« First « Previous Comments 1,349 - 1,356 of 1,356 Search these comments
Stuffysays’s Substack
2d
One thing I have noticed is that people will say an acquaintance has been diagnosed with x or keeping being infected with y but will not contemplate that the jabs may be involved - "oh no, I doubt that, after all, these things happen - people get unexpectedly and tragically ill all the time". The problem is that people, especially older people, do get unexpected illnesses and some of them must just be part of life and not due to the jabs. So it's tricky suggesting the possible/probable cause without sounding like a conspiracy-theorist-cum-anti-vaxxer. I don't think people want to know that the death and disease stalking the western world is connected to the Safe & Effectives because most people took the jabs and encouraged other people to take them.
Funny you should mention grandma Peter, my latest article deals with that subject:
Disease: The Back Door to Slit the Throat of All Notions of Freedom
The Concept of Contagion - The very notion of brings out the worst in us while in many of our minds it’s bringing out the best:
Each of us is a companion-seeking weapon that can kill grandma at any moment, and so because we ourselves are the threat, freedom is the threat, and therefore all non-essential activity must be denied. Only “they” get to determine what is or is not “essential”, and this is a dynamically changing judgement based on what they want in the moment and at the expense of everything else.
Think about how diabolically genius this is—they are preying on our instinctual need to be good people. After-all, who wants to be responsible for killing grandma? Not a soul. Consequently those bewitched by the propaganda then eagerly turn in their sovereignty to the nearest checkpoint while hating and scorning those who do not. Next the parasite controlled media dramatically magnifies both the positive feelings that stem from doing right by your fellow man, right alongside the negative aspects of self-righteousness, indignation, self-preservation, & condemnation
Excerpt from: https://tritorch.substack.com/p/signs-and-symbols-predictive-programming
« First « Previous Comments 1,349 - 1,356 of 1,356 Search these comments
Liberals defend their credentials which allow them to exploit those who don't have the same credentials. Credentials create monopolies, the ability to set high prices regardless of quality of service. It is a way to defeat free market competition.
The funding of universities depends entirely on the demand for their degrees, which they control. Their biggest horror would be a system where anyone could take tests to prove competence in a subject without paying for the years of classes and subjecting themselves to obedience to professors.
- Thomas Frank
Most of academia is less about learning than about paying for a paper proof of status and conformity. Non-conformists are expelled from schools, or failed out. Most teachers do not like their authority to be questioned. Bosses like the academic proof of conformity when they hire. The most "educated" are the most obedient.
Trump was a threat to their credentials and therefore a threat to their incomes and status.
The academic elite need a reason to hate those threatening themselves, therefore they use imaginary "racism", to which there is no defense. The accusation is the conviction.
Then they don't need to worry about the real class problem, which is independent of race. They would be uncomfortable looking at class, because they'd have to look at themselves and their unearned class privileges.
So their faith in the injection is faith in the "expert class" of which they are members, and they demand that the hoi polloi submit to it as an expression of the elite's power and prestige.