarkers described as elevated in the ahajournals.org abstract 10712 cited above.
If you could cite publications where Il-16, soluble Fas, and HGF, the biomarkers described as elevated in the ahajournals.org abstract, were elevated in diseases other than heart disease, that could be a reasonable argument. But you have not, and it is not.
« First « Previous Comments 270 - 276 of 276 Search these comments
https://data.cdc.gov/NCHS/Provisional-COVID-19-Death-Counts-by-Week-Ending-D/r8kw-7aab
I was curious about trends so I then downloaded the last six years of death data from the cdc and concatenated it into one file. I graphed it:
It was obvious that there was quite a spike from the corona virus (Blue Gray line) when I eliminated total deaths from the chart.
At this point I was curious if some of the other causes of death had gone down so I eliminated heart disease, cancer, and covid-19.
This is when I noticed the annual winter spike from flu and pneumonia was gone in 2020-2021. I also noticed the spike in "not elsewhere classified". I zoomed in and got this:
Logic using people can see there is a problem here.