patrick.net

I think it would be better to use AI to try to find a specific antigen on the tumor cells which is already there and simply inject antibodies against that instead of using mRNA at all.

https://theethicalskeptic.com/2025/09/25/the-state-of-things-pandemic/

While the Covid mRNA vaccines may have provided a therapeutic effect during the fall 2021 B.1.617.2 variant wave, helping to keep some vulnerable individuals out of the hospital, this benefit did not translate into reduced infection rates or into any arguable offset in overall mortality.

In contrast, the Week 14, 2021 inception of the mRNA vaccine has led to a pronounced and pervasive inflection in mortality across multiple-dozens of ICD codes. This shift has resulted in more than 840,000 excess deaths from causes other than Covid or non-natural means (see Charts 3b and 4c). These deaths have come mainly as a result of the vaccine itself ...

The mRNA Vaccine Continues to Kill 2,000 to 4,000 Americans per Week Now – (See Charts 3, 4c, 10, 11, 12, and 13)

We Also Have a Cancer Emergency Developing in Its Early Stages – (See Charts 6, 7, and 11)

https://www.coffeeandcovid.com/p/hanging-out-thursday-december-11

It was the latest headline that must be seen to be believed. The story quietly published on December 8th, and ever since has rippled outwards, in ever-increasing circles of shock and influence. Behold! The far-left Atlantic —the intellectual flagship for educated, professional-class, anti-Trump liberalism— ran a suspiciously honest-seeming story under this eye-popping banner:

Yes, Some Children May Have Died From COVID Shots
Denial only serves the aims of anti-vaxxers.

https://www.theatlantic.com/health/2025/12/prasad-memo-covid-vaccine-deaths/685175/

Please don’t overreact. They’re awfully sorry and all that, it’s perfectly regrettable, mistakes on all sides, but look on the bright side. Your dearly departed child was a net benefit. The vaccine may not have stopped infections from spreading and killing grandma, but the important thing is that your dead baby’s sacrifice* helped the government reach Dr. Fauci’s jab goals. Hang on to that reassuring fact during your grief.

(* note: does not qualify for compensation. We apologize for the inconvenience.)

... The Atlantic didn’t think that admitting the shots killed kids was important because it was true. It did not argue for transparency and reconciliation. Rather, it argued for making a tiny, grudging admission of an admittedly damaging truth, but only to win— by thwarting the real enemy: anti-vaxxers.

You see, lying isn’t wrong per se. It’s only wrong because, in this case, it’s aiding pharma’s adversaries. In short: the Atlantic is morally bankrupt.

The rest of the piece was equally narcissistic and frankly, psychopathic. The sub-headline’s infernal logic threaded throughout the story, where vaccine deaths were framed as acceptable collateral damage of a program that “prevented death on a vast scale,” and the real crisis is malevolent misinformers like Dr. Vinay Prasad, who are (allegedly) “eroding trust” and giving ammunition to RFK and his MAHA cronies, not the dishonest regulators who dismissed or mischaracterized fatal myocarditis cases.

It was simple calculus. The author advocated for telling a little inconvenient truth so as not to throw out the dead baby with the mRNA bathwater. ...

Robo-Atlantic expressed zero human empathy or sympathy for the victims. It conspicuously avoided grappling with the baseline risk to healthy infants and young children, which was never high enough to justify a “net benefit” claim for that entire cohort. Nor did it acknowledge informed consent as another casualty of the “minimization” (lying), coercion, and manipulative fear-based messaging tactics that it admitted. Those regrettable mishaps were just “tactical errors” because they are giving anti-vaxxers “leverage.”

But never mind. Despite the author’s painstaking effort to avoid any moral culpability and to excuse all the lying and reckless fearmongering as good-faith choices under difficult circumstances, the horrifying message still slipped through, loud and clear: dead babies. ...




💉 Admitting even a small number of vaccine‑caused infant deaths is a categorical, not marginal, shift. It moves the mRNA products from the “safe as air” box into the “can kill a healthy child” box, which permanently changes the ethical and legal terrain around mandates, messaging, and consent.

