patrick.net

Patrick says

Nope. Sheer incompetence.

The level of fuckery impeding government from being able to do even the most basic functions is too outstanding for the Average Joe to accept. So, we make up conspiracies to explain otherwise.

You can't explain DEI incompetence as the problem AND then claim Grand Conspiracy! at the same time. That's just more cope...usually after what I just said is pointed out.

"But! But! The Conspiracy IS DEI!"



A conspiracy IS easier to pull off in an environment of said rife incompetence, that's logical to say. But remember, the ppl conspiracists say are involved are in the very incompetent fuck-uped orgs we are talking about here. So, possible but unlikely.

The stonewalling from the SS and FBI is just them trying to cover their asses as long as possible. What we should be looking at is who and at what level is putting in paperwork for early retirement involving a move to Costa Rica or Belize, etc. where the can"t be supeoned and when that will go into effect for most of them. Then you find put when the investigation results will come out at the earliest.

I simply cannot fathom the assassination attempt was due to incompetance. That is a bridge too far for me. Unless they were all fighting over who is going to take the shot.

GNL says

I simply cannot fathom the assassination attempt was due to incompetance. That is a bridge too far for me.

Exactly. You are living proof of why Hanlon's Razor exists. Which I summed up here:

DemocratsAreTotallyFucked says

The level of fuckery impeding government from being able to do even the most basic functions is too outstanding for the Average Joe to accept.

DemocratsAreTotallyFucked says

Nope. Sheer incompetence.

The level of fuckery impeding government from being able to do even the most basic functions is too outstanding for the Average Joe to accept. So, we make up conspiracies to explain otherwise.

Incompetence does not excuse how he knew he could get access to a roof that SS snipers just yards away could see, and not take him out first.
That took some level of coordination and an itinerary. Erased and missing communications, and body cams damns the Secret Service from the Top down, until they can produce evidence that says otherwise.

Listen if your girlfriend is in a locked room with a mondongo moaning with pleasure. There is no side of caution to error on. It is what it is, just on the face of it. And that's what this fucking IS!

This isn't just a one off, the fuckery never ends, and the parade of pearl clutching useful idiots, saying "Well let's not jump to conclusion..." are just as culpable as the corrupt players organizing the skullduggery and fuckery.

Tenpoundbass says

Incompetence does not excuse how he knew he could get access to a roof that SS snipers just yards away could see

Yes, it can.

Tenpoundbass says

Erased and missing communications, and body cams damns the Secret Service from the Top down, until they can produce evidence that says otherwise.

Doesn't prove anything other than they got rid of the evidence. And you can't believe the main motive is to cover up their incompetence.

Tenpoundbass says

Listen if your girlfriend is in a locked room with a mondongo moaning with pleasure. There is no side of caution to error on. It is what it is, just on the face of it. And that's what this fucking IS!

No it isn't. That is you cooking up a convenient analogy that you INSIST applies to your conspiracy theory. That's it. Non sequitor, dude.

Tenpoundbass says

This isn't just a one off, the fuckery never ends, and the parade of pearl clutching useful idiots, saying "Well let's not jump to conclusion..." are just as culpable as the corrupt players organizing the skullduggery and fuckery.

Don't jump to conclusion YOU CAN'T PROVE. You can't understand that part or just refuse to acknowledge it.

You're all like Lefties who claim the whole thing was staged.

You also just admitted that you can't handle the fact that our government is fucking incompetent as hell enough to truly fuck this up and are now covering it up. That is the fuckery never ends that is happening here. There are plenty of other SS fuck ups that have happened. They just don't get the press much, is all. So history backs the incompetence angle up.way more than it does conspiracy.

Thus you prove Hanlon's Razor quite well.

Incompetence comes with scapegoats. This is a tight lipped fuck up, a hit on the President that went wrong.

Tenpoundbass says

Incompetence comes with scapegoats. This is a tight lipped fuck up, a hit on the President that went wrong.

The hit going wrong was pure luck. Allowing it to happen was the fuck up. That is why they are most likely why they being tight lipped and hiding shit from us.

"Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity."

I think we have been watching two different hearings. Or you haven't watched one damn minute of them.

With your useful idiot thinking, I bet you think the 2020 election was just a glitch of untrained incompetent poll workers too.

"You gotta be careful how you say (insert controlled narrative here)"
Facci's famous narrative control method.

