patrick.net

The_Deplorable says

"Giving experimental "vaccine" to hundreds millions people" including pregnant women and toddlers based on such limited data with no informed consent, is a huge malpractice."

These vaccine mandates are actually crimes against humanity and a violation of the The Nuremberg Code.

Let me be very, very, very direct for once.

Until people start being killed, this won't end. They are daring us to kill them. Now, do they have a planned response to this? I don't know.

I'm shocked nobody has been murdered over this bullshit, but given our media, maybe they have been, and it's simply not been reported.

richwicks says

I'm shocked nobody has been murdered over this bullshit, but given our media, maybe they have been, and it's simply not been reported.

It may be a stealth event where a college president was killed by a car while crossing the street. Looks like an accident, but the driver was the father of a kid who died from the jab that was required by that college president for the kid to attend school. Could also be a "robbery" like the Seth Rich case.

https://transcriberb.dreamwidth.org/7283.html

Dr. James Thorp (OB-GYN) Interviewed by Steve Kirsch
https://rumble.com/vru732-dr.-james-thorp-on-medical-censorship.html 

January 3, 2022

TRANSCRIPT OF EXCERPT

4:06

DR. JAMES THORP: [On recommending the covid "vaccines"] Certainly not for pregnant women and children.

STEVE KIRSCH: So could you then have your medical license revoked for giving your honest opinion like that?

DR. JAMES THORP: Absolutely, yes.

STEVE KIRSCH: So you're caught between your oath [Hippocratic Oath] and your duty to your patients, and losing your license.

DR. JAMES THORP: That's exactly right. There's no such thing— there's no physician or nurse in the entire United States of America that should be believed anymore.

Patients, for those of you listening, you shouldn't believe me, you shouldn't believe your physician or your nurse. We're all under a gag order. Why would you believe us? It's ridiculous. Because if we say what is opposed to the state doctrine, we will be destroyed. Our careers will be destroyed, we'll lose our livelihood, our reputation, and we'll have our families destroyed. So you shouldn't believe them.

And if that weren't bad enough, certainly there's no such thing as fair, honest, informed consent anymore, Steve. I mean, it's all null and void. When you make threats, when we've all been threatened like we have been, all nurses and all physicians, it's outrageous.

Within a six week time the American Board of Medical Specialties, the federation of the state medical boards, the American Board of Medical Specialties, mine is American Board of OB-GYN, and we've had some rather lively debates and some interactions. I've worked with them before formally, I know them all, they're all my contemporaries, I don't them all, I know two of them, Dr Susan Ramin and I know the executive director, Dr. George Wendel, and they're really reasonable people. I don't believe they have the constitution to do this, and to actually extort physicians and threaten them like this.

STEVE KIRCH: But that's what they're doing, right?

DR. JAMES THORP: That's exactly what they're doing. I held them in extremely high esteem for forty-plus years. I've worked with them formally for at least a year, I did examinations.

STEVE KIRSCH: So you've never seen anything like this before, and you've been doing this for 45 years?

DR. JAMES THORP: Forty-two years.

STEVE KIRSCH: Forty-two years. And you've never seen this kind of thing before, where you have to go and compromise your oath? So these are extraordinary times.

DR. JAMES THORP: These are bizarre times. I've never seen anything— this kind of behavior— as I ??— I served in the United States Air Force, so I a oath that I carry to my death. And I fought for freedom of this country. And I will die on this hill. I will not tolerate this. This kind of horse manure belongs over in Pyongyang, Shanghai, Moscow or Tehran. It doesn't belong in the United States of America.

STEVE KIRSCH: How many of your associates would agree with your point of view that you just expressed with me, privately. You know, where it's not for attribution, but just, you know, of your colleagues, and you asked them, hey, totally off the record, totally anonymously, can't get in trouble, how many of them are pissed off?

DR. JAMES THORP: That's a great question. I think most of them are upset with the threats. Many of them are just so busy, Steve, that they really don't, they really, I don't know where are they. In fact, many of whom I've raised their attention, they're like, "no way!" But when I show them the document and show them the threat, it's extraordinarily concerning. I have a lot of mentees, I've trained a lot of residents, medical students, ob gyn docs, and maternal field of medicine physicians around the country, and many of them have contacted me, extraordinarily upset and concerned about the American Board of OB-GYN.

And that's why I went in to them. I've been trying to communicate with them on LinkedIn for several months, and I guess some of my posts finally got to them. And I tried calling Dr. Wendel and he never returned my call, but he did send me a rather threatening email that I think I forwarded to you.

STEVE KIRSCH: So I take it these guys aren't open to, like, a pubic debate between you and representatives from the board.

DR. JAMES THORP: No.

STEVE KIRSCH: Don't want to talk about it.

DR. JAMES THORP: I'll debate anybody in the world. Bring them on. I'll debate anybody in the world.

STEVE KIRSCH: See, I always thought it was just me, that nobody wanted to debate me. So you have the same problem. We have something in common, that nobody wants to debate us.

9:05

[END OF EXCERPT]

Dr James Thorp
 https://www.vitals.com/doctors/Dr_James_Thorp.html 


His social media account is https://gettr.com/user/Jamesathorpmd

https://www.coffeeandcovid.com/p/back-pay-saturday-september-9-2023

Yesterday, someone connected to my office, who has an an autoimmune disease, got a call from her doctor the day before she was scheduled to get her covid booster shot. They cancelled — not rescheduled — her booster appointment explaining, “they don’t work.”

The ‘consensus’ is crumbling.

That's the kind of doctor I want!

https://rwmalonemd.substack.com/p/coercing-doctors-to-buy-covid-boosters

Here is the relevant clause:

"Providers currently enrolled in the Vaccines for Children Program are required to keep both publicly funded and privately purchased inventory of COVID-19 vaccines for the populations they serve."

