« First « Previous Comments 8,813 - 8,852 of 8,918 Next » Last » Search these comments
Can You Sue Your Employer For Forcing You to Get a Covid Vaccine?
In Memory of Nikki Turner
Nikki Turner
“I’m so stressed out I could scream. Don’t be a hater, or I will delete this.
I’ve travelled the country, been bartending and a lot of my customers and coworkers have gotten sick, and I haven’t. I literally go days without being around anyone else. I haven’t done any research because I had no intention of getting these kind of shots. Now I have to do it like “right now at this moment hurry up no time to research or think” if I want to keep my job. Like literally tomorrow morning before work is my deadline. (Thanks corporate life)
SO I have a really good mix of friends here, about half of you have gotten it and you are all well educated and thoughtful people. Those of you who have researched and made a thoughtful choice, which one did you get?
If you are uncomfortable leaving a public response you can message me.”
Nikki Turner’s Facebook post on October 27, 2021. She worked for Lockheed Martin.
A young woman died suddenly in the prime of her life on May 24, 2022. I suspected strongly, based on the shock but restrained at the time reaction to it, that it might have had something to do with that thing which cannot be named. Nobody even hinted at a cause of death for her. So I put on my homicide detective hat and decided to research her case. How many Nikki Turners are out there?
The Facebook responses alone to her post numbered 127 at the time. I assume most of the antivaxxers were kicked off as I could only find 75 comments remaining. Beyond a few people who encouraged her to file a religious exemption or walk away from her job the vast majority of the responses were from people who were Covid jabbed with whatever who assured her that it was fine, with the exception of one woman who also said she was forced to take the jabs or lose her job who said the side effects from the first shot were so significant that she could not get a second one. I wonder how all of these people are doing three years later? I suspect there might be enough death and injury to fill a law office gathered from her post alone.
A 60-year-old man with no significant medical history presented with gait instability and confusion 4 weeks after a single dose of the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine (AstraZeneca). Clinical examination revealed tetrapyramidal syndrome, ataxia, and dysexecutive syndrome. ...
A diagnosis of postvaccinal acute disseminated encephalomyelitis was considered despite the unusual radiologic presentation (extensive perivascular enhancement). The patient received 7 methylprednisolone pulses at 1000 mg per day combined with 5 plasma exchanges, resulting in dramatic clinical improvement, but only mild MRI improvement. At 15 weeks, the patient relapsed with confusion and gait instability and was referred to our center. Brain MRI showed further extension of white matter lesions and perivascular enhancement.
De nombreuses victimes des vaccins covid, dont celles regroupées au sein de l’association VIAC-19 (Victimes des injections anti-covid-19) se sont rassemblées à proximité du Palais Brongniart pour protester contre cette censure d’un autre âge.
Numerous victims of COVID vaccines, including those organized under the association VIAC-19 (Victims of Anti-COVID-19 Injections), gathered near the Palais Brongniart to protest against this archaic censorship.
A cohort of 467 HCWs from a teaching hospital in northern Taiwan, who received at least three doses of COVID-19 vaccines, were surveyed for long COVID symptoms. Participants were categorized into symptomatic (n = 224), asymptomatic (n = 21), and absence of COVID-19 (n = 222) groups based on diagnostic criteria involving questionnaire responses, medical records, and anti-nucleoprotein antibody data. ...
Despite meticulous data collection, the study revealed no statistically significant differences in the severity of neurological and psychiatric long COVID symptoms across the COVID-19 status groups.
COVID-19 mRNA "vaccine" harms research collection
Compiled by Dr. Martin Wucher, MSC Dent Sc (eq DDS), Dr Byram Bridle, PhD, Dr. Steven Hatfill, Erik Sass, et al.
