« First « Previous Comments 778 - 817 of 1,257 Next » Last » Search these comments
We analyse the relation between covid-19 vaccinations and all-cause-mortality in N=340 Dutch municipalities (17.3M people, ~99% of population), during the entire pandemic period. We do not use covid-19-attributed mortality, mortality predictions and excess mortality, thereby bypassing the ambiguities of case-identification and mortality-modeling. Municipal demographics such as age, culture and population density are strong confounders of mortality and vaccine-uptake. We account for these by normalizing results to prepandemic year 2019, where covid was absent but demographics were highly representative for later years. Normalized to 2019, we found no correlation between municipal mortality in 2020 with vaccination uptake in 2021, which shows the effectiveness of our confounder accounting. We could not observe a mortality-reducing effect of vaccination in Dutch municipalities after vaccination and booster campaigns. We did find a 4-sigma-significant mortality-enhancing effect during the two periods of high unexplained excess mortality. Our results add to other recent findings of zero mRna-vaccine effectiveness on all-cause mortality, calling for more research on this topic.
https://expose-news.com/2022/08/27/9-in-10-covid-deaths-past-year-vaccinated/
Peter McCullough, MD MPH
@P_McCulloughMD
Aug 27
Fraud alert. No proper RCT has shown mortality benefit. FDA never granted mortality claim. Only prior infection and multi drug prehospital RX reduce risk of hospitalization and death. \/ status irrelevant with post alpha variants.
Vaccinated 5X More Contagious Than the Unvaccinated 10 Days After SARS-CoV-2 Infection
https://expose-news.com/2022/08/27/9-in-10-covid-deaths-past-year-vaccinated/
Also the correlation between being triple vaxxed and being super old might be super high. And age is the largest factor for assessing vulnerability to Covid. But even if all the Covid dead are geezers with three jabs, it still means that the vax doesn’t work, at the minimum.
The more you vaccinate, the lower the protection against new strains.
COVID Shots 100 Times More Likely to Cause Injury to Young Adults Than Prevent It, Study Finds
A study by renowned British and American scientists has found that COVID-19 shots are 100 times more likely to cause serious injury to young adults than prevent hospitalization from the virus.
The study, which is currently undergoing peer review, was conducted in response to continued university and college COVID-19 vaccine mandates.
Do boosters save people from getting very sick with Covid? New data from Britain say the opposite.
The mRNA vaccine miracle just keeps getting more special. Don't blame me; the numbers come straight from the British government.
Alex Berenson
Sep 7
Newly mRNA boosted adults aged 40-74 are now TWICE as likely to be hospitalized for Covid as those who haven't recently been boosted, a new British government report shows.
Vaccine advocates endlessly claim that though mRNA shots fail against Omicron infection in weeks, they still miraculously prevent Covid from becoming a serious illness that could require hospitalization.
These figures, which cover hospitalizations in June, suggest otherwise.
A new study published in the New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM) shows not only that the effectiveness of the Pfizer Covid vaccine becomes negative (meaning the vaccinated are more likely to be infected than the unvaccinated) within five months but that the vaccine destroys any protection a person has from natural immunity.
The study is a large observational study that looks at 887,193 children aged 5 to 11 years in North Carolina, of whom 273,157 (30.8%) received at least one dose of Pfizer vaccine between November 1st 2021 and June 3rd 2022. The study includes 193,346 SARS-CoV-2 infections reported between March 11th 2020 and June 3rd 2022. ...
This is very disturbing because it suggests not only that the vaccines give negative ‘protection’ after a few months but also that they destroy the protection that should have been provided by natural immunity. The unvaccinated keep their protection from previous infection but the vaccinated end up with negative efficacy even if they’ve been previously infected. This means the vaccines appear to demolish a person’s natural immunity and leave him or her more vulnerable to infection than he or she was before.
Covid Vaccine Destroys Natural Immunity, NEJM Study Shows
A new study published in the New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM) shows not only that the effectiveness of the Pfizer Covid vaccine becomes negative (meaning the vaccinated are more likely to be infected than the unvaccinated) within five months but that the vaccine destroys any protection a person has from natural immunity.
The study is a large observational study that looks at 887,193 children aged 5 to 11 years in North Carolina, of whom 273,157 (30.8%) received at least one dose of Pfizer vaccine between November 1st 2021 and June 3rd 2022. The study includes 193,346 SARS-CoV-2 infections reported between March 11th 2020 and June 3rd 2022.