Must purchase and keep a stock of mRNA gene therapy-based “booster” vaccines or what will be the consequences, you ask?

"Providers that have not ordered COVID-19 vaccines by Friday, October 6, 2023, will be contacted regarding non-compliance with VFC requirements to offer all ACIP recommended vaccines."

And there you have it. Comply and purchase leaky “vaccine” products that are neither safe nor effective, and which will place your infant, child and adolescent patients at significant risk of myocarditis, or face the wrath of the NY State Board of Health. Which translates into a significant risk of losing your license to practice medicine.

In fact, The Federation of State Medical Boards have said that physicians who generate and spread COVID-19 vaccine “misinformation or disinformation” are risking disciplinary action by state medical boards, including the suspension or revocation of their medical license. They state that this includes doctors who knowingly spread false information about vaccines could lose their license. If you ever wondered why physicians don’t speak up, here is one very good answer. Just to recap, “misinformation and disinformation” consist of any information which, at the time it is “spread”, differs from the official position of either the World Health Organization or (in the case of US physicians) the pronouncements of the Federal Department of Health and Human Services. Both of which organizations’ positions have repeatedly shifted during the COVID crisis, and in the case of HHS have included intentional withholding of information (such as risk of myopericarditis) from public and medical practitioners. Therefore, those physicians who have shared verifiable truths concerning vaccine risks are defined as guilty of sharing “misinformation or disinformation”. And if that is not an Orwellian regulatory overreach, I do not know what is.

https://reportfromplanetearth.substack.com/p/anatomy-of-a-protection-racket

Dr. Gerson was called to New York as a consultant for a wealthy industrialist who had arthritis. He had successfully treated the patient’s brother-in-law in Europe. In a Park Avenue penthouse, he joined the house physician and another consulting specialist to see the patient. After the examination, the three physicians retired to discuss the case. Dr. Gerson proceeded to explain the treatment for arthritis he had so successfully used in Europe, then described the manner in which he expected the patient to recover. There was an awkward pause. Finally, one of the other doctors said, “Dr. Gerson, you don’t understand. This man is a wealthy member of the W.R. Grace family. They own steamship lines, banks, chemical companies, and so on. You don’t cure a patient like this, you treat him.”

This simple, insidious message drives most aspects of the medical world. The motivation to keep people healthy is completely undermined by the permeation of profiteering throughout a deeply corrupted industry that depends on the vulnerability of the suffering.

Dr. Gerson’s conclusion that most illness is related to poor diet — and thus correctible, particularly in the early stages of disease — continues to be minimized and ridiculed. ...

The flagrant marketing of noxious medications to the ill is only surpassed by the mandating of untested drugs for healthy people. No hawking is necessary; vaccines are hailed as an unassailable defense against sickness and death. Whereas other medications require patients to be diagnosed to sell a product, vaccines can be dispensed to those who have no symptoms, merely using the threat of disease to push inoculation. The government has ensured that while they are experimental, liability is diminished.

That they are described as free is a staggering lie. The inverse is true; inoculations have a special status as a commodity with unrivaled profitability as they can be forced on anyone, particularly when distributed by governments — whose revenues come from taxpayers.

This corruption is relentless. The marketing of vaccines to those who receive no benefit and are likely to suffer subtle or life-changing damage has no limitations. Without the restraint of any truth, the definitions of vaccine and adverse reaction have been changed to maximize proceeds and diminish liability. ...

The abhorrent means of extortion of an organized crime protection racket are now the standard practices of the pharmaceutical industry and their cronies; government agencies and doctors are their enforcers. This reckless atmosphere allows associated criminal activity, including the engendering of disease through negligent oversight of toxic causes and experimentation with pathogens.

Patrick says

Why would a doctor refuse the :life saving" vaccine? Because that doctor had more integrity than all those other doctors who forged the paperwork.

Doctors aren't just staying silent, they are resorting to an entire mythologic lexicon of gaslighting to sidestep the vaxicide/booster dilemma. I imagine the Rockefellers, the AI machines in Switzerland, and the various Mockingbird assets are helping them to spin their cotton candy fantasies of attribution. They are also using these distractions to inflict even more medication for the Rockefeller medical engines of profit and democide.

Doesn't matter, the wolf packs of class action will eventually consume them unless they can entirely erase their own histories and bank accounts. Useful idiot rank and file are sacrificed so the central demons can escape to Illuminati another day. The demons want the karma to be consumed on their vassals.

Patrick says

https://etana.substack.com/p/persecuted-dr-jeyanthi-kunadhasan

Persecuted Dr. Jeyanthi Kunadhasan: “If Twenty Percent of the Medical Profession Stood Up, This Would End!”

Australian Doctor Joins DailyClout to Discuss Repercussions for Refusing COVID jab

Watched the video. Taking her testimony at face value it's remarkable how far the West has fallen. Doctors huddled in secret meetings afraid to speak out. In Australia! I thought we were a free peoples. Doctors just following protocol and blindly obedient when told not to think and use critical thinking skills!
To be honest, I'm all out of 'fecks' to give and don't see her as some hero fighting for truth, where was she in 2020, 2021, 2022? Cashing her paychecks no doubt. And now the Australian authorities are after her licence. Every man for himself.

https://www.coffeeandcovid.com/p/little-packages-wednesday-december

🔬 A wildly significant little study — it’s actually just a case report — quietly popped up in the American Journal of Translational Research last month, titled “Successful treatment of new-onset diabetes mellitus and IgA nephropathy after COVID-19 vaccination: a case report.” It offers substantial hope to vaccine injured folks, far beyond its plain meaning.

In this case report, the researchers described a 56-year-old man who spontaneously developed atypical, adult-onset Type 2 diabetes three months after his third jab. Significantly, he had no “genetic predisposition” to diabetes, and he never had covid:

The patient was never infected with COVID-19. He had no known COVID-19 exposures and did not experience flu-like illness throughout the COVID-19 pandemic. He had no family history of kidney disease.

