patrick.net

Anna Von Reitz says Fauci means 'scythe', and he is from a blood line of assassins.

He probably did get his entrenched position for so long to quarterback the turning of medicine as an agent of death and profit against the public. AIDS was the trial run.

https://transcriberb.dreamwidth.org/34040.html

"The Explosive Interview with an Outcast Pharmacist from Darwin" [Australia]
Cafe Locked Ou, May 17, 2022
https://rumble.com/v15444z-the-explosive-pharmacist-from-darwin.html

... LI CHU: So that's the reason why I refuse over and over again, regardless of what they say, what they trying to put on, whatever, they can give a lot of excuses but the thing is, because the reason— also, one thing is because when I write to the company, actually, I was using my right in regards to religious exemption, which they did it pretty well in the US, you can use that as reason for that.

MICHAEL GRAY GRIFFITH: Yeah.

LI CHU: But I didn't know that momentarily they don't have such thing at all. They remove it. I think it was a year ago somewheres?

MICHAEL GRAY GRIFFITH: Yeah.

LI CHU: When covid hits, they actually knew it so they remove it.

MICHAEL GRAY GRIFFITH: Yeah.

LI CHU: So you can't use that, so no excuse unless you get a letter exemption from the doctors.

MICHAEL GRAY GRIFFITH: Good luck with that.

LI CHU: Yeah exactly. I mean, even people getting the jab injured and then you still need to get a jab.

MICHAEL GRAY GRIFFITH: I know. That's an interesting thing. Like, what it used to be, or, say you went to hospital and you had hepadine, you got an allergic reaction. They would put on your file, never give hepadine. And you would know—

LI CHU: [inaudible] all the time the prescription.

10:17
MICHAEL GRAY GRIFFITH: And you would know that as a chemist. You would get those things.

LI CHU: Yes.

MICHAEL GRAY GRIFFITH: Now these people go, this virus, this thing almost k—one girl we interviewed she was in hospital with heart palpitations, she'd had a heart attack, and the nurse came in and said, are you ready for your second jab?

LI CHU: Oh. You going to kill the person definitely.

MICHAEL GRAY GRIFFITH: You kidding me? I'm having a heart attack here!

LI CHU: Yeah. That's, that's called murder. That's very clear. Because you known causation of injuries and then you still, even if any drug reaction, even a suspected case, you already need to withdraw it. It's not even need to confirm. And this one you have evidence that you have the situation that you never have any problems, suddenly a heart attack, like kids as young as 7 and 9, you can get heart attack. Where in the world ever seen that? Ever, never. Something done differently has caused this to happen. I mean, if you have a brain, you should be able to think that. You don't need anyone, pharmacist, or any health profession tell you that, or not even experts tell you that. You have a brain, you should be able to think that.

https://brownstone.org/articles/my-board-certifications-have-been-revoked/

My Board Certifications Have Been Revoked
By Pierre KoryPierre Kory August 22, 2024

Iwill just start by saying that I believe that the ABIM’s decision was 100% predetermined even before we first received their accusation in June 2022. There was no way they were going to declare us innocent of misinformation, even though a good portion of this country knows how effective and accurate our deeply evidence-based Covid treatment guidance was (and still is).

One of the reasons why they were never gonna let us off is that, if they declared us “innocent,” (i.e. accurate) that action would have immediately imperiled the decisions by medical boards across the country who persecuted hundreds of doctors for using ivermectin or hydroxychloroquine or for recommending against Covid-19 mRNA gene therapy products. More importantly, it could potentially launch hundreds of thousands of lawsuits by the families of patients who died due to lack of early treatments offered by clinics and hospitals or filled by pharmacies.

The above examples which led to the deaths of so many show the sheer power of mega-corporations that put their financial interests ahead of our health and our lives. Through their overwhelming influence over nearly every institution of society and Science (media, journals, health agencies, politicians, medical schools, physicians, etc), they literally succeeded in depriving a whole country (and world) of the most effective, inexpensive, safe, and widely available treatments for Covid. My biggest worry is that this crime against humanity may never enter the history books and thus will be eventually erased from memory. Which is looking probable.

