by Patrick ➕follow (60) 💰tip ignore
« First « Previous Comments 45 - 84 of 98 Next » Last » Search these comments
In this day and age yes. Have you had a CT scan? Been to a hospital? Lots of people relying on computers for their health. Usually it's the human who programs or buils the computer that causes the error.
I understand money motivates. All I'm saying is that The op does not support your hypothesis.
Granted, it would be a large and uncomfortable shift in thinking to begin to suspect Fauci.
There's zero reason to get defensive if you know you're right.
Your op was posted to prove your point. Does it? It doesn't, That's my point.
Robert Sproul saysIf you are not over 70 or have serious co-morbidities you really have to torture some numbers to justify taking a novel "vaccine".
Fuck age, that's only a factor for the sick, and that's what co-morbidities means, people who are fucking sick. Unfortunately we have a large group of people now days who think there should be a pill or shot, or surgery for everything. A miracle solution so their lazy ass can continue to vegetate on the couch for eight hours a day.
If you're healthy, your immune system will keep you that way. If you aren't, maybe you should try putting in the hard work for once in your life instead of taking yet another shortcut...
Robert Sproul saysTC45 saysYou do realize that a faster computer can crunch numbers faster. So it would seem logical that things that rely heavily on computing power can be done quicker. Such as creating vaccines.
Or viruses for that matter.
Exactly
If you cannot do that and need a shot, maybe you should die. Maybe Gates and their ilk are on to something.
I wouldn't go as far as siding with the eugenicists
Stop spreading fake news @Patrick. This report is total BS.
Despite what the fake news media is telling you, most Americans have not gotten injected for the Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19). And those who have, it appears, are the ones getting sick with and driving the spread of the “delta variant.”
There is zero proof to suggest that non-injected people are the ones now functioning as “viral factories” as the government claims. To the contrary, the injected have been marked with toxic chemicals that are mutating into new forms of illness that are sending people to the hospital with “covid.”
An article recently published in Quanta Magazine warns that just like how taking antibiotics breeds antibiotic-resistant “superbugs,” taking these so-called vaccines contributes to the breeding of new variants that send some people to the hospital – or worse.
The piece discusses the history of the anti-Marek’s disease vaccine for chickens, which was first introduced back in 1970. It has had to be reinvented some three different times now because the virus continues to mutate to evade the vaccine.
The reason for this, of course, is that vaccines produce fake immunity, at best – fake meaning the type of immunity that wanes over time. Real immunity, which is produced by the immune system, lasts a lifetime.
A 2015 study published in the journal PLoS Biology also looked at the anti-Marek’s disease vaccine for chickens, revealing that unvaccinated chickens are the least likely to shed more virulent strains of the virus into the wild. Vaccinated chickens, on the other hand, are basically walking disease carriers.
“The findings suggest that the Marek’s vaccine encourages more dangerous viruses to proliferate,” the Quanta Magazine article explains. “This increased virulence might then give the viruses the means to overcome birds’ vaccine-primed immune responses and sicken vaccinated flocks.”
Viruses mutate all the time, and vaccines make things worse
How does this all relate to Fauci Flu shots? The answer is simple: The jabs are causing the Chinese Virus to morph into ever-new variants, which then turn into more new variants.
Vaccinated people are walking disease factories, in other words. Their damaged immune systems are now prone to spreading more illness, typically to other vaccinated people whose disease defenses have also been degraded.
While the mainstream media wants you to believe the opposite, the fact remains that injected people are the worst off when it comes to the risks involved with variant spread.
Even partially vaccinated people “might serve as sort of a breeding ground for the virus to acquire new mutations,” warns Paul Bieniasz, a Howard Hughes investigator at The Rockefeller University.
This, of course, runs contrary to media and government claims that unvaccinated people are somehow responsible for the vaccine-induced spread of new Wuhan Flu variants.
Richard Harris, NPR‘s science correspondent, warns of much the same. He says there is intense “evolutionary pressure” at play that renders vaccines unable to “completely block infection.”