The introduction’s first three sentences showed amazing progress. Apparently researchers can now get published without having to idolize the jabs at all. Well, they still have to say the shots were important, but look how matter of fact the language has become:

COVID-19 vaccine has been administered in almost all countries as a critical measure used to control the pandemic. However, COVID-19 vaccination-related glomerular (kidney) diseases have become a new concern. Both the mRNA vaccine and the inactivated vaccine can cause new-onset and relapsing glomerular (kidney) disease. These diseases typically occur after the first or second dose of vaccination.

Haha. So much for “safe and effective.” The researchers stated as an obvious fact that the mRNA vaccine can cause new-onset (and relapsed) kidney disease. They didn’t even squawk it was “rare.” (They even said typically occur awfully close to the word disease.) They ignored the drooling idiots infecting the useless CDC and captured FDA, neither of which apparently has the slightest idea at all that mRNA vaccines can cause kidney diseases.

Lalalalala we can’t hear you. ...

This case is unique because the kidneys and pancreas were simultaneously affected by the vaccine. Although correlation does not imply causation, the onset of symptoms of injury of two organs soon after vaccination should be considered as the inciting event. And in this case, it was strange that the patient’s blood sugar level was dramatically high within a short period, without any history of diabetes or a propensity to the disease. Therefore we suspected that the diabetes was caused by an immunological mechanism triggered by the COVID-19 vaccination.

Based on the vaccine-related mechanism of the immune reaction, we treated the patient with glucocorticoid (a steroid) and cyclophosphamide (a leukemia drug) and successfully controlled the diabetes mellitus within a short period.

This little case report is some of the best news to come down the pike in a while. The patient’s doctors ignored the CDC, did not gaslight him, and actually considered whether the vaccines might have caused his illness. In other words, because his doctors were open-minded about the possibility of vaccine injury, and were willing to try treating him as vaccine injured — not as what it looked like on the med school flow chart (“diabetes”) — this patient is now recovering instead of baffling doctors by getting worse and worse.

Bless these doctors who used their skills and training and thought for themselves.

I bet my next paycheck that “covid vaccine injury” is not listed anywhere on Medicare’s reimbursement guidelines. But I bet diabetes is on there; you betcha. We can assume the doctors would have earned more from treating his diabetes than they did from treating his covid vaccine injury. In other words, they were even more courageous and independent than it looks at first.

https://www.aussie17.com/p/emeritus-professor-seo-byeong-seon?publication_id=1242457&post_id=140110309&isFreemail=true&r=6gdz

Emeritus Professor Seo Byeong-seon of Korea Advises Against Taking Experimental mRNA Vaccines

“…from the beginning, I thought this was a lie. It's almost been three years, but the aspects of lying just keep appearing. We are practically being deceived, lied to...”

"They say that the coronavirus vaccine is poisonous. They say that the vaccine has absolutely no effectiveness, and I agree 100%."

In his view, the push for widespread vaccination is misguided:

"Thus, it really shouldn't be taken, and there's clearly an agenda behind it."

Professor Seo's remarks extend beyond mere criticism and enter the realm of activism. He calls for medical and scientific professionals to assert themselves:

"Doctors need to take a stand. Scientists need to rise up... Without experts taking a stand, this whole effort will collapse."

He concluded his earnest dialogue with a sobering reminder of the role of truth in public health:

"The best thing is not to take it, but the government continues to push for it. We must refuse."

His message is clear: he urges the scientific community to challenge the narrative and defend the integrity of their profession against what he perceives as a global deception.

https://unbekoming.substack.com/p/family

Here are the main strategies used against the family as outlined in the chapter above:

"Chapter 5 - Holy War on the Family"
Devaluation of the Family Concept: Mendelsohn argues that the traditional concept of the extended family has been devalued, replaced by the more nuclear model, which he sees as detrimental.

Medical Professional Dominance: Doctors, particularly in modern medicine, are seen as taking over roles traditionally played by family members, often undermining the family's influence and ethics.

Intervention in Family Affairs: Mendelsohn suggests that medical professionals intervene unnecessarily in family matters, often to the detriment of familial bonds.

Separation of Family Members: There's a critique of practices that separate family members, such as hospital policies and certain medical procedures, which prevent family involvement.

Undermining Breastfeeding: The promotion of formula over breastfeeding is seen as an attack on a natural and beneficial practice that strengthens the bond between mother and child.

Encouragement of Independence Over Family Bonds: Mendelsohn criticizes the encouragement of independence in situations where family interdependence would be healthier.

Influence on Childbirth Practices: The medicalization of childbirth is seen as an intrusion into a natural process, often involving unnecessary medical interventions.

Educational System's Role: The education system, in tandem with medical institutions, is accused of usurping parental roles and distancing children from their families.

Promotion of Professional Advice Over Familial Wisdom: There's a concern about the preference for professional advice over traditional family wisdom, which can erode family bonds.

Day-Care and Early Schooling: The rise of day-care centers and early schooling is seen as a mechanism for separating children from their families at a young age.

Isolation of the Elderly: Modern practices that isolate elderly family members, rather than valuing their role within the family unit.

Hospital Policies and Regulations: Critique of hospital policies that isolate patients from their families, especially during critical moments like childbirth and terminal illness.

Promotion of Formula Feeding in Developing Countries: The push for formula feeding in places where breastfeeding would be healthier and more economical is seen as destructive.

General Medicalization of Life Events: The medicalization of various life stages and events, such as childbirth, aging, and death, is viewed as an intrusion and a weakening of family roles and bonds.

Psychiatric Influence: The influence of psychiatry in family matters, often leading to further distancing among family members.

Immunization Policies: Mendelsohn critiques compulsory immunization policies as a form of control over the family.