Tenpoundbass says

I think we have been watching two different hearings. Or you haven't watched one damn minute of them.

Nope. Nor have you proven anything still.

Tenpoundbass says

With your useful idiot thinking, I bet you think the 2020 election was just a glitch of untrained incompetent poll workers too.

Another personal attack in lieu of proof of your conspiracy theories. Just like the crap I get from Stagers, too.

Tenpoundbass says

"You gotta be careful how you say (insert controlled narrative here)"
Facci's famous narrative control method.

So what?

I thought you were smarter than Rick Scott

https://www.breitbart.com/clips/2024/08/01/rick-scott-secret-service-is-making-the-public-feel-like-there-is-a-cover-up/

DemocratsAreTotallyFucked says

Tenpoundbass says

I think we have been watching two different hearings. Or you haven't watched one damn minute of them.

Nope. Nor have you proven anything still.

I'm not trying to prove anything, the coordination of the SS facilitating Crooks speaks for itself. It's the SS that has to prove something and they failed.
Go Useful Idiot somewhere else. I hear Maduro is looking for a few good... "Now hear him out!" people.

Tenpoundbass says

I thought you were smarter than Rick Scott

https://www.breitbart.com/clips/2024/08/01/rick-scott-secret-service-is-making-the-public-feel-like-there-is-a-cover-up/

'feel' is not proving anything. Abd there's no denying it makes ppl 'feel' that there is a coverup. Nor are cover ups conspiracies proving 'it's an inside job', either.

Tenpoundbass says

I'm not trying to prove anything, the coordination of the SS facilitating Crooks speaks for itself. It's the SS that has to prove something and they failed.

More BS. They don't have to prove YOUR conspiracy theories are false or not.

Burden of proof falls on you.

I don't blame you in thinking a lot here is fishy. I do hold you to using critical thinking skills, tho.

Tenpoundbass says

Go Useful Idiot somewhere else. I hear Maduro is looking for a few good... "Now hear him out!" people.

More as hominen in lieu of proof.

Initially I thought inside job but after about 10 days Dan Bongino claimed incompetence. He's former USSS and still has a lot of connections. Also he's a guy that I suspect would say inside job if he thought that was the case. I'm not convinced of either but if I had to choose it would be incompetence.

You're not proposing that I don't have legal grounds for my own opinions about the glaringly obvious are you?

You may as well join the Democrats and use it for an opportunity to ban the 2nd@.

Your bitching about how others see it is not beneficial. I have never nor will I ever bitch and argue with other people over their view over an event.

You keep calling for proof, what a joke. You mean bodycam and radio recording proof? That is criminally missing. Is that incompetence too?

Like the stolen election deniers, as the evidence stacks up and more people agree, they still believe the 2020 election was honest.

Tenpoundbass says

You're not proposing that I don't have legal grounds for my own opinions about the glaringly obvious are you?

No. You can imagine up whatever you want.

You just run into trouble when you present them as facts, get called out on it, then don't do shit when asked to prove it.

Just like I call out socal2's bullshit the same way.

Also, you.have proven yourself to be a hypocrite in not accepting others like me when I point the obvious as I see it.

Tenpoundbass says

You may as well join the Democrats and use it for an opportunity to ban the 2nd.

WTF? More ad hominen...and doesn't even have to do with this subject nor my well documented stance on the 2nd amendment here on ParNet. Admit it: you are just lashing out.

Tenpoundbass says

Your bitching about how others see it is not beneficial. I have never nor will I ever bitch and argue with other people over their view over an event.

1);You just proved otherwise in this entire conversation with me and 2) asking you to provide proof of your claims is not 'bitching about how others see it'.

Tenpoundbass says

You keep calling for proof, what a joke. You mean bodycam and radio recording proof? That is criminally missing. Is that incompetence too?

That is covering up the incompetence, as I have repeatedly stated so. Covering up incompetence is not proof that what happened was caused by factors other than incompetence, barring FUCKING PROOF otherwise.

GNL:
"I simply cannot fathom the assassination attempt was due to incompetance."

Yes And all I did was point out how that bears Hanlon's Razor out. You couldn't handle that because it was an affront to your conspiracy theories cooked up in your head, then went on the attack.

You then went on this wacko tirade involving me not hearing my girlfriend getting banged against a locked door, called me names, brought up Maduro. Brought up the 2nd...etc.

