patrick.net

https://lepointcritique.fr/2025/06/19/vaccins-arnm-anti-covid-peuvent-induire-cancer-de-17-manieres-distinctes-selon-plus-de-100-etudes/

Les vaccins ARNm anti-COVID peuvent induire le cancer de 17 manières distinctes selon plus de 100 études

The mRNA anti-Wuhan Virus injections induce cancer in 17 distinct ways, according to 100 studies

DO YOU NEED MORE EVIDENCE OF DEATH?
The government is still hoping you will forget and move on……

“Barry Young ran the NZ Government database that paid the vaccinators. He was given the names of those who were vaccinated and the names of those who had died to remove them from the future vaccination list. This is where his data came from. He is a brave whistleblower”……POST by Andrew Bridgen on X

https://x.com/toobaffled/status/1939987046711665059

""One vaccinator, in one day, vaccinated 99 people. Within a year, 36 of them were dead."

Patrick says

""One vaccinator, in one day, vaccinated 99 people. Within a year, 36 of them were dead."

This proves the mRNA Covid vaccine is killing people. No ifs or buts.

"Were they nursing home residents 75-96 years old ??"

‘Only Place Left for Me’ is Long-Term Care, Says Vaccine-Injured Bus Driver

Canadian school bus driver Michael Oesch told medical commentator John Campbell, Ph.D., about his vaccine-induced transverse myelitis, a disabling, degenerative neurological condition.

Canadian school bus driver Michael Oesch said a long-term care facility is “the only place left for me,” after his fourth COVID-19 shot left him with transverse myelitis — a disabling, degenerative neurological condition marked by spinal cord inflammation.

Oesch told medical analyst John Campbell, Ph.D., he believes medical professionals gaslit him when they diagnosed him with acute “idiopathic” transverse myelitis — meaning the cause of his condition was unknown — even though his symptoms began within 36 hours of the shot.

However, his own doctor immediately told him, “Don’t take another vaccine,” when Oesch sought treatment after he experienced his first symptom, a dragging leg.

Before his fourth shot, Oesch was a fit, active man in his mid-50s. He had walked across Canada. He loved gardening.

In 2020, he developed a mild case of COVID-19. After the vaccines became available, he received the AstraZeneca and Pfizer shots, followed by two doses of the Moderna boosters. After the second booster, his leg began to drag and then he couldn’t walk.

He recovered briefly, but days later blacked out while driving a school bus home after dropping off the children. He said he ran off the road, but escaped injury.

The neurologist told him he had never seen a spinal lesion so large in someone who had not suffered a serious impact. He also said that because the lesions affected a very sensitive part of Oesch’s spine, they were inoperable.

Oesch said the doctors acknowledged his condition was linked to the vaccine, but refused to document it in his medical record. According to Oesch, Ontario doctors who recorded vaccine injuries risked reprimand and loss of licensure.

I have a close family member: 30yo healthy male (young professional CPA) who began experiencing a multitude of health complications almost immediately after receiving his 2nd Pfi-dose. Extremely low CD4 count, skin lesions, opportunistic infections, cognitive impairment, and general autoimmune issues. Essentially he has AIDS symptoms, without the HIV. Doctors tiptoe around the issue because “it could be anything, but it can’t be that”… pointing at genetics “rare conditions” etc… now he hasn’t been able to work in over 3 years, suffers from mental health/depression as a result of this experience and having “lost hope”. He survives on the goodwill and support of family. But that’s just another story. No one really cares. We’re crazy conspiracy theorists, right.

Small fiber neuropathy following COVID-19 vaccination: A case series

Various peripheral neuropathies, from facial palsy to Guillain-Barre Syndrome, following vaccination have been reported in several different vaccination contexts. However, the relation between small fiber neuropathy and vaccination is still unclear. In the context of COVID-19 vaccination it is even more difficult to assess a secure causality due to the short time that has elapsed since the vaccination, thus research on possible pathophysiology is still in progress. Nonetheless, due to the extensive vaccination campaign held for COVID-19 since 2021, we were able to collect and describe clinical and electrophysiological data of 16 patients with suspected small fiber neuropathy following vaccination, of which 9 fulfilled the criteria for diagnosis of SFN.