“Many vaccines, apparently, including the covid vaccines, do not completely prevent a virus from multiplying inside someone even though these vaccines do prevent serious illness,” he alleges, toting the government line about the jabs supposedly minimizing the risk of serious illness.
One thing the fearmongering media is not telling people is the fact that each new variant of the Chinese Virus is becoming increasingly less dangerous, even if some of them are allegedly more contagious.
The risks to an unvaccinated person are almost nil regardless, while those who took the vaccines are now coming down with new infections that are sending many of them back to the hospital for treatment.
Subscribe and share @naomirwolf
How does this all relate to Fauci Flu shots? The answer is simple: The jabs are causing the Chinese Virus to morph into ever-new variants, which then turn into more new variants.
the fact that each new variant of the Chinese Virus is becoming increasingly less dangerous, even if some of them are allegedly more contagious.
“Many vaccines, apparently, including the covid vaccines, do not completely prevent a virus from multiplying inside someone even though these vaccines do prevent serious illness,”Correct! These are not sterilizing vaccines. There are always mutants that pop up but a healthy immune system takes on all comers. It doesn't know a wild-type from a mutant.
There are a multitude of antigenic sites on any virus. But the gene therapy innoculated's immune system has been directed to react to a discreet fragment of a protein that represents a very minor antigenic component of the entire virus. This puts very focused pressure on the virus that encourages the outgrowth of variants that can evade this specific immune response caused by the gene therapy. And if the gene therapy generated antibodies still bind the mutant, but do not inactivate it, antibody dependent enhancemet (ADE) can result.
It is irresponsible to not address these possibiltiies and criminal to silence the voices that seek to discuss them.
meaning that fully vaccinated people may be able to spread the virus, as well.”
Stop spreading fake news @Patrick. This report is total BS.
One liar wrote a fake news piece. One scientist wrote an opinion. This ain't science folks.
I know, asking @Patrick to stop spreading fake news on this forum is like stopping fish from swimming.
70 vaccinated people and 39 Unvaccinated died of Delta
https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/1001354/Variants_of_Concern_VOC_Technical_Briefing_17.pdf
As someone who favors science, my next question would be, if the experiment isn't showing marked benefits from the shot being administered, what are the side-affects, and when it's all added up, is there still justification to continue the experiment? We should be heavy into risk analysis when we see data like this.
Just like how colonoscopies are not given to children because the chance of a kid having colon issues is virtually nil.
As someone who favors science, my next question would be, if the experiment isn't showing marked benefits from the shot being administered, what are the side-affects, and when it's all added up, is there still justification to continue the experiment?
Their only question is this: "Is there still massive profit to Big Pharma in continuing the experiment?"
Leaky Vaccines Enhance Spread of Deadlier Chicken Viruses
BYED YONG
PUBLISHED JULY 27, 2015
Over the past fifty years, Marek’s disease—an illness of fowl—has become fouler. Marek’s is caused by a highly contagious virus, related to those that cause herpes in humans. It spreads through the dust of contaminated chicken coops, and caused both paralysis and cancer. In the 1970s, new vaccines brought the disease the under control. But Marek’s didn’t go gently into that good night. Within ten years, it started evolving into more virulent strains, which now trigger more severe cancers and afflict chickens at earlier ages.
Andrew Read from Pennsylvania State University thinks that the vaccines were responsible. The Marek’s vaccine is “imperfect” or “leaky.” That is, it protects chickens from developing disease, but doesn’t stop them from becoming infected or from spreading the virus. Inadvertently, this made it easier for the most virulent strains to survive. Such strains would normally kill their hosts so quickly that they’d die out. But in an immunised flock, they can persist because their lethal nature has been neutered. That’s not a problem for vaccinated individuals. But unvaccinated birds are now in serious trouble.
« First « Previous Comments 45 - 84 of 98 Next » Last » Search these comments
patrick.net
An Antidote to Corporate Media
1,236,935 comments by 14,793 users - stfu online now