I. Spike protein pathogenicity research library (n=375)
Originally part of the outer coat of the SARS-CoV2 virus, where it functions as a “key” to “unlock” (infect) cells, spike proteins are also produced in large amounts by the mRNA “vaccines,” triggering a short-lived immune response in the form of antibodies. However, a growing body of evidence has shown that the spike protein is harmful by itself, including over 370 peer-reviewed scientific papers collected in section I.
II. Spike protein and “vaccine” mRNA biodistribution studies (n=61)
In addition to the pathogenic characteristics of the spike protein antigen, over 60 peer-reviewed studies have demonstrated that both the “vaccine” mRNA encoding for the spike protein antigen and the spike protein itself can penetrate distant tissues, causing systemic harms.
III. Spike protein and “vaccine” mRNA persistence studies (n=41)
Over 40 peer-reviewed studies confirm that “vaccine” mRNA and the resulting spike protein antigen persist in the tissues of human vaccine recipients and animal test subjects far longer than claimed by public health officials; viral spike proteins, resulting from natural infection, have been shown to persist even longer, bolstering concerns that the identical “vaccine” spike may also last longer than anticipated.
IV. Lipid nanoparticle toxicity and allergenicity studies (n=80)
80 peer-reviewed papers show that ionizable lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) used in the experimental mRNA injections are highly inflammatory on their own, including their polyethylene glycol (PEG) component, an established cause of anaphylaxis (an extreme allergic reaction).
V. COVID-19 “vaccine” immune imprinting library (n=140)
Immune imprinting, dubbed “original antigenic sin” by Thomas Francis Jr., occurs when memory B lymphocytes produced in response to an initial viral infection dominate subsequent responses to related viruses. 140 peer-reviewed papers suggest that COVID “vaccines” imprinted the immune systems of recipients through exposure to the “wild type” spike protein from the original Wuhan strain, shaping their response to subsequent variants in potentially harmful ways.
VI. SARS-CoV2 vaccine and viral variant research library (n=70)
In addition to the pathogenicity, distribution, and long persistence of the “vaccine” spike protein, this collection of 70 peer-reviewed papers suggests the “vaccines” applied strong selective pressure to the fast-mutating SARS-CoV2 virus, quickly giving rise to “vaccine”-resistant variants.
The managed care industry got carpet-bombed yesterday, after Centene Corporation, one of the largest health insurers in the U.S., suffered the worst single-day stock drop in its history—crashing up to 40% after yanking its 2025 guidance. The crash was caused by devastating new actuarial data showing that Centene’s Affordable Care Act (Obamacare) enrollees are sicker, costlier, and fewer than expected, especially in 22 states where Centene holds significant market share. ...
But the company’s explanations made the hair on the back of my neck stand up. They cited two “unexpected” developments. First, morbidity (sickness and permanent disability) is rocketing upwards. Seon, at the same time, their insured pools are shriveling. The loss of enrollees is, presumably, because of excess death. Why else would very sick people drop off free or heavily subsidized insurance rolls?
Centene’s clients are not typical MAHA folks who might be fleeing ACA for non-traditional healthcare. They are folks captured by government healthcare.
Centene’s customers are possibly the most heavily jab-propagandized populations on planet Earth. Its core customer base includes Medicaid recipients, ACA exchange enrollees, and Medicare Advantage members. I.e., seniors and low-income, working-age folks. These are precisely the populations that faced the most aggressive vaccine outreach, were most subject to institutional mandates and incentives, and had the fewest options to resist or opt out.
Medicaid recipients were often required or heavily pressured to get vaccinated in order to keep jobs, access care, or participate in other public programs. ACA ‘marketplace’ enrollees, many of whom fall into the working-poor category, were heavily targeted by state-level campaigns. And Medicare Advantage members —primarily older adults— were at the front of the vaccine rollout line, with near-total uptake among those over 65.
If a long-term adverse event signal were associated with mass vaccination, Centene’s risk pool would necessarily be disproportionately exposed to that signal. ...
