« First « Previous Comments 1,404 - 1,443 of 1,510 Next » Last » Search these comments
"So what. A 'court' 'names' what a large segment of awake public have known for years (again and again). The crime part is well illustrated. The punishment part is the part that is always missing."
https://twitter.com/RFKJr_Official/status/1947379317794869454
Overall 5,400 people needed to be vaccinated to save one life, but in the under-30s this figure rose to 100,000 jabs, the paper suggests.
Researchers criticised “aggressive mandates and the zealotry to vaccinate everyone at all cost”, adding that the findings had implications for how future vaccine rollouts were handled.
John Ioannidis, a professor of medicine at Stanford University and the study’s first author, said: “I think early estimates were based on many parameters having values that are incompatible with our current understanding.
“In principle, targeting the populations who would get the vast majority of the benefit and letting alone those with questionable risk-benefit and cost-benefit makes a lot of sense.
“Aggressive mandates and the zealotry to vaccinate everyone at all cost were probably a bad idea.”
“We knew pretty quickly who the most susceptible groups were and we should have focused very strictly on them, rather than placing people who were at little risk in hazard’s way.
“The level of aggression of trying to force people to become vaccinated and shutting down people who were raising concerns, the reasons for those concerns are all validated in this report.”
https://twitter.com/RFKJr_Official/status/1947379317794869454
Robert W Malone, MD
@RWMaloneMD
Jul 22
This is a fake account and has nothing to do with the Secretary HHS. Furthermore, Jay is at NIH not FDA.
"Sadly, seems to be a hoax:
Robert W Malone, MD... Jul 22... This is a fake account and has nothing to
do with the Secretary HHS. Furthermore, Jay is at NIH not FDA....
https://x.com/RWMaloneMD/status/1947613336277057774
Patrick says
"Sadly, seems to be a hoax:
Robert W Malone, MD... Jul 22... This is a fake account and has nothing to
do with the Secretary HHS. Furthermore, Jay is at NIH not FDA....
https://x.com/RWMaloneMD/status/1947613336277057774
So, is this story from July 10, true?
"Moderna Receives Full U.S. FDA Approval for COVID-19 Vaccine, Spikevax,
in Children Aged 6 Months Through 11 Years at Increased Risk for COVID-19 Disease"
https://feeds.issuerdirect.com/news-release.html?newsid=5090085430616980&symbol=MRNA
"presumably it’s rescinded now"
I still remember the headlines. “COVID Vaccines Saved 14.4 Million Lives in One Year.” It was everywhere. It sounded definitive—like the scientific verdict had been delivered, stamped, and sealed. Anyone who questioned it was accused of misinformation. And yet, as I’ve learned through both research and experience, the truth in science has a habit of evolving—sometimes uncomfortably so.
Fast forward to 2025, and a new study has quietly revised the estimate. Not 14.4 million in one year, but just 2.5 million over four years. You read that right. From a thunderous proclamation of vaccine triumph to a humble whisper of revised projections. I couldn’t ignore the implications.
The original estimate came from Imperial College London and was backed by every major player with a stake in the vaccine rollout—WHO, GAVI, Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, the UK Medical Research Council. The newer study? It came from Stanford researchers, without the same global affiliations or massive funding. That difference alone should make us pause. ...
What’s most disturbing, though, is how this newer paper didn’t account for adverse events. It only looked at lives “saved from severe COVID”—without balancing that against the potential lives lost to vaccine complications. If even one or two people died for every 5,000 doses given—through myocarditis, thrombosis, or other immune-triggered injuries—the net benefit could be zero. Or worse.
Let’s not forget the data point that stunned me most: only 299 young people under 20 were estimated to be saved across the entire world. That’s 0.1%. And yet vaccine mandates were—and in some places still are—imposed on this age group. Where was the risk-benefit analysis then? ...
And the greatest irony? By overselling one vaccine, we may have undermined trust in all vaccines. The same institutions now expressing concern about rising measles cases don’t seem to understand the damage they’ve done. When you push an intervention without acknowledging its limitations—and then silence those who point them out—you break the contract of trust.
« First « Previous Comments 1,404 - 1,443 of 1,510 Next » Last » Search these comments
First one:
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10035347/Married-couple-Michigan-fully-vaccinated-die-COVID-one-minute-apart.html?source=patrick.net