Once the consensus concedes that at least some children died “after and because of” the shots, the prior scheme of categorical assurances, moral shaming, and practical coercion of parents is not just flawed messaging. It is exposed as a wicked deception, a cruel artifice that cornered families into accepting a non‑zero risk of their child’s death to benefit a population‑level project.

When a vaccine program for a cohort with extremely low baseline covid mortality admits, however reluctantly, that it killed even a handful of healthy children, the argument “net benefit in the aggregate” no longer neutralizes the moral charge, because each affected family was never asked to accept that risk on honest terms. The parents of the dead children never consented to “a very small chance this could kill your child.” They only consented, after intense social and institutional pressure, to what they were told was essentially zero lethal risk and was overwhelmingly “safe and effective.”

Mazer, bless his heart, tries to confine the deaths into numerically absorbable externalities (aka, friendly fire), but once you accept that healthy children were killed by a state‑sponsored intervention that parents did not truly understand, the moral stakes are profoundly altered. Mandates, coercive messaging, and suppression of dissent all look, in hindsight, like a grotesque machine that funnelled families into lethal risks they never consented to and were never properly told existed.

Real human beings implicitly understand that, even if psychopaths like Ben Mazer can’t relate. And the signs of awakening are popping up everywhere.

💉 Yesterday, I texted a link to Mazer’s article to my best friend from high school, who now lives in the deep-blue Northeast. Here’s what he promptly returned:

One of my lib friends sent me this. He and I debated the shots endlessly for
years and only now has he been given permission to believe from his bible-The
Atlantic. Hilarious

The “lib friend” gets what Dr. Mazer missed. It’s what all the lying doctors implicitly understood. And the Atlantic —a trusted member of the technocratic tribe— printed it, creating a permission structure allowing hardened progressives to shift on the vaccine issue.

I found other comments similar to my friend’s, blooming like winter pansies, in comments below tweets about the Atlantic piece. For example:



https://x.com/drtaubraun/status/1998493079020646809

Now that stubborn denial has become untenable, they want to shift the debate down one notch, from “no kids died” to “a few kids died, but it was worth it.” ... Unlike in previous vaccine scandals such as the Cutter polio incident or the Pandremrix-narcolepsy episode —which they are almost certainly furiously studying now for PR tips— they stretched too much, too far this time with covid.

Washington Post headline, April 2020:

The tainted polio vaccine that sickened and fatally paralyzed children in 1955
It was 'one of the worst biological disasters in American history,' one scholar wrote

The public forgot about the Cutter vaccine and Pandremrix. But it’s different this time. Too many people were involved. ...

Remember: every single American adult with legal capacity recalls being told, approximately sixteen million times, that “this is the safest and most studied vaccine in history.” If so … then how did they miss the killing babies part? Either they lied about studying the jabs, or they lied about the harms. Or both.

Either way, they lied— and if they lied about that, what else have they been lying about?

Current surveys find that large segments of the public, especially outside the blue enclaves, no longer automatically trust government agency statements about vaccines. Instead, many exist in a “malleable middle” that doubts official narratives while not (yet) fully embracing alternative theories. Into that spongy disquiet, a belated message of “yes, some children died, but don’t overreact, and don’t help the anti‑vaxxers” reads less like humble transparency and more like coerced confirmation that they will only disclose the truth to the minimum extent necessary. ...

In other words, they’ve finally given up. They’ve finally surrendered their fantastic dreams of perpetual vaccine annuities, of annual covid jabs plunged into arms along with the seasonal flu shots, ringing cash registers like Christmas bells. They’ve thrown in the bloodstained towel. ...

With fantasies of astronomical covid jab profits gone moribund, the priorities have changed. It’s no longer now about plunging one more round of highly profitable mRNA juice into Americans’ arms. Now it’s about salvaging trust in all other vaccines and in biomedical technocracy in general. Hence the starter’s pistol shot announcing the race toward an acceptable limited hangout.