Today, a new peer-reviewed study published in the International Journal of Innovative Research in Medical Science, blandly titled “View of Association Between COVID-19 Vaccination and Neuropsychiatric Conditions.”

https://ijirms.in/index.php/ijirms/article/view/2090/1487

The results, however, were not bland.

In the just-published peer-reviewed study, researchers analyzed over three decades of vaccine injury reports in the U.S. government’s own VAERS database, comparing covid mRNA vaccines to both flu shots and all other vaccines (combined). Using the CDC’s and FDA’s own method for detecting safety problems —called “Proportional Reporting Ratios” or PRRs— they found that reports of serious neuropsychiatric issues like brain fog, psychosis, dementia, and even suicidal behavior were not just higher, but dozens to hundreds of times more frequent after the covid shots.

If you thought people were crazy to take the jab, you might have been onto something.

The safety signal thresholds weren’t just crossed; they were blown out of the water, with some categories showing PRRs over four hundred, far above the FDA’s red-flag threshold of two. The study concluded these signals were sufficiently alarming to warrant immediate attention and further investigation— an understatement as big as the Statue of Liberty.

Among the most alarming findings, the study flagged massive spikes in reports of serious brain-related problems after covid vaccination. Compared to flu shots, reports of brain fog were up over 100-fold, psychosis nearly 80 times higher, and Alzheimer’s-type dementia more than 40 times more frequent. Even more chilling, reports related to suicidal thoughts or behaviors, including suicide attempts and self-harm, showed increases as high as 80-fold. One rare but deadly condition —cerebral venous sinus thrombosis, a type of brain clot— was reported at rates over 400 times higher than with flu vaccines.

These numbers weren’t small deviations— they were sky-high red flags by the FDA’s own data and safety standards. ...

It’s also worth noting that VAERS is widely understood —even by the CDC itself— to suffer from substantial under-reporting. Most adverse events, especially non-lethal or slow-developing ones, are never logged, thanks largely to the system’s time-consuming and painstaking reporting requirements. That means the staggering signal ratios found in this study are almost certainly undercounts, not exaggerations. If even a fraction of those cases represent real harm, we’re looking at a public health catastrophe playing out in increasingly fast motion.

Predictably, other critics will attack the study not by engaging the data, but by going after the authors themselves— a classic case of the genetic fallacy, where a claim is dismissed based on who made it rather than whether it’s true. Several authors are well-known covid policy critics, like familiar heroes Dr. Peter McCullough, Dr. James Thorp, and Dr. Steven Hatfill.

But so what? That doesn’t invalidate the data they used —VAERS, the U.S. government’s own database— or the statistical method they applied, which came straight from CDC and FDA playbooks. If a former dissenter publishes solid evidence using government sources and standard methodology, the proper response isn’t character assassination; it should be scrutiny of the claims, not the bios.

When critics start attacking résumés instead of rebutting the math, it usually means they’ve got nothing else.

The fact that this astonishing study —authored by high-profile dissidents, using politically radioactive data, and drawing devastating conclusions— still passed peer review and was published in a legitimate journal marks a significant crack in the Overton window. As you well know, for years, any suggestion that covid vaccines could cause widespread neurological or psychiatric harm was treated as fringe conspiracy theory. But now, that same claim sits inside the pages of a peer-reviewed medical journal, backed by basic math, verifiable government data, and unremarkable regulatory methodology.

This doesn’t just crack the narrative— it blows a hole in the prison wall. If the system still held total control over scientific discourse, this paper would never have seen daylight. But it did. And that means the narrative guardians —the journals, peer-reviewers, and editors— are either losing their grip or starting to hedge, perhaps because suppressing credible dissent has become riskier than letting it through.

This study is more than a dead canary in the iatrogenic coal mine. It signals a critical turning point: what was once unspeakable is now printable, citable, and, if the trend continues, increasingly undeniable.