The fact that Centene had to suddenly withdraw guidance —not revise, not adjust, but yank it entirely— and instead report a devastating $1.8 billion projected hole, based on new data from its auditors, suggests the trend was recent and sharp, not gradual. The scope or scale was unexpected— possibly exponential. Their previous assumptions were suddenly falsified in an astonishingly short timeframe.
That means the underlying risk landscape shifted materially, and fast. ...
... The Administration hasn’t taken any victory laps claiming that historically reduced Social Security payments were the fruits of DOGE labor. Not officially or even unofficially. I was just trying to connect some dots.
But … what if there’s another explanation? What if the historic downward spike in Social Security payouts is because … there are suddenly a lot fewer seniors? ...
The Social Security chart is evidence that reinforces the Centene bombshell— a massive, actuarially driven revelation of sudden and unexpectedly high morbidity and shrinking insured populations in Medicaid and the ACA exchanges. Two entirely separate systems. Two different populations. One unmistakable pattern: rapidly shrinking rolls of government-dependent individuals, precisely as healthcare costs suddenly explode. ...
If we were searching for the early warning signs of an iatrogenic catastrophe on a national scale, this is exactly what it would look like.
In other words, if a significant portion of the population experienced subclinical injury or long-term health destabilization from a medical intervention (say, inflammation, clotting, immune dysregulation), then you’d expect a lag. Not immediate death, but a multi-year, slow-motion collapse, with inflection points stabbing when the weakest systems start to give out.
Years 2 to 4 post-intervention is prime time for that kind of morbidity to begin translating into mortality— especially in already-vulnerable populations like elderly, disabled, and immunocompromised.
Anecdotally, many independent public health watchers (myself included) have noticed a recent uptick in sudden and unexpected deaths and disabilities. Just yesterday, one of my high-profile, out-of-town mediations with a $100-billion hospital canceled on short notice, because the hospital’s tall building lawyer experienced a severe cardiac problem. That kind of thing maybe happened once in my pre-covid career. Now, everybody’s like, okay, let’s check our calendars for the reschedule.
Here are some eerily similar headlines from just within the last two days, without even trying:
... I cannot help but shake the sense that we are quickly approaching an undeniable inflection point when someone will be forced to confront the obvious. Disappearing Social Security recipients and ACA enrollees aren’t something easily swept under the rug. Real money is involved; not even pandemic-era money. Think bigger. Much bigger. ...
In conclusion, we who remain live to fight another day. The unwanted duty falls to we, the fortunate, to bear witness, to speak when others are silent, and to ensure that the architects of this unfolding disaster are all finally run to ground and hung as high as Haman (after fair trials, of course). We must ensure that this slow-motion iatrogenic catastrophe is neither memory-holed nor mythologized.
The truth will be the reckoning.
https://www.2ndsmartestguyintheworld.com/p/from-turbo-cancer-to-sudden-cardiac-438
I was jab injured (reported on VAERS) then caught COVID in January 2021 which served as a catalyst. I will not bore you with the details - only to say that COVID was so mild that I thought I just caught some bug.
It did not kill me but most definitely stole my life. I was very active and healthy before that jab and only took it because of an elderly relative that I was afraid I’d kill with Covid if I did not take it.
I just exist now. My body is like a battery with a very low charge that just dies with minimal exertion. ...
I went through the UAB LONG COVID Clinic where almost every single test I took & all bloodwork came back “normal”. I knew something was terribly wrong - just not “what”.
Then I found a physician who tested the VEINS, for blood clots, along with many bloodwork tests I’d never heard of - all of which came back abnormal. ...
My neurologist in Pensacola did the MRV which showed the clots in my brain.
Disappearing Social Security recipients and ACA enrollees aren’t something easily swept under the rug. Real money is involved; not even pandemic-era money. Think bigger. Much bigger. ...
Bollywood Star Shefali Jariwala Dies Suddenly of Cardiac Arrest at 42
Beloved Bollywood actress and model Shefali Jariwala has died suddenly of an unexpected cardiac arrest at the age of 42.