Child Protection Policies: The interpretation of child protection policies in ways that can unjustly separate children from their families is mentioned.

Encouragement of Women to Work Outside the Home: This is seen as a strategy that disrupts traditional family roles and leads to reliance on external care for children.

Patrick says

Undermining Breastfeeding: The promotion of formula over breastfeeding is seen as an attack on a natural and beneficial practice that strengthens the bond between mother and child.

That's one point I disagree on. Sure formula was totally overhyped in the 80s and breastfeeding is superior, but so are lactation "specialists" overhyped these days and mothers who are tired and weak enough from giving birth are terrorized into waking up and trying to breastfeed their babies every 2-3 hours. Some babies are not natural latchers and some women don't produce enough milk. If it happens naturally, great, if it doesn't even after a few good tries don't destroy your body and mind over it and use formula.

Whatever happened to wetnurses? Seems like a good idea.

Patrick says

Whatever happened to wetnurses? Seems like a good idea.

They do exist but are rare and expensive these days, didnt they used to be servants? Also companies have invaded this field and are selling expensive "breastmilk". There are some mom groups where they share the feedings, a bit strange but whatever ;)

mell says

Patrick says

Undermining Breastfeeding: The promotion of formula over breastfeeding is seen as an attack on a natural and beneficial practice that strengthens the bond between mother and child.

That's one point I disagree on. Sure formula was totally overhyped in the 80s and breastfeeding is superior, but so are lactation "specialists" overhyped these days and mothers who are tired and weak enough from giving birth are terrorized into waking up and trying to breastfeed their babies every 2-3 hours. Some babies are not natural latchers and some women don't produce enough milk. If it happens naturally, great, if it doesn't even after a few good tries don't destroy your body and mind over it and use formula.

I was disgusted by the doctors and nurses after my son was born. They were relentlessly trying to guilt trip my wife into using formula because she was having early difficulties. At least in TX, La Leche League was a critical resource to support mothers who wanted to breastfeed.

Over the course of her nursing our child, we learned that the more frequently the child is fed, the more the milk production ramps up. More short feedings is better than less, but longer feedings.

One thing the formula floggers don't tell you is that breastmilk contains tryptophan - yes that tryptophan found in turkey meat - which acts to make the infant sleepy. Much less fussiness because the infant is well rested.

Optimally nursing a child requires a substantial commitment by the mother to be readily available for feedings. This is pretty much impossible if the mother has to go to work.

I should add that our son was also lower weight for a few years. He eventually caught up (he'll probably be bigger than me), and now wears a bigger shoe size than I do - at 14 years old.

https://transcriberb.dreamwidth.org/129502.html

Presentation To Adams County Commissioners in Idaho
December 15, 2023

https://rumble.com/v41fqh0-presentation-to-adams-county-commissioners-in-idaho.html

DESCRIPTION: "This is a presentation to the Adams County Commissioners in Idaho. Laura Demaray organized this presentation. Participants include: Dr. Peter McCullough, Dr. Ryan Cole, Sasha Latypova, Dr. Janci Lindsay, Dr. Reni Moon, and others."

DR. RENATA MOON: Thank you. So, Dr. Reni Moon, I'm a pediatrician, board-certified. I'm actually from Idaho, I grew up in Idaho, but have practiced for much of my career across the border in Washington State. I trained at a top US medical school, I've had no actions or lawsuits against me, and I'm bringing that up because it's pertinent for what I'll say later in the discussion today.

So I take care of children. And I just want you to think, please, why in the world, with everything that you've just heard, why in the world are we giving this to our nation's children?

Children have a 99.997%, actually higher than that, survival rate from covid. They have a .0027 percent fatality rate from covid. And we're being asked to inject this synthetic genetic product into our nation's children with absolutely no understanding of what it might do, what harms it might cause long term, and with an avalanche of data showing short-term harm and with fatalities that have clearly happened from this product and people who've been injured from this product. Dr. Walskog will speak to that still I think in a few minutes.

This is, this is horrible. And I just want to give you a sense of what we're seeing on the, on the front lines, so to speak.

So I've practiced for over 20 years. I know what the normal baseline for example of myocarditis is. Myocarditis is inflammation of the heart muscle, right? We've all heard that associated with these mRNA products. Right? I, in over 20 years of practice, only saw 2 cases of myocarditis in the entire time until these products launched. And now I have direct knowledge of way too many cases of myocarditis in my community, in my friend group, and just in the, in our, in our nation.

So to give you an example, I went to lunch with a friend in a city outside of Idaho, but her son, five days after his second dose of mRNA product, had chest pain, palpitations, and was diagnosed with myocarditis while serving in our military. His military doctor assured him that it was not from the shot he received 5 days earlier. Are you kidding me? Of course we know better than that. That young man now, it's a year later, and he's on chronic disability for ongoing heart muscle issues. He was medically discharged from the military.

What are we doing to our nation's children in terms of their heart muscle? In terms of other damage? And even in terms of fatalities? There are children who have died of myocarditis directly attributed to the shot within, within a week or two of the shot having been given. What are we doing?

I want to say that we, on the forefront of medicine, the ones who are actually tasked with ordering this product for children, for the record, I've never ordered this for a child, this product, this data was clear from the outset, it should have been pulled back at the beginning of this, it never should have been out on the market. And yet here it sits. It's, it's terrible.

So why are, why are more physicians and pediatricians not speaking out? We're not speaking because they're coming after us. I have a clean record of patient care. I've never had any lawsuits, like I said at the beginning, I've never had any actions against my license. I spoke about my concerns about the increase of myocarditis, I spoke about my concerns about giving this product to our nation's children, I spoke at a hearing in Washington DC in December of 2022, so a year ago, and I just found out a few months ago that as a result of my speaking to my government at a senate hearing in Washington DC, my medical license in Washington state is now being investigated and I'm being accused of unprofessional conduct. For speaking.