Not if I can help it.

https://transcriberb.dreamwidth.org/55191.html

Dr. Joseph Fraiman, MD: Closing the Curtain on Covid Theater
March 7, 2022
https://rumble.com/vwrd6z-dr.-joseph-fraiman-closing-the-curtain-on-covid-theater.html

From the conference hosted by Governor of Florida Ron DeSantis and Surgeon General Dr. Joseph Ladapo. See
https://flgov.com/2022/03/07/governor-desantis-closes-the-curtain-on-covid-theater/

DR. JOSEPH FRAIMAN: In contrast to actually a lot of the voices here, my perspective throughout the early parts of this pandemic were very different than theirs. You know but I think that sometimes maybe when you're similar to maybe like at a movie when you have the front row you don't necessarily, you can't necessarily see the whole picture. For example, in the first wave, my nurses and I, we were, we saw so many people dying from covid, it horrified us, it was more death than any of us had ever seen. Freezer trucks at our door holding the bodies that were left over, you know, from than our morgue could handle. At that time the only thing I could see was we needed more aggressive covid policies to get this plague under control, stop these deaths from happening. I was confident that all of the locations that didn't embrace this, like, aggressive covid policy, they were going to suffer tremendous deaths. And what we would see next, of course what would follow is they would see how much death they suffered and it would become so painfully obvious that they would adopt all the aggressive policies.

But I was wrong. I was, my views were wrong at that time. Because the states and nations that didn't take aggressive covid policies, they didn't do obviously worse.

You know, it took me a year into the pandemic before it became really clear that it wasn't obvious at all that any policy was strongly effective at reducing covid infections or death outside of within the island nations where clearly border control looked like it did have a pretty strong effect.

So the scientist in me had to take this emerging data that I was seeing and acknowledge my hypothesis had been falsified, I guess you can say, and the covid policies that I was so certain were necessary, they just didn't help the way that I would hope they had helped.

And then I realized something that I kind of ignored that much of the people here have discussed and brought up which is that these policies were harmful. Initially I was, I don't want to say I was ignorant but I was, it was irrelevant because there were lives on the line, I'm an emergency doctor, lives, there's lives, it's, like, no, we have to do it. But if the policies didn't make a big difference and they only cause harm, then you have to start rethinking what we're doing. You take the data that's clearly in front of us and if it is only causing harm and at best can only save few, we need to think about it because if at best, right, an aggressive lockdown policy, imagine it reduced hospitalizations, death by 20%, 20% of deaths hospitalizations reduced. If that was the case then maybe we could come here and debate, is the harms that are caused by those lockdowns worth that benefit? And how do we negotiate that benefit through you know not getting through our freedoms? But the reality is, hospitalizations and deaths were not reduced by 20% by any policies. And because if they were we would have had studies at this point that would have been able to consistently identify that and that just has not occurred at all.

So I think as a society we have to decide if we want to continue like a public policy that's obviously producing large harm and offering only a minimal benefit at best. It's currently unmeasurable.

Also, personally, I would like to apologize to the three other scientists sitting with me here on Zoom, the proponents of the Barrington Declaration[1] because initially I did think y'all were crazy. Or dumb. Or maybe you just didn't understand what I was seeing. But I now realize actually, I'm sorry, because I believe now, you guys were correct. And you were correct from the beginning. And I wish that more people including myself had realized that sooner. And I hope more people realize that soon enough.

https://slaynews.com/news/doctor-who-pandemic-force-vaccines-public-not-deal-disease/

A prominent Kenyan doctor has accused the globalist World Health Organization (WHO) of using the Covid “pandemic” to “force” mRNA “vaccines” onto the public.

Dr. Wahome Ngare, the director of the Kenya Christian Professionals Forum (KCPF), blasted the WHO and health officials around the world for using the public’s fear to advance their own sinister agenda

In a Tuesday interview with podcast host Lynn Ngugi, Dr. Wahome Ngare asserted that the WHO and global governments only want to force vaccination and “not deal with the disease.”

