« First « Previous Comments 8,662 - 8,701 of 8,796 Next » Last » Search these comments
Jamaica had no Excess Deaths in 2020 but 31.6% excess in 2021. Peak Excess Deaths Match Peak Covid-19 Vaccine Dosing. Neonatal Deaths Spiked with 1st Vaccine Rollouts and Stillbirths with Peak Dosing.
Peak deaths in September 2021 were 2.16x September 2020 levels. No VS Data has been published for 2022 and 2023, begging the question of whether adverse population outcomes are being hidden. ...
There are no published vital statistics data after 2021, even though prior year’s data was published with only a 1-year delay, i.e. 2021 data was published by 31 December 2022, and 2022 and 2023 data would have been expected to have been released by now. ...
Death data is plotted by year. 2020 is unexceptional with deaths 1.2% lower than 2019 levels. However, 2021 is highly abnormal. Deaths rise well above 2020 levels from March concurrent with the Covid-19 vaccines rollouts, peaking in September at 2.16x September 2020 levels.
ConcernedCitUSA
My BFF's two sons (29 and 24) both ended up in the ER with myocarditis after the shot. Both dumb@$$es would still take it again because "fear." The brainwashing of the "other party" was unbelievably effective.
In March 2022, the Vatican confirmed media’s inquiries that Pope Francis had his booster (his third shot)
The study titled, Paradoxical increase in global COVID-19 deaths with vaccination coverage: World Health Organization estimates (2020–2023), was just published in the International Journal of Risk & Safety in Medicine:
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/09246479251336610
Results
COVID-19 deaths increased with vaccination coverage ranging from 43.3% (Africa) to 1275.0% (Western Pacific). The Western Pacific (1.5%) and Africa (3.8%) regions contributed least to the global cumulative COVID-19 deaths pre-vaccines, while the Americas (49.9%) and Europe (27.6%) had the highest counts. The Americas (39.8%) and Europe (34.1%) accounted for >70% of global COVID-19 deaths despite high vaccination, and the percentage increase in COVID-19 mortality and the percentage of person’s ≥65 years were significantly correlated (0.48) in Africa.
Conclusion
COVID-19 mortality increased in the vaccination era, especially in regions with higher vaccination coverage.
Conclusions
An interpretation is that vaccination, despite temporary protection, increased mortality. Strengthening the interpretation was relatively high mortality among vaccinated not involving COVID-19 counterintuitively following periods of excess mortality. Further strengthening the interpretation was relatively high mortality not involving COVID-19 among vaccinated, corresponding with excess mortality during much of the same period.
Indiana life insurance CEO says deaths are up 40% among people ages 18-64
By Margaret Menge
Jan 1, 2022
The head of Indianapolis-based insurance company OneAmerica said the death rate is up a stunning 40% from pre-pandemic levels among working-age people.
“We are seeing, right now, the highest death rates we have seen in the history of this business – not just at OneAmerica,” the company’s CEO Scott Davison said during an online news conference this week. “The data is consistent across every player in that business.”
OneAmerica is a $100 billion insurance company that has had its headquarters in Indianapolis since 1877. The company has approximately 2,400 employees and sells life insurance, including group life insurance to employers nationwide.
Davison said the increase in deaths represents “huge, huge numbers,” and that’s it’s not elderly people who are dying, but “primarily working-age people 18 to 64” who are the employees of companies that have group life insurance plans through OneAmerica.
“And what we saw just in third quarter, we’re seeing it continue into fourth quarter, is that death rates are up 40% over what they were pre-pandemic,” he said.
“Just to give you an idea of how bad that is, a three-sigma or a one-in-200-year catastrophe would be 10% increase over pre-pandemic,” he said. “So 40% is just unheard of.”
“COVID-19 vaccines — and all of their progeny and future boosters — are NOT SAFE FOR HUMAN USE.”
-Dr. Peter McCullough, under oath
"I want to support you because my wife lost her 50 year old young brother to COVID after he got on shot in February 2020 and died September 2021 from a massive bleed from his liver. He only took the shot because he wanted to see his new born baby in Queensland and they said only if he was vaccinated. He was against the vaccination."