Now I'm going to be clear, I took care of Washington State's sickest children for about 19 years. I cared for them in hospital settings, and again, a crystal clear record of patient care. This is outrageous. This is why other physicians aren't speaking out. Dr. Cole has had his license attacked. Other physicians here have as well.

This is, this is something that has to stop. So we are turning to you at the grassroots level of this, and we thank you for all the work that you've done in the state of Idaho, but we're turning to you to stop this atrocity, this nightmare. This has to be stopped. We need you at the grassroots level to say no, that the fraud and the corruption is so large, so big, that you can stop it by stopping these shots at the grassroots level, at the local level.

Please don't do this to our nation's children, our young people, and to any American citizen.

Thank you.

https://twitter.com/karma44921039/status/1743926840740241895

A nurse during covid now telling you the truth

https://brownstone.org/articles/medicine-has-been-fully-militarized/

Among its many harsh lessons, Covid has taught us this: if you substitute Pfizer and Moderna for Raytheon and Lockheed Martin, and swap the NIH and CDC for the Pentagon, you get the same result. The “medical-industrial complex” is every bit as real as its military-industrial counterpart, and it is every bit as real a problem.

As a physician, I am embarrassed to admit that until Covid, I possessed only an inkling that this was so – or more accurately, I knew it, but didn’t realize how bad it was, and I didn’t worry about it too much. Sure (I thought), Pharma engaged in dishonest practices, but we’d known that for decades, and after all, they do make some effective drugs. Yes, physicians were increasingly becoming employees, and protocols were dictating care more and more, but the profession still seemed manageable. True, healthcare was far too expensive (gobbling up a reported 18.3 percent of the US GDP in 2021), but healthcare is inherently expensive. And after all, we’re saving lives.

Until we weren’t.

By early-to-mid 2020, it became obvious to those paying attention that the Covid “response,” while promoted as a medical initiative, was in fact a military operation. Martial law had effectively been declared approximately on the Ides of March 2020, after President Trump was mysteriously convinced to cede the Covid response (and practically speaking, control of the nation) to the National Security Council. Civil liberties – freedom of assembly, worship, the right to travel, to earn one’s living, to pursue one’s education, to obtain legal relief – were rendered null and void.

Top-down diktats on how to manage Covid patients were handed down to physicians from high above, and these were enforced with a militaristic rigidity unseen in doctors’ professional lifetimes. The mandated protocols made no sense. They ignored fundamental tenets of both sound medical practice and medical ethics. They shamelessly lied about well-known, tried-and-true medicines that were known to be safe and appeared to work. The protocols killed people.

Those physicians and other professionals who spoke out were effectively court-martialed. State medical boards, specialty certification boards, and large healthcare system employers virtually tripped over each other in the rush to delicense, decertify, and fire dissenters. Genuine, courageous physicians who actually treat patients, such as Peter McCullough, Mary Talley Bowden, Scott Jensen, Simone Gold, and others, were persecuted, while non-practicing bureaucrats like Anthony Fauci were hailed with false titles like “America’s Top Doctor.” The propaganda was as nauseating as it was blatant. And then came the jabs.

How did this happen to medicine?

It all seemed so sudden, but in fact it has been in the works for years.

Covid taught us (by the way, Covid has been such a harsh tutor, but haven’t we learned so much from her!) that the medical-industrial complex and military-industrial complex are deeply connected. They are not just twins, or even identical twins. They are conjoined twins, and so-called “Public Health” is the tissue shared between them.

The SARS CoV-2 virus, after all, is a bioweapon, developed over a period of years, funded by US tax dollars in a joint effort between Fauci’s NIH and the Department of Defense to genetically manipulate the transmissibility and virulence of coronaviruses (all done in the name of “Public Health,” of course).

Once the bioweapon was out of the lab and into the population, the race was on within the medical-industrial complex to develop and market the supremely profitable antidote to the bioweapon. Cue the full-on military takeover of medicine: the martial law lockdowns, the suppression of cheap and effective treatments, the persecution of dissidents, the ceaseless propaganda and anti-science, and the unabashed whoring of most hospital systems for CARES Act money.

We know the rest. The ill-conceived, toxic, gene-therapy antidote, falsely billed as a “vaccine,” was foisted upon the population by blackmail (“the vaccine is how we end the pandemic”), the effective bribery of medical authorities and politicians, as well as other Deep-State directed psyops designed to divide the population and scapegoat dissenters (“pandemic of the unvaccinated”).

The end result even sounds like the aftermath of a gigantic military operation. Millions are dead, many millions more are psychologically traumatized, economies are in tatters, and a few warmongers are fantastically rich. Moderna CEO Stephane Bancel (who, incidentally, oversaw the construction of the Wuhan Institute of Virology years ago) is a freshly minted billionaire. And not one of those who caused all the mischief are in prison.

At this writing, virtually all the major healthcare systems, specialty regulatory boards, specialty associations, and medical schools are standing at attention, still in lockstep with the received – and by now, clearly false – narrative. Their funding, after all, be it from Pharma or the Government, depends upon their obedience. Barring dramatic change, they will respond in the same fashion when orders come down from above in the future. Medicine has been fully militarized.

In his farewell address, Eisenhower said something else that I believe is most prescient here. He described that a military-industrial complex fostered “a recurring temptation to feel that some spectacular and costly action could become the miraculous solution to all current difficulties.”

Enter Disease X.

gabbar says

What I really think about YouTube's new rules by Annette Bosworth, MD

https://www.coffeeandcovid.com/p/regrettably-saturday-february-24

💉 You’ll enjoy the latest mea culpa from a formerly pro-vaccine healthcare professional-slash-social media influencer. Annette Bosworth, MD, also known as “Dr. Boz,” has a popular YouTube channel (600,000 subscribers) and website focusing on the health benefits of keto dieting and intermittent fasting. It seems like a great channel and I subscribed. Dr. Boz normally covers wellness topics like shopping for a good blood glucose monitor, breaking carb addiction, comparing exercise to intermittent fasting, and things like that.