Discussion
The excess risk of serious adverse events found in our study points to the need for formal harm-benefit analyses, particularly those that are stratified according to risk of serious COVID-19 outcomes. These analyses will require public release of participant level datasets.
Leaked data suggests lack of mRNA integrity may explain the ineffectiveness, dangers of COVID jabs
'For an effective mRNA product, the mRNA integrity needs to be 100%, meaning all the RNA must be intact. Considering how ineffective the jabs are, it seems fair to question whether lack of mRNA integrity might be to blame.'
The reason health officials don’t want individual vaccine vials examined by independent scientists is because the vials are all different — and the mRNA in the shots is not intact.
For an effective mRNA product, the mRNA integrity needs to be 100%, meaning all the RNA must be intact. Considering how ineffective the jabs are, it seems fair to question whether lack of mRNA integrity might be to blame.
Fragmented RNA could potentially also be hazardous to health by generating incomplete spike proteins. While we do not know if incomplete spike proteins are dangerous, it’s possible they might contribute to cellular stress.
The “bad batch” phenomenon may also be indicative of quality problems. Independent investigations have revealed that some lots of the shots are associated with very severe side effects and death, whereas other lots have very few or no adverse events associated with their use.
However, the fact that “hot” lots are being released in a coordinated fashion suggests vaccine makers may in fact be doing intentional lethal-dose testing on the public, and that these “bad batches” are not merely the result of intermittently poor manufacturing.
@AlexBerenson
17h
The six phases of mRNA vaccine failure:
Euphoria
Side Effects
Mandates
Denial
Regrets
Prosecution
Side effects may include a complete loss of trust in all governments.
Vaccine Narrative Collapses as Harvard Study Shows Jab More Dangerous than COVID
As boosters that have not been tested on humans are being rolled out across the country, a new study indicates that the jab is far more dangerous than COVID-19 itself. And the CDC has provided false information regarding their tracking of adverse events linked to the vaccines.
@EdwardDowd
·
Sep 13
🚨🚨We had 2 pandemics. The 1st was Covid the 2nd was the “Vaccine”
Below Weekly Eurostat Data EU for 25-49 ages in 9 countries. Every country’s excess deaths (except Portugal but still excess) was worse than Pre-vaccines.
We rest our case.
Prepared by Carlos Alegria & Yuri Nunes of Phinance Technologies. Just 1 chart that is part of a much bigger formal study. Will be on website eventually. Work in progress. Both PHD Physicists.
![]()
@YellowJ97022132
20h
Replying to @shmuelcshapira
Safe and effective
At each #Pfizer #Moderna introduction there is a mortality increase
![]()
In chart B, we see both the red and blue lines – which represent children who are vaccinated and have been previously infected and not previously infected respectively – again going through zero at a steep gradient within five months of vaccination. The fact that the vaccinated who have natural immunity from previous infection also see negative effectiveness is a surprise as one would not expect those with natural immunity to be more susceptible to infection than those without it.
![]()
... Now look at the blue line in chart C, which is protection against Delta in the previously infected and unvaccinated. It, too, is waning, but much more slowly, and after eight months it is still very much in positive territory at over 50%. The same can be said for natural immunity against earlier variants (green line), which wanes slowly and remains positive after 16 months. Why is natural immunity remaining protective for the unvaccinated, whereas in the vaccinated their ‘protection’ goes negative even if they have natural immunity?
![]()
It's Official! CDC and UK government data reveal the COVID vaccines do not prevent cases, transmission, severe illness or deaths
So what DO they do, and WHY are we using them?
https://rumble.com/v16s5az-shocking-prof.-dolores-cahill-everyone-who-has-had-an-mrna-injection-dies-w.html
original link
I can't believe she's right that everyone who took the toxxine will be dead in 3 to 5 years, but I do worry that things are going to get really bad.
No, the vaccines never worked all that well against severe Covid
Also, they nearly DOUBLED the risk of coronavirus hospitalizations after the first dose; the figures come from huge and (until now) unnoticed British study
« First « Previous Comments 778 - 817 of 1,257 Next » Last » Search these comments
First one:
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10035347/Married-couple-Michigan-fully-vaccinated-die-COVID-one-minute-apart.html?source=patrick.net