Post-vaccination acute sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 (PASC-vac) is a condition characterized by persistent neurological and immunological symptoms following COVID-19 vaccination. This study explores the clinical manifestations, immune correlates, and potential pathogenic mechanisms underlying PASC-vac. A cohort of 71 PASC-vac patients and 19 healthy donors was analyzed through immunological assessments, including flow cytometry, serum antibody profiling, and tissue examination. The findings indicate that PASC-vac patients frequently experience peripheral neurological symptoms such as paresthesia, dysautonomia, and vasomotor disturbances. Additionally, elevated levels of anti-idiotype antibodies and disruptions in peripheral lymphocyte subsets were detected. Analysis of inflammatory precursor cells (CD34+ DNAM-1bright CXCR4+) suggests their involvement in immune dysregulation associated with PASC-vac. The study also investigates the connection between PASC-vac and small fiber neuropathy (SFN), demonstrating reduced nerve fiber density in affected individuals. These results highlight the role of abnormal immune responses, autoantibody production, and immune dysregulation in the development of PASC-vac. Furthermore, therapeutic strategies targeting NRP1 and ACE2 receptors are proposed as potential avenues for treatment.
A New York middle school teacher has dropped dead in front of her students after suffering from a mysterious “medical episode” while teaching her class.
Adrian Gilmore was just 48 years old when she died suddenly in front of her horrified young students.
Gilmore worked at Albert G. Prodell Middle School in Shoreham, Long Island.
The contribution of pre-existing conditions to severe versus mild postacute sequelae (PASC) of SARS-CoV-2 in the population is lacking. Here, we evaluated reproductive and other PASC side-by-side in unvaccinated and vaccinated individuals after 1st SARS-CoV-2 infection. In an online global survey of 7,541 individuals from 95 countries, high grade fever (> 102˚F)/ hospitalization after a first SARS-CoV-2 infection were more likely to be reported by vaccinated males than unvaccinated males (13.64% vs. 8.34%; p = 0.0483; HR = 1.63 [95% CI: 1.008, 2.65]). Women reported experiencing more frequent PASC than men. More women than men reported vaccine-associated adverse events (AEs) after the 1st dose (60.85% vs 48.79%, p < 0.01). Vaccine-associated hospitalization was reported by 6.24% SARS-CoV-2 naïve respondents versus 1.06% of unvaccinated after 1st SARS-CoV-2 infection. Pre-existing thyroid disease, osteoporosis, and autoimmune disorders were more prevalent in women, whereas more men reported back problems, elevated cholesterol, and hypertension; several pre-existing conditions posed ≥ 2.0 relative risk of developing severe vs mild COVID-19. Individuals aged < 55 years had an absolute risk of 6.01%, whereas individuals ≥ 55 years had an absolute risk of 11.69% of getting severe vs mild COVID-19 disease. Vaccinated women reported significantly greater menstrual cycle-associated reproductive PASC compared to unvaccinated women. Vaccinated men reported hormonal changes and sexual dysfunction as reproductive PASC compared to unvaccinated men. A detailed and thorough follow-up is needed to better understand if pre-existing health conditions and/or vaccine-associated AEs exacerbated COVID-19 sequelae.
"A New York middle school teacher has dropped dead in front of her students after suffering from a mysterious “medical episode” while teaching her class."
https://x.com/vancemurphy/status/1914040593568739823
The two largest COVID-19 vaccine safety studies ever conducted, involving 99 million (Faksova et al) and 85 million people (Raheleh et al), found that mRNA injections are not safe for human use. The shots significantly increase risks of the following serious adverse events:
Myocarditis (+510% after second dose)
Acute Disseminated Encephalomyelitis (+278% after first dose)
Cerebral Venous Sinus Thrombosis (+223% after first dose)
Guillain-Barré Syndrome (+149% after first dose)
Heart Attack (+286% after second dose)
Stroke (+240% after first dose)
Coronary Artery Disease (+244% after second dose)
Cardiac Arrhythmia (+199% after first dose)
Two young runners have tragically died from cardiac arrest after completing half-marathon races in Oregon.
Both young adults collapsed and died shortly after crossing the finish lines.
According to officials, the runners both died suddenly from unexplained cardiac arrest.
On Sunday morning, just a few steps after completing the Eugene Half Marathon, 23-year-old Mateo Cruz collapsed. ...
On April 5, another runner, 19-year-old Oregon State University sophomore Camryn Morris, also died of cardiac arrest after completing the Corvallis Half Marathon.