Before the pandemic, Dr. McCullough was a credentialed expert, widely published, respected across his field, and apolitical— just a humble physician-scientist minding his own business. Then came covid. To shut him up they did everything they could to destroy him: stripped his affiliations, silenced his platforms, and vilified his reputation. Now, McCullough’s only path to redemption isn’t apologies or reinstatements— those will never come. His only option is total vindication: proving, with hard data and relentless persistence, that they lied, the public was misinformed by them, the harms he reported were real, and that he —not them— told the truth when it mattered most.

McCullough has published more peer-reviewed articles in his specialty than anyone else in history. He knows exactly how the system works— and now he’s turning it against its corruptors.

In trying to erase him, they created their own worst enemy. Hubris, meet Nemesis. (Again.)

During the COVID-19 pandemic there were reports of an increased association between COVID 19 and various autoimmune diseases (AID) in adults. This study aims to investigate the incidence of AIDs in children before and during the pandemic and explores potential links to SARS-CoV-2 vaccination.

We analyzed 493,705 anonymized medical records from Maccabi Healthcare Services, Israel’s second-largest healthcare provider, to study AID incidence during 2014–2022. ...

The study indicates a potential association between COVID-19 vaccination and an increased risk of developing autoimmune diseases, necessitating further research to elucidate long-term effects in the pediatric population.

Vaccine Deaths Far Outpace Virus Deaths, McCullough Warns

As of now, 19,417 deaths have been reported to the U.S. Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) following COVID-19 vaccination, many submitted by doctors who believe the vaccine was the direct cause of death.

However, public health experts, including those testifying before the FDA, have long acknowledged that VAERS captures only a fraction of adverse events.

Dr. David Wiseman, in FDA testimony, noted that a conservative underreporting multiplier of 30x should be applied.

When McCullough did the math:

30 x 19,417 = 582,510 estimated deaths following COVID vaccination.

That’s over 4.7 times more deaths than the virus itself, according to McCullough’s adjusted estimates.

Despite the staggering potential toll, the federal government continues to purchase more shots and pressure Americans into “booster” campaigns, even as millions of doses sit unused or are destroyed.

Gruber, echoing the concerns of many Americans, expressed disbelief that taxpayer dollars are still funding what critics now call a deadly and failed experiment.

And McCullough’s verdict is unflinching: “No more shots. Not for anyone.

This educational film shares the deeply personal stories of vaccine trial participants from around the world. These volunteers stepped forward with hope and trust, only to face life-altering health challenges.

Now caught in medical limbo, their experiences highlight a broader issue: post-vaccination patients left without care and silenced by censorship.

Cancer rates in Australians under 50 are rising at a pace that's alarming doctors and scientists

Australians aged in their 30s and 40s are experiencing unprecedented and in some cases world-leading rates of at least 10 different types of cancer — and scientists are desperate to understand why.

A peer-reviewed study published in the April issue of Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience has confirmed that government-imposed COVID-19 policies—including lockdowns, daycare closures, social distancing, and face masks—disrupted brain development in children, impairing their ability to recognize emotional expressions, especially happy faces.

The findings raise questions about whether the government should have the power to impose sweeping behavioral mandates.

“During-pandemic children did not neurocognitively differentiate between happy and fearful expressions,” the authors write. “This effect was primarily attributed to a reduced amplitude in response to happy faces.”

Eric Holder says

Lyme? What is the value of Lyme as a bioWEAPON? Spread by slow and easily defeated ticks, cant jump from person to person, has mild but noticeable symptoms at early stages and is easiliy treated with cheap antibiotics. It's saying a Nerf gun is an assault weapon, lol.

Not sure the context here, but if not treated early and thoroughly it can become a chronic bitch you don't want to experience lifelong. Covid is a walk in the park compared to Lyme, but then again, it's just a cold

During a recent episode of the Joe Rogan Experience podcast, Rogan claimed that there's evidence Lyme disease, which is spread by tick bites, was actually a man-made weapon which leaked out of an island lab near Connecticut.

Rogan, 57, has continued to claim the devastating illness was artificially created by scientists on his podcast for several years, discussing the alleged Lyme disease conspiracy in 2019 and 2020.