The shock death is triggering shockwaves across India’s entertainment industry and raising renewed questions about the alarming rise in cardiac-related deaths among seemingly healthy public figures. ...
Though the official cause of death has been listed as cardiac arrest, Jariwala’s sudden passing has prompted renewed scrutiny in the wake of a wave of similar incidents involving young, seemingly healthy public figures worldwide.
In early 2021, Jariwala was a vocal promoter of the Covid mRNA “vaccine” rollout in India.
She posted videos on social media while receiving a Covid shot, urging her fans to do the same.
“Finally got my first dose!” she captioned one video. ...
As the medical community continues to grapple with unexplained excess deaths and reports of post-vaccine myocarditis, cases like Shefali Jariwala’s underscore the importance of honest investigation, not silence.
Les vaccins ARNm anti-COVID peuvent induire le cancer de 17 manières distinctes selon plus de 100 études
The mRNA anti-Wuhan Virus injections induce cancer in 17 distinct ways, according to 100 studies
https://lepointcritique.fr/2025/06/19/vaccins-arnm-anti-covid-peuvent-induire-cancer-de-17-manieres-distinctes-selon-plus-de-100-etudes/
Les vaccins ARNm anti-COVID peuvent induire le cancer de 17 manières distinctes selon plus de 100 études
The mRNA anti-Wuhan Virus injections induce cancer in 17 distinct ways, according to 100 studies
DO YOU NEED MORE EVIDENCE OF DEATH?
The government is still hoping you will forget and move on……
“Barry Young ran the NZ Government database that paid the vaccinators. He was given the names of those who were vaccinated and the names of those who had died to remove them from the future vaccination list. This is where his data came from. He is a brave whistleblower”……POST by Andrew Bridgen on X
https://x.com/toobaffled/status/1939987046711665059
""One vaccinator, in one day, vaccinated 99 people. Within a year, 36 of them were dead."
Patrick says
""One vaccinator, in one day, vaccinated 99 people. Within a year, 36 of them were dead."
This proves the mRNA Covid vaccine is killing people. No ifs or buts.
"Were they nursing home residents 75-96 years old ??"
‘Only Place Left for Me’ is Long-Term Care, Says Vaccine-Injured Bus Driver
Canadian school bus driver Michael Oesch told medical commentator John Campbell, Ph.D., about his vaccine-induced transverse myelitis, a disabling, degenerative neurological condition.
Canadian school bus driver Michael Oesch said a long-term care facility is “the only place left for me,” after his fourth COVID-19 shot left him with transverse myelitis — a disabling, degenerative neurological condition marked by spinal cord inflammation.
Oesch told medical analyst John Campbell, Ph.D., he believes medical professionals gaslit him when they diagnosed him with acute “idiopathic” transverse myelitis — meaning the cause of his condition was unknown — even though his symptoms began within 36 hours of the shot.
However, his own doctor immediately told him, “Don’t take another vaccine,” when Oesch sought treatment after he experienced his first symptom, a dragging leg.
Before his fourth shot, Oesch was a fit, active man in his mid-50s. He had walked across Canada. He loved gardening.
In 2020, he developed a mild case of COVID-19. After the vaccines became available, he received the AstraZeneca and Pfizer shots, followed by two doses of the Moderna boosters. After the second booster, his leg began to drag and then he couldn’t walk.
He recovered briefly, but days later blacked out while driving a school bus home after dropping off the children. He said he ran off the road, but escaped injury.
The neurologist told him he had never seen a spinal lesion so large in someone who had not suffered a serious impact. He also said that because the lesions affected a very sensitive part of Oesch’s spine, they were inoperable.
Oesch said the doctors acknowledged his condition was linked to the vaccine, but refused to document it in his medical record. According to Oesch, Ontario doctors who recorded vaccine injuries risked reprimand and loss of licensure.
