12
0

San Francisco Closes In-N-Out Burger After Defying City’s Vaccine Rule


 invite response                
2021 Oct 19, 1:45pm   3,175 views  73 comments

by Eric Holder   ➕follow (5)   💰tip   ignore  

In-N-Out Burger’s Chief Legal and Business Officer, Arnie Wensinger, is set to release a statement after the San Francisco Department of Health closed one of the Top California Burger Restaurant’s locations.

“Today, the San Francisco Department of Health closed our restaurant…” he wrote. According to Wensingers statement, In-N-Out Burger employees were allegedly “not preventing the entry of customers who were not carrying proper vaccination documentation.”

Beyond the famous California institution’s location “properly and clearly” posting signage to communicate local vaccination requirements, the SFDH has attempted to require In-N-Out Burger employees to act as health police and enforcement personnel for the city.

He explains, “After closing our restaurant, local regulators informed us that our restaurant Associates must actively intervene by demanding proof of vaccination and photo identification from every customer…barring entry for any Customers without proper documentation.”

Wensigner opened up further in the statement saying they are committed to the highest level of customer service & making all feel welcome.

We refuse to become the vaccination police for any government. It is unreasonable, invasive, and unsafe to force our restaurant associates to segregate customers,” wrote Wensigner.



https://thehighwire.com/news/san-francisco-closes-in-n-out-burger-after-defying-citys-vaccine-rule/

« First        Comments 69 - 73 of 73        Search these comments

69   Patrick   2021 Nov 5, 11:20pm  

https://www.sfchronicle.com/opinion/openforum/article/In-N-Out-shouldn-t-have-to-play-vaccine-police-16572100.php

Why making In-N-Out play vaccine police is actually bad for public health


Kind of astonishing that a San Fran paper would even question the authoritarian left.
70   Patrick   2021 Dec 2, 8:01pm  

https://www.outkick.com/burger-boss-in-and-out-continues-to-thumb-nose-at-california-vax-mandate/


BURGER BOSS IN-AND-OUT CONTINUES TO THUMB NOSE AT CALIFORNIA VAX MANDATE

In-N-Out Burger in California apparently isn’t requiring proof of vaccination, fines be darned.

According to an “investigative report” from CBSLA Ch. 2/KCAL 9 in Los Angeles, In-N-Out didn’t request proof of vaccination for indoor dining, as required by California law. It stands to receive fines of up to $5,000 if anyone with a bigger say in things than CBSLA finds out.

Not that In-N-Out burger necessarily cares. It can afford to break the rules as one of world’s most noted burger chains.

Anyway, back to the report.

CBS political reporter Tom Wait visited multiple In-N-Out establishments on Tuesday “and found that it was business as usual, despite the fact that burger chain could face fines,” the station’s website reported.

Why a political reporter is doing an exposé on a fast food chain, we shall never know. But Wait, there’s more.

“At no point, during any of the visits to five different locations, was Wait ever asked to show proof of vaccination, not while entering the restaurants, while ordering or even while sitting a table indoors,” CBSLA wrote.

Of course, Wait wasn’t really uncovering anything new. In-N-Out released a statement two months ago saying it would not honor the mandate and that anyone — vaccinated or otherwise — would be free to eat inside whenever they wished.

“In-N-Out Burger strongly believes in serving all customers who visit us and making all customers feel welcome. We refuse to become the vaccination police for any government,” the statement read.

CBSLA reported that In-N-Out did not respond to a request for comment. Perhaps because it has already made its stance clear. It’s not the restaurant’s fault that some TV station that probably almost folds every four months is just now finding out about it.”

“You have the right to eat here or not,” CBSLA quoted a presumably satisfied customer as saying. “It’s their business, not ours. It’s up to them.”


I've eaten there twice now with my wife, just to support them for this.
71   NuttBoxer   2021 Dec 3, 9:50am  

We're going after running some errands this evening. In n Out will be just fine without SF or LA, but SF and LA will be in burger hell.
72   EBGuy   2021 Dec 28, 3:53pm  

Glorious. Ate indoors in Marin without having to show anything to vax police. Hats off to the good folks at In-N-Out (vs. say Burger King in NYC, Yikes!).
In other news, In-N-Out heiress loses money on used home sale. I think she'll be all right...
In-N-Out heiress Lynsi Snyder sells Bradbury mega-mansion for $16.25 million
The city of Bradbury just saw its priciest sale in years when Lynsi Snyder, owner and heiress of the In-N-Out Burger chain, sold her Mediterranean mansion for $16.25 million.
It chalks up as a loss for Snyder, who bought the nearly 19,000-square-foot home from former Dodgers star Adrián Beltré for $17.21 million in 2012. She first flipped it onto the market for $19.8 million in 2017 before dropping the price to $16.8 million earlier this year, records show.
73   Misc   2021 Dec 29, 10:01am  

Yep, Snyder sold her house. I bet she's gonna do a Musk and leave for Texas.

Just a loss of some more tax money. Probably pull the headquarters too.

« First        Comments 69 - 73 of 73        Search these comments

Please register to comment:

api   best comments   contact   latest images   memes   one year ago   random   suggestions