During a March 14 interview with comedian Michael Kosta, Rogan added that US Health and Human Services secretary Robert F Kennedy Jr also believes the tick-borne illness was part of a botched US bioweapons program in the 1970s.

20 Year-Old Jab-Mandated Child Care Worker, Out with Heart Damage

INTERVIEWER: So when all the mandates and everything came down, were you caught up in that net of
having to follow government orders?

BOHDI: Yeah, I pretty much had to, otherwise I was going to lose my job. Yeah. ...

INTERVIEWER: Wow. And so how many of the jabs did you have?

BOHDI: I got two.

INTERVIEWER: OK. And any problems from there?

BOHDI: What, 3 days after my first jab, on Christmas, I ended up in hospital.

INTERVIEWER: Oh. What took you there?

BOHDI: Severe chest pains.

INTERVIEWER: OK. And prior to that, to that jab, never had anything?

BOHDI: Never had anything, no. ...

INTERVIEWER: Yeah [inaudible] seemed a good thing, huh?

BOHDI: But at the time I needed to have the second jab to work.

INTERVIEWER: OK.

BOHDI: So I had to go ahead with it.

INTERVIEWER: And have you lost any time off work since having those jabs?

BOHDI: Um, yeah. Like every now and again I'd just have to take a day off because my heart would start acting up and I would just have to go home, have to go to hospital all the time. ...

BOHDI: They thought that it might have been either that or inflammation of the heart muscle or sac surrounding the heart.

INTERVIEWER: Oh, that sounds like myocarditis. ...

INTERVIEWER: So it hasn't stopped. It just comes out of nowhere?

BOHDI: During physical exercise is when it happens worse—

INTERVIEWER: Yeah.

BOHDI: — or if I'm— Well pretty much it's physical exercise. Or if I get, like, excited or if I get angry and then my blood pressure rises, all of a sudden my whole arm turns red.

INTERVIEWER: Oh wow.

BOHDI: Yeah.

INTERVIEWER: Really?

BOHDI: And all the blood, all the veins in my arm start popping out and then my left side of my neck starts hurting. And I've fainted before and which never happened before.

Post-vaccination acute sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 (PASC-vac) is a condition characterized by persistent neurological and immunological symptoms following COVID-19 vaccination. This study explores the clinical manifestations, immune correlates, and potential pathogenic mechanisms underlying PASC-vac. A cohort of 71 PASC-vac patients and 19 healthy donors was analyzed through immunological assessments, including flow cytometry, serum antibody profiling, and tissue examination. The findings indicate that PASC-vac patients frequently experience peripheral neurological symptoms such as paresthesia, dysautonomia, and vasomotor disturbances. Additionally, elevated levels of anti-idiotype antibodies and disruptions in peripheral lymphocyte subsets were detected. Analysis of inflammatory precursor cells (CD34+ DNAM-1bright CXCR4+) suggests their involvement in immune dysregulation associated with PASC-vac. The study also investigates the connection between PASC-vac and small fiber neuropathy (SFN), demonstrating reduced nerve fiber density in affected individuals. These results highlight the role of abnormal immune responses, autoantibody production, and immune dysregulation in the development of PASC-vac. Furthermore, therapeutic strategies targeting NRP1 and ACE2 receptors are proposed as potential avenues for treatment.

What sets the Czech data apart is that it now includes an unprecedented official breakdown of births by the mother’s “vaccination” status.

Released only after repeated Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests and political pressure, the data provides the clearest view yet into what happened.

According to the figures, women who had received at least one Covid “vaccine” dose prior to giving birth conceived about one-third fewer children than would be expected based on their share of the population.

Unvaccinated women, by contrast, conceived at rates consistent with pre-pandemic trends.

