by Patrick ➕follow (59) 💰tip ignore
« First « Previous Comments 212 - 223 of 223 Search these comments
Tucker Carlson Says Doctors Should APOLOGIZE for Wrongly Recommending the COVID Vax
“If you hurt someone unintentionally, you have to say, ‘I’m sorry.’”
“By the way,” Carlson added, “I would never go to a doctor who was still lying about COVID because that’s a dangerous person. That’s an immoral person and a dangerous person.”
“I can’t get past it,” Carlson continued.
“It’s like, ‘Oh, I’m great at my job. I killed a bunch of people, but I’m a great person.’ It’s like, no, it’s too big a sin to overlook. You have no credibility unless you apologize for that and explain how you reached that wrong conclusion.”
Tucker Carlson Says Doctors Should APOLOGIZE for Wrongly Recommending the COVID Vax
“If you hurt someone unintentionally, you have to say, ‘I’m sorry.’”
“By the way,” Carlson added, “I would never go to a doctor who was still lying about COVID because that’s a dangerous person. That’s an immoral person and a dangerous person.”
“I can’t get past it,” Carlson continued.
“It’s like, ‘Oh, I’m great at my job. I killed a bunch of people, but I’m a great person.’ It’s like, no, it’s too big a sin to overlook. You have no credibility unless you apologize for that and explain how you reached that wrong conclusion.”
Tucker Carlson Says Doctors Should APOLOGIZE for Wrongly Recommending the COVID Vax
“If you hurt someone unintentionally, you have to say, ‘I’m sorry.’”
“By the way,” Carlson added, “I would never go to a doctor who was still lying about COVID because that’s a dangerous person. That’s an immoral person and a dangerous person.”
“I can’t get past it,” Carlson continued.
“It’s like, ‘Oh, I’m great at my job. I killed a bunch of people, but I’m a great person.’ It’s like, no, it’s too big a sin to overlook. You have no credibility unless you apologize for that and explain how you reached that wrong conclusion.”
Not sure this is true, but would not be surprised if it is.
Doctors received approximately $12.1 billion from drug and device makers between 2013–2022, study reveals
Despite evidence that financial conflicts of interest may influence medical practice and research and may erode patient trust in medical professionals, these relationships remain pervasive. According to a new analysis of the Open Payments platform, a database that tracks payments between physicians and industry, a team led by a Penn State researcher found that doctors received approximately $12.1 billion from drug and device makers between 2013 and 2022.
Their findings were published in JAMA. It's one of the first studies to look at industry payments longitudinally and by specialty. ...
The analysis showed that more than half of physicians received at least one payment, and roughly 94% of payments were associated with one or more marketed medical products. A small percentage of physicians received the largest amounts, often exceeding $1 million. Orthopedic surgeons received the greatest sum of payments, while pediatric surgeons received the least amount.
Why Do Doctors Give Up On Patients?
Exploring the Psychology Behind the Greatest Medical Disaster in History.
•In medicine, doctors will often assume there is nothing that can be done for their patients and then shift the blame to the patient (e.g., sorry you should have gotten vaccinated).
•I believe this lack of creativity is a product of the training doctors receive and a need to reinforce the mythology Modern Medicine rests upon (that it is the medical savior of the world).
•Since many of the existing (for-profit) treatments are unsafe and ineffective, it hence is critical for the medical industry to prevent doctors from looking into better alternatives.
•All of this was laid bare during COVID-19, where we saw the medical profession refuse to go against the orthodoxy, not treat a fairly manageable condition, and instead persecute those who were able to provide safe and effective treatments for COVID-19 (which competed with the vaccines).
•In this article, we will provide some documented examples of this mentality, review the psychology that gives rise to that abhorrent behavior, and cover some of what I found to be the safest and most effective treatments for COVID-19 (most of which did not require a prescription or doctor to obtain).
@DrJ_surgeon
Feb 8, 2023
After 3 years of reading hundreds of Covid studies, here is what I believe to be most likely:
1. Covid exists as a respiratory virus that started from the Wuhan lab as an infectious clone. It was spreading worldwide as early as the summer of 2019.
2. This coincided with ongoing mRNA research and this was the planned response to establish this technology platform for all future vaccinations.
3. Pressure was exerted to suppress all viable treatments to advance this agenda and obtain the EUA.
4. HCQ and Ivermectin work well when given early and as a multi-drug regimen. IVM likely has some utility in later stages of disease. Vit D, Zinc and other supplements help in patients with deficiency, given early or prophylactically.
5. Many elderly people and people with comorbidities died, due to lack of early treatment. Many of the early nursing home deaths were the result of lockdowns, over medication, dehydration, isolation and deaths of despair.
6. The rollout of vaccines caused waves of infections and deaths immediately after each dose, due to the 2-3 weeks of immunosuppression and adverse effects of the technology. There was a large variation in batches due to degradation of the mRNA, LNP and poor mRNA integrity.
7. The leaky vaccines led to accelerated viral convergent evolution of evading variants. This has prolonged the pandemic, resulting in failure to ever achieve a degree of herd immunity.
8. The mRNA vaccines probably prevented some severe Covid disease early in the pandemic, but these gains were offset by deaths from resulting increased infections and myocardial disease and other adverse events. They were never needed for healthy people.
9. Currently, I believe excess deaths are occurring due to the mRNA vaccines causing an immunological change causing T-cell exhaustion, IgG4 response and possible ADE with Covid infections. This is leading to a devastating systemic vascular and cardiovascular response.
10. The initial 2 doses of vaccine may have given T-cell immunity that is broad and longer lasting and protects against variants, but subsequent doses do nothing more and cause further problems. Accumulating spike protein could be a major concern.
11. Natural immunity has always given better immunity and still gives long lasting protection in most against severe disease.
12. A biomedical security state has been an underlying goal, with the establishment of vaccine digital passports. The ultimate failure of the vaccines has severely set back that goal.
« First « Previous Comments 212 - 223 of 223 Search these comments
patrick.net
An Antidote to Corporate Media
1,197,036 comments by 14,092 users - Ceffer, richwicks online now