The doctor explains that because vaccination targets the healthy and not the sick, it entails greater risks.

He notes that this is the reason why vaccines are normally reserved for addressing conditions that are “dangerous” enough to run this risk of stimulating a person’s immune system through a virus, or a piece of a virus.

“So, if your vaccine has a problem, then you can threaten the whole community – that’s why vaccines become a national security issue, because if they’re not properly taken care of and you’re giving them to your whole population (who are) healthy, then you can cause a lot of damage,” Ngare said.

It is therefore “much better to treat those who are sick” than to target healthy people through vaccination, he notes.

He argues that the risk involved in mRNA injections was much greater than that of a typical vaccine.

This is in part because the full results of Phase One and Phase Two clinical trials, which are “supposed to tell us whether it is safe and effective,” were not released until December 2023 – three years after the outbreak of Covid.

“And the only reason this information was released is because somebody went to court and sued Pfizer in the U.S., and they were forced by the court to release this documentation,” Ngare noted.

He further explained that these trial results revealed many problems caused by the Covid mRNA injections, including serious injuries and death.

“What that tells me as a doctor is very simple: that as doctors we let the world down,” he told Ngugi.

“Because we shouldn’t have given any support for that injection without seeing the phase one and phase two clinical trial results.”

https://lettersfromaustralia.substack.com/p/dna-contamination-woollahra-council

Thousands of doctors and scientists have called for the shots to be halted in the Hope Accord, on safety grounds.

The council meeting came the day after University of London Emeritus Oncology Professor Angus Dalgleish appeared on Sky News Outsiders, saying the products were “full of contaminants” and asking “why on earth” were they ever mandated (video here).

“The messenger RNA vaccines of Pfizer and Moderna have caused unbelievable problems and damage to people,” he told Outsiders on Sunday.

“The red flags are enormous,” he said.

“Why hasn’t the government banned these vaccines immediately. For a start, covid doesn’t exist anymore - or if it does, it doesn’t kill anybody anymore.

“So why are you using vaccines - boosters - that we now know increase the rate of cancer, and the cancers are appalling. They’re turbo cancers.”

https://jamesroguski.substack.com/p/international-opposition-to-the-mrna

"I think the vaccines are shit mate, they’re absolute shit, they are killers. They destroy people’s DNA - and I’m telling you this Australia and the world as a registered doctor. This is coming from a registered Australian medical professional; the mRNA vaccines are poisonous. They are bad for you, they are not good for you. They are harming your children they are harming you. Everything you’ve heard has been there to deceive you. I have been vindicated in court today. To let you know the people of Australia that you have been lied to by the medical regulator. The medical regulator APHRA has lied to you."

https://www.drtrozzi.news/p/dear-canadian-politicians-and-bureaucrats

https://elizabethhart.substack.com/p/this-is-unethical-and-this-is-madness

"This is unethical and this is madness" - NZ doctor Alison Goodwin on the COVID-19 vaccine rollout, 3 July 2021

Where were the doctors who should have been challenging the Covid madness from the beginning?

It seems most were silenced by their ‘regulators’, such as AHPRA in Australia, see for example:

Reckless disregard for voluntary informed consent - the AHPRA Position Statement 9 March 2021
Elizabeth Hart
December 15, 2024

But there were good doctors speaking out, if only more of their colleagues had joined them…

Consider for example general practitioner Alison Goodwin in New Zealand, speaking out in July 2021:




... TRANSCRIPT - ALISON GOODWIN GP, 3 JULY 2021

Hi, I'm Dr Alison Goodwin, a GP in New Zealand.

Today I just want to speak to you about the Pfizer vaccine rollout that's happening in New Zealand.

In my opinion, it's inappropriate and unethical to roll out a medical procedure to the whole population of New Zealand, particularly a medical procedure that's new, and is still in clinical trials.