Moments after crossing the finish line, she “collapsed into the arms of her friends,” according to her obituary.
https://www.sunsetgardenstricities.com/obituary/2025/04/camryn-morris/
Conclusions: We found unacceptably high breaches in safety signals for 37 AEs after COVID-19 vaccination in pregnant women. An immediate global moratorium on COVID-19 vaccination during pregnancy is warranted. The United States government, medical organizations, hospitals, and pharmaceutical companies have misled and/or deceived the public regarding the safety of COVID-19 vaccination in pregnancy. The promotion of the COVID-19 vaccines in pregnancy by The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG), The American Board of Obstetrics & Gynecology (ABOG), and The Society for Maternal Fetal Medicine (SMFM) must cease immediately.
"According to officials, the runners both died suddenly from unexplained cardiac arrest."
💉💉💉
Four days ago, the most important covid shot study yet was published as a preprint on MedRxIV. It was blandly titled, “Twelve-Month All-Cause Mortality after Initial COVID-19 Vaccination with Pfizer-BioNTech or mRNA-1273 among Adults Living in Florida.” In a science-following world, this study would announce the beginning of the end, the great unraveling of the big “safe and effective” lie.
If there’s one thing —just one thing— a “safe and effective” vaccine absolutely shouldn’t do, it’s increase your odds of dropping dead. Death is not a side effect; that’s the reverse-opposite of vaccination. It’s like a parachute that “works great” until you pull the ripcord. Aieeeeeeee.
This week’s study was organized by co-author and Florida Surgeon General Joe Ladapo, a Harvard-trained M.D. and PhD. Impeccably credentialed MIT professor of statistics Retsef Levi also joined. They brilliantly scraped Florida’s Medicare database and compared the two jabs against each other, specifically, their risks of dying from any cause —“all-cause mortality”— and they found a statistically undeniable +40% risk of fatality following the Pfizer jab over Moderna.
In other words, hundreds of thousands more Floridians died in the 12 months following the Pfizer jab than Moderna, when there should have been no difference at all. Specifically, they found that +230 more people died after Pfizer for every 100,000 jabbed. Not only that, but Pfizer getters died from cardiovascular causes at a rate of +83 more often per 100,000.
The researchers were super careful to avoid leaving room for criticism. They started with known vaccinees, then excluded nursing home residents, the homeless, and people who died from violent causes (homicides and suicides). Then they took out people who got their shots more than six weeks apart (i.e., not as recommended), people who mixed shot types, people who got more than 2 shots, and people whose health records were incomplete (such as unknown gender). Finally, they separated people who died from covid.
Those left over included more than 9 million Floridians. I.e., it was a big sample. Then they matched recipients 1-to-1 based on their location (census tract), avoiding any potential regional differences.
It wasn’t even close.
The authors ultimately concluded that, “Florida adults who received the BNT162b2 COVID-19 vaccine (Pfizer) in the initial series appear to have significantly higher risk of 12-month all-cause, cardiovascular, COVID-19, and non-COVID-19 mortality compared to mRNA-1273 recipients (Moderna).”
Pfizer’s Grim Reaper came most often for seasoned citizens. “When stratifying by age group,” the researchers wrote, “the increase in mortality risk was highest in adults 60 years and older.”
The genius of Ladapo’s study was to compare the two shots against each other. The data for those who were unvaccinated is completely unreliable, since doctors recorded anyone with “unknown” jab status as unvaccinated. But the state has very good data about who actually got the shots and then died, since hospitals and pharmacies were required to report detailed data for Medicare reimbursement, both for the original shots and then for the patients’ end-of-life care.
Simply put, comparing shots like-for-like surfaced a wide variety of deadly effects, at least for Pfizer. Though the study didn’t directly study the other shot, it remains reasonable to assume Moderna also increased death risk compared to non-vaccination, since the shots are so similar.
💉 And as bad as these results are, the truth is probably much worse. It only tracked deaths in the 12 months following the second shot, so we don’t know how high the totals are now. And it excluded people who took three, four, or more shots. It’s fair to assume that more shots don’t decrease people’s risk of death.
In other words, when it comes to mortality risk, this study’s results likely represent a floor, not a ceiling.
Death is binary. It’s not a PCR cycle. Folks either died or they didn’t. All-cause mortality is immune to narrative manipulation. You might well ask, why hasn’t the FDA already required long-term all-cause mortality studies for these products? The data is readily available. Post-marketing all-cause mortality studies are not common, but the speed at which the covid jabs were developed at warp speed and government mandates to take them aren’t common either.
