« First « Previous Comments 1,388 - 1,427 of 1,511 Next » Last » Search these comments
Worse, anyone infected in the first two weeks was counted as “unvaccinated”. And this statistical trick inflated infection rates in the “unvaccinated” group while keeping the early vaccinated infections off the books. This simple statistical slight of hand created the illusion of vaccine effectiveness when none actually existed. Later, when vaccinated individuals fell ill in future waves, they called it “waning immunity”. But it wasn’t waning. It was the washing out of a statistical illusion.
This period of immune suppression did not just cause earlier infections in the susceptible. It had real consequences. It caused people to die.
Peter Rossiter was a healthy 39-year-old, a pianist, a son, a life ahead of him. Four days after his second dose he fell ill with covid. His immune system was obliterated. His mother testified, “His white blood count was almost zero. He fell very seriously ill very quickly”. And Pfizer’s response to this was, “He wasn’t fully protected yet.” They knew this period was dangerous, but instead of admitting it they used cases like Peter’s to prop up the illusion of vaccine benefit.
The extra deaths in young people — some still labelled as “unvaccinated” — were used to claim that the virus had become more deadly, and that the vaccines were therefore working. And this was coupled with fantasy models which assumed vaccines prevented 90% of deaths. So of course they “proved” that millions of lives were saved.
Debunking the claim that COVID "vaccines" saved lives
The data is now clear…..these COVID shots should never have been released in the first place. The risk of the mRNA shots have been shown to far outweigh any claimed benefit.
It is with great regret that the drug regulators are moving so slowly to remove and modify the official administration recommendations for these injections. The forces opposing change are colossal.
Millions of babies, children and adolescents are still being injected. ...
The drug regulators are moving too slowly. The FDA is still refusing to label “death” as a side effect of the COVID-19 “vaccines”.
"So what. A 'court' 'names' what a large segment of awake public have known for years (again and again). The crime part is well illustrated. The punishment part is the part that is always missing."
https://twitter.com/RFKJr_Official/status/1947379317794869454
Overall 5,400 people needed to be vaccinated to save one life, but in the under-30s this figure rose to 100,000 jabs, the paper suggests.
Researchers criticised “aggressive mandates and the zealotry to vaccinate everyone at all cost”, adding that the findings had implications for how future vaccine rollouts were handled.
John Ioannidis, a professor of medicine at Stanford University and the study’s first author, said: “I think early estimates were based on many parameters having values that are incompatible with our current understanding.
“In principle, targeting the populations who would get the vast majority of the benefit and letting alone those with questionable risk-benefit and cost-benefit makes a lot of sense.
“Aggressive mandates and the zealotry to vaccinate everyone at all cost were probably a bad idea.”
“We knew pretty quickly who the most susceptible groups were and we should have focused very strictly on them, rather than placing people who were at little risk in hazard’s way.
“The level of aggression of trying to force people to become vaccinated and shutting down people who were raising concerns, the reasons for those concerns are all validated in this report.”
« First « Previous Comments 1,388 - 1,427 of 1,511 Next » Last » Search these comments
First one:
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10035347/Married-couple-Michigan-fully-vaccinated-die-COVID-one-minute-apart.html?source=patrick.net