Japan’s Shocking mRNA Vaccine Revelations: 21 Million Vaccination Records Expose Alarming Death Trends

Peak in deaths occurs 3 to 4 months after vaccination

If you thought the mRNA vaccine saga couldn’t get any wilder, Japan just dropped a bombshell that’s shaking the narrative to its core. A group of 350 Japanese volunteers, led by the United Citizens for Stopping mRNA Vaccines, has unleashed a staggering 21 million vaccination records—yes, you read that right—obtained through Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests. This isn’t some small-fry dataset; it’s a colossal trove of vaccination dates, lot numbers, and, most chillingly, deaths. And what it reveals? Well, let’s just say it’s not the “safe and effective” mantra we’ve been spoon-fed.

By analyzing the 21 million records, Prof Murakami of Tokyo Science University uncovered a disturbing peak in deaths 90–120 days after mRNA vaccination, with higher doses showing earlier death peaks. That’s right—folks who got more jabs died sooner, suggesting a cumulative toxicity that builds with each shot.

Murakami estimates that 600,000 to 610,000 Japanese may have died post-vaccination, a figure that aligns eerily with Japan’s excess death statistics. But here’s the kicker—why haven’t these deaths been plastered across headlines? Prof Murakami suggested that they’re happening three to four months later, slipping under the radar of official reports because doctors do not see them as cause of deaths if they are not within a few days after vaccination. The government’s not connecting the dots, folks, and it’s no surprise why. These delayed deaths don’t fit the narrative of “safe and effective.” Instead, they point to a silent crisis that’s been swept under the rug.

Want to dig deeper? The database is online. Contact the United Citizens for Stopping mRNA Vaccines to join the fight. This isn’t over, folks. Share this, spread the word, and let’s keep pushing for the truth.

https://stop-mrna.sakura.ne.jp/db/lot_totalization.php

https://stop-mrna.sakura.ne.jp/en/

Methods
128 eyes of 64 patients were evaluated in this prospective study. The time interval between pre and post-vaccination examinations was nearly two and a half months (75.6 ± 4.5 days). ...

Results
The significant change in the topographic evaluation was the post-vaccine (542.0 (534.25–548.0)) increase in central corneal thickness compared to pre-vaccine values (528.0 (520.25–537.75) (p = 0.001). The endothelial cell density (ECD) was 2597 (2550.0–2646.50) before vaccination and 2378.0 (2299.0–2419.0) at least two months after vaccination (p < 0.001). ...

Conclusion
Changes in corneal endothelium occur in the short term after two-doses of the Pfizer-BioNTech (BNT162b2) COVID-19 mRNA vaccine. Hence the endothelium should be closely monitored in those with a low endothelial count or who have had a corneal graft.

COVID-19 mRNA Shots Destroy 8.4% of Non-Renewable Eye Cells in Just 75 Days
New study finds irreversible structural damage to the eye's corneal endothelium in healthy young adults following Pfizer mRNA injection

That means the excess number of lives lost to cardiac arrest in just one year during the peak of the COVID-19 mRNA injection campaign was nearly double the number of lives we spent two decades working to save.

In summary:

Cardiac arrest survival declined and plateaued at 18% during the mRNA vaccine rollout—reversing decades of steady improvement documented by the JAMA study.

In 2022 alone, excess cardiac arrest deaths in King County reached 4.9 per 100,000—nearly double the net lives gained over 20 years of resuscitation progress (2.9 per 100k).

Public health officials, cardiology societies, and emergency medicine leaders have failed to do their jobs and ignored this disaster for far too long. It’s time to remove the cardiotoxic mRNA injections from the market.

Deborah's case involved 170 serious adverse events that the hospital allegedly prevented her from reporting. 160 VAERS reports she successfully submitted on her own initiative. Specific patient examples of adverse events following vaccination that went unreported. The court found these allegations painted a picture of systematic non-compliance with federal safety monitoring requirements.

This ruling is significant beyond just Deborah's case. It establishes that 1) healthcare providers cannot ignore federal safety reporting requirements while continuing to collect taxpayer money; 2) the False Claims Act can be used to hold institutions accountable for COVID-related misconduct; and 3) whistleblowers who expose these practices have legal protection.