If the Levi–Ladapo study is right, it implies catastrophic failure by the FDA for not requiring long-term safety data, the CDC for continuing to push boosters with no mortality data, the NIH for funding everything except what might challenge the narrative, and Big Pharma for withholding or obscuring adverse event data.
I couldn’t find a single corporate media mention about this study. The silence was deafening. As you know, media loves running headlines about weird studies linking things like “too much joy” to heart attacks and strokes. But this? Crickets. If Levi-Ladapo’s results showed that both shots had reduced 12-month mortality, that result would’ve been plastered across headlines within 24 hours and chirped three times on NPR before breakfast.
As I keep saying —and will keep saying— the steady drip of vaccine safety studies is pooling into a vast and rising lake of condemnation. At some point, that lake will be too deep for the guilty to wade across. They can tiptoe around the puddles now, but the water’s quickly coming up— and the truth will eventually drown them.
We herein report a case involving a patient with quiescent ulcerative colitis (UC) in long-term clinical remission whose condition rapidly worsened after receiving a severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) vaccination, leading to colectomy due to toxic megacolon. The patient received the fifth dose of the Spikevax (mRNA-1273) vaccine and experienced a severe flare-up of UC 6 days later. Pathologic findings of the surgical specimens were consistent with severe active UC concomitant with cytomegalovirus infection. Because mRNA vaccines stimulate both humoral and cellular immunogenicity, it is important to note that they can be a triggering factor for the relapse of UC.
Cases of menstrual disorders, particularly abnormally heavy menstrual bleeding, have been reported following mRNA COVID-19 vaccination.
This safety signal was confirmed and added to the product characteristics summaries (SmPCs) and the patient information leaflets for mRNA vaccines in October 2022.
However, to date, few studies have effectively measured this risk.
To address this, the French scientific interest group in the epidemiology of health products, ANSM-Cnam EPI-PHARE, conducted a study aimed at evaluating the risk of heavy menstrual bleeding that required hospital care after vaccination with COVID-19 vaccines in France.
"This study provides new evidence supporting the existence of an increased risk of heavy menstrual bleeding following COVID-19 mRNA vaccination," the authors state.
“The two largest COVID-19 vaccine safety studies ever conducted, involving 99 million (Faksova et al) and 85 million people (Raheleh et al), confirm RFK Jr.’s concerns, documenting significantly increased risks of serious adverse events following vaccination, including:
1. Myocarditis (+510% after second dose)
2. Acute Disseminated Encephalomyelitis (+278% after first dose)
3. Cerebral Venous Sinus Thrombosis (+223% after first dose)
4. Guillain-Barré Syndrome (+149% after first dose)
5. Heart Attack (+286% after second dose)
6. Stroke (+240% after first dose)
7. Coronary Artery Disease (+244% after second dose)
8. Cardiac Arrhythmia (+199% after first dose)”
Words fail me. It is hard to believe our once trusted “health experts” can continue with this charade when children are needlessly dying.
If you have a doctor paediatrician who is wilfully blind to the carnage, maybe it is time to question the quality of medical advice you are getting.
Cornelia recently interviewed Melanie Llewellyn.
From Cornelia’s post on Rumble and YouTube:
“I got sick immediately in 2021. I was in the very first batch for first responders. I took the Moderna vaccine January 7th, 2021, and I immediately got sick… My first shot is from the most toxic batch of all the VAERS universe according to Albert from VAERSAware.com. So my first batch is famous. It's 032H20A.”
Melanie received four mRNA Moderna shots between January 2021 and May 2022. She developed the auto-immune disease lichen sclerosus right after her first shot.
One year after her fourth Moderna shot, in the spring of 2023, she was diagnosed with a fast growing invasive ductal carcinoma and metastatic cancer in her lymph nodes: “So within 28 days from when I got my breast cancer mammogram results, 28 days later in surgery, my breast cancer had doubled.”
She had surgery to dissect nine lymph nodes in the spring of 2023. Soon after she found a white fibrous clot growing in the drainage tube that had been attached to her lymph nodes: “All of a sudden the clot expanded and they started jumping around inside the tube. They were like an elastic band.”
My name is Retsef Levi, I'm a faculty in the MIT from 2006. I have no conflicts of interest to declare today, and I'm speaking on my own behalf and not representing MIT's position.