I have a close family member: 30yo healthy male (young professional CPA) who began experiencing a multitude of health complications almost immediately after receiving his 2nd Pfi-dose. Extremely low CD4 count, skin lesions, opportunistic infections, cognitive impairment, and general autoimmune issues. Essentially he has AIDS symptoms, without the HIV. Doctors tiptoe around the issue because “it could be anything, but it can’t be that”… pointing at genetics “rare conditions” etc… now he hasn’t been able to work in over 3 years, suffers from mental health/depression as a result of this experience and having “lost hope”. He survives on the goodwill and support of family. But that’s just another story. No one really cares. We’re crazy conspiracy theorists, right.
Small fiber neuropathy following COVID-19 vaccination: A case series
Various peripheral neuropathies, from facial palsy to Guillain-Barre Syndrome, following vaccination have been reported in several different vaccination contexts. However, the relation between small fiber neuropathy and vaccination is still unclear. In the context of COVID-19 vaccination it is even more difficult to assess a secure causality due to the short time that has elapsed since the vaccination, thus research on possible pathophysiology is still in progress. Nonetheless, due to the extensive vaccination campaign held for COVID-19 since 2021, we were able to collect and describe clinical and electrophysiological data of 16 patients with suspected small fiber neuropathy following vaccination, of which 9 fulfilled the criteria for diagnosis of SFN.
Today, a new peer-reviewed study published in the International Journal of Innovative Research in Medical Science, blandly titled “View of Association Between COVID-19 Vaccination and Neuropsychiatric Conditions.”
https://ijirms.in/index.php/ijirms/article/view/2090/1487
The results, however, were not bland.
In the just-published peer-reviewed study, researchers analyzed over three decades of vaccine injury reports in the U.S. government’s own VAERS database, comparing covid mRNA vaccines to both flu shots and all other vaccines (combined). Using the CDC’s and FDA’s own method for detecting safety problems —called “Proportional Reporting Ratios” or PRRs— they found that reports of serious neuropsychiatric issues like brain fog, psychosis, dementia, and even suicidal behavior were not just higher, but dozens to hundreds of times more frequent after the covid shots.
If you thought people were crazy to take the jab, you might have been onto something.
The safety signal thresholds weren’t just crossed; they were blown out of the water, with some categories showing PRRs over four hundred, far above the FDA’s red-flag threshold of two. The study concluded these signals were sufficiently alarming to warrant immediate attention and further investigation— an understatement as big as the Statue of Liberty.
Among the most alarming findings, the study flagged massive spikes in reports of serious brain-related problems after covid vaccination. Compared to flu shots, reports of brain fog were up over 100-fold, psychosis nearly 80 times higher, and Alzheimer’s-type dementia more than 40 times more frequent. Even more chilling, reports related to suicidal thoughts or behaviors, including suicide attempts and self-harm, showed increases as high as 80-fold. One rare but deadly condition —cerebral venous sinus thrombosis, a type of brain clot— was reported at rates over 400 times higher than with flu vaccines.
These numbers weren’t small deviations— they were sky-high red flags by the FDA’s own data and safety standards. ...
It’s also worth noting that VAERS is widely understood —even by the CDC itself— to suffer from substantial under-reporting. Most adverse events, especially non-lethal or slow-developing ones, are never logged, thanks largely to the system’s time-consuming and painstaking reporting requirements. That means the staggering signal ratios found in this study are almost certainly undercounts, not exaggerations. If even a fraction of those cases represent real harm, we’re looking at a public health catastrophe playing out in increasingly fast motion.
Predictably, other critics will attack the study not by engaging the data, but by going after the authors themselves— a classic case of the genetic fallacy, where a claim is dismissed based on who made it rather than whether it’s true. Several authors are well-known covid policy critics, like familiar heroes Dr. Peter McCullough, Dr. James Thorp, and Dr. Steven Hatfill.
