« First « Previous Comments 257 - 296 of 296 Search these comments
Can anyone point to ANY healthy school-age child who died of Covid? I am serious; I followed this very closely and the cases were almost all extremely odd and frequently associated with high-profile GoFundMe campaigns.
This is a periodic reminder that there remains no evidence of any kind that school closures reduced COVID deaths.
And there was never any particular reason to think they would. Harmed a ton of kids though.
Journalists remain profoundly incurious about this.
Given the media's obsession in 2020 and 2021 with reporting Covid deaths of healthy people, I have to believe any clear-cut case would have received endless national attention. Yet they all seemed to be like this drowning...
cnn.com/2020/08/10/us/georgi…
The 7-year-old Georgia boy with Covid-19 who died drowned in a bathtub after a seizure, coroner says
The boy is the youngest person with the disease to die in Georgia.
cnn.com
This 7-year-old boy tragically drowned in a bathtub of a seizure that was blamed on a fever that was blamed on Covid. Let's assume that Covid did actually cause the seizure - no one noticed him dying IN A BATHTUB?
Here's another case of a four-year-old girl who died at home in her sleep in September 2021: the family's initial statement blaming her death on Covid received national attention, the walk-back two months later did not.
https://www.houstonchronicle.com/news/houston-texas/galveston/article/galveston-girl-not-die-of-covid-medical-examiner-16642149.php
Anish Koka, MD
@anish_koka
Sep 17
First child myocarditis ad I’ve ever seen.
Children are unlikely to have been the primary source of household SARS-CoV-2 infections ...
INTERPRETATION Whilst SARS-CoV-2 can cause mild disease in children, the data available to date suggests that children have not played a substantive role in the intra-household transmission of SARS-CoV-2.
So why the fuck would you inject innocent children with a dangerous and ineffective experiment?
BREAKING: Pfizer seeks to kill US kids: Pfizer and BioNTech Submit Application to U.S. FDA for Emergency Use Authorization of Omicron BA.4/BA.5-Adapted Bivalent COVID-19 Vaccine in children under 5
Why? Show me, show us ANY evidence you have that this gene injection is needed in statistical zero risk children, with a vaccine that is non-neutralizing and drives variants, and is harmful. Why?
The killing machine of a dying regime
The FDA rushing through authorizations of more untested shots for kids prior to the Republican takeover of the House reminds one of the Nazis accelerating operations at concentration camps in the waning days of World War II.
The vax didn't seem to stop kids from dying.
Study is clear: Children with natural exposure immunity way better protected from COVID-19 infection & hospitalization when compared to vaccinated kids (Omicron or subvariant clade)...
The data appears to show and adds to the existing evidence that those children with natural exposure immunity were much better protected from COVID infection and hospitalization (and I would argue death) than then children who were vaccinated.
https://palexander.substack.com/p/ka-boom-natural-immunity-wins-again
Study is clear: Children with natural exposure immunity way better protected from COVID-19 infection & hospitalization when compared to vaccinated kids (Omicron or subvariant clade)...
The data appears to show and adds to the existing evidence that those children with natural exposure immunity were much better protected from COVID infection and hospitalization (and I would argue death) than then children who were vaccinated.
mell
According to the Department for Education, 20,000 defibrillators will be delivered to almost 18,000 state-funded schools by the end of the academic year.
Who would volunteer their babies to Pfizer for the jab test?
Who would volunteer their babies to Pfizer for the jab test?
Abraham?
University of Rochester Paid Participants for Pfizer Vax Study, Some as Young as 6 Months! (What we know so far...)
University of Rochester offered $500-$900 for participants in the Covid Vaccine Study! 6 months and older! (& maybe unrelated, Peter Daszak's daughter goes to U of R too...)
In a large, real-world population, exposure to young children was strongly associated with less severe COVID-19 illness, after balancing known COVID-19 risk factors.
COVID-19 shot now among the routine vaccines recommended by the CDC for children
It's Official: CDC Adds Three-Dose COVID Jab To Childhood Vax List
BRITTANY M. HUGHES | FEBRUARY 10, 2023
The CDC has officially taken the recommendation of its vaccine panel and added a triple dose of the COVID shot to its list of recommended vaccinations for American kids, toddlers, and babies - a list used by many public school systems to determine which shots a child must have in order to start school.
