patrick.net

Conclusions
The excess deaths involving AKI seasonal Signal 1 began when remdesivir was heavily incentivized by CMS.gov. Remdesivir should be immediately suspended pending forensic investigation.

The excess deaths involving AKI steadily increasing Signal 2 began when COVID “vaccines” began. COVID “vaccines” should be immediately suspended pending forensic investigation.

AKI is involved in 211,805 excess deaths (2021-2024) in the United States at ages far younger than those from COVID disease per se.

Legal Duty to Act
The leaders of the NIH, FDA, and CDC have a legal duty to ensure that an earnest and immediate forensic investigation occurs using the medical files from decedents who died from AKI. There are no excuses. The omission of investigation is a felony failure of required legal duty to act. The People are dying and demand answers from our governments.

People harmed by Covid jab to tell of ‘devastating results’

The ongoing inquiry by Lady Justice Hallett is looking into the development of vaccines and the implementation of the rollout programme

Coronavirus vaccines went “horrifically wrong” for many people after the government told the public they must have the jab, the Covid Inquiry will hear on Tuesday.

The fourth module in the ongoing inquiry is looking into the development of Covid-19 vaccines and the implementation of the rollout programme.

In opening statements on Tuesday, representatives of those harmed will tell Lady Justice Hallett that the “devastating results” could have been prevented if the government had acted sooner to warn people of the dangers.

Latest figures show more than 17,500 people have applied to the Vaccine Damage Payment Scheme (VDPS), believing that they – or their loved ones – have been injured by the jabs.

However, there have only been 188 payouts so far, with hundreds of people rejected for “not being disabled enough”.

Unsurprisingly similar to our own PREP Act’s horrible program, in Great Britain 17,500 people have applied for official vaccine injury compensation. But over four years, the UK program has only paid a paltry 188 claims. Hundreds more have insultingly been rejected for “not being disabled enough.”

Worse, the British program just pays people disabled by the shots a maximum of £120,000 (about $150,000), but only if the government agrees the claimants are “over 60% disabled.” You can imagine the awful Orwellian arguments opened up by that squishy standard. Sorry, mate, you still have one good eye and you can talk properly half the time, so. Only fifty-eight percent.

The vaccine defenders will also be testifying in force, of course. It’s a roster of evil characters who the British despise as much as we despise our own Mengele-like “doctors” Fauci, Birx, Hotez, Offit, and so forth. I noted with a laugh that one of the planned pro-pharma witnesses is “Professor” Heidi Larson, who is, get this, an “expert in vaccine hesitancy.”

I think we are more expert in vaccine hesitancy than Heidi Larson could ever hope to be.

The inquiry might wind up a whitewash, but well-organized vaccine injury groups plan to make sure the government knows it’s been in a fight. But consider that simple, damning headline. If the tone of the Guardian’s article was any sign, the narrative has already shifted.