So it must have shocked many of her subscribers when three days ago she named her most recent YouTube stream, “The biggest crime in the history of medicine.”




https://www.youtube.com/live/v3N-uFfvU5s?si=0NmJn2SJZIWKmPCq

That’s quite a title for a pro-vaccine doctor. And it quickly became Dr. Boz’s highest-watched YouTube ever. But within 12 hours, YouTube de-monetized the show, which was a new experience for the influential advocate. Two days ago, she published a short follow-up video trying to figure out what YouTube terms she violated. She was astounded that discussing a peer-reviewed paper could get her punished at this stage of the pandemic.

But let’s focus on her original video. It began with a bang:

"I am really excited about tonight’s show. (Wryly) I have been putting this off. I have been wrong. And I have seen lots of you out there and I have personal friends out there that have been telling me I was wrong, and I would much rather avoid this conversation and not do this at all, but … you were right."

Dr. Boz explained that it was the relentless pressure of subscriber’s jab comments — comments she pretended to ignore but actually noticed — that kept her attention secretly on the science related to the vaccines.

Then she introduced Dr. McCullough’s (and five other authors including Jessica Rose and Steve Kirsch) latest 40-page, peer-reviewed article that published in the Cureus open-access journal on January 24th. The study was neutrally-titled, “COVID-19 mRNA Vaccines: Lessons Learned from the Registrational Trials and Global Vaccination Campaign.” Here’s how she described the study:

“This is a peer-reviewed article. If you’re like me, you’re not going to want to believe it. I don’t WANT to believe this. I’m so irritated by this article. This is a difficult thing for me to talk about. The dozen peers who reviewed this paper took two and a half months to cross-check and verify everything they said. I’m just going to point out a few things that made me sleepless. During the pandemic, we broke some of the rules to serve the public. One of the rules was this emergency use act.”

For regular C&C readers, there isn’t anything particularly surprising in the McCullough paper, which methodically and professionally walked through all the issues we currently know about, starting with the statistical tricks that Pfizer and Moderna employed in their early clinical trials to exaggerate the benefits and whitewash the risks, and then tackled thornier issues such as why the jabs are actually genetic therapies and are not actually vaccines. It was the carefully-documented way the authors addressed these problems that finally penetrated Dr. Boz’s cognitive defenses:

“I knew (the vaccine) came with some risks, but until this paper, I didn’t really appreciate it. The (biggest) problem with the vaccines is, there was no off-switch. This is a problem … when you trust the scientific process is being (properly) used, when there needs to be an exception to the rules (like EUA), you don’t just break every single rule there is… If you’re like me, when you get to the end of this article, you ask yourself: what did we say ‘yes’ to?”

Ultimately, the unyielding weight of McCullough’s data and logical analysis pressed Dr. Boz to self-reflect. She started by explaining how Pfizer and Moderna were able to conclude efficacy and safety only because they’d restricted it to healthy trial participants aged 18-55. Later she combined all these issues — the lack of a spike shut-off, the obviously faked trials, and Dr. McCullough’s carefully-documented findings of spike protein in the heart muscles of autopsied sudden-death patients — Dr. Boz took all of that and clearly experienced a painful change of heart:

Until you start looking at the autopsies and start wondering: what part in this did I play? And… first of all, how do ya say, I’m sorry to all of ya’ll who’ve been putting comments in my videos for like, a year, (saying), ‘hey take a look at this!’ And I just said (to myself), okay, they’re just chirpin’ again. But you were right.

And worse, the loss of trust! I was in a class (last year), and everybody was like, I don’t think we should take ANY shots anymore, and I was SHOCKED. Even for flu or shingles. They asked, but can we trust these OTHER vaccinations? And I said, of COURSE you can.

But now, it’s hard for me to say that. How long will it take before the World will trust – before I will trust — what they’re telling me. And … what was MY part in it? How could’ve I been more …. I mean, I had MY kids vaccinated. I had all of the people I loved vaccinated. And when you look back and say hey, look at what it did — especially to the kids … um … anyway (trails off).

When it comes down to it, I was wrong. I don’t know that it gets worse than telling all my patients, get the vaccination, get the vaccination, get the vaccination. (Sighs) Okay, let’s move on to something easier to talk about than my continued failures…

There’s plenty more in the video. To keep it a manageable length, I omitted several other interesting parts, like where Dr. Boz explained how trusted gatekeepers like herself were manipulated into towing the party line and not asking questions. As I said, you’ll enjoy hearing the thought process of a proud pro-vaccine doctor being convinced to humble herself and make a public apology.

What we don’t see though are all the doctors and health professionals who aren’t social media influencers like Dr. Boz, but who also have been convinced by Dr. McCullough’s careful, thoughtful, peer-reviewed article. Dr. McCullough is another one we should be grateful for. I’m not minimizing the contributions of the other authors, but Dr. McCullough was the most-published cardiologist in history. He knows a lot about how to get papers peer-reviewed and published, even regarding controversial topics.

https://www.aussie17.com/p/popular-youtuber-dr-annette-bosworth

In one of the most dramatic live U-Turns ever, Dr. Annette Bosworth, affectionately known by her legion of followers as Dr. Boz, has ventured into the point of no return concerning the COVID-19 mRNA vaccines. Through a video boldly titled “The biggest crime in the history of medicine,” Dr. Boz channels her inner whistleblower to dissect what she portrays as the many failings and misconceptions shrouding these vaccines gene therapies—a narrative that unfolds against the backdrop of a recently retracted (ahem… censored), yet initially peer-reviewed article.