Next, we should appreciate how this new demolition phase started, which is described right at the start of the article. It began with Dr. Vinay Prasad’s leaked internal letter, in which he referred to finding ten kids killed from covid shots out of 96 studied. Dr. Prasad is one of ours, an RFK appointee and an iconoclastic jab skeptic. ...

Where it will end is unclear. But, on the other hand, the revolution is only just beginning. And the white-coated fraudsters are desperately scrambling to get ahead of what’s coming next.

Patrick says

“yes, some children died, but don’t overreact, and don’t help the anti‑vaxxers”

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-15374809/Stanford-scientists-Covid-vaccine-myocarditis.html

Scientists discover how Covid shots cause deadly heart damage... as officials launch probe into vaccine-linked deaths

Scientists at Stanford University have revealed how the mRNA Covid vaccines can cause damage to heart cells.

Experts have long sounded the alarm over myocarditis, an VERY COMMON complication of the vaccine that causes inflammation of the heart muscle. ...

They found that people who suffered from the rare side-effect had elevated levels of two immune system-linked proteins in their blood.

Subsequent experimentation in mice then showed that these proteins prompted neutrophils (a type of immune cell that is the first responder to damage) to infiltrate the heart muscle, causing damage to the tissue via inflammation.

Doctors say the complication is normally mild and eases on its own without treatment. In severe cases, however, it can cause hospitalization or death...

Just a mild case of death.

I personally know three people who developed heart inflammation after taking the mRNA death jabs, so it's not "rare" at all.

Patrick says

y
I think it would be better to use AI to try to find a specific antigen on the tumor cells which is already there and simply inject antibodies against that instead of using mRNA at all.

Yes. The hunt for tumor-restricted antigens hasn’t tured up a trememndous amount of targets. Usually they are tumor-associated with expression also on “dispensable” bystander cells. For example, BCMA, B-cell maturation antigen, is found on multiple myeloma cells (cancerous plasma cells) but also healthy plasma cells. Plasma cells produce antibodies, with which you would die if you had zero antibodies. But giving donor antibodies (IVIG) to patients receiving BCMA-targeted antibodies or CAR T cells, helps a lot. The patients still can still ocassionaly get nasty infectious disease complications, but the risk-reward is acceptable. If AI could help find tumor-restricted targets, that would be great.

Maybe tumors have a multiple-antigen profile that could be targeted somehow.

There has to be something about each tumor that is sufficiently weird for that characteristic to be a narrow target, given that they are so obvious to the human eye.

Car t is very dangerous and has only be proven useful in very limited situations so far. Still it's a valid means, esp. in a life or death situation, in which those risks become acceptable. It probably will mature further. PSS's Anktiva or SLS's (disclaimer: holding stock) GPS (targeting WT1) are likely more promising in a broader range. Immunotherapy is where it's at, and it doesn't (necessarily) need gene therapy. Otherwise vectors such as modified viruses are also very interesting.

It started out with a nurse dying publicly on air, but only several years until anybody really started catching on that the vaccines were dangerous and were intended to be that way, no matter how many warnings there were. The trillion dollar global psyops defeated what could openly be seen. The evidence of the senses didn't matter.

That was Tiffany Dover. The Covid-19 vaccine killed her in December 2020 - the
moment she was given the vaccine.

The_Deplorable says

That was Tiffany Dover. The Covid-19 vaccine killed her in December 2020 - the
moment she was given the vaccine.

Someone needs to do an "Abbey Road" AI meme with her as the dead person. Pfauci could be the preacher, Birx the undertaker, and Hotez the gravedigger.

This sounds like a mission for @UveBeenNudged1

^^^

Patrick says

This sounds like a mission for UveBeenNudged1

^^^

I've never used AI (but have lifted the occasional AI backdrop someone else has made). It's pity because what normally takes hours can be done in seconds...
I don't have Abbey Road, so you'll have to make do with these for now :-)