You did each in response to me calling you out to prove what you are saying other than 'it is the obvious'. You never provided proof to back that 'obvious'. You conflate the cover-up as being proof enough of said 'obvious' and, based on your behavior displayed here, you take any challenge to that as a direct attack on you and then go on the attack yourself - ALL WHY CLAIMING THAT IS WHAT I AM DOING.

^^ that's the FACTS of this situation, summed up.

You posted back 2018 one of PatNet's longer lived and successful threads 'How come liberals lack critical thinking skills?'

Yet your behavior here shows a complete lack of critical thinking skills being applied. In fact, this is classical liberal behavior you are engaging in, instead.

WTF, dude?

DemocratsAreTotallyFucked says

Just like I call out socal2's bullshit the same way.

Also, you.have proven yourself to be a hypocrite in not accepting others like me when I point the obvious as I see it.

Well unlike Socal and others that you feel so desperate to constantly set straight with "Facts" as you see them.
I don't give three fucks what you fucking think or just how big of a useful Idiot you're willing to be for the establishment.
So piss off.

I'll continue to see the failed assassination attempt by Biden's SS Pony Tail brigade, until the FBI, DOJ and HS can do a better job at aligning the facts with your "OPINION".

Take note boys, this is how you handle these useful idiots this election season.
They have no high ground, just lies and deceit don't let them brow beat you, or attack you when you lay out your opinion.

FTR, DATF started savagely attacking my opinion, while trying to call me out as being like the TDS and unreasonable Leotards.
Are you fucking Bot DATF, you attack everyone you don't agree with, or call them bots, why can't you just take a post at face value and shut the fuck up?

My opinions don't have any room for your bullshit injections. While you try to bullet point what I say and talk about proof. You sound like the Libtards here on patnet in the old days. Want proof of every original thought that anyone would post ,that didn't align with their politics.

The more you talk the more you sound like a Fed. Keep digging.

Why are you so vested in stirring Patnet's opinion on this? Just curious.

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2024/08/josh-hawley-acting-secret-service-director-ordered-cuts/

Why it wasn't an inside job, PROOF:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bdA67VTWA_w

Speaking of Rittenhouse, he says he has asshole burn because Trump isn't calling for AR15s to be issued to newborns in lieu os social security numbers. Says he will write in Ron Paul's name. Is he trying to be a zero?

SoTex says

Why it wasn't an inside job, PROOF:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bdA67VTWA_w

I can't stand that guy. He needs to back off the PED's as well. I get the satire, but he just annoys me for some reason.

Tenpoundbass says

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2024/08/josh-hawley-acting-secret-service-director-ordered-cuts/

Yes. PROOF OF INCOMPETENCE.

personal

DemocratsAreTotallyFucked says

Doesn't matter what you fucking 'see'. Only matters what IS.

Back atcha!

WookieMan says

SoTex says

Why it wasn't an inside job, PROOF:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bdA67VTWA_w

I can't stand that guy. He needs to back off the PED's as well. I get the satire, but he just annoys me for some reason.

I don't particularly like him either. Just an attempt (unsuccessfully) to lighten the thread up a bit.

Rittenhouse got excited at meeting Ron Paul and he's a young guy and is all excited about freedom.

Made an over-the-top post, no biggie.

Most Working Cops these days are loyal to their Leftist ran employers. They are never Trumpers to the core. I can see Kyle's desire to be a Cop and or be liked by a clique of cops, be at the point he would telegraph political views from them. Just so that he can garner admiration and consideration to be hired on. Or at least fit in, and be popular at Dunkin Donuts.

Kyle Rittenhouse exposed his ties to Never Trumper organization.

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2024/08/flip-flop-kyle-rittenhouse-denounces-trump-says-he/

DemocratsAreTotallyFucked says

Hmm, certainly interesting. She should get a medal but, what’s the whole story? Some facts must be missing otherwise, that is fucked up.

GNL says

Some facts must be missing

Yes, quite so. Notice the poster said Rittenhouse "murdered two people in cold blood," which is patently false. I guarantee there is missing content to the story where the lady killed her sex trafficker.

HeadSet says

Yes, quite so. Notice the poster said Rittenhouse "murdered two people in cold blood," which is patently false. I guarantee there is missing content to the story where the lady killed her sex trafficker.

https://edition.cnn.com/2024/08/19/us/chrystul-kizer-sentencing-sex-trafficking-death/index.html