Anyway, I condensed 8 key moments from the clip into a 4.5-minute video running at 1.5x speed so you don’t have to watch the whole 54 minutes or read a 40 page peer reviewed paper! Here are the important points (Full clip on youtube available here, and in case YouTube brings it down, I’m sharing the full one at the end of this article)

Gene Therapy in Disguise?
"And it really makes me nervous once you see what this...never have I seen bias play out like this at this degree...it should have been called gene therapy product." Dr. Boz doesn't mince her words here. She lays bare the misnomer that has potentially misled millions. By revealing the true nature of these so-called vaccines as gene therapy, she challenges the foundation upon which public acceptance was built.

There’s no Off Switch!
"The problem with what they were playing with is there is no off switch for this. In a vaccination, your immunity rises and then falls, and your body's done. With this, there's no mechanism built into our bodies that has the ability to turn it off." Dr. Boz articulates a fundamental flaw in the vaccine's design: it's a one-way ticket with no return journey. The unceasing nature of this genetic engagement raises pertinent questions about long-term health implications.

Contaminated DNA
"They found an enormous amount of DNA particles...What the hell is DNA doing in a vaccination that is supposed to be for the protein production to fight off this virus?...it disrupts the existing natural genetic sequence." Dr. Boz highlights the staggering discovery of contamination within the vaccine vials. This revelation not only casts a shadow over manufacturing processes but also introduces an element of genetic roulette with uncertain stakes.

Spike Proteins in Autopsies of Vaccinated Hearts
"The spike proteins are found in the cells of human heart...not supposed to be inside us at all." This stark disclosure by Dr. Boz uncovers the alarming presence of spike proteins in cardiac tissues of the vaccinated, a phenomenon that was neither intended nor expected. It's a testament to the unpredictable nature of these vaccines, stirring grave concerns about their safety profile.

Playing with Statistics
"They played games to have this bias towards the favorability of the vaccination." Here, Dr. Boz condemns the manipulation of clinical trial data, exposing how the framework of these studies was twisted to favor positive outcomes. This manipulation erodes the foundation of trust and calls into question the integrity of the scientific process.

Killing 27 people to “save” 2 people.
"52,000 vaccinations would be needed in order to prevent one Covid-19 death...yet we see that we have 27 deaths per 100,000 in the same batch of injections because of adverse events." Dr. Boz compellingly illustrates the disproportion between risk and reward, challenging the narrative that the benefits of vaccination outweigh the costs. This staggering statistic illuminates a grim picture of vaccine efficacy and safety.

Pregnancy and the Vaccine
"And they recommended it in pregnancy when they knew that absolutely not one single subject in the trial was pregnant...I think that's just egregious." The ethical implications of recommending the vaccine to pregnant women without solid trial data are profound. Dr. Boz's astonishment is palpable, echoing concerns about the lack of transparency and due diligence in these recommendations.

Regret and Call for Awareness
"I had all of my kids vaccinated. I had all of the people I loved vaccinated...look at what it did to especially the kids." Dr. Boz reflects on her own decisions to vaccinate her family and loved ones based on the information she had at the time. Her regret is a powerful testament to the complex and evolving nature of our understanding of the vaccines, underscoring the importance of ongoing critical review and honest discourse.

Oh, and finally, check out how she was demonetized by YouTube after her rant!

https://slaynews.com/news/top-cardiologist-raises-alarm-damage-found-vaxxed-patients/

A leading cardiologist has raised the alarm over the devastating side effects of Covid mRNA shots, warning he has “never witnessed such harm from a therapeutic intervention.”

Dr. Dean Patterson is a world-renowned consultant cardiologist based in Guernsey.

Patterson is also a Fellow of the prestigious Royal College of Physicians.

After witnessing the shocking “harm” caused to his patients, the esteemed heart specialist has penned a letter to the CEO of the General Medical Council (GMC).

He is urging for an investigation into the unprecedented damages caused by the COVID-19 mRNA injections. ...

“In my 33 years of medical practice, I have never witnessed such harm from a therapeutic intervention.

“In the first year of the rollout, I diagnosed 20 patients with myocarditis and 15 cases of pericarditis, including one death (42-year-old) and another who required an ICD (79-year-old male),” he revealed.

In the 16 years prior to now, the doctor would typically diagnose 2-3 cases of myocarditis per year, with serious cases occurring only once every 3-4 years. ...

Meanwhile, mainstream cardiologists and scientists continue to blame Covid infection as the cause for the harm he is seeing.

However, Patterson says he did not diagnose a single case of post-Covid myocarditis prior to the vaccine rollout in Guernsey.

The warning from Patterson has emerged after Slay News recently reported on a disturbing secret report from the U.S. Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).

The CDC report shows a staggering half a million American children and young adults have been killed by Covid shots.

Almost 500,000 Americans aged between 0 and 44 years old died from the dangerous side effects of the Covid mRNA injections between the start of the public rollout of the shots in early 2021 and October 9, 2022, the CDC report reveals.

However, the shocking revelations from the report have been completely ignored by the corporate media – the same outlets that told the public the vaccines were “safe and effective.”

Patrick says

A leading cardiologist has raised the alarm over the devastating side effects of Covid mRNA shots, warning he has “never witnessed such harm from a therapeutic intervention.”

https://nakedemperor.substack.com/p/leading-cardiologist-writes-to-the

Last week, Dr Dean Patterson wrote to the Chair of the Executive Board of the General Medical Council (GMC) in the UK, supporting Dr Aseem Malhotra’s calls for an investigation into unprecedented harms from the Covid-19 vaccines. ...

He believes that the medical establishment appears to be blind to the harm and is concerned that medical practice itself will be irreparably damaged by the fallout from the mishandling of the Covid vaccine side effects.

https://transcriberb.dreamwidth.org/93362.html

I am a, I'm a pediatric hospitalist. I worked for St. Luke Hospital network and I spoke on 69 News against this very mandate. And it aired at 6 o'clock news and 3 hours later I was told not to come back to the hospital ever again because I spoke up against the mandate.