We estimate over 500,000 were killed by the shots, millions lost their jobs for refusing them, and Big Pharma received billions for dangerous and experimental treatments. This case reveals a legal pathway to begin holding the system accountable

Scientists discover Pfizer COVID jab linked to major eye damage

If you have had a similar reaction to Pfizer's COVID-19 vaccine, email chris.melore@dailymail.com with your story

Scientists have discovered that Pfizer's COVID-19 vaccine may increase the risk of eye damage, leading to vision loss.

The new study specifically examined how the vaccine affected patients' corneas, the clear front part of the eye that allows light to enter.

In 64 people, scientists in Turkey measured changes in the cornea's inner layer, called the endothelium, before taking the first Pfizer dose and two months after receiving the second.

Results revealed that taking both doses of the vaccine led to thicker corneas, fewer endothelial cells in the eye and more variation in size of these specialized cells that form the endothelium.

Jul 19, 2025

Dr. Robert Sullivan, MD—a board-certified anesthesiologist—stood before the U.S. Senate with a devastating admission: "I am vaccine injured."

His testimony shatters the myth that COVID vaccine injuries are "rare" or "mild."

A Doctor’s Body, Broken
- Three weeks post-vaccination, he went from elite fitness to heart failure.
- Diagnosed with pulmonary hypertension—a progressive, fatal disease caused by spike protein-induced vascular damage.
- 50% lung capacity loss—yet he "looks normal." How many others are silently suffering?

The Science They Ignored
- December 2020: Georgetown researchers warned spike protein (from infection or vaccines) could destroy lung blood vessels.
- Autopsies confirmed it: COVID victims had the same lung damage Dr. Sullivan now lives with.
- Peer-reviewed studies show spike protein is directly toxic to the heart, lungs, and brain.

The System Failed Him
- He filed a VAERS report (a system most doctors aren’t even taught exists).
- No CDC follow-up. No FDA investigation.
- "If you are harmed, you are on your own."

The Silent Epidemic
- Athletes post-vaccine saw 5-10 years of aerobic decline in a week.
- Long COVID patients show identical vascular destruction.
- How many "mysterious" heart and lung cases are actually vaccine injuries?

A Demand for Justice
1. ACKNOWLEDGE the injured.
2. END medical mandates—restore INFORMED CONSENT.
3. INVESTIGATE spike protein toxicity NOW.

To the thousands suffering in silence: You are not "anecdotes." You are not "anti-science." You are victims of a system that refuses to see you.

This is not conspiracy. This is medicine. And medicine must do better.

Mounting Evidence: mRNA Vaccine Technology Radically Disrupts The Human Genome

Recent data from two patient groups—one with serious injury and one with rapid-onset cancer following mRNA vaccination—reveals a disturbing molecular pattern.

Our RNA sequencing of Group 1 and Group 2 patients post-mRNA injection uncovered catastrophic disruption of gene regulation, protein synthesis, immune balance, and genomic stability.

What we found ends the debate!

This mRNA vaccine platform forces a reprogramming of the cell using:
•Foreign RNA transcripts
•Artificial regulatory domains (5′/3′ UTRs)
•Nucleoside-modified bases (Ψ) that evade detection
•Lipid nanoparticles that cross into immunologically and destabilizes your cellular architecture.

We compared:
•Group 1: Patients with severe systemic syndromes following mRNA exposure
•Group 2: Patients with aggressive, treatment-resistant cancers emerging post-injection
•Control group: Unexposed healthy individuals (Never had COVID Infection and not mRNA vaccinated) Datasets of 803 healthy people

The disruption in transcriptomic control and cell identity was undeniable.

Group 1 (Post-Vaccine Injury):
•Mitochondrial disassembly (loss of Complex I activity, PINK1 repression)
•Proteasome collapse (possible spike accumulation and misfolding)
•Translation blockade at ribosomes
•Endothelial dysfunction (angiogenic suppression, adhesion molecule overexpression)
•Immune activation in a self-targeting loop (↑CD28, CCR7, SELL)

Group 2 (New-Onset Cancer):
•Nucleolar hypertrophy (↑rRNA, ↑MYC, ↑nucleolin expression)
•Tumor suppressor inactivation (↓TP53, ↓KRAS, ↓Wnt)
•Aberrant DNA methylation and chromatin remodeling
•Chronic immune dysregulation and exhaustion