It's also inappropriate and unethical to force a person to have a medical procedure against their wishes or under coercion.

I have a number of concerns about this vaccine rollout and, to be fully informed, I think you need to know the following things:

First of all, it's a new technology, hasn't been used before.

Secondly, it's still in clinical trials. It won't be finished until 2023.

It's only got provisional consent with 58 conditions.

Pfizer has no liability in case of the vaccine not working or having adverse effects.

There is no long-term safety data. We have no idea what will be the outcome in one year, two years, five years. And the same applies to the efficacy.

It's not been studied in pregnancy or in the frail elderly.

Overseas, there are treatments being used that can treat COVID-19.

And I do not think that the monitoring of adverse reactions is adequate at present.

We're not all at equal high risk of harm from catching COVID-19. Some of us are already immune.

Those of us who are under 60 and otherwise healthy are at minimal risk from catching COVID-19. And in this instance, the risks of the vaccine are likely to outweigh any benefits. ...

https://slaynews.com/news/doctor-testifies-mrna-vaccines-most-destructive-lethal-medical-products-ever-used/

Doctor Testifies: ‘mRNA Vaccines Are Most Destructive, Lethal Medical Products Ever Used’

A doctor has testified before lawmakers about the devastation she has witnessed firsthand among those who received Covid mRNA “vaccines.”

Dr. Christine Drivdahl-Smith provided testimony as an expert witness during a hearing before the Montana House Judiciary Committee.

Drivdahl-Smith is a family physician in Miles City and a volunteer board member for the Montana Medical Freedom Alliance. ...

“[mRNA vaccines are] the most destructive and lethal medical products that have ever been used in medical history,” she told the committee.

Drivdahl-Smith and other proponents blamed mRNA vaccines for causing skyrocketing deaths and serious injuries in humans. ...

“Incidents of COVID-19 itself went up after the vaccines came out,” she told the committee.

The bill is now on its way to the Montana House floor after passing out of committee in a party-line vote.

Meanwhile, several other states have been pushing to ban the mRNA injections.

https://www.aussie17.com/p/the-healers-rebellion-why-dr-jipson

The Healer’s Rebellion: Why Dr. Jipson Quah’s Defiance Deserves Vindication

When the state mandates harm, one doctor said no—and they made him pay! ...

Singapore in 2021 was no bastion of reason—it was a laboratory of authoritarian hubris. The government, cloaked in its technocratic sheen, rolled out a vaccine mandate with the ruthlessness of a machine: no jab, no livelihood, no entry to malls, restaurants, or the fabric of daily life. ...

Mei Ling (a pseudonym to maintain confidentiality), a single mother clutching her toddler’s hand outside Dr. Quah’s clinic, was one such doubter. She’d read the whispers—unproven tech, skipped trials—and saw not salvation, but risk. Without a vaccine card, she’d lose her cashier job, her flat, her child’s future. The state’s answer was pitiless: comply or perish. Dr. Quah, a clinician with a resume spanning Thermo Fisher labs and a network of care, saw her tears and chose mercy over mandate. “I gave the Sinopharm vaccine,” he explained, emphasizing that “saline is an ingredient in the vaccine. In giving the vaccine, I had given saline and overemphasized it to the patients to allay their fears.” He chose Sinopharm, a non-mRNA option, because “I felt it was safer,” a decision rooted in his doubt about mRNA vaccines, though authorities believed he gave only saline, misinterpreting his approach as deceit.

That act of compassion became a lightning rod for the state’s vengeance. On January 21, 2022, Dr. Quah’s world imploded. Police swarmed his clinic, patients gawking as officers dragged him away. The handcuffs clicked—a sound he’d never forget—marking the start of a prosecutorial onslaught that laid bare the state’s brutality. Interrogated for over 26 hours without rest—“I was awake for more than 26 hours at one point,” he recalled—he sat in a dim room, officers circling like vultures, his voice fading to a rasp. Questions were hammered down by the police investigators: “Why the saline? Who paid? Name Iris Koh (who was a prominent advocate against the experimental gene therapy)!” ...