During morning rounds in the hospital I was asked by my colleagues, are you really going to take a stand for this? Are you going to risk losing everything you worked for? You loved teaching medical students and residents, is that worth the risk? You're going to, are you going to die on this hill of a vaccine?

And at that time, right in our little nursery, during morning rounds, I said, no, I'm not willing to die on the hill of a vaccine, but I am willing to die on the hill of liberty.

https://transcriberb.dreamwidth.org/140424.html

THE DOCTORS ARE SPEAKING OUT!

original link

Mirror:
Ireland Doctors: The Dangers Of Injecting Children With COVID-19 Vaccines
https://rumble.com/vm3g8h-ireland-doctors-the-dangers-of-injecting-children-with-covid-19-vaccines.html

TRACEY O'MAHONEY, BARRISTER AT LAW: This video is sponsored by the Irish Council for Human Rights. In this presentation you will hear from prominent Irish doctors expressing their concerns about the potential dangers of administering this experimental vaccine to children. Please watch and listen carefully.

[cut]

TEXT ON SCREEN: Dr Michael McConville GP 39 years medical experience

DR. MICHAEL MCCONVILLE GP: Thousands of doctors and scientists worldwide have studied the mountains of data now currently available about covid 19. These professionals have sincere and grave concerns about the mainstream story of this disease. To follow the science, we need first to debate the science. We need to disagree and challenge each other with the evidence so that we might find the truth. Unfortunately, social media and mainstream media censor alternative interpretations of the evidence, so that you, the people, cannot participate in the debate, and are thus poorly informed.

[cut]

TEXT ON SCREEN: Dr Gerry Waters GP 44 years medical experience

DR. GERRY WATERS GP: At the start of the covid 19 vaccination campaign, Acting Chief Medical Officer Dr. Ronan Glynn [2] stated that they'd had no information to impart to those administering the vaccines regarding efficacy, transmission, length of protection, side effects, or need for boosters. The vaccinators in turn had no real information to pass on to the people they were vaccinating. There is no possibility of informed consent in the absence of information. Nine months later they have some information on the important elements of the vaccine and, as result of this information, in a world where reason, honesty, and medical ethics held sway, the vaccination campaign would be terminated immediately, never mind extended to children.

[cut]

TEXT ON SCREEN: Dr Pat Morrissey GP 22 years of medical experience

DR. PAT MORRISSEY: The recent publication of Technical Briefing Number Twenty by Public Health England showed that 65% of those that died from covid were fully vaccinated. This means that the vaccine strategy is failing as the virus continues to evolve. This fact is corroborated by data from other highly vaccinated countries such as Iceland and Israel. These countries are experiencing surges in covid hospitalizations and deaths among those who are fully vaccinated. We must stop using these failing vaccines and instead focus on early treatment that works on all variants.

[cut]

TEXT ON SCREEN: Dr Martin Feeley Vascular Surgeon 45 years medical experience

DR. MARTIN FEELEY VASCULAR SURGEON: From March 2020 we have consistently been told to do the right thing. And the right thing for parents has always been to protect their children. We know that giving your child the covid vaccine does not prevent them from catching the virus and does not stop them transmitting the virus to others. So, in other words, there's no benefit to your child or indeed to anybody else. On the other hand, these vaccines are not without risks, some of which are really serious. It is clear that in vaccinating your children there is no potential for doing good and huge potential for doing harm. So how can you as a parent say you are doing the right thing for your child?

[cut]

TEXT ON SCREEN: Dr Billy Ralph GP 27 years medical experience

DR. BILLY RALPH GP: There are no benefits to young, healthy people from this vaccine. There are only risks. The risk of death from the vaccine is at least 4 times that of covid. The vaccines will not protect you from contracting the virus, nor will it prevent you from transmitting it, so you will not be protecting others. If you were taking it so that you can take part in society, ask yourself, when was the last time you had to undergo a medical procedure to go to the pub with a friend?

[cut]

TEXT ON SCREEN: Dr Vincent Caroll GP 30 years medical experience

3:38 DR. VINCENT CAROLL GP: If you are considering vaccinating your child against covid, have you really thought it through? Or are you reacting to bullying and peer pressure? According to the Medicines and Health Care Product Regulatory Agency, MHRA in the UK, the risk to your child of an adverse event is 8,000 times greater than any benefit. The science tells us that covid poses little or no risk to young, healthy people. Are you really prepared to expose your child to all the risk while getting none of the benefit? Usually in life we weigh up risk versus benefit and we do things because of a perceived benefit. But here there is no benefit, only risk to your child. So think hard.

[cut]

TEXT ON SCREEN: Dr Anne McCloskey GP 39 years medical experience

DR. ANNE MCCLOSKEY GP: The possible side effects of these injections can be divided into 3 groups, short term, medium term, and long term. Since they've only been in use for 8 months, obviously only the short term side effects have been seen in humans. But believe me, they are real. Look at the American VAERS or British MHRA data bases where the problems are being reported, and we know that this may only be the tip of the iceberg. Short term recorded side effects include death, anaphylaxis, strokes, heart attacks, pregnancy loss, nerve damage, clots, blindness, seizures, rashes, fatigue, and many others. The medium and long term effects obviously can't be quantified since there's no data yet, but are based on what we know about what we know about mRNA vaccines from previous animal experiments and from in vitro observations, that is, events seen in the laboratories. These include all of the problems I've already mentioned, and in addition things like infertility, autoimmune diseases, neurodegenerative disorders such as Alzheimer's and other forms of dementia, Parkinson's Disease, increased risk of cancers and premature death. Why would you risk this for your children when this virus will not harm them?

https://dee746.substack.com/p/when-uncle-sam-interferes-the-result