Per the updated guidelines, healthy kids 6 months old and up should receive a two doses of either the Moderna or Pfizer-BioNTech monovalent COVID-19 vaccine followed by a bivalent vaccine or booster.
Songpinganq
@songpinganq
·
Nov 7, 2021
Chinese government are forcing 3-11 years old take the mandatory covid vaccine now!
11/7/2021
AB 659 would require 8-12 CA Grade School Children to be vaccinated for
Human Papillomavirus (HPV)
Donna,
Our partners over at A Voice for Choice Advocacy have sounded the warning for the past eight years when "Bad Bills" have been introduced. While the hope was that this year would be a 100% positive year, yesterday AB 659 was introduced, by Assembly Member Aguiar-Curry. AB 659 will require the Human Papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine to attend 8-12th grade in public or private school, starting January 1 2024. Assembly Member Aguiar-Curry has been threatening to introduce this bill for the past few years. Last year, she was going to move the bill forward but changed it at the last minute due to pressure in part from AVFCA to be an insurance related bill (which was vetoed).
Take Action:
Make an appointment TODAY to meet with your CA Assembly Member and their staff to discuss AB 659.
- Not sure who that is, enter your address here. (Note: No need to contact your Senator yet) https://findyourrep.legislature.ca.gov/
- Not sure how to set up a meeting and build a trusted relationship with your legislators, watch this webinar. Be sure to mention you are a constituent.
Make an appointment TODAY to meet with your Religous Leaders and individual School Board Members to discuss AB 659 and ask them to oppose the bill.
Not sure what to say: Through our partnership, A Voice for Choice Advocacy is talking to leaders in other states that have had HPV vaccine mandate bills introduced. We, along with AVFCA, will email a summary of talking points early next week, for you to take to use for your Assembly Member meeting, but the key one will be that this is a sexually transmitted disease and the vaccine should not be a requirement to attend school.
Over the past 8 years, A Voice for Choice Advocacy has established itself as the leading legislative organization lobbying in the California Capitol for your health rights. While A Voice for Choice Advocacy's lobbying activity in the Capitol is important, your positive constituent relationships with your CA State Senator and Assembly Member and their staff are critical to assisting with A Voice for Choice Advocacy's efforts in the Capitol.
Knowing how to create a trusted, professional relationship with your legislator is not always easy, and it can be hard to know where to start. Christina, during 2015, spent every Monday thru Wednesday in Sacramento lobbying alongside our seasoned lobbyist, learning the tricks of the trade, and since then has had hundreds of legislative meetings, has shared her knowledge in this video, so you can be as effective as possible.
Please keep a look out for more information and action steps, thank you.
In Solidarity,
Stand for Health Freedom & A Voice for Choice Advocacy
From an email list I'm on: ( employeemandatesunite.standupcalifornia.com )
AB 659 would require 8-12 CA Grade School Children to be vaccinated for
Human Papillomavirus (HPV)
Donna,
Our partners over at A Voice for Choice Advocacy have sounded the warning for the past eight years when "Bad Bills" have been introduced. While the hope was that this year would be a 100% positive year, yesterday AB 659 was introduced, by Assembly Member Aguiar-Curry. AB 659 will require the Human Papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine to attend 8-12th grade in public or private school, starting January 1 2024. Assembly Member Aguiar-Curry has been threatening to introduce this bill for the past few years. Last year, she was going to move the bill forward but changed it at the last minute due to pressure in part from AVFCA to be an insurance related bill (which was vetoed).
Take Action:
Make an appointment TODAY to meet with your CA Assembly...
« First « Previous Comments 257 - 296 of 296 Search these comments
I don’t know how you guys feel, but I’m never going to let them jab my kids. I have two in that age range and I’ll pull them from school completely before this. There are lots of good remote learning programs now. Correspondence courses online can work and might be more helpful than actual school.
I’m betting that a lot of other parents feel the same way. I wonder how many teachers will be laid off after they do this?
https://www.sfchronicle.com/bayarea/article/California-considering-vaccine-mandate-for-school-16482039.php