Now, in 2025, the government’s house of cards collapses. The mRNA vaccines, their sacred cow, are unmasked as an unproven gene therapy, a reckless experiment foisted on a populace without consent. Studies scream the truth Dr. Quah intuited: a surge in cancers, lymphomas blooming in once-healthy chests, immune systems faltering like autumn leaves. Fukushima’s warnings, validated by Japan’s official data—link increased age-adjusted cancer deaths to the third mRNA dose, showing biodistribution studies where mRNA travels everywhere, producing toxic spike proteins in the brain, nails, and every cell, contradicting government claims.

Professor Gabriel Oon’s observations amplify this, painting a dystopian Singapore where annual mortality and cancer cases soar—blood cancers, leukemia, early relapses, colon and breast cancers—the amendment of Coroners Act’s in May 2023 to avoid investigating medicine-related deaths raised eyebrows.

Singapore’s cancer sales data soared as I reported here. ...

Dr. Jipson Quah is no villain—he’s a mirror to a government lost in its own myth. Handcuffed, weeping, suicidal, he held a line the state couldn’t fathom. As 2025 tallies the cost of their arrogance, his prosecution is a final, bitter wrong. Vindicate him—not just for his agony, but for the truth he bore against a tide of tyranny. The healer’s rebellion was right; the state’s was ruin.

Lest we forget. One murdered for opposing the narrative, the other dead for supporting the narrative.

https://t.me/newstfn/38177

https://www.aussie17.com/p/victory-over-the-medical-mafia-dr

Victory Over the Medical Mafia: Dr. Roland Victor Freed in Malaysia’s COVID Vaccine Witch Hunt

Hi friends, sometimes we have to take our little victories and celebrate, and today’s a big one worth shouting about. Dr. Roland Victor, a courageous Malaysian doctor with over 100k followers on Facebook, and founder of The KL Sky Clinic in Kuala Lumpur, walked free today after the Sessions Court in Sepang threw out a baseless case against him. For four grueling years, the medical mafia tried to silence him for daring to question the sacred mRNA vaccine narrative, but today, science and free speech scored a knockout blow against their tyranny.

Back in February 2021, Dr. Roland posted a 56-minute Facebook Live video breaking down the mRNA jab—how it works, what it does to your immune system, and the risks the so-called experts didn’t want you to hear. For this “crime” of informing the public, the powers-that-be slapped him with charges in July 2021 under Section 233(1)(a) of the Communications and Multimedia Act 1998, claiming his words were “offensive” and meant to “annoy.” A single complaint was all it took for the medical cartel to drag him through the mud, threatening him with a RM50,000 fine or a year behind bars. This wasn’t justice—it was a vendetta to crush a doctor who refused to bow to Big Pharma’s script.

Judge Ahmad Fuad Othman ordered that Dr Roland Victor, to be freed, stating that the prosecution had failed to establish the case beyond a reasonable doubt.

“I do not see what Dr Roland said as being slanderous…There is also no evidence, either from the prosecution or defence witnesses, through cross-examination and so on, stating that what he said was untrue or slanderous.”, the Judge said in the ruling.

The 3 most important factors to stopping infectious disease

1. Hygiene
2, Sanitation
3. Etiology (knowing where it comes from, how it spreads, and the symptoms)

The vast vast majority of diseases are survivable by healthy persons under 75 when 3 factors (or at least a good chunk of the 3rd) are known.

HCQ and Ivermectin are wonder drugs.

The silver or the bullet. The doctor gets the silver, the patient gets the bullet.

https://unexpectedturns.substack.com/p/spci-8-the-catastrophic-rollout-of

"The catastrophic rollout [of] the covid vaccines is arguably the biggest avoidable public health disaster in human history, and in my view constitutes a crime against humanity"

Former NHS doctor and the CEO of the UK Medical Freedom Alliance Liz Evans on covid vaccines and ethical violations