In both groups, we observed:
•ACE2 gene silencing → Angiotensin II overload → NF-κB/ERK-driven cancer signaling
•Spike chaperone overload (↑HSP90, ↑calnexin) → unfolded protein response
•Ribosomal frameshifting → defective protein translation
•Persistent synthetic RNA → unresolvable transcriptional instability. The cell enters an irreversible stress and survival loop.

it's not off-target toxicity. It is systemic mimicry of host genetic regulation:
•Hijacking of host microRNA pathways
•Subversion of normal mRNA decay and splicing
•Disruption of polyadenylation and nuclear export
•Imitation of endogenous regulatory RNA signatures.

We detected molecular signatures consistent with:
•Alzheimer’s and ALS-related protein misfolding
•Parkinsonian mitochondrial stress
•Autoimmune T-cell confusion
•Oncogenic transcription patterns
•Endocrine and metabolic collapse

This is not rare. It is reproducible across patients with adverse events.

And the most dangerous mechanism of all:

Evidence of LINE-1 retroelement activation was present.
This means:
•High Risk of reverse transcription of synthetic mRNA is occurring
•Genomic integration under cellular stress is plausible
•This may accelerate somatic mutation and transformation into cancerous clones

In Group 2, this correlates with de novo tumor emergence post-vaccine.

Somatic mutation patterns and oncogenic signatures mirror viral and retroelement-driven tumorigenesis, indicating aberrant genomic coding embedded within the host DNA.

The human cell becomes:
•A spike initiated destructive protein-producing machine
•A cytokine amplifier
•A misfolded protein sink
•A genomic landmine

The consequences are now undeniable: widespread harm and death following the rushed deployment of mRNA technology. Still branded the crown jewel of vaccine innovation, this platform’s genomic hazards are deliberately ignored—sacrificing truth, safety, and lives for financial gain.

Neo7Bioscience will release:
•REViSS scores
•GSEA enrichment maps
•Case comparisons showing synthetic mRNA-induced oncogenic acceleration

The data speaks! No more coverup!

Professor Angus Dalgleish, a leading cancer researcher, claims a Japanese data revealing a rise in cancer after COVID jabs was deliberately erased after being acquired by Nature Springer.

“You only go to this level to cover up evidence if you’ve committed a serious crime.”

the vaccine program, the COVID vaccine was rolled out. And I know that from when I was over and talked to everybody. And we also know that they were being punished for even suggesting that there was a link. I mean, it is beyond belief that people were saying, look, I'm seeing an awful lot more young cancers here and they've all been vaccinated. We should do something about it. And the attitude was, be quiet if you want to keep your job or we'll send you off to an asylum or something. Losing it, it was absolutely awful.

"So that data is there and they're not getting it. So let's just look at the people, brave enough to do it. Japan. The Japanese Office of National Statistics have released all this data and it's absolutely clear that the more boosters you have, the greater the increase in the cancer incidents.

"What is interesting from my point of view is, from Japan is that whereas I thought I was seeing mainly, and this may well be selective because of my practice and the people I talk to is those cancers which are controlled by the immune response, the ones we know we use immunotherapy for, et cetera. In Japan, it was all, all cancers across the board. So they were all increasing with the vaccine and some particular ones like pancreatic cancer and gliomas.

"I mean all, all the sort of rarer sort of jumping up across the board. And of course, what happens to these people who publish all this correct data? That there is a team which is funded by Pfizer and the NIH, according to sources which are on the various substacks, etc, who go around and harass editors to withdraw any. Anything that looks like it's data to incriminate the vaccine for some link or another.

"We know that they are so vigorous about that that in the first Japanese data published in Cureus, the editor wouldn't withdraw it. The authors found absolutely no reason to. The reviewers found no reason to. So what happened? Cureus was bought out by Nature Springer and the paper removed. I mean that would have cost them millions. This is the level, and you only go to this level to cover up evidence if you've committed a very serious crime. So I think that the fact they're still doing it, is basically mea culpa and we should hold them to account on this."