But so what? That doesn’t invalidate the data they used —VAERS, the U.S. government’s own database— or the statistical method they applied, which came straight from CDC and FDA playbooks. If a former dissenter publishes solid evidence using government sources and standard methodology, the proper response isn’t character assassination; it should be scrutiny of the claims, not the bios.
When critics start attacking résumés instead of rebutting the math, it usually means they’ve got nothing else.
The fact that this astonishing study —authored by high-profile dissidents, using politically radioactive data, and drawing devastating conclusions— still passed peer review and was published in a legitimate journal marks a significant crack in the Overton window. As you well know, for years, any suggestion that covid vaccines could cause widespread neurological or psychiatric harm was treated as fringe conspiracy theory. But now, that same claim sits inside the pages of a peer-reviewed medical journal, backed by basic math, verifiable government data, and unremarkable regulatory methodology.
This doesn’t just crack the narrative— it blows a hole in the prison wall. If the system still held total control over scientific discourse, this paper would never have seen daylight. But it did. And that means the narrative guardians —the journals, peer-reviewers, and editors— are either losing their grip or starting to hedge, perhaps because suppressing credible dissent has become riskier than letting it through.
This study is more than a dead canary in the iatrogenic coal mine. It signals a critical turning point: what was once unspeakable is now printable, citable, and, if the trend continues, increasingly undeniable.
Before the pandemic, Dr. McCullough was a credentialed expert, widely published, respected across his field, and apolitical— just a humble physician-scientist minding his own business. Then came covid. To shut him up they did everything they could to destroy him: stripped his affiliations, silenced his platforms, and vilified his reputation. Now, McCullough’s only path to redemption isn’t apologies or reinstatements— those will never come. His only option is total vindication: proving, with hard data and relentless persistence, that they lied, the public was misinformed by them, the harms he reported were real, and that he —not them— told the truth when it mattered most.
McCullough has published more peer-reviewed articles in his specialty than anyone else in history. He knows exactly how the system works— and now he’s turning it against its corruptors.
In trying to erase him, they created their own worst enemy. Hubris, meet Nemesis. (Again.)
During the COVID-19 pandemic there were reports of an increased association between COVID 19 and various autoimmune diseases (AID) in adults. This study aims to investigate the incidence of AIDs in children before and during the pandemic and explores potential links to SARS-CoV-2 vaccination.
We analyzed 493,705 anonymized medical records from Maccabi Healthcare Services, Israel’s second-largest healthcare provider, to study AID incidence during 2014–2022. ...
The study indicates a potential association between COVID-19 vaccination and an increased risk of developing autoimmune diseases, necessitating further research to elucidate long-term effects in the pediatric population.
Vaccine Deaths Far Outpace Virus Deaths, McCullough Warns
As of now, 19,417 deaths have been reported to the U.S. Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) following COVID-19 vaccination, many submitted by doctors who believe the vaccine was the direct cause of death.
However, public health experts, including those testifying before the FDA, have long acknowledged that VAERS captures only a fraction of adverse events.
Dr. David Wiseman, in FDA testimony, noted that a conservative underreporting multiplier of 30x should be applied.
When McCullough did the math:
30 x 19,417 = 582,510 estimated deaths following COVID vaccination.
That’s over 4.7 times more deaths than the virus itself, according to McCullough’s adjusted estimates.
Despite the staggering potential toll, the federal government continues to purchase more shots and pressure Americans into “booster” campaigns, even as millions of doses sit unused or are destroyed.
Gruber, echoing the concerns of many Americans, expressed disbelief that taxpayer dollars are still funding what critics now call a deadly and failed experiment.
And McCullough’s verdict is unflinching: “No more shots. Not for anyone.
« First « Previous Comments 8,813 - 8,852 of 8,918 Next » Last » Search these comments
https://bigleaguepolitics.com/better-call-saul-star-bob-odenkirk-collapses-on-set-after-receiving-experimental-covid-19-vaccine/