My academic research is in the area of advanced analytics, risk management, and safety. And I've been working extensively with health systems and also on manufacturing of biologics in collaborations with pharmaceutical companies and under multiple FDA contracts and awards. ...
So I don't want to repeat everything that was said here, but I can tell you that I know many mainstream scientists and medical professionals who, similar to me, think that the current narrative is extreme and wrong. But very few of them are willing to speak up. And I'm not sure I can blame them because any attempt to deviate from the main narrative today is faced with a wall of hostility, rejection, and even elimination from the government, including funding agencies, from public media, and worst of all, from the scientific community itself.
And let me just quote a very close colleague at MIT, a member of the National Academy of Engineering, this is one of the most distinguished status that you can have as an academic. He told me something like that, and I quote, you have to be careful because you can be eliminated. And he told me that in the context of raising concerns about the current main narrative about how to manage the covid 19 pandemic. ...
But the story line is similar when it comes to safety. Scientific publications in the most prestigious journals asserting that the vaccine is safe, failing to report on serious side effects such as this, whereas attempts to raise awareness to concerning data, and I'm going to share a personal example about that.
Me and my co-authors pointed out that when you look on national emergency services calls in Israel for cardiac arrest among young individuals under 40, you see a dramatic increase of 25% in these calls parallel to the vaccination campaign in Israel in early 2021 and its statistical association to that campaign.
We wrote a paper about that, not claiming that there is a causal effect between the vaccines what we see because we don't have the proof for that. But we did raise concern and we called authorities to check, what is going on?
Needless to say that we never got a response from the authorities and in fact they went public and called this research fake. But even more concerning, journal after journal after journal in the academic literature is rejecting this article most of the time based on the argument that it is not a priority.
Well, I don't think that calling safety concerns fake is morally right or scientifically right. I think it's clear these vaccines are not naive. They have serious and unprecedented side effects and we need to use them with caution following the very basic principles in medicine, first do no harm.
"We wrote a paper about that, not claiming that there is a causal effect
between the vaccines what we see because we don't have the proof for that."
Me and my co-authors pointed out that when you look on national emergency services calls in Israel for cardiac arrest among young individuals under 40, you see a dramatic increase of 25% in these calls parallel to the vaccination campaign in Israel in early 2021 and its statistical association to that campaign.
Among 1.47 million Florida adults, those who received Pfizer's BNT162b2 vaccine had higher 12-month risks of all-cause, cardiovascular, COVID-19, and non-COVID-19 mortality compared to Moderna’s mRNA-1273 vaccine recipients. However, upon closer inspection, the study is much more valuable than a simple brand comparison.
Recently, Steve Kirsch conducted further analysis of the study’s findings, plausibly extrapolating a conservative estimate of 470,000 American deaths from the Pfizer mRNA shots alone...
Here’s how the estimate was calculated:
Key Assumptions:
An estimated 250 million Americans received at least one COVID-19 vaccine dose
Of those, 60% received the Pfizer vaccine → 150 million people
The baseline annual all-cause mortality rate in the U.S. is approximately 0.87% (pre-COVID average)
→ So the expected annual deaths among 150 million Pfizer recipients would be:
150M × 0.0087 = 1.305 million deaths
Now apply the study’s reported 36% increase in non-COVID all-cause mortality (NCACM) among Pfizer recipients (vs. Moderna):
1.305M × 0.36 = ~470,000 excess deaths
This translates to roughly 1 death per 636 doses administered, or a Pfizer vDFR (vaccine dose fatality rate) of 0.157%. As Steve pointed out, this figure corroborates a study by Redert, who found an average COVID-19 vaccine DFR of ~0.15% across 17 European countries.
Another Study Shows Higher Miscarriage Rate Among Women Who Received COVID Vaccines
Among a group of pregnant women who tested positive for COVID-19, the women who received a COVID-19 vaccine were significantly more likely to miscarry compared to women who didn’t get a COVID-19 vaccine, according to a new peer-reviewed study.
However, the authors said their findings “reinforce the effectiveness and safety of COVID-19 vaccination in pregnant women.”
The study by six Spanish researchers was published last week in BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, a Springer journal.
« First « Previous Comments 8,662 - 8,701 of 8,796 Next » Last » Search these comments
https://bigleaguepolitics.com/better-call-saul-star-bob-odenkirk-collapses-on-set-after-receiving-experimental-covid-19-vaccine/